可加入機器人作為演員的數位學習劇場之製作與機器人不同互動模式對學習成效的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：26

、訪客IP：18.119.108.202

姓名

顏究真(Chiu-Chen Yen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

可加入機器人作為演員的數位學習劇場之製作與機器人不同互動模式對學習成效的影響
(The production of a digital learning theater where robots can be added as actors and the influence of different interactive modes of robots on learning effectiveness)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在戲劇中學習語言時，學生模擬演出真實情境中會遇到的問題來學習，並且近年來機器人的快速發展，相較於傳統戲劇教學方式，機器人可以成為學生有趣的表演同伴，機器人也可以讓整個戲劇更吸引人，而我們設計機器人本身的行為會根據情境與時間產生不同互動，使得學生每次表演均具有趣性。因此，本研究建立了可加入機器人作為演員的數位學習劇場之製作與機器人不同互動模式對學習成效的影響，讓學生在戲劇情境中學習時，可以與機器人一起進行有形互動學習，其中包含機器人移動互動、具身可觸摸互動、與脈絡相關的口語互動，不只增加了許多趣味性，也增加了學生的學習動機，更增加學生學習時的印象，進而提高學習成效。
本研究與桃園某國中教師合作並進行實驗，實驗組學生使用具機器人移動互動、具身可觸摸互動、與脈絡相關的口語互動模式之數位學習劇場，人數為39人，對照組學生使用機器人不移動、不具觸摸互動、僅語言互動模式之數位學習劇場，人數為31人。實驗結果顯示，實驗組學習成效顯著高於對照組。此外，透過問卷我們得知：學生們認為具有形互動之機器人的數位學習劇場趣味性較高，也能增加學生的學習動機及加深對學習時的印象。

摘要(英)

When learning language in drama, students simulate the problems encountered in the real situation of performance to learn. Robotic technology has advanced by leaps and bounds. Compared with traditional drama teaching methods, robots can become interesting performance companions for students, and robots can also make the whole drama more attractive, and the behavior of the robot we design will have different interactions according to the situation and time, making the students have fun every performance. Therefore, this study establishes a digital learning theater to join robots as actors in different interaction modes to explore the learning effectiveness, so that students can tangible interact with robots when they are learning in drama scenarios, including robot moving interaction, embodied touch interaction, Oral interactions related to context-sensitive. Not only add a lot of fun, but also increase the motivation of students to learn, but also increase the impression of students in learning, and thus improve the effectiveness of learning.
In this study, we cooperated with teachers from a junior high school in Taoyuan and conducted experiments. The students in the experimental group used a digital learning theater with robot moving interaction, embodied touch interaction, and oral interaction related to context-sensitive. The number of participants was 39. The students in the control group used a digital learning theater with robot motionless interaction, non-touch interactive, only oral interaction. The number of participants was 31. Experimental results show that the learning effectiveness of the experimental group is significantly higher than the control group. In addition, through the questionnaire, we learned that students think that digital learning theater with robots as actors in tangible interactive modes is more interesting, which can also increase students′ learning motivation and deepen their impression of learning.

關鍵字(中)

★ 戲劇式學習
★ 數位學習劇場
★ 教育機器人
★ 社交機器人

關鍵字(英)

★ Drama-based learning
★ Digital learning theater
★ Educational robot
★ Social robot

論文目次

摘要 vi
Abstract vii
誌謝 ix
目錄 x
圖目錄 xii
表目錄 xv
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 3
1-3 研究目的 4
1-4 研究問題與對策 5
二、相關研究 8
2-1 凱比機器人 8
2-2 學習型機器人 8
2-3 VR應用在學習上 9
2-4 戲劇式學習 10
2-5 數位學習劇場 11
2-6 機器人結合劇場 12
三、系統設計與實作 13
3-1 學習設計與設計理念 13
3-2 系統架構與設計 15
3-2-1 環境設計 15
3-2-2 系統架構 16
3-2-3 系統開發環境 17
3-3 系統實作 18
四、實驗設計 41
4-1 實驗假設 41
4-2 實驗對象 41
4-3 教學內容設計 43
4-4 環境設置 43
4-5 實驗流程 44
4-6 研究工具 55
五、結果分析與討論 57
5-1 學習成效分析 - 加入機器人作為演員的數位學習劇場 57
5-2 學習成效分析 – 不同互動模式結果分析 57
5-3 趣味性討論 60
5-4 學習動機討論 62
5-5 學習印象討論 63
5-6 分析與討論 63
六、結論與未來研究 65
6-1 結論 65
6-2 未來研究 66
參考文獻 68
附錄一、學習劇本 72
附錄二、編擬試題 78
附錄三、問卷 79

