智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：100

、訪客IP：3.144.43.78

姓名

李國豪(Guo-Hao Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響
(A Study of Smart Interaction Using SmartVpen and its influence on English Learning in Authentic Contexts)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts
★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習	★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲
★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估	★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響
★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養	★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps
★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響	★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies
★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例	★ 在真實情境下結合圖像與位置辨識促進英文寫作

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著科技日新月異，行動科技開始蓬勃發展，許多研究者著手研究如何將其導入教育領域當中，原因在於行動科技有著許多優勢，例如便攜性，多媒體工具，網路功能，而本研究選擇將其應用於英文學習領域之中。研究發現台灣英文學習環境並無太多機會讓學習者進行聽與說的練習，導致學習者口說能力的低落，所以本研究將利用行動科技的特性以及情境學習為學習者提供練習口說的環境。
因此，為對應國中學習者的英文教學，本研究開發了一套SmartVpen系統，主要功能為識別學習者的口說語音並給予準確率的回饋，以及通過雲端資料庫辨識學習者的練習問句並給予適當的回答。本研究主要探討的目的為三組學習者的學習成效和學習行為差異，三組學習者分別為實驗組、控制組1和控制組2，其中實驗組使用本研究所開發的SmartVpen進行活動，而控制組1僅使用Android內建功能進行活動，最後的控制組2則是無科技介入的傳統教學。研究對象為八年級的學習者，參與研究人數為69人，時間為期6週。
研究結果顯示使用本研究系統的學習者，不管是英文的理解還是英文的口說能力方面都明顯好於其他學習者，進一步探究其學習行為，發現準確率對於英文口說能力最具相關性以及預測力，換句話說，本研究系統能有效提升學習者的口說能力，尤其以語音辨識準確率的回饋最為有效，因為學習者會為了達到最高準確率，而進行反覆練習，達到精熟學習的效果。另一方面，發現學習者在真實情境中進行對話練習的次數會多於非真實情境當中，因為學習者對於遠離教室這種單一情境，前往不同情境，是感到新奇有趣的，藉此引發學習者練習的動機，由此可知在真實情境中進行智慧對話練習對於學習者口說能力的提升是一項重要因素。

摘要(英)

With the rapid development of technology, a variety of mobile devices have come out. Many researchers have started to study how to implement mobile devices into the field of education. The reason is that mobile devices have many advantages, such as portability, multimedia tools, and network. It is found that there are not many opportunities for learners to practice listening and speaking in Taiwan′s English learning environment, which leads to the decline of learners′ oral ability. Therefore, this study will provide learners with an environment to practice oral speaking by taking advantage of the characteristics of mobile devices and situational learning.
For English teaching of junior high school students, this study developed a system, SmartVpen. The main function is to identify learners′ oral speech and give accurate feedback and to identify learners′ exercise questions and give appropriate answers through the cloud database. For the purpose of this study mainly discusses three groups of learners′ differences in learning and learning behavior, three groups of learners to the experimental group and control group 1 and control group 2, respectively, in which the experimental group using SmartVpen this institute development activities, and the control group 1 only using Android built-in function of activity, the control group 2 is no involvement of the traditional teaching of science and technology. The subjects of the study were eighth-grade learners with 69 participants over six weeks.
Research results show that the use of the system of learners, whether in the understanding of the English or English speaking ability is much better than any other learners, to further explore their learning behavior, found that the accuracy for speak English the most correlation and predictive, in other words, this study system can effectively promote learners′ spoken ability, especially with the feedback of the speech recognition accuracy is the most effective, because learners in order to achieve the highest accuracy, and to carry on the practice, to achieve the effect of mastery learning. On the other hand, it is found that learners practice more dialogues in the real situation than in the non-real situation, because learners are novel and interesting to get rid of the single situation in the classroom, thus triggering learners′ motivation to practice. It can be seen that practicing intelligent dialogue in an authentic environment an important factor to improve learners′ speak ability.

