伯利茲河流域中游森林恢復項目的成本效益分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：91

、訪客IP：3.145.9.34

姓名

葛雷恩(Leon Verne Garbutt) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

國際永續發展碩士在職專班

論文名稱

伯利茲河流域中游森林恢復項目的成本效益分析
(Cost-Benefit Analysis of a forest restoration project in the Middle Reaches of the Belize River Watershed)

相關論文

★ 水資源供需指標建立之研究	★ 救旱措施對水資源供需之影響分析
★ 台灣地區颱風雨降雨型態之分析研究	★ 滯洪池系統最佳化之研究
★ 運用遺傳演算優化串聯水庫系統聯合運轉規線之研究	★ 河川魚類棲地分佈之推估與分析研究－以卑南溪新武呂河段為例－
★ 整合型區域水庫與攔河堰聯合運轉系統模擬解析及優化之研究	★ 河川低水流量分流演算推估魚類棲地之研究-以烏溪上游為例
★ 大漢溪中游生態基流量推估與棲地改善之研究	★ 遺傳演算法運用在石門與翡翠水庫並聯系統操作規線之研究
★ 石門水庫水質模擬與水理探討	★ 越域引水水庫聯合操作規線與打折供水最佳化之應用－以寶山與寶山第二水庫為例
★ 防洪疏散門最佳啟閉時間之研究－以基隆河臺北市河段為例－	★ 配水管網破管與供水穩定性關係之研究
★ 石門水庫永續指標之建立與研究	★ 台灣地區重要水庫集水區永續指標建立與評量

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

森林生態系統對世界許多人的經濟和生計至關重要。然而，森林的可持續服務功能受到與人類有關的土地利用影響的極大威脅。因此，正確管理，養護，保護和恢復這些生態系統，以從其提供的環境商品和服務（EGS）中獲得最大收益非常重要。這項研究的重點是成本效益分析（CBA），用於評估和估算伯利茲河分水嶺（BRW）中游地區的森林恢復項目的收益和成本，該流域可支持近50％的伯利茲人口。 CBA被用作決策工具，以確定在研究區域內實施為期十年（2019-2028年）的森林恢復項目的可行性。選擇該研究區域的原因是，由於農業和城市發展的不可持續性，該地區是流域中受負面影響最大的區域，因此迫切需要保護和恢復。在進行的CBA中，自然資源評估（NRV）方法被用作輸入數據，以評估研究區森林恢復所提供服務的收益。具體來說，在 “現狀/照常營業（BAU）” 方案中，使用市場定價的市場估值和收益轉移方法評估成本和收益，而恢復率分別為25％和40％。估計，比較每個方案的淨現值（NPV）和效益成本比（BCR）（CBA的輸出值），並將其用作確定項目可行性的決策標準，並選擇最合適的方案實施。
研究結果表明，如現狀/ BAU情景所示，如果在研究區域中未進行任何干預或實施任何項目，則沒有任何好處，此外，還會給社會帶來環境和社會成本。實施恢復項目的成本評估表明，在25％的恢復情況下，NPV估計為$ 2,008,206-$ 3,013,346。從$ 2,916,512美元到$ 4,169,017美元，在10年的時間範圍內進行40％的恢復。在實施25％的恢復方案時，項目實施帶來的淨現值收益估計在16,188,538美元-24,556,845美元之間；從$ 24,338,955美元到$ 38,759,050美元，在相同的10年時間範圍內恢復40％。從CBA的淨現值（NPV）以7％的折扣率得出的結果表明，在Status-Quo / BAU方案中，實施森林恢復項目所獲得的收益/經濟價值大大超過了未實施該項目的情況。在25％的恢復方案中，BCR估計為8.96，在40％的恢復方案中，BCR為9.52。結論是，CBA進行了評估成本和收益的綜合方法，以使人們對研究區域的森林現狀有所了解，並協助伯利茲做出保護和恢復這一受威脅生態系統的決策，並提供服務。分析結果還提供了關於森林的經濟貢獻及其在伯利茲可持續發展中的重要性的見識。伯利茲河流域中游地區的森林恢復計劃應予以實施，因為其收益超過了進行的CBA的成本。

摘要(英)

