博碩士論文 107421004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:6 、訪客IP:18.227.161.226
姓名 林宜妙(I-Miao Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 虛擬與真實世界的人際資本
(Social capital in the virtual and real world)
相關論文
★ 工作滿足、領導行為、工作特性與人格特質對離職傾向之探討-以超大型會計師事務所審計人員為例★ 以組織診斷模型診斷企業組織層級架構-以某公司為例
★ 科技產業組織診斷與分析之研究-以Q公司為例★ 製造業推行六標準差的成功關鍵因素探討
★ 高職辦理輪調式建教班對學校經營績效之評估-以北區私立高職為例★ 本國商業銀行經營績效之探討-資料包絡分析法之應用
★ 台灣中小企業 創業動機與創業績效關係之研究★ 員工當責與真誠領導之關聯性-以心理賦權與團隊凝聚力為中介變數
★ 以個人與環境適配為關鍵中介探討特定品牌領導對員工品牌權益之影響★ 道德感讓你買更多綠色產品?從消費者產品知覺價格及品質角度來探討—以綠色程度做調節
★ 線上品牌社群該如何提升與粉絲的價值共創?以線上品牌社群活動與線下實體活動為中介變數探討★ 農業創新服務模式之商業模式研究-以蜂巢數據科技有限公司為例
★ 燈⽕闌珊處的求職旅程:如何透 過⼯作價值觀、雇主吸引⼒、激 勵因⼦為求職者點亮路徑★ 購買意願的幕後功臣:Instagram大小網紅的 自我揭露對消費者自我一致性與感知真實的影響
★ 中小企業之組織診斷與分析-以A公司為例★ 高科技產業人力資源發展與組織績效之研究-以新竹科學園區為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 本研究試圖回答:「在社群媒體和現實生活中,不同的依附方式會對社會資本有何影響,代理與互惠又會如何調節依附對社會資本的影響?」本研究根據依附理論探討安全依附、焦慮依附、排除依附與逃避依附是否會影響線上與線下的結合型社會資本及橋接型社會資本,並檢測代理與互惠是否對依附與社會資本間的關係具有調節效果。
本研究經由網路問卷發放的方式蒐集資料,研究對象為年滿18歲的社群媒體(Facebook、Line)使用者。問卷總計發放301份,有效問卷266份,問卷有效回收率達88%,問卷回收後透過統計軟體SPSS 20與 Amos 18執行資料分析,並利用路徑分析(Path Analysis)探討本研究之路徑因果關係,研究發現依據依附類型區分,說明如下:第一、安全依附對線下結合型社會資本與橋接型社會資本皆為負向影響;對線上結合型社會資本為正向影響;對線上橋接型社會資本則沒有影響。代理對安全依附與線上、線下結合型社會資本、線上橋接型社會資本間的關係皆為負向影響;與線下橋接型社會資本間的關係為正向影響。互惠對安全依附與線上和線下結合型社會資本、線上橋接型社會資本間的關係皆為負向影響;與線下橋接型社會資本間的關係則沒有影響。第二、焦慮依附對線下、線上橋接型社會與線下結合型社會資本皆為負向影響;對線上結合型社會資本則沒有影響。代理對焦慮依附與線上、線下的結合型社會資本、橋接型社會資本間的關係皆沒有任何影響。互惠對焦慮依附與線下結合型社會資本、橋接型社會資本間的關係皆為負向影響;其他則沒有影響。第三、排除依附對線上結合型社會資本為正向影響;其餘則沒有影響。代理對排除依附與線下結合型社會資本、橋接型社會資本間的關係為負向影響;與線上結合型社會資本、橋接型社會資本間的關係則沒有影響。互惠則對排除依附與線上、線下的結合型社會資本、橋接型社會資本間的關係皆沒有任何影響。第四、逃避依附對線上結合型社會資本為負向影響;其餘皆沒有影響。代理對逃避依附與線上、線下的結合型社會資本、橋接型社會資本間的關係皆沒有影響。互惠對逃避依附與線上結合型社會資本間的關係皆為正向影響;其他則沒有影響。依據本研究結果,將能作為用戶往後在社群媒體上尋求資源和社會支持時的參考依據。
摘要(英) This study attempts to investigate the impact of different attachment styles upon social capital on social media and in real life, and, how agency and communal can moderate the influence of different attachment styles upon social capital. Based on attachment theory, this research explored whether security attachment, preoccupied attachment, dismissing attachment and fearful attachment will affect the online/offline bonding social capital and bridging social capital, and investigated whether agency and communal have a moderating effect on the relationship between attachment and social capital.