關鍵字(中)

★ 行動科技輔助語言學習
★ 情境學習
★ 語音辨識
★ 矯正性回饋

關鍵字(英)

★ MALL
★ Situated learning
★ Speech recognition
★ Corrective Feedback

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的與問題 3
1.3研究限制 4
第二章文獻探討 6
2.1英語學習與智慧互動 6
2.1.1口說能力對於英文學習的重要性 6
2.1.2行動科技輔助語言學習(Mobile assisted language learning, MALL) 7
2.1.3英語口說辨識與回饋 8
2.2真實情境對學習之影響 9
2.3戲劇創作 11
第三章系統設計與實作 13
3.1系統設計概念 13
3.1.1系統架構 16
3.2對話練習過程 17
3.3戲劇創作過程 19
3.3.1註記工具 19
3.3.2戲劇創作 20
3.3.3觀看分享 22
3.4操作型定義 22
第四章研究方法 24
4.1研究架構 24
4.2研究對象與時間 27
4.2.1不同組別學習者學習活動之差異 27
4.3研究流程 29
4.4研究工具 31
4.4.1紙筆和口說測試 31
4.4.2戲劇評估標準 33
4.4.3問卷調查 34
4.5資料收集與分析 34
第五章研究結果與討論 36
5.1不同組別學習者在學習成效之差異 36
5.1.1筆試測驗之差異 36
5.1.2筆試字彙成績之差異 38
5.1.3筆試句子成績之差異 41
5.1.4筆試會話成績之差異 43
5.1.5口說測驗之差異 44
5.1.6口說字彙成績之差異 47
5.1.7口說句子成績之差異 49
5.1.8口說會話成績之差異 52
5.1.9口說情境描述成績之差異 54
5.2學習行為與學習成效之相關性分析 57
5.2.1非情境對話、智慧情境對話與學習成效之相關性分析 57
5.2.2非情境對話、智慧情境對話與口說能力之相關性分析 59
5.2.3註記行為、學習成效與口說能力之相關性分析 61
5.2.4回家作業、學習成效與口說能力之相關性分析 63
5.2.5戲劇行為、學習成效與口說能力之相關性分析 65
5.3學習行為與學習成效間迴歸分析 67
5.4非情境與智慧情境對話行為之差異 69
5.5實驗組和控制組1戲劇活動之差異 70
5.6問卷結果分析 72
第六章結論與建議 75
6.1研究結論 75
6.1.1不同組別學習者的紙筆測驗成績對於學習成效之影響 75
6.1.2不同組別學習者的口說測驗成績對於學習成效之影響 76
6.1.3學習者使用SmartVpen的學習行為對於英文理解之影響 76
6.1.4學習者使用SmartVpen的學習行為對於口說能力之影響 77
6.1.5學習者進行對話練習時，身處真實環境對學習行為之影響 77
6.1.6使用SmartVpen學習者與未使用SmartVpen學習者進行戲劇創作時所展現出的戲劇成效之差異 77
6.1.7學習者對於使用SmartVpen以真實物件練習情境對話的看法 78
6.2未來建議 78
參考文獻 80
附錄一英文紙筆測驗-前測 87
附錄二英文口說測驗-前測 89
附錄三英文紙筆測驗-後測 91
附錄四英文口說測驗-後測 93
附錄五單字句子活動學習單 95
附錄六非情境對話活動學習單 98
附錄七智慧情境對話活動學習單 99
附錄八戲劇創作活動學習單 100
附錄九回家作業一 101
附錄十回家作業二 102
附錄十一回家作業三 103
附錄十二擴增實境學習問卷 104