Forest ecosystems are vital to the economies and livelihoods of many people around the world. The sustainable service functionalities of forests, however, are greatly threatened by human-related land-use impacts. It is, therefore, very important to properly manage, conserve, protect, and restore these ecosystems to achieve the maximum benefits from the environmental goods and services (EGS) they provide. This research focused on a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) assessing and estimating the benefits and costs of a forest restoration project in the Middle Reaches’ of the Belize River Watershed (BRW), a watershed that supports close to 50% of Belize’s population. The CBA was used as the decision-making tool to determine the feasibility for the implementation of the 10-year (2019-2028) forest restoration project in the study area. The area under study was selected because it is the most negatively impacted region in the watershed, as a result of impacts from unsustainable agricultural and urban development, and thus is in urgent need of protection and restoration. Natural Resource Valuation (NRV) methods were utilized as input data in the CBA conducted, in estimating benefits through the services provided by restoring forests in the study area. Market priced market valuation and Benefit Transfer methods, specifically, were used in the evaluation of costs and benefits in a ‘Status-Quo/ Business as Usual (BAU)’ scenario against a 25% and a 40% restoration scenario. The Net Present Value (NPV) and the Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR), (output values of CBA) of each scenario were estimated, compared, and used as decision-making criteria to determine the project’s feasibility, and selection of the most appropriate option for implementation.
The findings of the research gathered that there are no benefits if there is no intervention done or project implemented in the study area, as presented in a Status Quo/BAU scenario, however, there is an environmental and social cost to society. Cost assessments with the implementation of restoration project showed that NPV were estimated to range from $2,008,206 - $3,013,346 US in 25% restoration scenario; and from $2,916,512 - $4,169,017 US in 40% restoration scenario over 10-year time horizon. The NPV benefits estimated from the implementation of projects were estimated to range from $16,188,538 US - $24,556,845 US in 25% restoration scenario; and from $24,338,955 US - $38,759,050 US in 40% restoration scenario over same 10-year time horizon. The results gathered from the NPV of CBA conducted at a 7% discount rate showed that the benefits/economic value gained from the implementation of forest restoration projects greatly outweigh that without the project’s implementation in a Status-Quo/BAU scenario. BCR was estimated to be 8.96 in a 25% restoration scenario and 9.52 in a 40% restoration scenario. It is concluded that the CBA conducted provided an integrated approach of assessing costs and benefits in bringing awareness to the current status of forests in the study area, and assisting in decision making in Belize in protecting and restoring this threatened ecosystem, and services provided. The results of the analysis also provided insight into the economic contribution of forests, and their importance in the sustainable development of Belize. A forest restoration program in the Middle Reaches of the Belize River watershed should be implemented because the benefits outweigh the costs in the CBA conducted.

關鍵字(中)

★ 成本效益分析
★ 伯利茲河流域
★ 自然資源評估

關鍵字(英)

★ Cost-Benefit Analysis
★ Belize River Watershed
★ Natural Resource Valuation

論文目次

中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………..i
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………...ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………………. iii
LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………...iv
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………v
ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………………vii
SYMBOLS…………………………………………………………………………….ix
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….1
1.1 Background………………………………………………………………………….1
1.2 Thesis Organization…………………………………………………………………3
1.3 Study Motivation & Relevance……………………………………………………….4
1.4 Research Purpose, Scope and Objectives…………………………………………...6
1.4.1 Study Purpose…………………………………………………………….6
1.4.2 Scope of Research………………………………………………………...7
1.4.3 General Objective…………………………………………………………7
1.4.4 Specific Objectives……………………………………………………….8
1.5 Limitations………………………………………………………………………….8
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………….10
2.1 Watersheds………………………………………………………………………….10
2.1.1 Watershed and its importance for Belize………………………………….11
2.2 Forest Ecosystems in Watersheds…………………………………………………...12
2.2.1 Defining forest…………………………………………………………….12
2.2.2 Importance of forests………………………………………………………12
2.2.3 Forests in Belize Watersheds………………………………………………15
2.2.4 Threats to forest ecosystems in watersheds……………………………….17
2.3 Forest Landscape Restoration……………...………………………………………18
2.4 Cost Benefit Analysis……………………………………………………………….20
2.4.1 Uses and importance of CBA……………………………………………21
2.4.2 Main components of CBA……………………………………………….22
2.4.3 Overview of CBA in FLR projects………………………………………23
2.5 Natural Resource Valuation Methods……………………………………………….25
2.5.1 Total Economic Valuation…………………………………………………25
2.5.2 Market, Non- Market & Benefit Transfer Methods……………………….27
2.5.3 Natural Resource Valuation in Belize…………………………………….28
2.5.4 Priority ecosystem services in Belize……………………………………...29
CHAPTER 3: STUDY AREA………………………………………………………….32
3.1 Overview of Study Area…………………………………………………………….32
3.1.1 General Background of the country of Belize…………………………….32
3.1.2 Belize River Watershed………………………………………………….35
3.2 Middle Reaches of the Belize River Watershed…………………………………….37
3.2.1. Main Threats in the Study Area………………………………………….42
3.2.2 Visual Depictions of Conditions in the Study Area……………………….45
CHAPTER 4: METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………….49
4.1 Steps of Cost-Benefit Analysis……………………….………………………………51

