參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
1.王雅雲 (2011),「我國非典型就業概況」,《臺灣勞工季刊》,27,100-111。
2.成之約 (1999),「淺論非典型聘僱關係工作型態的發展與影響」,《勞工行政》139,10-18。
3.江豐富 (2011),「失業、非典型就業的人口組成與工資率分析」,《台灣經濟預測與政策》,42(1),75-118。
4.辛炳隆 (2011),《運用非典型勞工提升產業競爭力之研究》,中華經濟研究院。
5.李誠、辛炳隆和成之約 (2000),《勞動市場彈性化與非典型僱用》,行政院勞工委員會。
6.柯志哲 (2008),《我國使用非典型工作型態之探討:使用情況與決定因素》,中央研究院社會學研究所。
7.柯志哲 (2014),「區隔的勞動市場?探討臺灣典型與非典型工作者的工作流動與薪資差異」,《台灣社會學刊》,55,127-177。
8.張苙雲 (1988),「行政組織內的個人事業生涯發展」,《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》,66,1-30。
9.黃月盈 (2018),「非典型就業對國內薪資影響之研究」,《經濟研究》,19,65-82。
10.曾敏傑和Tseng, Min-Chieh (1998),「台灣核心與邊陲產業的分類:1990年代初期的靜態測量」,《東吳社會學報》。
11.謝國雄 (1989),「黑手變頭家:臺灣製造業中的階級流動」,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,2(2),11-54。
12.顏吉利 (1989),「國營事業,巨型民營企業與資源使用效率」,《壟斷與剝削:威權主義的政治經濟分析》,119-138。
二、英文部分
1.Atkinson, John (1984), “Manpower Strategies for Flexible Organizations,” Personnel Management, 16(8), 28-31.
2.Atkinson, John (1987), “Flexibility of Fragmentation? The United Kingdom Labour Market in the Eighties, ” Labour and Society, 12, 87-105.
3.Axel, Helen (1995), “Contingent Employment,” HR Executive Review, 3, 1-14.
4.Baron, J. N., & Bielby, W. T. (1980), “Bringing the firms back in: stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work,” American Sociological Review, 45, 737-765.
5.Bosanquet, N., & Doeringer, P. B. (1973), “Is There a Dual Labour Market in Great Britain?” Economic Journal, 83(330), 421-435.
6.Cohany, Sharon R. (1996). “Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements,” Monthly Labor Review, 119(10), 31-45.
7.Dickens, William T. and Lang, Kevin (1985). “A Test of Dual Labor Market Theory,” American Economic Review, 74, 792-805.
8.Doeringer, Peter B., Piore, Michael J. (1985), Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis.
9.Giesecke, J., & Groß, M. (2003), “Temporary Employment: Chance or Risk? ” European Sociological Review, 19(2), 161-177.
10.Gordon, D. M., Edwards, R., & Reich, M. (1982) , “Segmented Work, Divided Workers,” Cambridge University Press.
11.Hodson, R., & Kaufman, R. L. (1982), “Economic Dualism: A Critical Review,” American Sociological Review, 47, 727-739.
12.Hudson, K. (2007), “The New Labor Market Segmentation: Labor Market Dualism in the New Economy.Social,” Science Research, 36(1), 286-312.
13.Kalleberg, A. L., Rasell, E., Cassirer, N., Reskin, B. F., Hudson, K., Webster, D., ... & Spalter-Roth, R. M. (1997), “Nonstandard Work, Substandard Jobs: Flexible Work Arrangements in the U.S. Washington,” D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.
14.Kalleberg, Arne L. (2000), “Nonstandard Employment Relations: Part-time, Temporary and Contract Work,” Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 341-365.
15.Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin, B. F., & Hudson, K. (2000), “Bad Jobs in America: Standard and Nonstandard Employment Relations and Job Quality in the United States,” American Sociological Review, 65(2), 256-278.
16.Kalleberg, A. L. (2009), “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition,” American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1-22.
17.Reid, L. W., & Rubin, B. A. (2003), “Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of. Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974-2000,” The Sociological Quarterly, 44(2), 405-432.
18.Rosenfeld, R. A. (1992), “Job mobility and career processes,” Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 39-61.
19.Sakamoto, A., & Chen, M. D. (1991), “Inequality and Attainment in a Dual Labor Market,” American Sociological Review, 56, 295-308.
20.Sakamoto, A., & Powers, D. A. (1995), “Education and dual labor market for japanese men,” American Sociological Review, 60, 224-246.
21.Sato, Yoshimichi (2010), “Stability and Increasing Fluidity in the Contemporary Japanese Social Stratification System,” Contemporary Japan, 22, 7-21.
22.Sato, Yoshimichi, Imai, Jun (2011), Japan′s New Inequality: Intersection of Employment Reforms and Welfare Arrangements.
23.Schmid, G., & Gazier, B. (Eds.). (2002), The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration Through Transitional Labour Markets.
24.Tolbert, C. M. (1982), “Industrial segmentation and men career mobility,” American Sociological Review, 47, 457-477.
25.Wang, Ruqu, Weiss, Andrew (1998), “Probation, Layoff and Wage Tenure Profiles: A Sorting Explanation,” Labour Economics, 5, 359-383. |