基於智慧城市和可持續發展概念的商業集群滿意度研究：桃園市老商業區的實證研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：14

、訪客IP：3.12.164.103

姓名

康小鵬(Jovan Luke Raharjo) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木系營建管理碩士班

論文名稱

基於智慧城市和可持續發展概念的商業集群滿意度研究：桃園市老商業區的實證研究
(A Satisfactory Study toward Business Clusters based on Smart City and Sustainability Concepts: Empirical Evidence in Taoyuan City Old Business District)

相關論文

★ 運用深度神經網路建立H型鋼構件自動辨識系統之研究	★ 運用關聯法則探討協力廠商對營造廠報價行為之研究
★ 探討影響台灣工程顧問公司落實法律遵循反貪腐關鍵因素之研究	★ 以分包商角度探討對營造廠報價行為策略之研究
★ 運用SOMCM分群演算法開發設計雲端智慧平台之營運維護產業介面-以桃園市某園區為例	★ 專案管理在履約爭議處理機制之比較與研析
★ H型鋼構件智慧塗裝路徑優化研究	★ 以資料包絡分析法評估大型統包營造廠之經營績效-以上市櫃公司為例
★ 運用組織特徵映射圖動作軌跡相似度測量法探索預鑄工項生產效率與資源規劃之研究	★ 預鑄專案成本估算策略之研究
★ 新建工程建造執照查核缺失要項之探討--以台北市為例	★ 灰關聯分析探討古蹟與歷史建築再利用之研究
★ 營造工地管理人資量化與預測	★ 公共建設專案現金管理與控制之研究
★ 營建業ERP整合PDA模型之研究	★ 水庫營運效益評估之研究-以石門水庫為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

隨著桃園市政府計劃振興桃園市老商業區，城市規劃的複雜性需要政府和公眾的配合。這項研究使用專家訪談作為初步調查，然後繼續進行問卷調查，共有307名受訪者參加，目的是探索桃園市舊商業區振興計劃中的智慧城市和可持續概念應用，並檢查居民的滿意度。作為公眾對該計劃的回應。過去採訪利益相關者和相關項目的代表，以探討他們對地區和問卷的看法。進行了滿意度調查和試點調查，以確保有效性和可靠性，目的是加強數據完整性並使用統計分析量化關注程度。結果表明，將智慧城市和可持續發展概念與AR和VR集成以及綠色能源作為技術實施相結合，制定了人力資源改善計劃，並將桃園政府視為有序解決的相關問題。但是，滿意度調查結果很差。居民對公共交通設施（3）感到中度滿意，對公共安全（2.58），日常生活質量（2.5），公共設施（2.3），環境清潔度（2.13）不滿意，並且對停車位的可用性非常不滿意（1.75）。從滿意度調查中最相關的方面來看，最高的是公共設施（0.842），其次是日常生活質量（0.814），公共安全（0.774），環境衛生（0.675），公共交通（0.572）和停車空間可用性（0.534）。渴望擁有良好的公共設施會給該地區的發展帶來瓶頸，例如建築質量，道路服務質量，行人環境，公園或開放空間等，這些都需要改進。

摘要(英)

The complexity of urban planning needs both government and public collaboration as Taoyuan Government planning to revitalize Taoyuan City Old Business District. This research is using expert interview as the preliminary survey and continued with a questionnaire survey with a total of 307 respondents with objectives to explore the Smart City and Sustainable Concept application within the Taoyuan City Old Business District revitalization plan, and to examine the residents’ satisfaction level as public responses toward the plan. Interviewing stakeholders and representatives of related project in the past in order to explore their point of view toward the district and questionnaire. The satisfaction survey supplemented with a pilot survey to ensure the validity and reliability was conducted with an aim to strengthen the data integrity and to quantify the degree of concern using statistical analysis. The result revealed that Smart City and Sustainable Concept was applied with AR and VR integration as well as green energy as technology implementation, human resource improvement program was prepared, and the Taoyuan government was considered the relevant issue to fix in order. However, satisfaction survey results are poor. The residents feel moderately satisfied about the public transport facility (3), dissatisfied with the public security (2.58), daily life quality (2.5), public facility (2.3), environmental cleanliness (2.13), and very dissatisfied with the parking space availability (1.75). Sorted by the most concerning aspect from the satisfaction survey, the highest is the public facility (0.842), followed with daily life quality (0.814), public security (0.774), environmental cleanliness (0.675), public transportation (0.572), and parking space availability (0.534). The eagerness to have good public facility brings to the development bottleneck within the district such as quality of buildings, road service quality, pedestrian environment, park or open spaces, etc. that needs improvement.