4.2 Step 1: Desired Policy/ Project Outcome………….…………………………………51
4.3 Step 2: Impact Assessment…………………………………………………………..51
4.3.1 Defining degraded land area to be restored…………………….………….52
4.3.2 Activities to restore degraded land & Defining Stakeholders………………56 4.4 Step 3: Valuation…………….……………………………………………………….56
4.4.1 Valuation of Benefits in Restoration scenarios…………………………….56
4.4.1.1 Forest ecosystem service benefits………………………………..56
4.4.1.2 NRV Method…………………………………………………….58
4.4.1.3 Valuation of benefits using Market Price Method……………….59
4.4.1.4 Valuation of benefits using BT Method………………………….62
4.4.2 Valuation of benefits in Status-Quo/BAU scenario………………………..67
4.4.3 Valuation of costs in restoration…………………………………………...67
4.4.4 Valuation of costs in Status-Quo/BAU scenario…………………………..69
4.5 Step 4: Calculation Methodology……………………………………………………70
4.5.1 Net Benefits……………………………………………………..................70
4.5.2 Discounting………………………………………………………………...70
4.5.3 Net Present Value………………………………………………………….72
4.5.4 Benefit-Cost Ratio…………………………………………………………72
4.5.5 Sensitivity Analysis………………………………………………………..73
CHAPTER 5: RESULTS & DISCUSSION………………………………………….74
5.1 Modeling Future Land use within Study Area………….……………………………74
5.1.1 Historical Data…………………………………………………………...74
5.1.2 Status Quo/Business as Usual (BAU) Scenario………………………….80
5.1.3 25% restoration scenario…………………………………………………80
5.1.4 40% restoration scenario………………………………………………....81
5.2 Estimating Costs……………………………………………………………………..83
5.2.1 Status- Quo/ BAU scenario……………………………………………….83
5.2.2 Restoration scenarios (25% & 40%)……………………………………….86
5.3 Estimating ecosystem services (Benefits) in restoration scenarios…….……………89
5.4 Decision making criteria: Net Present Value & Benefit-Cost Ratio…………………93
5.5 Sensitivity Analysis………………………………………………………………….94
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS………………………...96
6.1 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………...96
6.2 Recommendation…………………………………………………………………….96
BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………98
APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………106
Appendix I……………………………………………………………………...106
Appendix II…………………………………………………………………….111
Appendix III……………………………………………………………………118

