參考文獻 |
中文文獻
何榮桂. (2000). 《電腦模擬》教育大辭書. 台北市:文景
林曉雯. (2014). 應用5E學習環教學以提昇國小學童學習成就之研究-以「月相」概念為例. 國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所碩士論文
邱美虹. (2000). 概念改變研究的省思與啟示. 科學教育學刊, 8(1), 1-34.
陳均伊. (2016). 實施實驗式探究教學對於國小五年級學生 科學探究能力表現之研究. 國立嘉義大學師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文
黃若瑜. (2016). 認知風格與先備知識於預測, 模擬, 觀察, 解釋科學探究活動之影響. 國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文
黃湘武. (1980). 皮亞傑認知心理學與科學教育. 科學教育月刊.
黃福坤. (2006). 透過物理模擬動畫進行物理教學與學習. 物理雙月刊
英文文獻
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?. Journal of educational psychology, 103(1), 1.
Baser, M. (2006). Fostering conceptual change by cognitive conflict based instruction on students’ understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 96-114.
Couture M. (2004) Realism in the design process and credibil- ity of a simulation-based virtual laboratory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 40–49.
Han, I., & Black, J. B. (2011). Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2281-2290.
Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 271-283.
Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24-32.
Kang, J., Lindgren, R., & Planey, J. (2018). Exploring emergent features of student interaction within an embodied science learning simulation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(3), 39.
Lee, H., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2006). Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations. Journal of educational psychology, 98(4), 902.
Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174-187.
Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J. gutter, & Vincent, M.(2002)supporting guided-inquiry instruction. Teaching exceptional children. 34(3),88-91.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227.
Reif, F. (1987). Instructional design, cognition, and technology: Applications to the teaching of scientific concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 309-324.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370.
Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. (1994). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century.
Srinivasan, M., Hwang, J. C., West, D., & Yellowlees, P. M. (2006). Assessment of clinical skills using simulator technologies. Academic Psychiatry, 30(6), 505-515.
Srisawasdi, N., & Sornkhatha, P. (2014). The effect of simulation-based inquiry on students’ conceptual learning and its potential applications in mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 1, 8(1), 28-49.
Sun, K. T., Lin, Y. C., & Yu, C. J. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1411-1422.
Trundle, K. C., & Bell, R. L. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1078-1088.
Unlu, Z. K., & Dokme, I. (2011). The Effect of Combining Analogy-Based Simulation and Laboratory Activities on Turkish Elementary School Students′ Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 320-329.
Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145-160 |