關鍵字(中)

★ 商業區
★ 振興
★ 城市規劃
★ 滿意度調查
★ 智慧城市和可持續概念

關鍵字(英)

★ Business District
★ Revitalization
★ Urban Planning
★ Satisfaction Survey
★ Smart City and Sustainable Concept

論文目次

ABSTRACT i
摘要 ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES vii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Research Background 1
1.2. Research Objectives 2
1.3. Research Scope and Limitation 2
1.4. Methodology 3
1.5. Thesis Organization 5
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1. Business Cluster and Urbanization 7
2.1.1. The Urbanization and Urban Dynamics 7
2.1.2. Business Cluster and Industrial District 7
2.1.3. Vitality and Viability Improvement Benefits in Revitalized Business District 8
2.2. The Development of Smart City Concept 10
2.2.1. Smart City Concept and Dimension 10
2.2.2. Smart City Policies and Development 12
2.2.3. Sustainable Development of Smart Cities 13
2.3. Sustainability of District Development 14
2.3.1. Introduction of Sustainability 14
2.3.2. Sustainability of Urban Renewal 15
2.3.3. Sustainable Strategies for Local Governments 16
CHAPTER III EXPERT INTERVIEW AND QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN 17
3.1. Expert Interview 17
3.2. Questionnaire Design and Pilot Survey 20
3.3. Descriptive Analysis 23
CHAPTER IV CASE STUDY AND DISCUSSION 31
4.1. Study Case Overview 31
4.1.1. Land Use Proportion 31
4.1.2. Transportation Service 34
4.1.3. District Development Evaluation 35
4.2. Satisfaction Analysis 39
4.3. Discussion 40
4.3.1. Smart City and Sustainable Concept Application 40
4.3.2. Residents Satisfaction and Preferable Solution 42
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION 45
5.1. Summary 45
5.2. Suggestion 46
REFERENCES 47
Appendix A Expert Interview in Chinese A-1
Appendix B Expert Interview in English B-1
Appendix C Questionnaire Survey in Chinese C-1
Appendix D Questionnaire Survey in English D-1