In this study, data were collected through online questionnaires. The research target was social media (Facebook, Line) users, who were at least 18 years old. A total of 301 questionnaires were distributed, 266 valid questionnaires, and the effective recovery rate of the questionnaires reached 88%. After the questionnaires were recovered, data analysis was performed through statistical software SPSS 20 and Amos 18, and path analysis was used to explore the path causality of this study. The study found that it is distinguished according to the type of attachment, as explained below: First, security attachment has a negative impact on offline bonding and bridging social capital; it has a positive impact on online combined social capital; it has no effect on online bridging social capital. Agency has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between secure attachment and online/offline bonding social capital and online bridging social capital; the relationship with the offline bridged social capital is positive. Communal has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between secure attachment and online/offline bonding social capital and online bridging social capital; the relationship with offline bridging social capital has no effect. Second, preoccupied attachment has a negative impact on online/offline bridging social capital and offline bonding social capital; it has no effect on online combined social capital. Agency has no effect on the relationship between preoccupied attachment and online/offline bonding social capital and bridging social capital. Communal has a negative impact on the relationship between preoccupied attachment and offline bonding and bridging social capital, and others have no effect. Third, dismissing attachment has a positive effect on online bonding social capital; the rest has no effect. Agency has a negative impact on the relationship between dismissing attachment and offline bonding and bridging social capital; the relationship with online bonding and bridging social capital has no effect. Communal has no effect on the relationship between the dismissing attachment and online/offline bonding and bridging social capital. Fourth, fearful attachment has a negative impact on online bonding social capital; the rest has no effect. Agency has no effect on the relationship between fearful attachment and online/offline bonding and bridging social capital. Communal has a positive effect on the relationship between fearful attachment and online bonding social capital; the rest has no effect.
According to these findings, the result of this research will provide a future reference for users to seek resources and social support on social media.
關鍵字(中) ★ 依附理論
★ 結合型社會資本
★ 橋接型社會資本
★ 代理
★ 互惠
★ 社群媒體
關鍵字(英) ★ Attachment Theory
★ Bonding Social Capital
★ Bridging Social Capital
★ Agency
★ Communion
★ Social Networking Service(SNS)
論文目次 一、緒論 1
1-1研究背景與目的 1
1-2研究價值與預期貢獻 4
二、文獻探討 5
2-1依附理論(Attachment theory) 5
2-2社會資本(Social Capital) 8
2-3代理(Agency)與互惠(Communion) 10
2-4依附理論與線上、線下社會資本的關係 12
2-4-1安全依附與線上、線下社會資本的關係 12
2-4-2代理、互惠對安全依附與社會資本的調節作用 14
2-4-3焦慮依附與線上、線下社會資本的關係 16
2-4-4代理與互惠對焦慮依附與社會資本的調節作用 18
2-4-5排除依附與線上、線下社會資本的關係 19
2-4-6代理與互惠對排除依附與社會資的調節作用 21
2-4-7逃避依附與線上、線下社會資本的關係 22
2-4-8代理與互惠對逃避依附與社會資本的調節作用 24
三、研究方法 26
3-1研究對象與樣本發放 26
3-2問卷設計 27
3-3變數衡量方式 28
3-3-1成人依附 28
3-3-2社會資本 29
3-3-3代理與互惠 33
3-4控制變項 35
3-5分析方法 35
3-5-1敘述性統計分析與相關分析 35
3-5-2因素分析 36
3-5-3信度分析 36
3-5-4效度分析 36
3-5-5路徑分析 37
四、資料分析與研究結果 38
4-1敘述性統計分析 38
4-2信度分析 41
4-3建構效度分析 41
4-3-1收斂效度 41
4-3-2區別效度與相關分析 44
4-4路徑分析 46
4-4-1安全依附路徑分析 46
4-4-2焦慮依附路徑分析 54
4-4-3排除依附路徑分析 59
五、結論與建議 68
5-1研究發現與結論 68
5-1-1安全依附 68
5-1-3排除依附 78
5-1-4逃避依附 82
5-2實務管理意涵 86
5-3研究限制與後續研究建議 87
參考文獻 89
附錄、研究問卷 107
參考文獻 Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(4), 768.