參考文獻

Bailey, M., Meerman, J., Vasquez, M., & Parish, A. (2007). Rapid Assessment of Anthropogenic Impacts on Select Transboundary Watersheds of the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef Systems (MBRS) Region. Mesoamerican Barrier Reef Systems (MBRS) Project, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Tufts University. http://www.mbrs.doe.gov.bz/dbdocs/tech/watersheds.pdf
Baldwin-Cantello, W. (2020). Forests | WWF. https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/
Barbera, M. G. (2010). Benefit Transfer Approaches.
Belize | Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. (2020). https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/country/belize
Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2019a). Trade & Investment Zone. Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Country Profile: Geography. https://www.belize.org/trade-investment-zone/
Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2019b). Trade & Investment Zone. Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Country Profile: Population. https://www.belize.org/trade-investment-zone/
Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2020a). Sectors. Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Sector. https://www.belize.org/trade-investment-zone/sectors/
Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2020b, May 11). Okay! We’re economically vulnerable! Now What? Part 1. Belize Chamber of Commerce and Industry. https://www.belize.org/okay-were-economically-vulnerable-now-what-part-1/
Belize Tourism Board. (2018). The Belize Travel and Tourism Statistics Digest. https://belizetourismboard.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018-TT-Statistics-Digest_Final.pdf
Boles, E. (2014). Rapid Ecological Assessment Workbook: A system-approach to evaluating ecosystem health, ecological impacts, and success of intervention strategies.
Boles, E., Penados, F., Young, C., Phillips, L., Rios, N., Jolly, K., Requina, E., & Garcia-Saqui, J. (2010). Rapid Assessment of the Upper Belize River Valley.
Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans Gulf Region Oceans and Science. (2006). Ecological Restoration of Degraded Aquatic Habitats: A Watershed Approach. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Oceans and Science Branch, Gulf Region.
Carrias, A., Cano, A., Saqui, P., Ake, J., & Boles, E. (2018). Management Plan for the Belize River Watershed, Belize.
Chappelow, J. (2019). Is Economics Really a Dismal Science? Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economics.asp
Conservation Strategy Fund. (2014). Intro to Cost-Benefit Analysis | Conservation Strategy Fund. https://www.conservation-strategy.org/csf-economic-video/intro-cost-benefit-analysis
CSF. (2015, July 1). Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Classes of Values | Conservation Strategy Fund. https://www.conservation-strategy.org/csf-economic-video/classes-values
Department of Environmental Protection, Pennslyvania. (2020). Subwatershed. https://www.dep.pa.gov/Citizens/JustForKids/Water/Watershed/Pages/Subwatershed.aspx
FCPF. (2020). Belize | Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/country/belize
Field, B. C., & Field, M. K. (2017). Environmental Economics: An Introduction. Mc Graw Hill Education. https://www.academia.edu/40567200/Environmental_Economics_by_Bary_C._Field_and_Martha_k._Field
Forest Department. (2019). Belize Collect Earth/Open Foris Land Use and Land Use Change Assessment Protocol. Belmopan City: Government of Belize.
Forest Department. (2020). Belize Forest Reference Level (FRL), 2001—2015. Belmopan City: Governent of Belize. https://redd.unfccc.int/files/belize_frel_final__report__2001-2015__2020.01.13.pdf
Fransen, B. (2019, August 5). How to calculate CO2 sequestration. EcoMatcher. https://www.ecomatcher.com/how-to-calculate-co2-sequestration/
Garcia, R., Monsanto, M., Mattis, C., Rosado, S., & Martinez, H. (2018). Natural Resources Valuation Pilot Study Report on the mouth of the Belize River.
GEF, & GOB. (2011). Management and Protection of Key Biodiversity Areas in Belize. https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/project_documents/9-19-11%2520Belize%2520PIF_0.pdf
Goldberg, J. (2007). Economic Valuation of Watershed Systems: A Tool for Improved Water Resource Management. . . Ecological Applications, 15.
Gustafson, K. (2020). What is forest restoration and how do we do it well? World Wildlife Fund. https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-is-forest-restoration-and-how-do-we-do-it-well
Guzman, A., Palacios, E., Castano, F., & van Beukering, P. (2017). Natural Resources Valuation: Methodological Guide for Belize & Wider Caribbean—Google Search. https://www.google.com/search?q=Natural+Resources+Valuation%3A+Methodological+Guide+for+Belize+%26+Wider+Caribbean&oq=Natural+Resources+Valuation%3A+Methodological+Guide+for+Belize+%26+Wider+Caribbean&aqs=chrome..69i57.901j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Hailu, F. (2013). The Economic Value of Natural and Environmental Resource. https://www.grin.com/document/283864
Hammond, D., Busby, G., & Hartwell, R. (2011, June). (PDF) Economic Valuation of the Environmental Goods and Services of the Maya Mountain Massif and the Maya Mountain Marine Corridor (Terrestrial Area). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309733683_Economic_Valuation_of_the_Environmental_Goods_and_Services_of_the_Maya_Mountain_Massif_and_the_Maya_Mountain_Marine_Corridor_Terrestrial_Area
Hargreaves-Allen, V. (2010). The Economic Valuation of the Natural Resources of Andros | MARINE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PARTNERSHIP. http://map.marineecosystemservices.org/node/8388
Harrison, M. (2010). Valuing the Future: The social discount rate in cost-benefit analysis.
