家族企業、創業導向與企業績效關係之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：28

、訪客IP：3.149.237.3

姓名

邱玟君(Wen-Chun Chiu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

家族企業、創業導向與企業績效關係之研究
(The Study of the Relations between Family Firm, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年在科技發展與全球化趨勢下，企業為了在競爭激烈的產業環境中創造更好的績效表現，本質上應具備創業導向。另外，家族企業的經營型態在台灣為普遍的存在，且家族企業所有的特性提升其具有較佳的創業導向以及績效表現的可能性。因此，本研究針對家族企業（家族控制程度）、創業導向以及企業績效彼此之間的關係進行探討，並以創業導向為中介變項，更進一步探討家族企業（家族控制程度）對績效表現是否具有中介效果。本研究以2009至2018年台灣上市櫃企業為研究對象，共計13289個觀察值，1523家企業。實證結果顯示，家族控制程度之家族控制股權與董事會家族化對創業導向有顯著正向影響；創業導向對企業績效有顯著正向影響；家族企業與家族控制股權對績效有顯著正向影響；家族控制股權會透過創業導向的中介作用，對績效產生正向影響。因此，企業試圖在快速變動的產業環境中創造更好的績效表現，除了受到企業經營形態及特性的影響，亦與是否採取創業導向的策略有關。
關鍵字：家族企業、家族控制程度、創業導向、企業績效

摘要(英)

Under the trend of technology development and globalization, in order to create better performance in a competitive industrial environment, firms should essentially have entrepreneurial orientation. In addition, the family firm is a ubiquitous form in Taiwan. The characteristics of family firm enhance the possibility of having the higher level of entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Therefore, the study explores the relations between family firm (family control), entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Also uses the entrepreneurial orientation as a mediator, further explores the mediation effect of family firm (family control) on performance. Collecting data from listed companies in Taiwan from 2009 to 2018, including 13289 observations and 1523 firms. The empirical results indicate that controlling interest and board constitution of family control have significant positive effect on entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial orientation has significant positive effect on firm performance, family firm and family control have significant positive effect on firm performance and entrepreneurial orientation have a　mediating effect on the relationship between family control and firm performance. As a result, except for the influence of company forms and characteristics, firms need to adopt entrepreneurial-oriented strategies if they would like to create better performance in a turbulent industrial environment.
Keywords: Family Firm, Family Control, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Firm Performance

關鍵字(中)

★ 創業導向
★ 家族企業
★ 家族控制程度
★ 企業績效

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
一、緒論 1
二、文獻探討 3
2-1家族企業定義及特性 3
2-2創業導向（Entrepreneurial Orientation） 5
2-3家族企業與創業導向關係 8
2-4創業導向與績效關係 10
2-5家族企業與績效關係 13
2-6創業導向的中介效果 17
三、研究方法 18
3-1研究架構 18
3-2研究假設 18
3-3變項衡量 19
3-3-1家族企業 19
3-3-2創業導向 19
3-3-3企業績效 20
3-3-4控制變項 20
3-4研究樣本 22
3-5研究工具 22
四、研究結果 23
4-1敘述性統計 23
4-2相關性分析 25
4-3迴歸分析與假設驗證 27
五、結論與建議 33
5-1研究結論 33
5-2學術貢獻 34
5-3管理意涵 35
5-4研究限制與未來建議 36
參考文獻 38