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(5), 751.
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006, June). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In International workshop on privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 36-58). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Adler, P. S. and S. W. Kwon (2002). ‘ Social capital: prospects for a new concept’, Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), pp. 17– 40.
Ahn, J. (2012). Teenagers’ experiences with social network sites: Relationships to bridging and bonding social capital. The Information Society, 28(2), 99-109.
Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American psychologist, 44(4), 709.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). " On the Internet no one knows I′m an introvert": Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 5(2), 125-128.
Andalibi, N., Ozturk, P., & Forte, A. (2017, February). Sensitive Self-disclosures, Responses, and Social Support on Instagram: the case of# depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 1485-1500).
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 16(5), 427-454.
Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In The social psychology of female–male relations (pp. 69-119). Academic Press.
Baek, Y. M., Cho, Y., & Kim, H. (2014). Attachment style and its influence on the activities, motives, and consequences of SNS use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 522-541.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Beacon Press (MA).
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal relationships, 7(2), 147-178.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(2), 226.
Bartholomew, K., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Methods of assessing adult attachment. Attachment theory and close relationships, 1998, 25-45.
Bartz, J. A., & Lydon, J. E. (2004). Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1389-1401.
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?. Psychological science in the public interest, 4(1), 1-44.
Baym, G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Paradigm Pub.
Blackwell, D., Leaman, C., Tramposch, R., Osborne, C., & Liss, M. (2017). Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 69-72.
Blasberg, S. A., Rogers, K. H., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): Measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(5), 523-531.
Boase, J., Horrigan, J., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss v. 3 (Vol. 1). Random House. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D.(2009). Methods and measures: The network of relationships inventory: Behavioral systems version. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 470-478.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, vol. II: Separation. Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Separation: Anxiety and anger (Vol. 2). Vintage.
Bowlby, J. (2008). Attachment. Basic books.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Bretherton, I., Ridgeway, D., & Cassidy, J. (1990). Assessing internal working models of the attachment relationship. Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention, 273, 308.
Buote, V. M., Wood, E., & Pratt, M. (2009). Exploring similarities and differences between online and offline friendships: The role of attachment style. Computers in human Behavior, 25(2), 560-567.
Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2014, April). Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4187-4196).
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(3), 510.
Carvallo, M., & Gabriel, S. (2006). No man is an island: The need to belong and dismissive avoidant attachment style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 697−709.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(2), 267.
Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of a child′s ties. U: J. Cassidy i PR Shaver (Ur.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (str. 3-20).
Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.
Chung, C. J., Nam, Y., & Stefanone, M. A. (2012). Exploring online news credibility: The relative influence of traditional and technological factors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(2), 171-186.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, (94) Supplement, 95–120.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(4), 644.
Collins, N. L., Guichard, A. C., Ford, M. B., & Feeney, B. C. (2006). Responding to need in intimate relationships: Normative processes and individual differences. In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of Romantic Love: Attachment, Caregiving, and Sex (pp. 149–189). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
DeWall, C. N., Lambert, N. M., Slotter, E. B., Pond Jr, R. S., Deckman, T., Finkel, E. J., ... & Fincham, F. D. (2011). So far away from one′s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1302.
Dewitte, M., & De Houwer, J. (2008). Adult attachment and attention to positive and negative emotional face expressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 498–505.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(6), 1246.
Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. bt technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
Duggan, M., & Brenner, J. (2015). The demographics of social media users.
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 781-797.
Elgar, F. J., Davis, C. G., Wohl, M. J., Trites, S. J., Zelenski, J. M., & Martin, M. S. (2011). Social capital, health and life satisfaction in 50 countries. Health & place, 17(5), 1044-1053.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855-870.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 11(2), 415-441.
Feeney, B. C., Cassidy, J., & Ramos-Marcuse, F. (2008). The generalization of attachment representations to new social situations: predicting behavior during initial interactions with strangers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(6), 1481.
Feeney, J. A. (2008) Adult romantic attachment: developments in the study of couple relationships. In Cassidy, J., Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford Press. Pp. 456–481.
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Bucholtz, I. (1995). Effects of adult attachment style on the perception and search for social support. The Journal of Psychology, 129(6), 665-676.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research.
