台灣地區工業4.0成熟度現況之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：161

、訪客IP：18.219.22.169

姓名

陳品媜(Pin-Chen Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

台灣地區工業4.0成熟度現況之探討

相關論文

★ 企業流程為核心的食品產業運籌體系規劃:低溫物流部份	★ 以企業流程方法規劃整體飛航後勤維修體系之研究
★ 成衣產業導入ERP運籌管理方案之個案研究	★ 光電產業試產基地之生產最佳化模式：以光投影機為例
★ TFT LCD產業獲利因素之探討	★ 科技事業進行合併/讓售之決策過程與成效之個案探討
★ 企業治理、風險及遵循解決方案導入之個案研究-以職責分離資訊系統為例	★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用
★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響	★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析
★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響	★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響	★ 電子產業新產品開發參考模式之發展
★ 應用資料科學方法提昇國防裝備可靠度之研究－以防空系統為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

德國為下個世代建立產業發展政策，為此建立工業4.0的開端。然而，朝向工業4.0的路徑中，必須歷經數位轉型。但企業朝向數位轉型遇到的困境，如公司對工業4.0缺乏方向，最重要的是企業無法評估自身公司的能力。在此困境下，企業須先對自身評估企業的工業4.0的成熟度，再透過與目標相比，明確了解公司目前身處何種程度以及需加強哪些構面。本研究沿用Puchan , Krischke 與Jun-Der Leu於2019年01月16天下雜誌665期，台灣地區製造業的工業4.0現況調查之問卷，工業4.0的成熟度分為五個構面﹕策略、組織、數位化聯結、數位化工廠、數位化服務，其中策略與組織視為數位化管理構面，數位化聯結、數位化工廠、數位化服務為數位化工程構面。財務績效構面下包括毛利率、資本生產力及人均產值。財務績效是一個反應企業是否達到經濟目標的指標，在新技術的導入下，加上前述工業4.0本身的特性，進行生產優化的結果是否能真實提升財務績效，為多數企業關注的課題。本研究透過結構方程模型(Structural equation modeling, SEM)，對其分析數位化管理面與數位化工程如何影響財務績效，以及兩者如何相輔相成。本研究提出三個假設，假設一為數位化管理構面對財務績效有正向影響。假設二為數位化工程主構面對財務績效有顯著正向影響，假設三為數位化管理主構面對數位化工程構面有顯著正向影響。由經濟意涵而言，若持續精機器設備至最佳，將無法有效提升財務績效，必須考量策略及組織構面如抗拒變革、員工參與等因素，搭配數位化管理面向才能使財務績效提升。若是企業內部數位化管理構面越成熟，數位化工程構面越成熟，即考慮管理面向越全面，員工抗拒變革程度越小，將更容易導入新的機器設備。

摘要(英)

To develop the policy of economics for the next generation, Germany government published the industry 4.0 guild with enterprise and non-governmental organization. To the path to industry 4.0, company needed to perform digital transformation. The dilemmas were company didn’t know the goal or the strategy were correct or not. Even if company wasn’t know the benefit and the expense. Most important was company can’t measure the capability of industry 4.0 by itself. Therefore, company need to measure the capability of industry 4.0 by itself and then compare the current situation with goal that company know which dimensions should be improved. This study is based on the results of a study conducted by Puchan, Krischke and Jun-Der Leu on 01/01/2019. The questionnaire of the survey on the current status of Industry 4.0 in Taiwan′s regional manufacturing industry was published in Magazine, Issue 665, September 16, 2012. The maturity level of industry 4.0 were combined with five dimensions：strategy, organization, digital connection, digital service and digital factory. Our study defined strategy and organization as digital management aspect and defined digital connection, digital service and digital factory as digital engineering aspect. The financial performance aspect included gross margin, capital productivity and output per capital. Three assumptions are made in this study. The study used the structural equation model (SEM) method to analyze how the digital management aspect and digital engineering aspect affect financial performance aspect. There are three Hypothesis in this study. The results of the study show that Hypothesis 1 and 3 are valid. Assumption 2 does not hold. If company always improved the machine or software in the factory that can’t be build up the financial performance, company should be considered the strategy and organization such as reinforce or participation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 工業4.0
★ 數位轉型
★ 成熟度
★ 財務績效

關鍵字(英)