IUCN DC. (2011). Bonn Challenge | The Bonn Challenge is a global effort to restore 150 million hectares of the world’s deforested and degraded lands by 2020. https://www.bonnchallenge.org/
Karper, J., & Boles, E. (2004). Human Impact Mapping of the Mopan and Chiquibul Rivers within Guatemala and Belize. 18.
Karsenty, A., Blanco, C., & Dufour, T. (2003). Intruments Related to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and their potential for susttainable forest management in Africa: Forests and Climate Change. http://www.fao.org/3/ac836e/AC836E03.htm
Kerr, J., & Chung, K. (2002). Evaluating watershed management projects. Water Policy, 3(6), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00016-8
King, D. M., & Mazzotta, M. J. (2000). Ecosystem Valuation, Method 8: Benefit Transfer Method. https://ecosystemvaluation.org/benefit_transfer.htm
Koetse, M. J., Brouwer, R., & van Beukering, P. J. H. (2015). Economic valuation methods for ecosystem services. In J. A. Bouma & P. J. H. van Beukering (Eds.), Ecosystem Services: From Concept to Practice (pp. 108–131). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477612.009
Kotchen, M. (2010). Cost- Benefit Analysis (Matthew Kotchen, 2010) | UNDP Climate Change Adaptation. https://www.adaptation-undp.org/resources/document/cost-benefit-analysis-matthew-kotchen-2010
Nahman, A. (2011). Pricing landfill externalities: Emissions and disamenity costs in Cape Town, South Africa. Waste Management, 31(9), 2046–2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.015
NYDF. (2018). NYDF Global Platform – New York Declaration on Forests. https://www.nydfglobalplatform.org/
Paterson, R. W., & Boyle, K. J. (2005). Costs and Benefits of Riparian Forest Management: A Literature Review. 20.
Pearce, D. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments | Request PDF. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30522926_Cost-benefit_analysis_and_the_environment_Recent_developments
Postel, S. L., & Thompson, B. H. (2005). Watershed protection: Capturing the benefits of nature’s water supply services. Natural Resources Forum, 29(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00119.x
PPF Capital Belize Ltd. (2018). Biodiversity Financial Needs Assessment. Governement of Belize.
Price, F. (2020). Forests | WWF. https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/
SIB. (2020a). Population: Postcensal estimates by administrative area and sex, 2010 -2019. Statistical Institute of Belize. http://sib.org.bz/statistics/population/
SIB. (2020b, May 27). Gross Domestic Product. Statistical Institute of Belize, GDP : First Quarter 2020. http://sib.org.bz/statistics/gross-domestic-product/
Statistical Institute of Belize. (2019). Labour Force. Statistical Institute of Belize, Labour Force. http://sib.org.bz/statistics/labour-force/
Statistical Institute of Belize. (2020a). Belize’s top Country Markets Analysis | Statistical Institute of Belize. https://www.statisticsbelize.org.bz/437/
Statistical Institute of Belize. (2020b). COVID-19. Statistical Institute of Belize. http://sib.org.bz/covid-19/
Statistical Institute of Belize. (2020c). Statistical Institute of Belize | Belize Population Growth Rate. https://www.statisticsbelize.org.bz/
Tangatatai, T. (2014). Cost benefit analysis of riparian planting options for freshwater coastal streams in Horowhenua: Ngā utu kia piki te Mauri o ngā wai a Parawhenuamea. 146.
Tangatatai, T., Patterson, M. G., & Hardy, D. (2017). Cost benefit analysis of riparian planting options of Waiwiri stream, Horowhenua. Manaaki Taha Moana Research Report No. 15. Massey University, Palmerston North.
The World Bank Group. (2020). GNI per capita, PPP (current international $)—Belize, New Zealand, Netherlands, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.PP.CD?locations=BZ-NZ-NL-SX
The World Bank, T. W. (2019). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019 (No. 137513; pp. 1–97). The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/191801559846379845/State-and-Trends-of-Carbon-Pricing-2019
Ulibarri, C. A., & Wellman, K. F. (1997). Natural resource valuation: A primer on concepts and techniques (DOE/RL/01830--T62). Battelle Columbus Div. http://inis.iaea.org/Search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:29021978
United Nations. (2015). THE 17 GOALS | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
US Department of Commerce, N. O. and A. A. (2020). What is a Watershed? https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/watershed.html
van Beukering, P., Brander, L., Tompkins, E., & McKenzie, E. (2007). Valuing the Environment in Small Islands. 66.
Verdone, M. (2015). A Cost-Benefit Frameworkfor Analyzing Forest Landscape Restoration Decisions.
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Wainaina, P., Gituku, E., & Minang, P. (2020). An Exploratory Study of Cost-Benefit Analysis of Landscape Restoration. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). https://doi.org/10.5716/WP20014.PDF
WWF. (2020a). Deforestation causes | WWF. https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/deforestation_causes2/
WWF. (2020b). Forest conversion | WWF. https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/deforestation_causes2/forest_conversion/
WWF. (2020c). Importance of Forests | WWF. https://wwf.panda.org/our_work/forests/importance_forests/
XE.com Inc. (2020). 8.87 BZD to USD | Convert Belizean Dollars to US Dollars | XE. https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=8.87&From=BZD&To=USD
Young, C. (2018). Identification of Priority Areas for Conservation and Restoration in BRW for the project “Integrated Management of Production Landscapes to Deliver Multiple Global Environmental Benefits.”

指導教授

吳瑞賢(Ray Shyan Wu)

審核日期

2020-8-20

推文