Fox, J., Warber, K. M., & Makstaller, D. C. (2013). The role of Facebook in romantic relationship development: An exploration of Knapp’s relational stage model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(6), 771-794.
Gattiker, U. E., Perlusz, S., & Bohmann, K. (2000). Using the Internet for B2B activities: a review and future directions for research. Internet Research.
Gillath, O., Karantzas, G. C., & Selcuk, E. (2017). A net of friends: investigating friendship by integrating attachment theory and social network analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(11), 1546-1565.
Grabill, C. M., & Kerns, K. A. (2000). Attachment style and intimacy in friendship. Personal relationships, 7(4), 363-378.
Graham, S. M., Huang, J. Y., Clark, M. S., & Helgeson, V. S. (2008). The positives of negative emotions: Willingness to express negative emotions promotes relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3), 394-406.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak ties” American journal of Sociology 78: 13 60-1380. Examines the role of ties within a group and their effect on performance.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological theory, 201-233.
Grayson, P. A., & Schwartz, V. (2000). Commentary on “Contrasting Case Studies of Frequent Internet Use:” Is It Pathological or Adaptive?”. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 14(4), 19-22.
Greenwood, D. N., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Long, C. R. (2008). Young women′s attachment style and interpersonal engagement with female TV stars. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(3), 387-407.
Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633– 649.
Guisinger, S. Blatt, S.J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialectic.. American Psychologist, 49, 2 104– 111 1994-25035-001
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hampton, K. N. (2011). Comparing bonding and bridging ties for democratic engagement: Everyday use of communication technologies within social networks for civic and civil behaviors. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 510-528.
Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277-311.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The information society, 18(5), 385-401.
Hazan, C. 8: Shaver, PR (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(51), 1-524.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological inquiry, 5(1), 1-22.
Heckman, J. J., LaLonde, R. J., & Smith, J. A. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1865-2097). Elsevier.
Heiman, T. (2000). Friendship quality among children in three educational settings. Journal of Intellectual and developmental Disability, 25(1), 1-12.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 412.
Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of personality, 68(6), 1031-1057.
Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., and Campos, D. (2006). Congruence between social values and implicit motives: effects on life satisfaction across three cultures. Eur. J. Pers. 20, 305–324. doi: 10.1002/per.590
Hofer, M., & Aubert, V. (2013). Perceived bridging and bonding social capital on Twitter: Differentiating between followers and followees. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2134-2142.
Horton, R. S., Reid, C. A., Barber, J. M., Miracle, J., & Green, J. D. (2014). An experimental investigation of the influence of agentic and communal Facebook use on grandiose narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 93-98.
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Carr, C. L. (2002). Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 145-166.
Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & education, 58(1), 162-171.
Kafetsios, K., & Nezlek, J. B. (2002). Attachment styles in everyday social interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(5), 719-735.
Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Zin, T. T., & Reese, D. D. (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), JCMC10417.
Kemp, S. (2020). Digital in 2020: global digital overview. We are Social, Hootsuite, jan.
Kenny, M. E., & Rice, K. G. (1995). Attachment to parents and adjustment in late adolescent college students: Current status, applications, and future considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 23(3), 433-456.
Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological review, 90(3), 185.
Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. I., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Community & Society, 9(5), 582-611.
Krames, L., England, R., & Flett, G. L. (1988). The role of masculinity and femininity in depression and social satisfaction in elderly females. Sex Roles, 19(11-12), 713-721.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 49-74.
Küfner, A. C., Back, M. D., Nestler, S., & Egloff, B. (2010). Tell me a story and I will tell you who you are! Lens model analyses of personality and creative writing. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 427-435.
Lee, D. Y. (2013). The role of attachment style in building social capital from a social networking site: The interplay of anxiety and avoidance. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1499-1509.
Lemerise, E. A., & Arsenio, W. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child development, 71(1), 107-118.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Hitlin, P., Lenhart, A. E., & Madden, M. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation.
Leonard, R. (1997). Theorizing the relationship between agency and communion. Theory & Psychology, 7(6), 823-835.
Leonard, R., & Onyx, J. (2003). Networking through loose and strong ties: An Australian qualitative study. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(2), 189-203.
Li, X., Chen, W., & Popiel, P. (2015). What happens on Facebook stays on Facebook? The implications of Facebook interaction for perceived, receiving, and giving social support. Computers in human behavior, 51, 106-113.