★ Industry 40.
★ digital transformation
★ maturity level
★ financial performance

論文目次

目錄
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 i
圖目錄 ii
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景及動機 1
1.2研究目的及範圍 1
第二章文獻回顧 3
2.1工業4.0 3
2.2工業4.0與財務績效 4
2.3數位轉型 6
2.4成熟度模型 7
2.4.1 成熟度模型一 8
2.4.2 成熟度模型二 11
2.4.3 成熟度模型三 13
2.4.4台灣地區製造業的工業4.0現況－成熟度模型 15
2.5 模型比較 18
2.6項目比較 25
第三章研究方法 38
3.1研究假設 38
3.2驗證性分析 40
3.2.1信度及效度 42
3.2.2配適度指標 43
3.2.3違犯估計 44
3.3路徑分析 44
3.4其他相關分析 45
3.4.1常態性檢定 45
3.4.2 Johnson轉值 46
3.4.3 皮爾森相關分析 46
3.5研究問卷及模型設定 47
3.5.1問卷回收概況 47
3.5.2問卷型態 48
3.5.3成熟度計算公式 49
3.5.4研究分析樣本 51
3.5.5研究限制 51
3.5.6研究變數 52
第四章研究結果 55
4.1描述性統計 55
4.2 KS檢定 59
4.2.1 Jonshon轉換結果 60
4.2.2皮爾森相關分析 61
4.3驗證性分析 63
4.3.1信度及效度分析 63
4.3.2適配度指標 66
4.3.3違犯估計 67
4.4路徑分析結果 68
第五章結論與建議 72
5.1研究結果及討論 72
5.2研究貢獻 74
5.3研究限制與未來研究方向 75
參考文獻 76

參考文獻

Aaltonen, I., Salmi, T., & Marstio, I. (2018). Refining levels of collaboration to support the design and evaluation of human-robot interaction in the manufacturing industry. Procedia Cirp, 72, 93-98.
Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Drayer, R. W. (2005). The digital transformation: technology and beyond. Supply Chain Management Review, 9(1), 22-29.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Buer, S.-V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. (2018). The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924-2940.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5): Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Heavin, C., & Power, D. J. (2018). Challenges for digital transformation–towards a conceptual decision support guide for managers. Journal of Decision Systems, 27(sup1), 38-45.
Kiel, D., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K.-I. (2017). The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies–A business level perspective. Technovation, 68, 4-19.
Lichtblau, K., Goericke, D., & Stich, V. (2015). Industrie 4.0-Readiness-Check. Retrieved 24 May 2020, from https://www.industrie40-readiness.de/?lang=en
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 430.
Pini, F., Leali, F., & Ansaloni, M. (2015). A systematic approach to the engineering design of a HRC workcell for bio-medical product assembly. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA).
Proença, D., & Borbinha, J. (2016). Maturity models for information systems-A state of the art. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 1042-1049.
Puchan, J., Krischke, A., & Jun-Der, Leu. (2019年1月)。全台首次566家公司智慧製造大調查：誰是最佳工業4.0企業﹖天下雜誌，665，72-86。
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S., & Pellerin, R. (2020). Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644-1661.
Scheer, A.-W., Abolhassan, F., Wolfram, J., Kirchmer, M., Scheer, A., Abolhassan, F., & Jost, W. (2002). Business process excellence: Springer.
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52, 161-166. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
Schumacher, A., Nemeth, T., & Sihn, W. (2019). Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 79, 409-414.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner′s guide to structural equation modeling: psychology press.
Senvar, O., & Sennaroglu, B. (2016). Comparing performances of clements, box-cox, Johnson methods with weibull distributions for assessing process capability. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(3), 634-656.
Shi, J., Jimmerson, G., Pearson, T., & Menassa, R. (2012). Levels of human and robot collaboration for automotive manufacturing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems.

Tay, S., Lee, T., Hamid, N., & Ahmad, A. (2018). An overview of industry 4.0: Definition, components, and government initiatives. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10(14), 1379-1387.
Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E. (2017). Industry 4.0: managing the digital transformation: Springer.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems.
Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12(1), 3159805. doi:10.1155/2016/3159805
Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2011). Digital Transformation: A roadmap for billion-dollar organizations. MIT Center for Digital Business and Capgemini Consulting, 1, 1-68.
Winkelhake, U., Winkelhake, & Schilgerius. (2018). Digital Transformation of the Automotive Industry: Springer.
Yuan, X.-M. (2020). Impact of Industry 4.0 on Inventory Systems and Optimization Industry 4.0-Impact on Intelligent Logistics and Manufacturing: IntechOpen.

指導教授

呂俊德(Jun-Der Leu)

審核日期

2020-7-22

推文