參考文獻

佛格勒克里斯多夫. (2013). 作家之路：從英雄的旅程學習說一個好故事(全譯本): 商周出版.
吳韋毅(2016)。教室內的數位互動式學習劇場。國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士論文，桃園市。
李勇輝(2017)。學習動機、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究-以數位學習為例。經營管理學刊，68-86。
陳品吉(2020)。導入Zenbo機器人之高職智能障礙生分數乘法課程設計與實作。國立臺中教育大學教育資訊與測驗統計研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文，台中市。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
溫欣慈, & 曾秋蓉. (2018). 以 Zenbo 機器人為運算思維學習載具之語音化程式語言. TANET2018 臺灣網際網路研討會, 2597-2601.
羅元甫(2015)。教室內的數位鏡室學習劇場。國立中央大學資訊工程學系碩士論文，桃園市。
Afzal, H., Ali, I., Aslam Khan, M., & Hamid, K. (2010). A Study of University Students’ Motivation and Its Relationship with Their Academic Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 80-88. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v5n4p80
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
Bakker, S., Antle, A. N., & Van Den Hoven, E. (2012). Embodied metaphors in tangible interaction design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 433-449.
Brouillette, L. (2009). How the arts help children to create healthy social scripts: Exploring the perceptions of elementary teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(1), 16-24.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Chao, P. Y., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 13-24.
Chen, G. D., Hsu, T. C., & Liyanawatta, M. (2018, August). Designing and Implementing a Robot in a Digital Theater for Audience Involved Drama-Based Learning. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 122-131). Springer, Cham.
Cheng, Y. W., Sun, P. C., & Chen, N. S. (2018). The essential applications of educational robot: Requirement analysis from the perspectives of experts, researchers and instructors. Computers & education, 126, 399-416.
Chiang, Y. H. V., Zheng, Y. J., Cheng, Y. W., & Chen, N. S. (2019, July). A Preliminary Analysis of Learners′ Social Behavioral Cues When Interacting with Language Learning Robots and IoT Based Toys. In 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 152-155). IEEE.
Chisholm, J. S., Whitmore, K. F., Shelton, A. L., & Mcgrath, I. V. (2016). Moving Interpretations. The English Journal, 105(5), 35-41.
Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49(1), 3-18.
Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82-96.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of educational psychology, 88(4), 715.
Courtney, R. (1989). Play, drama & thought: The intellectual background to dramatic education: Dundurn.
Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. J., & DeFanti, T. A. (1993, September). Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 135-142).
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior: Springer US.
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. science, 323(5910), 66-69.
Dodson, S. L. (2002). The educational potential of drama for ESL. Body and language: Intercultural learning through drama, 3, 161-206.
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). “Information gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL quarterly, 20(2), 305-325.
Dunn, J., Bundy, P., & Woodrow, N. (2012). Combining drama pedagogy with digital technologies to support the language learning needs of newly arrived refugee children: a classroom case study. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 17(4), 477-499.
Ghaoui, C. (2005). Encyclopedia of human computer interaction. Perspectives, 2021, 299.
Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2016). Production and evaluation of educational material using augmented reality for teaching the module of “representation of the information on computers” in junior high school. Creative Education, 7(09), 1270-1291.
Gordon, G., Breazeal, C., & Engel, S. (2015, March). Can children catch curiosity from a social robot?. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 91-98).
Guo, S. C., & Chen, G. D. (2018, December). Fostering the Learning of English Idioms by Setting Children within a Virtual Environment. In 2018 Seventh International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) (pp. 36-39). IEEE.
Haseman, W. D., Nuipolatoglu, V., & Ramamurthy, K. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influences of the degree of interactivity on user-outcomes in a multimedia environment. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 31.