參考文獻

1. Nations, U., Kyoto Protocol Refference Manual: On Accounting of Emissions and Assigned Amount. 2008, United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). p. 130.
2. Nations, U., Paris Agreement. 2015.
3. Change., I.P.o.C., Global Warming of 1.5C, in Summary for Policymakers. 2018.
4. Change., I.P.o.C., Climate Change 2014, in Synthesis Report. 2015.
5. Change., I.P.o.C., Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, in Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014.
6. Change., I.P.o.C., Climate Change 2014, in Global and Sectoral Aspects and Regional Aspects. 2014.
7. Chasek, P.S., Global Environemntal Politics. Actors in The Environemntal Arena. 2017.
8. Mills, L.O. and N. Attoh-Okine, Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure Systems: The Past, The Present, and The Way Forward, in International Conference on Sustainable Development of Critical Infrastructure, X. Liu and A.H.S. Ang, Editors. 2014, American Society of Civil Engineers: Shanghai, China. p. 79-90.
9. Trindade, E.P., et al., Sustainable development of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2017. 3(1).
10. Cakmak, P.I. and E. Tezel, A Guide for Risk Management in Construction Projects: Present Knowledge and Future Drections, in Risk Management in Construction Projects, D.N. Khatleli, Editor. 2019.
11. Wu, J., L. Wang, and W. Li, Usage Patterns and Impact Factors of Public Bicycle Systems: Comparison between City Center and Suburban District in Shenzhen. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2018. 144(3).
12. Yildiz, S., S. Kivrak, and G. Arslan, Contribution of Built Environment Design Elements to the Sustainability of Urban Renewal Projects: Model Proposal. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2019. 145(1).
13. Knight, J.N., G. Smithwick, and A.T.R. MA, The Importance of Cash Contribution on Sustainability of International Development Projects, in World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2014: Water Without Borders, P.D. Wayne C. Huber, P.E., D.WRE, Editor. 2014: Portland, Oregon. p. 1647 - 1660.
14. Liu, B., et al., Critical Success Factors for the Management of Public Participation in Urban Renewal Projects: Perspectives from Governments and the Public in China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2018. 144(3).
15. Bonnes, M., M. Bonaiuto, and A.P. Ercolani, Crowding and Residential Satisfaction in the Urban Environment: A Contextual Approach. Environment and Behavior, 1991. 23(5): p. 531 - 552.
16. Säynäjoki, E.-S., et al., How central business district developments facilitate environmental sustainability – A multiple case study in Finland. Cities, 2014. 41: p. 101-113.
17. Stokes, R.J., Business Improvement Districts and Inner City Revitalization: The Case Of Philadelphia′s Frankford Special Services District. International Journal of Public Administration, 2006. 29(1-3): p. 173-186.
18. Ratcliffe, J. and S. Flanagan, Enhancing the vitality and viability of town and city centres. Property Management, 2004. 22(5): p. 377-395.
19. Green Paper on the Urban Environment. COM (90) 218 final, 27 June 1990. 1990.
48
20. Kong, L., Improbable Art: The Creative Economy and Sustainable Cluster Development in a Hong Kong Industrial District. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2013. 53(2): p. 182-196.
21. Branzanti, C., Creative Clusters and District Economies: Towards a Taxonomy to Interpret the Phenomenon. European Planning Studies, 2014. 23(7): p. 1401-1418.
22. (ODPM), O.o.t.D.P.M., Business Improvement Districts Guidance: A Working Draft. 2003.
23. Nam, T. and T.A. Pardo, Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions, in 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. 2011.
24. AL-ALwani, M., Towards Sustainable Middle Eastern Cities: A Local Sustainability Assessment Framework, in School of Architecture, Design, and Environment. 2014, University of Plymouth.
25. Development, W.C.o.E.a., Report of The World Comission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. 1987, Oxford University Press: New York.
26. Tainter, J., A Framework for Sustainability. World Futures, 2003. 59(3-4): p. 213-223.
27. Bithas, K.P. and M. Christofakis, Environmentally sustainable cities. Critical review and operational conditions. Sustainable Development, 2006. 14(3): p. 177-189.
28. Fischer, J., et al., Mind the sustainability gap. Trends Ecol Evol, 2007. 22(12): p. 621-4.
29. Lee, J.-Y., et al., Indoor environmental quality, occupant satisfaction, and acute building-related health symptoms in Green Mark-certified compared with non-certified office buildings. Indoor Air, 2019. 29(1): p. 112-129.
30. Cruz, C.O. and J.d. Brito, Role of Public Administration in Fostering Urban Housing Rehabilitation. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2015. 141(4).
31. Renn, O. and A. Klinke, A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning. Sustainability, 2013. 5(5): p. 2036-2059.
32. AECOM, AECOM Initial Report: Old Town Regeneration Planning Case Initial Report - In Chinese. 2019.

指導教授

陳介豪(Jieh-Haur Chen)

審核日期

2020-1-17

推文