參考文獻

Ahn, T. Y., & Lee, S. M. (2016). User experience of a mobile speaking application with automatic speech recognition for EFL learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 778-786.
Alemi, M., Sarab, M. R. A., & Lari, Z. (2012). Successful learning of academic word list via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6), 99-109.
Ananda, D. R., Febriyanti, E. R., Yamin, M., & Mu’in, F. (2017). Students’ Preferences toward Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class at English Department of Lambung Mangkurat University Academic Year 2015/2016. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 176-186.
Anderson, N. J. (2010). Keeping the flame of motivation burning: Strengthening ties between research and instruction. Paper presented at the Nineteenth International Symposium on English Teaching, Taiwan.
Attewell, J., & Savill-Smith, C. (2005). Mobile learning anytime everywhere: A book of papers from MLEARN 2004: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Baker, D. L., Al Otaiba, S., Ortiz, M., Correa, V., & Cole, R. (2014). Vocabulary development and intervention for English learners in the early grades. In Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 46, pp. 281-338): Elsevier.
Barradell, S., Blackstock, F. C., Tang, C. Y., & Leo, J. (2017). " Being Absorbed in That Environment… It’s Just So Beneficial”–The Experiences of Physiotherapy Students in a Situated Learning Pilot Study. International Journal of Practice-based Learning in Health and Social Care, 5(1), 12-23.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching.
Brown, V. (2017). Drama as a valuable learning medium in early childhood. Arts Education Policy Review, 118(3), 164-171.
Chandra, A. N. (2011). Improving Students’ English Speaking Skill by Using Drama (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta. In: Published Research Paper. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Chang, C.-K., & Hsu, C.-K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation–annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer assisted language learning, 24(2), 155-180.
Chang, K. E., Lan, Y. J., Chang, C. M., & Sung, Y. T. (2010). Mobile‐device‐supported strategy for Chinese reading comprehension. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 69-84.
Chen, G.-D., Fan, C.-Y., Chang, C.-K., Chang, Y.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (2018). Promoting autonomy and ownership in students studying English using digital comic performance-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 955-978.
Chen, N.-S., & Hsieh, S.-W. (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language learning & technology, 12(3), 93-113.
Cheng, A.-C. (2006). Effects of differentiated curriculum and instruction on Taiwanese EFL students′ motivation, anxiety and interest: University of Southern California.
Cook, V. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching: Routledge.
Cucchiarini, C., Neri, A., & Strik, H. (2009). Oral proficiency training in Dutch L2: The contribution of ASR-based corrective feedback. Speech Communication, 51(10), 853-863.
Demouy, V., & Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(3), 217-232.
Dey, A. K., & Abowd, G. D. (1999). Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness.
Duff, A., & Maley, A. (1982). Drama techniques in language learning: A resource book of communication activities for language teachers: Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, N. E., Brooks, C. F., & Kubicka-Miller, T. (2006). Oral communication skills in higher education: Using a performance-based evaluation rubric to assess communication skills. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 115-128. doi:10.1007/s10755-006-9012-x
Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language learning & technology, 2(1), 54-73.
Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form‐focused instruction. Language learning, 51, 1-46.
Fageeh, A. A. I. (2013). Effects of MALL applications on vocabulary acquisition and motivation. Arab World English Journal, 4(4).
Fajardo, A. (2014). Multimedia-Assisted Instruction in Developing the English Language Skills: CBSUA Experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2).
Faqeih, H. I. (2015). Learners’ attitudes towards corrective feedback. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 664-671.
Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The modern language journal, 75(2), 173-180.
Finlay-Johnson, H. (1912). The dramatic method of teaching: Ginn.
Fleming, J., Gibson, R., Anderson, M., Martin, A. J., & Sudmalis, D. (2016). Cultivating imaginative thinking: teacher strategies used in high-performing arts education classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(4), 435-453. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2015.1064097
Fletcher-Watson, B. (2016). Learning though theatre: the changing face of Theatre in Education; Theatre in Education in Britain: origin, development and influence. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 21(4), 590-592. doi:10.1080/13569783.2016.1228451
Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189-201.
Galloway, A. (1993). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction and Sample Activities. ERIC Digest. ERIC.
Goh, C. C. M. (2007). Teaching speaking in the language classroom: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre Singapore.
Guskey, T. R. (1985). Implementing mastery learning: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.): Boston, MA: Henile & Henile.
Hashemi, M., & Ghasemi, B. (2011). RETRACTED: Retraction notice to using mobile phones in language learning/teaching [SBSPRO 15C (2011) 2947–2951]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2007). Authentic mobile learning in higher education.
Hockly, N. (2012). Mobile learning. Elt Journal, 67(1), 80-84.
Holden, S. (1981). Drama in language teaching (Vol. 19): Longman London.
Hsu, C.-K. (2015). Learning motivation and adaptive video caption filtering for EFL learners using handheld devices. ReCALL, 27(1), 84-103.
Hwang, G.-J., Chiu, L.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2015). A contextual game-based learning approach to improving students′ inquiry-based learning performance in social studies courses. Computers & Education, 81, 13-25.
Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., & Huang, S.-M. (2011). A study of a multimedia web annotation system and its effect on the EFL writing and speaking performance of junior high school students. ReCALL, 23(2), 160-180.
Ives Wiley, H., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26(4), 207-214.
Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition: The New Media Consortium.
Kim, S.-J. (2004). Coping with cultural obstacles to speaking English in the Korean secondary school context. Asian EFL Journal, 6(3), 17-27.
Kim, S. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language learning & technology, 18(2), 20-35.
Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(2), 169-187.
Kristmanson, P. (2006). Beyond time on task in second language teaching and learning: A case study of cognitive processing in intensive French. PhD diss., University of New Brunswick.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach (Vol. 1): Language teaching publications Hove.
Li, S. (2013). Oral corrective feedback. Elt Journal, 68(2), 196-198.
Littlewood, W. (2001). Students′ attitudes to classroom English learning: a cross-cultural study. Language teaching research, 5(1), 3-28.
Liu, T.-Y., & Chu, Y.-L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
Liu, T.-Y., Tan, T.-H., & Chu, Y.-L. (2008). QR code and augmented reality-supported mobile English learning system. Paper presented at the Workshop of Mobile Multmedia Processing.
Liu, X. (2010). Arousing the College Students′ Motivation in Speaking English through Role-Play. International Education Studies, 3(1), 136-144.
Loh, E. (2015). Using drama in education to enhance Chinese language proficiency of non-Chinese speaking secondary school students. IB Journal of Teaching Practice.
Lynch, L., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (2000). Computer‐assisted reading intervention in a secondary school: an evaluation study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 333-348.
Lys, F. (2013). The development of advanced learner oral proficiency using iPads. Language learning & technology, 17(3), 94-116.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 125-139.
McDonough, K. (2005). IDENTIFYING THE IMPACT OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNERS′RESPONSES ON ESL QUESTION DEVELOPMENT. Studies in second language acquisition, 27(1), 79-103.
McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73-81.
Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309.
Miller, K., Lukoff, B., King, G., & Mazur, E. (2018). Use of a social annotation Platform for Pre-class reading assignments in a Flipped introductory Physics class. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education.
Molden, M. (2015). Employing Apple’s Siri to practice pronunciation: A preliminary study on Arabic speakers. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series, 13, 2-17.
Morozova, Y. (2013). Methods of enhancing speaking skills of elementary level students. Translation Journal, 17(1), 1-24.
Morton, H., & Jack, M. (2010). Speech interactive computer-assisted language learning: A cross-cultural evaluation. Computer assisted language learning, 23(4), 295-319.
Muslem, A., & Abbas, M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Immersive Multimedia Learning with Peer Support on English Speaking and Reading Aloud. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 203-218.
Naidu, S., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Analyzing CMC content for what? Computers & Education, 46(1), 96-103.
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer assisted language learning, 15(5), 441-467.
Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer assisted language learning, 21(5), 393-408.
Nguyen, T.-H., Hwang, W.-Y., Pham, X.-L., & Ma, Z.-H. (2018). User-Oriented EFL Speaking through Application and Exercise: Instant Speech Translation and Shadowing in Authentic Context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 129-142.
Nordin, N., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2010). Mobile learning framework for lifelong learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 130-138.
Norris, J. (2016). Drama as research: Realizing the potential of drama in education as a research methodology. Youth Theatre Journal, 30(2), 122-135.
Panel, N. R., Health, N. I. o. C., & Development, H. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National ….
Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: Mobile, wireless, in-your-pocket learning. LiNE Zine, 2006.
Rahimi, M., & Miri, S. S. (2014). The impact of mobile dictionary use on language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1469-1474.
Redvall, E. N. (2009). Scriptwriting as a creative, collaborative learning process of problem finding and problem solving. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research, 25(46), 22 p.-22 p.
Rojas-Drummond, S., Littleton, K., Hernández, F., & Zúñiga, M. (2010). Dialogical interactions among peers in collaborative writing contexts. Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction, 128-148.
Sari, D. (2011). Drama as a tool in interpretation: Practitioner perceptions of its strengths & limitations. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 23(2), 22-33.
Saunders, W. M., & O’Brien, G. (2006). Oral language. Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence, 14-63.
Savignon, S. J. (1987). Communicative language teaching. Theory into practice, 26(4), 235-242.
Shadiev, R., & Huang, Y.-M. (2016). Facilitating cross-cultural understanding with learning activities supported by speech-to-text recognition and computer-aided translation. Computers & Education, 98, 130-141.
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., Huang, Y.-M., & Liu, C.-J. (2016). Investigating applications of speech-to-text recognition technology for a face-to-face seminar to assist learning of non-native English-speaking participants. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(1), 119-134.
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., Huang, Y. M., & Liu, T. Y. (2018). Facilitating application of language skills in authentic environments with a mobile learning system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 42-52.
Smith, E. K., & Pastor, M. (2016). Engage me and I learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(2), 41-43.
Sockman, B. R., Sutton, R., & Herrmann, M. (2016). Comic relief: Graduate students address multiple meanings for technology integration with digital comic creation. TechTrends, 60(5), 475-485.
Song, J.-W. (2009). An Investigation into the Effects of an Oral English Diary a Using Voice Bulletin Board on English Spoken Performance. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 12(1), 125-150.
Stern, S. L. (1980). Drama in second language learning from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language learning, 30(1), 77-100.
Suhre, C., Winnips, K., de Boer, V., Valdivia, P., & Beldhuis, H. (2019). Students’ experiences with the use of a social annotation tool to improve learning in flipped classrooms. Paper presented at the HEAD′19. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances.
Wang, Z. (2014). Developing Accuracy and Fluency in Spoken English of Chinese EFL Learners. English language teaching, 7(2), 110-118.
Ward, W. (1930). Creative dramatics: D. Appleton.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. Multimedia language teaching, 320.
Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice: Cambridge university press.
Whiteson, V. (1996). New Ways of Using Drama and Literature in Language Teaching. New Ways in TESOL Series II. Innovative Classroom Techniques: ERIC.
Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Gress, C. (2010). The learning kit project: Software tools for supporting and researching regulation of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 787-793.
Xu, J. (2010). On the problems and strategies of multimedia technology in English teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 215-218.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Chang, L. Y. (2008). No improvement—reflections and suggestions on the use of Skype to enhance college students’ oral English proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 721-725.
Zhang, H., Hwang, W.-Y., Tseng, S.-Y., & Chen, H. S. (2019). Collaborative drama-based EFL learning in familiar contexts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 697-722.
Zhou, M., & Li, Z. (2019). Blended mobile learning in theatre arts classrooms in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 307-317.

指導教授

黃武元(Wu-Yuin Hwang)

審核日期

2019-9-18

推文