參考文獻

一、中文文獻
1.李坤鐘（2000）。創業導向、行銷策略與行銷績效關係之研究。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，嘉義縣。
2.林翠蓉、張力、侯啟娉（2011）。家族所有權、公司治理與公司績效關係之實證研究。績效與策略研究，8(1)，61-79。
3.林寶人（2010）。台灣上市櫃家族企業與公司績效。會計學報，3(1)，53-82。
4.許士軍、陳光中（1989）。台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係。行政院國家科學委員會專題報告。
5.陳建宇（2003）。臺灣中小企業創業導向、組織資源與能力對企業績效影響之研究。國立成功大學企業管理學系專班碩士論文，臺南市。
6.曾煌鈞（2017）。淺談家族企業之治理。證券暨期貨月刊，35(9)，32-47。
7.葉銀華（1999）。家族控股集團, 核心金業與報酬互動之研究-台灣與香港證券市場之比較。管理評論，18(2)，59-86。
二、英文文獻
1.Ambad, S. N. A., & Wahab, K. A. (2016). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian large companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2).
2.Anderson, B. S., Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2009). Understanding the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic learning capability: an empirical investigation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(3), 218-240.
3.Anderson, B. S., Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Eshima, Y. (2015). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic management journal, 36(10), 1579-1596.
4.Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
5.Aronoff, C., & Ward, J. (2016). Preparing your family business for strategic change. Springer.
6.Astrachan, J. H. (2003). Commentary on the special issue: The emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 567-572.
7.Astrachan, J. H., Zahra, S. A., & Sharma, P. (2003). Family-sponsored ventures. Kansas, MO: Kauffman Foundation.
8.Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New Brunswick. NJ: Transaction.
9.Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of financial economics, 20, 267-291.
10.Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. The journal of finance, 58(5), 2167-2201.
11.Carton, R. B., Hofer, C. W., & Meeks, M. D. (1998). The entrepreneur and entrepreneurship: operational definitions of their role in society. In Annual International Council for Small Business. Conference, Singapore.
12.Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29(5), 555-575.
13.Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.
14.Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The journal of finance, 57(6), 2741-2771.
15.Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(5), 855-872.
16.Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Empirical relationship among strategic posture environmental context variables, and new venture performance. Frontiers Entrepreneurship Research, 16(5), 124-133.
17.Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16(1), 7-26.
18.Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines.
19.Diéguez-Soto, J., López-Delgado, P., & Rojo-Ramírez, A. (2015). Identifying and classifying family businesses. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 603-634.
20.Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
21.Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of financial economics, 65(3), 365-395.
22.Faccio, M., Lang, L. H., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91(1), 54-78.
23.Gibb Dyer Jr, W. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family business review, 19(4), 253-273.
24.Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative science quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
25.Green, K. M., Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2008). Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness and entrepreneurial orientation: The role of structure–style fit. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(3), 356-383.
26.Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory. Family business review, 19(2), 135-145.
27.Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(1), 19-46.
28.Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
29.James, H. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International journal of the economics of business, 6(1), 41-55.
30.Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations.
31.La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., A. Shleifer & R. Vishny (1998). Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113-1155.
32.La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2), 471-517.
33.Lumpkin, G. T., Brigham, K. H., & Moss, T. W. (2010). Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3-4), 241-264.
34.Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
35.Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of business venturing, 16(5), 429-451.
36.Mandl, I. (2008). Overview of family business relevant issues. Contract, (30-CE), 0164021.
37.Martínez, J. I., Stöhr, B. S., & Quiroga, B. F. (2007). Family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from public companies in Chile. Family Business Review, 20(2), 83-94.
38.Menéndez-Requejo, S. (2006). 31 Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Spanish family firms. Handbook of research on family business, 575.
39.Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman Jr, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of management review, 3(3), 546-562.
40.Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management science, 29(7), 770-791.
41.Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management science, 30(10), 1161-1183.
42.Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business Press.
43.Miller, D., & Le Breton–Miller, I. (2011). Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 35(5), 1051-1076.
44.Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?. Journal of corporate finance, 13(5), 829-858.
45.Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California management review, 16(2), 44-53.
46.Morck, R. K., Stangeland, D. A., & Yeung, B. (1998). Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth: The Canadian disease (No. w6814). National Bureau of Economic Research.
47.Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family business review, 20(1), 33-47.
48.Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Frese, M., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2004). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: Cumulative empirical evidence. In 23rd Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference. Glasgow, UK.
49.Rodrigues, R. G., & Raposo, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, human resources information management, and firm performance in SMEs. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l′Administration, 28(2), 143-153.
50.Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., & Engelen, A. (2014). On cultural and macroeconomic contingencies of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 255-290.
51.Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2002). Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Managerial and decision economics, 23(4‐5), 247-259.
52.Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of business venturing, 18(4), 473-490.
53.Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization science, 12(2), 99-116.
54.Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family business review, 10(1), 1-35.
55.Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic management journal, 19(8), 729-753.
56.Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22(1), 9-24.
57.Shyu, J. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: evidence from Taiwanese firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 7(4), 397-411.
58.Sraer, D., & Thesmar, D. (2007). Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the european economic Association, 5(4), 709-751.
59.Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?. Journal of financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417.
60.Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses. Strategic management journal, 24(13), 1307-1314.
61.Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of business venturing, 20(1), 71-91.
62.Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of finance, 2(1‐2), 21-48.
63.Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family business review, 18(1), 23-40.

指導教授

陳明園

審核日期

2020-6-24

推文