Hsieh, Y. Z., Lin, S. S., Luo, Y. C., Jeng, Y. L., Tan, S. W., Chen, C. R., & Chiang, P. Y. (2020). ARCS-Assisted Teaching Robots Based on Anticipatory Computing and Emotional Big Data for Improving Sustainable Learning Efficiency and Motivation. Sustainability, 12(14), 5605.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401-412): Springer.
Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182.
Ioannou, A., Andreou, E., & Christofi, M. (2015). Pre-schoolers’ interest and caring behaviour around a humanoid robot. TechTrends, 59(2), 23-26.
Jones, A., & Castellano, G. (2018). Adaptive Robotic Tutors that Support Self-Regulated Learning: A Longer-Term Investigation with Primary School Children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1-14.
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-computer interaction, 19(1), 61-84.
Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810.
Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(1), 1-30.
Lin, J. M., Chen, Y. K., & Hung, C. W. (2019, May). Enhancing an MOOC Platform with Emotional Sensing and Robot Interaction Features. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Taiwan (ICCE-TW) (pp. 1-2). IEEE.
Liu, J. (2000). The power of readers theater: From reading to writing. ELT journal, 54(4), 354-361.
Liu, Y. T., Lin, S. C., Wu, W. Y., Chen, G. D., & Chen, W. (2017). The digital interactive learning theater in the classroom for drama-based learning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 784-789). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Mantovani, G., Riva, R., & Galimberti, C. (2003). VR learning: Potential and challenges for the use of 3D. Towards cyberpsychology: Mind, cognitions, and society in the Internet age, 208-225.
Miccoli, L. (2003). English through drama for oral skills development. ELT journal, 57(2), 122-129.
Nicolescu, M. N., & Mataric, M. J. (2003, July). Natural methods for robot task learning: Instructive demonstrations, generalization and practice. In Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 241-248).
Pachidis, T., Vrochidou, E., Kaburlasos, V. G., Kostova, S., Bonković, M., & Papić, V. (2018, June). Social robotics in education: State-of-the-art and directions. In International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria Danube Region (pp. 689-700). Springer, Cham.
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21-21.
Schneider, B., Jermann, P., Zufferey, G., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). Benefits of a tangible interface for collaborative learning and interaction. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(3), 222-232.
Shen, W. W., Tsai, M. H. M., Wei, G. C., Lin, C. Y., & Lin, J. M. (2019, December). ETAR: An English Teaching Assistant Robot and Its Effects on College Freshmen’s In-Class Learning Motivation. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 77-86). Springer, Cham.
Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding virtual reality. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kauffman.
Sims, R. (2010). Promises of Interactivity: Aligning Learner Perceptions and Expectations With Strategies for Flexible and Online Learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 87-103. doi:10.1080/01587910303050
Tsai, M. F., Shen, W. W., Lin, J. M., Lai, C. C., Syu, Y. J., & Lin, S. T. (2018). Applying humanity robot to the storytelling service for children in a library–a case study on national library of public information. Taiwan Public Libr. J, 7, 1-33.
Ullah, S. (2011). Multi-modal Interaction in Collaborative Virtual Environments: Study and analysis of performance in collaborative work. Université d′Evry-Val d′Essonne.
Wessels, C. (1987). Drama (Vol. 3): Oxford.
Xie, L., Antle, A. N., & Motamedi, N. (2008, February). Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children′s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (pp. 191-198).
Yaffe, S. H. (1989). Drama as a Teaching Tool. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 29-32.
You, Z. J., Shen, C. Y., Chang, C. W., Liu, B. J., & Chen, G. D. (2006, July). A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. In Sixth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT′06) (pp. 87-91). IEEE.

指導教授

陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2020-8-19

推文