摘要(英) |
The goal of this study is to measure adsorption performances for water vapor in the case of FAM Z05 and MOF (Metal-organic frameworks) by using gravimetric method (load cell). The study was conducted under two different environments, which are atmospheric pressure and vacuum. In addition, more materials, such as traditional zeolites: 13X, Y type, ZSM-5, SAPO and silica gel, were used to compare adsorption performance for water vapor under the same environments. The adsorption rate differences for each adsorbent under the air conditioning condition were calculated. It could highly improve the design for adsorption bed in adsorption system in the future.
According to the result of the study, Y type zeolite had the best adsorption speed. It only needed three hours to reach saturated state, and so it is more applicable in adsorption systems with short cycles. SAPO zeolite had the best adsorption rate, the adsorption rate for SAPO zeolite is 0.27 g/g in eight hours. It could still adsorb water vapor after eight hours, and it is applicable in adsorption systems with long cycles. In vacuum chamber, comparing MOF and FAM Z05 with others, MOF and FAM Z05 desorb water vapor at 60 oC, which means they could desorb water vapor at much lower temperature. Therefore, it becomes more desirable in terms of adsorption system. Comparing adsorption rate differences under various air conditioning condition, MOF has the best adsorption rate difference. As a result, MOF might be a good design for coating adsorption bed in the future.
Keyword: gravimetric method, adsorption system, zeolite, FAM Z05, MOF.
|
參考文獻 |
[1] 羅凱帆、黃蒨芸、李建宏、康育豪,2014,「吸附式製冷循環系統技術」,台灣能源期刊,第1卷第二期。
[2] 謝鎮州、張文師、王智正、唐震宸,2004,「運用工業廢熱之固體吸附式製冷系統」,化工技術,第12卷第四期。
[3] P.J.F. Harris, Z. Liu, K. Suenaga, 2008, “Imaging the atomic structure of activated carbon”, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mater, 2008, Vol. 20, 362201.
[4] F. Schuth, K. Sing, J. Weitkamp, 2002, Handbook of Porous Solids, Wiley-Vch, Vol. 3, p.1547.
[5] A. Mastinu, A. Kumar, G. Maccarinelli, S.A. Bonini, M. Premoli, F. Aria, A. Gianoncelli, M. Memo, 2019, “Zeolite Clinoptilolite: Therapeutic Virtues of an Ancient Mineral”, molecules, Vol 24(8), p.1517.
[6] S.K. Masoudian, S. Sadighi, A. Abbasi, “Synthesis and Characterization of High Aluminum Zeolite X from Technical Grade Materials”, 2013,Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, Vol. 8(1), pp.54 – 60.
[7] M.A. Carreon, “Molecular sieve membranes for N2/CH4separation”, 2017, Journal of Material Research, Vol. 33, pp. 32-43.
[8] M.A. den Hollander, M. Wissink, M. Makkee, J.A.Moulijn, “Gasoline conversion: reactivity towards cracking with equilibrated FCC and ZSM-5 catalysts”, Applied Catalysis A:General, , 2002, Vol. 223, pp.85-102.
[9] H.T. Chua, K.C. Ng, A. Chakraborty, N. Oo, and M. A. Othman, 2002, “Adsorption Characteristics of Silica Gel + Water System”, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, Vol. 47, pp.1177-1181.
[10] S.C. Sayilgan, M. Mobedi, S. Ulku, 2016, “Effect of regeneration temperature on adsorption equilibria and mass diffusivity of zeolite 13X-water pair”, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Vol. 224, pp.9-16.
[11] S. Kayal, S. Baichuan, B.B. Saha, 2016, “Adsorption characteristics of AQSOA zeolites and water for adsorption chillers”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 92, pp.1120-1127.
[12] .W.B. Teo, A. Chakraborty, W. Fan, 2017, “Improved adsorption characteristics data for AQSOA types zeolites and water system under static and dynamic conditions”, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials ,Vol. 242, pp.109-117.
[13] 徐樹剛、戴清智、張昭君,2014,˹以動態吸附實驗評估矽凝膠、活性碳與沸石之水氣吸附特性˺,中華民國環境工程學會廢水處理技術研討會。
|