以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：32

、訪客IP：3.12.164.238

姓名	羅綺曼(Irma Nuur Rochmah)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱	探討真實情境小學生分數問題解決行為和策略與其對學習成效之影響 (Investigate Behaviors and Strategies of Fraction Problem Solving for Elementary School Students in Authentic Contexts and its Influences on Learning Achievements)
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-7-20以後開放)
摘要(中)	如果我們能夠將數學應用於真實環境中的日常生活問題，數學將變得更加重要和更有價值。這是因為解決問題是學習數學的重要目標之一。在生活中應用數學也可能有助於在處理現實生活中的問題時驗證並加強對數學概念的理解。但是，數學對於小學生而言很難，尤其是分數，因為抽象概念和缺乏與真實經驗的連結 。因此，為了在真實的學習環境下加強小學生的分數學習並研究他們的分數問題解決策略，我們設計並開發了基於平板電腦的應用程序Ubiquitous-Fraction（U-Fraction），讓學生在不論何時何地都可以學習分數。對於學習活動設計，給出了三個學習主題，例如基本分數概念和表示，分數簡化以及分數加法和減法。之後，要求學生解決分數符號問題和單詞問題，並分析他們的解決行為和策略 經過了一次準實驗，結果顯示實驗組與對照組的學習成績存在顯著差異。進一步的數據分析發現，學生對分數的理解會嚴重影響分數問題的解決，例如正確的計算和正確的答案。關於分數解決問題策略的分析，將策略定義成三類，即優良、中等和不佳。事實證明，適度而良好的策略可以引導學生正確解決分數問題並獲得更好的學習成績。這是因為U-Fraction的反饋功能可以幫助學生創造性地，有效地開發解決分數問題的策略。最後，了解到學生對在真實環境中使用U-Fraction的看法，了解到非常正面和有趣。因此，強烈建議數學教師在真實情況下推廣和使用U-Fraction進行分數學習。
摘要(英)	Mathematics becomes more important and valuable if we can apply it to solve daily life problems in authentic contexts. This is because solving problems is one of the vital goals of learning mathematics. Applying mathematics in life can also possibly help to verify and consolidate mathematics concepts and understandings when dealing with problems in real life. However, it is quite difficult for elementary school students to study mathematics, especially fractions, due to abstract conception and lack of connecting authentic contexts. Therefore, to strengthen fraction learning of elementary school students with authentic contextual supports and investigate their fraction problem-solving strategies, we designed and developed a tablet-based application, Ubiquitous-Fraction(U-Fraction), and allowed students to learn fraction anywhere and anytime in the real world. Regarding learning activity design, three learning topics were given, such as basic fraction concepts and representation, fraction simplification, and fraction addition and subtraction. After that, students were asked to solve fraction symbolic problems and word problems and their solving behaviors and strategies were also analyzed. One quasi-experiment was conducted and the results showed that there were significant differences in learning achievements between the experiment group and the control group. Further data analysis found that students′ fraction understanding can significantly affect fraction problem solving like correct calculation and correct answer. Regarding the analysis of fraction problem-solving strategies, three categories of strategies will be defined, namely bad, moderate, and good. Moderate and good strategies were demonstrated to lead students to solve fraction problems correctly and obtain better learning achievements. This is because the feedback feature of U-Fraction can help students to develop fraction problems solving strategies creatively and effectively. Finally, students′ perceptions toward using U-Fraction in authentic contexts were studied and found very positive and playful. Therefore, it is strongly suggested for mathematic teachers to promote and use U-Fraction for fraction learning in authentic contexts.