Lin, J. H. (2015). The role of attachment style in Facebook use and social capital: Evidence from university students and a national sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 173-180.
Lin, J. H. (2016). Need for relatedness: A self-determination approach to examining attachment styles, Facebook use, and psychological well-being. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(2), 153-173.
Lin, J. H., Peng, W., Kim, M., Kim, S. Y., & LaRose, R. (2012). Social networking and adjustments among international students. New media & society, 14(3), 421-440.Gil de Gil de
Liu, D., & Yang, C. C. (2016). Media niche of electronic communication channels in friendship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 451-466.
Liu, H., Shi, J., Liu, Y., & Sheng, Z. (2013). The moderating role of attachment anxiety on social network site use intensity and social capital. Psychological Reports, 112(1), 252-265.
Lukaszewski, A. W. (2013). Testing an adaptationist theory of trait covariation: Relative bargaining power as a common calibrator of an interpersonal syndrome. European Journal of Personality, 27(4), 328-345.
Lussier, Y., Sabourin, S., & Turgeon, C. (1997). Coping strategies as moderators of the relationship between attachment and marital adjustment. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 14, 777–791.
Ma, W. W., & Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 51-58.
MacDonald, G., & Borsook, T. K. (2010). Attachment avoidance and feelings of connection in social interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1122-1125.
Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1591.
McAdams, D. (2000). Collusive-Seeming Equilibria′in the Uniform-Price Auction.
Mcandrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2359-2365.
McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and social psychology review, 4(1), 57-75.
Mesch, G., & Talmud, I. (2006). The quality of online and offline relationships: The role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. The information society, 22(3), 137-148.
Meyer, B., Olivier, L., & Roth, D. A. (2005). Please don’t leave me! BIS/BAS, attachment styles, and responses to a relationship threat. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 151-162.
Mikulincer, M., & Selinger, M. (2001). The interplay between attachment and affiliation systems in adolescents′ same-sex friendships: The role of attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(1), 81-106.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(4), 753.
Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?. Personality and individual differences, 52(3), 243-249.
Niiya, Y. (2016). Does a favor request increase liking toward the requester?. The Journal of social psychology, 156(2), 211-221.
Nitzburg, G. C., & Farber, B. A. (2013). Putting up emotional (Facebook) walls? Attachment status and emerging adults’ experiences of social networking sites. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(11), 1183-1190.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory (3 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hil.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory: 2d Ed. McGraw-Hill.
Odacı, H., & Çıkrıkçı, Ö. (2014). Problematic internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 61-66.
Oldmeadow, J. A., Quinn, S., & Kowert, R. (2013). Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1142-1149.
Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The journal of applied behavioral science, 36(1), 23-42.
Orchard, L. J., Fullwood, C., Galbraith, N., & Morris, N. (2014). Individual differences as predictors of social networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 388-402.
Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G. (2008). Attachment and attraction toward romantic partners versus relevant alternatives within daily interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1126-1137.
Papacharissi, Z., & Mendelson, A. (2010). 12 Toward a new (er) sociability: uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. Media perspectives for the 21st century, 212.
Park, N., & Yang, A. (2012). Online environmental community members′ intention to participate in environmental activities: An application of the theory of planned behavior in the Chinese context. Computers in Human Behavior, 28( 4), 1298– 1306.
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being: A closer look at hope and modesty.
Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 1(4), JCMC144.
Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students′ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 30(3), 227-238.
Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2006). Demographics of Internet users http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/User_Demo_4.26.06.htm (Accessed: 10 April 2008).
Pfeil, U., Arjan, R., & Zaphiris, P. (2009). Age differences in online social networking–A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 643-654.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115-122.
Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2003). Interpersonal theory of personality. Handbook of psychology, 209-229.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and economic growth. American Prospect, 4(13), 35-42.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics (pp. 223-234). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Quayle, M., Lindegger, G., Brittain, K., Nabee, N., & Cole, C. (2018). Women’s ideals for masculinity across social contexts: Patriarchal agentic masculinity is valued in work, family, and romance but communal masculinity in friendship. Sex roles, 78(1-2), 52-66.
Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Mis Quarterly, 841-864.
Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. HCI in the New Millennium, 77, 247-272.
Rom, E., & Mikulincer, M. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(6), 1220.
Roos, P. E., & Cohen, L. H. (1987). Sex roles and social support as moderators of life stress adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 576.
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Magee, J. C. (2018). The agentic–communal model of advantage and disadvantage: How inequality produces similarities in the psychology of power, social class, gender, and race. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 58, pp. 71-125). Academic Press.
Saferstein, J. A., Neimeyer, G. J., & Hagans, C. L. (2005). Attachment as a predictor of friendship qualities in college youth. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 33(8), 767-776.
Sajuria, J., vanHeerde-Hudson, J., Hudson, D., Dasandi, N., & Theocharis, Y. (2015). Tweeting alone? An analysis of bridging and bonding social capital in online networks. American Politics Research, 43(4), 708-738.
Salmivalli, C., Ojanen, T., Haanpää, J., & Peets, K. (2005). " I′m OK but you′re not" and other peer-relational schemas: explaining individual differences in children′s social goals. Developmental psychology, 41(2), 363.
Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media. Management decision, 50(2), 253-272.
Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276-288.
Shaver, P. R., & Cassidy, J. (2008). Handbook of attachment. Theory, research and clinical applications, 317-332.
Sheldon, K. M., & Cooper, M. L. (2008). Goal striving within agentic and communal roles: Separate but functionally similar pathways to enhanced well‐being. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 415-448.
Shepherd, R. M., & Edelmann, R. J. (2005). Reasons for internet use and social anxiety. Personality and individual Differences, 39(5), 949-958.
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(5), 971.
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. E. (1998). Attachment theory and close relationships. Guilford Press.
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(5), 899.
Sin, L. Y., Cheung, G. W., & Lee, R. (1999). Methodology in cross-cultural consumer research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(4), 75-96.
Skoric, M. M., & Kwan, G. C. E. (2011). Platforms for mediated sociability and online social capital: the role of Facebook and massively multiplayer online games. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(5), 467-484.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445.
Stopfer, J. M., Egloff, B., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 592-598.
Stritzke, W. G., Nguyen, A., & Durkin, K. (2004). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6(1), 1-22.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(3), 321-326.
Tellhed, U., Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2018). The role of ability beliefs and agentic vs. communal career goals in adolescents′ first educational choice. What explains the degree of gender-balance?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 1-13.
Trepte, S., Reinecke, L., & Juechems, K. (2012). The social side of gaming: How playing online computer games creates online and offline social support. Computers in Human behavior, 28(3), 832-839.
Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one′s profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 314-335.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students′ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(4), 875-901.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents′ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584-590.
Van Buren, A., & Cooley, E. L. (2002). Attachment styles, view of self and negative affect.
Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2011, January). The ties that bond: Re-examining the relationship between Facebook use and bonding social capital. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital. Journal of business research, 60(7), 698-710.
Webb, L. D., Brigman, G. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Linking school counselors and student success: A replication of the Student Success Skills approach targeting the academic and social competence of students. Professional School Counseling, 407-413.
Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American behavioral scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior.
Williams, D. (2006). On and off the’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 11(2), 593-628.
Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self‐esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 617-627.
Xie, B. (2007). Using the Internet for offline relationship formation. Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 396-404.
Xie, B. (2008). The mutual shaping of online and offline social relationships. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 13(3).
Yaakobi, E., & Goldenberg, J. (2014). Social relationships and information dissemination in virtual social network systems: An attachment theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 127-135.
Yang, S., Liu, Y., & Wei, J. (2016). Social capital on mobile SNS addiction. Internet Research.
Ye, J. (2007). Attachment style differences in online relationship involvement: An examination of interaction characteristics and relationship satisfaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 605-607.
Yuan, Y. C., Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2006). Focused activities and the development of social capital in a distributed learning “community”. The Information Society, 22(1), 25-39.
Zhong, Z. J. (2011). The effects of collective MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games) play on gamers’ online and offline social capital. Computers in human behavior, 27(6), 2352-2363.
Zhong, Z. J. (2014). Civic engagement among educated Chinese youth: The role of SNS (Social Networking Services), bonding and bridging social capital. Computers & Education, 75, 263-273.
Zuroff, D. C., Moskowitz, D. S., & Côté, S. (1999). Dependency, self‐criticism, interpersonal behaviour and affect: Evolutionary perspectives. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 231-250.
2019台灣網路報告。(2019)取自:台灣網路資訊中心:https://report.twnic.tw/2019/
指導教授 李憶萱 審核日期 2020-8-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明