關鍵字(中)	★ U-Fraction, Authentic context, Problem-solving strategy, Feedback	關鍵字(英)	★ U-Fraction, Authentic context, Problem-solving strategy, Feedback
論文目次	Abstract i 中 文 摘 要 ii Acknowledgment iii List of Content iv List of Table vi List of Figure vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1. Background and Motivation 1 1.2. Purpose of the Study 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1. Fraction learning in Elementary School and the Difficulties 4 2.2. Fraction learning in Authentic Contexts 5 2.3. Students’ Strategy to Solve the Problems 7 2.4. Motivation Questionnaire and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 9 Chapter 3 System Design and Implementation 11 3.1. Ubiquitous Fraction (U-Fraction) System 11 3.1.1. Activity Section 12 3.1.2. Direction Section 15 3.1.3. FRT in Fraction Representation Option 18 3.1.4. FSP Tasks and FWP Tasks in Problem Solving Option 20 3.2. Automatic Feedback 23 Chapter 4 Research Method 25 4.1. Participants and Subject 25 4.2. Research Flow 25 4.3. Experimental Procedure 26 4.4. Research Architecture 28 4.5. Learning Tasks 36 4.6. Data Analysis 39 Chapter 5 Result and Analysis 41 5.1. Learning Achievement between the Two Groups 41 5.2. Learning Tasks between the Two Groups 44 5.3. Learning Behavior using U-Fraction with Authentic Contexts 47 5.4. The Most Important Predictor Learning Behavior for Learning Achievement 49 5.5. Type of Strategy in Problem Types and Posttest Types 50 5.6. Learning Motivation 53 5.7. Students’ Perception toward Using U-Fraction 54 Chapter 6 Conclusions 57 6.1. Conclusions 57 6.2. Limitations 58 6.3. Future Study 59 References 60 Appendix 1 MSLQ Questionnaire 65 Appendix 2 TAM Questionnaire 69 Appendix 3 Pretest 71 Appendix 4 Posttest 78
參考文獻	References Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Isaacson, R. M. (2010). Goals, efficacy and metacognitive self-regulation a path analysis. International Journal of Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v2i1.357 Amal, R. W. (2015). Learning Android Google Maps. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd. Anderson, K.B. & Pingry, R.E. (1973). Problem-solving in mathematics. The learning of mathematics: Its theory and practices. Washington D. C.: The National Council of Teacher of mathematics. Attard, C. & Curry, C. (2012). Exploring the use of iPads to engage young students with mathematics. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics Education: Expanding Horizons. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (pp. 75-82). Singapore: MERGA. Beşevli, C., Salman, E., Goksun, T., Urey, H., & Özcan, O. (2019). MaR-T: Designing a Projection-Based Mixed Reality System for Nonsymbolic Math Development of Preschoolers: Guided by Theories of Cognition and Learning. Association for Computing Machinery. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ′19) (pp. 280- 292). New York: ACM. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational Objective, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay. Booker, G., Paul, S., Len, S., Denise, B., & Peter, S. (2014). Teaching primary mathematics/Booker, Bond, Sparrow & Swan (5th eds). Melbourne: Pearson Australia. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X 018001032 Bruckner, L. J. & Grossnickle, F. E. (1947). How to make arithmetic meaningful. Philadelphia: the John C Winston Co. Caiman, C., and Lundegård, I. (2018). Young children’s imagination in science education and education for sustainability. Springer Cult Stud of Sci Educ 13, 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9811-7 Cardenas-Robledo, L & Pena-Ayala, A. (2018). Ubiquitous learning: A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), pp. 1097-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele .2018.01.009 Chadli, A., Tranvouez, E., & Bendella, F. (2019). Learning Word Problem Solving Process in Primary School Students: An Attempt to Combine Serious Game and Polya’s Problem Solving. Model Data Analytics Approaches in Educational Games and Gamification Systems. Springer Singapore. Dale E. Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching. 3rd Ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1969:p.108. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409 Donker, A., S., de Boer, H., Kustons, D., & Dignath, C. (2013). Effectiveness of Learning Strategy Instruction on Academic Performance: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002. Egan, K. & Mandej, K. (2010). Engaging Imagination and Developing Creativity in Education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Ersoy, E. & Guner, P. (2015). The Place of Problem Solving and Mathematical Thinking in The Mathematical Teaching. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(1), 120-130. Fahrudin, D., Mardiyana, & Pramudya, I. (2018). The analysis of mathematic problem solving ability by polya steps on material trigonometric reviewed from self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254, 012076. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012076 Fitrianti, Y, Suryadi, D., & Kusnandi. (2019). Analysis of Difficulties for Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher in Problem Solving of Division and Divisibility Based on Theory of Action, Process, Object, and Schemes. Journal of Physics: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education 2019 (ICMScE 2019), 1521, 032007. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032007 Gollapudi, S. (2019). Learn Computer Vision Using OpenCV: With Deep Learning CNNs and RNNs. Apress Media: India. Guo, W. and Wei, J. (2019). Teacher Feedback and Students’ Self-regulated Learning in Mathematics: A Study of Chinese Secondary Students. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 28, 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00434-8 Halawati, & Ranti, M. G. (2020). Improvement of Ability of Class Vb Students SDN Indrasari 2 Martapura to Solve Multiplying and Dividing Fraction Use Tiered Drilling. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 65-74. Https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v6i1.911 Hasemann, K. (1981). On difficulties with fractions. Educ Stud Math 12, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386047 Herrington, T. and Herington, J. (2006). Authentic Learning in Higher Education. British Library. Hilpert, J. C., Stempien, J., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Husman, J. (2013). Evidence for the latent factor structure of the MSLQ. SAGE Open, 3(4). doi:10.1177/2158244013510305 Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-aware Ubiquitous Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81–91. Hwang, W. Y, Chen, & Hsu. (2006). Development and Evaluation of Multimedia Whiteboard System For Improving Mathematical Problem Solving. Computers & Education, 46 (2006) 105–121. Elsevier. Hwang, W. Y., Utami, Q. U., & Holly-Chen. (2018). An Evaluation Study of Learning Behaviors and Achievements with Ubiquitous Fraction (U-Fraction) for Elementary School Student. 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. DOI 10.1109/ICALT.2018.00087 Jackson, C. R. (2018). Validating and Adapting the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for STEM Courses at an HBCU. AERA Open, 8, Vol. 4(4), pp. 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346. Jupri, A. & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student Difficulties in Mathematizing Word Problems in Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016, 12(9), 2481-2502 doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a Kang, S.. Shokeen, E., Byrne, V. L., Norooz, L., Bonsignore, E., Williams-Pierce, C & Froehlich, J. E. (2020) ARMath: Augmenting Everyday Life with Math Learning. Association for computing Machinery. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ′19), pp. 280- 292. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376252 Kara, F. & Incikabi, L. (2018). Sixth Grade Students’ Skills of Using Multiple Representations in Addition and Subtraction Operations in Fractions. International electronic journal of elementary education, 10(4), 463-474. DOI: 10.26822/iejee.2018438137 Kennedy, S. (2017). Designing and Teaching Online Courses in Nursing. Springer Publishing. Kim, B. & Reeves C. T. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: in search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35:207–256. Springer. DOI 10.1007/s11251-006-9005-2 Kinshuk, Graf S. (2012) Ubiquitous Learning. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. Kitsantas, A., Winsler, A., & Huie, F. (2008). Self-regulation and ability predictors of academic success during college: A predictive validity study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 42–68 Kusuma, U. I. and Retnawati, H. (2019). Analysis of Sixth Graders’ Difficulties in Solving Mathematics Word Problems on Whole Numbers, Fractions, and Decimals. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012008. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012008 Kutub, A. H. M., Wijayanti, P., & Manuharawati (2019). Relationship of Teacher’s Content Knowledge on Fraction Topic Toward Student Performance. Journal of Physics: MISEIC 2019, 1417, 012054. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012054 Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (p. 67–94). Harvard University Press. Liao, S., Hong, J. C, Wen, M. H, Pan, Y. C., and Wu, Y. W. (2018). Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to explore Users’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt a Performance Assessment System for E-book Production. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1601. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93575. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Basic Books. Misquitta, R. (2011). A Review of the Literature: Fraction Instruction for Struggling Learners in Mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26(2):109 – 119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00330.x Montage-Smith, A., Cotton, T., Hansen, A., & Price,A. J. (2018). Mathematics in Early Years Education (4th eds). Routledge: New York. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC. Nottingham, J. & Nottingham, J. (2017). Challenging Learning Through Feedback. Sage Publication: USA. Nurkaeti, N. (2018). Polya’s Strategy: an Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Difficulty in 5th Grade Elementary School. EduHumaniora: Jurnal pendidikan Dasar, 10 (2), 140-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v10i2.10868 OpenCV. (2020). About. Retrieved June 18, 2020, from OpenCV: https://opencv.org/about/ Panko, R. (2018, July 10). The Popularity of Google Maps: Trends in Navigation Apps in 2018. Retrieved June 18, 2020, from THE MANIFEST: https://themanifest.com/appdevelopment/popularity-google-maps-trends-navigation-apps-2018 Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An analysis of elementary school students’ difficulties in mathematical problem solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3169-3174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.728. Phothong, S. (1996). The development of mathematical problem solving ability of Prathomsuksa six students with high mathematics learning acheivement through metacognition. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok. Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E., V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. USA: The American Psychological Association, Inc. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1990). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Washington, DC, USA: NCRIPTAL. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing Metacognition and SelfRegulated Learning. En G. Schraw and J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska Press. Polya, G. (2014). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton Science Library Edition. USA. Posamentier, A., S., and Krulik, S. (2009). Problem Solving in Mathematics: Grade 3-6: Powerful Strategies to Deepen Understanding. California: Corwin Publisher. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting selfregulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. Sellars, M. (2018). Numeracy in Authentic Contexts: Making Meaning Across The Curriculum. Singapore: Springer. Siegler, R. S., Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., & Zhou, X. (2013). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 13-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.004 Soemantri, D., Mccoll, G. & Dodds, A. Measuring medical students’ reflection on their learning: modification and validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). BMC Med Educ 18, 274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s129 09 -018-1384-y Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., Bishop, M. J. (2014). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (eds). New York: Springer Science Business Media New York. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32. Star, J. R., Caronongan, P., Foegen, A., Furgeson, J., Keating, B., Larson, M. R., Lyskawa, J., McCallum, W. G., Porath, J., & Zbiek, R. M. (2015). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students (NCEE 2014-4333). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from the NCEE website: http://whatworks.ed.gov. The Basic Education Core Curriculum. (2008, July 11). The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Retrieved June 18, 2020, from THE MANIFEST: http://academic.obec.go.th/images/document/1525235513_d_1.pdf The Japan Times. (2020, Feb 7). Google Maps Marks 15-years Milestone with New Features. Retrived June 18, 2020, from THE JAPAN TIMES. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/02/07/business/tech/google-maps-marks 15 -year-milestone-new-features/#:~:text=RELATED%20STORIES&text=Google%20 boasts%20more%20than%201,traffic%20updates%20in%20171%20countries.&text=Google%20said%20it%20took%20down,by%20users%20in%202018%20alone. Vanderstoep, S. W., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345–362. Warsito, Nuraini, Y., Sukirwan, & Muhtadi, D. (2018). The design learning of fraction with realistic mathematics education in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1) 012110. IOP Publishing. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012110 West, T. A. (1977). Verbal problems: A diagnostic perspective approach. Arithmetic Teacher, 25, 57-58. Wingard-Nelson, R. (2012). Fractions and Decimals. Enslow Publisher: USA. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulatory learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 284–290
指導教授	黃武元 Priyanto(Wu-Yuin Hwang Priyanto)	審核日期	2020-7-28
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare