| 姓名 |
呂權訓(Chuan Hsun Lu)
查詢紙本館藏 |
畢業系所 |
環境工程研究所在職專班 |
| 論文名稱 |
以緩衝模組提升兩塔型RTO處理效率之可行性探討
(Enhancement of VOC Removal Efficiency Achieved with Two-canister RTO via Buffering Module)
|
| 相關論文 | |
| 檔案 |
 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
 [相關文章]  [文章引用]  [完整記錄]  [館藏目錄]  [檢視] [下載]- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
|
| 摘要(中) |
焚化法對於揮發性有機廢氣的處理，在眾多的空氣污染防制手段是目前處理效率最高的程序。為節省燃料的之故而發展出的蓄熱式焚化法，藉由閥件切換將VOCs導入焚化爐內，而造成部份VOCs洩漏，其中又以兩塔型蓄熱式焚化爐因切換閥件作動而造成處理效率下降的問題最嚴重，本研究以設置緩衝模組進行兩塔型RTO處理效率的提升。其設計的構想是在蓄熱塔的切換閥件作動以前，將脫附風機途經焚化爐爐膛的空間充滿乾淨的外氣。雖然洩漏現象依然會發生，但經過切換程序而洩漏的並非高濃度的VOCs而是乾淨的外氣，因此可避免焚化爐系統的總處理效率降低的狀況發生。本研究選擇兩套RTO設備，其中RTO#A的設計處理風量為166.3 CMM，RTO#B的設計處理風量為87.2 CMM。兩套RTO系統經過質量平衡計算後得到焚化爐系統入口、沸石濃縮轉輪出口和焚化爐出口等質量流率，再以質量流率進行處理效率的計算，以此還原系統的真實處理效率。設置緩衝模組前RTO#A系統於切換閥件作動時的處理效率會降低至72.66%，設置緩衝模組後RTO#A系統於切換閥件作動時處理效率提升至91.59%，RTO#A爐體進出口的平均排放量則降低0.3 kg/hr。本研究也另外探討緩衝模組設計錯誤的案例RTO#B，導致設置緩衝模組後未如RTO#A的設置結果般所預期的效果，其中RTO#B在切換閥件作動期間的處理效率，也與RTO#A未設置緩衝模組時的效率接近。此外，RTO#B因設計錯誤而引入過多的外氣，相當於三塔型RTO引入外氣進行掃氣程序的2倍，使得耗能問題加劇。在兩種爐型的製造成本比較方面，兩塔型RTO的成本較三塔型RTO低約70萬餘元，若加入緩衝模組設置費用約45萬餘元，整體製造成本則不如預期的低廉。對於污染源在新建設備的考量，建議設置三塔型或旋轉型RTO，避免後續改善工程增加額外的施作時間。 |
| 摘要(英) |
Thermal oxidation is one of the most effective processes for the treatment of VOC-containing gas stream. Especially, regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) has been developed to reduce energy consumption. For the operation of RTO, the VOC removal efficiency achieved with two-canister RTO is greatly reduced during valve switching. In this research, buffering module is applied to improve the VOC removal efficiency achieved with two-canister RTO. The concept is to fill the volume between the desorbing fan and the RTO with clean air prior to valve switching. Although leakage may still occur, high-concentration VOCs is not leaked. Because clean air is purged through the switching process, overall VOC removal efficiency achieved with the RTO system can be maintained. In this study, two facilities equipped with two-canister RTO were selected for investigation. The capacity of RTO#A was 166.3 CMM as designed, while the capacity of RTO#B was 87.2 CMM. Mass balance of the RTO system is performed to get the mass flow rates at the RTO system inlet, the zeolite concentrator outlet and the RTO outlet, respectively. The removal efficiency was calculated on the basis of the mass flow rate to restore the true removal efficiency of the system. Before the buffering module was installed, the overall removal efficiency of VOC achieved with RTO#A was 72.66%. After the installation of buffering module, the removal efficiency of VOCs achieved with the RTO#A system was increased to 91.59%. The mass flow rate of VOCs emitted from RTO#A was reduced to 0.3 kg/hr. The case of RTO#B was also investigated and it was a wrong design. The effectiveness of the buffering module is not as expected as the result of RTO#A. The VOCs removal efficiency achieved with RTO#B decreases during the actuation of the valve switching process, which is similar to the RTO#A before buffering module was installed. In addition, RTO#B also leads to too much air due to improper design and it, is equivalent to double of purge air in the three-canister RTO to perform the purge process. It aggravates the energy consumption problem. Regarding the manufacturing cost, the cost of the two-canister RTO is about NT$700,000, which is less expensive than the three-canister RTO. If the buffering module is added, the extra cost is about NT$450,000. The overall manufacturing cost is not as low as expected. Thus, three-canister RTO or rotary-type RTO is recommended for the new facility when considering RTO as the option for VOC removal to avoid additional cost and implementation time for subsequent improvement. |
| 關鍵字(中) |
★ 蓄熱式焚化爐
★ 質能平衡
★ 空氣污染
★ 處理效率
★ 製造成本 |
關鍵字(英) |
★ RTO
★ Mass and energy balance
★ VOC removal
★ Buffering module
★ Cost analysis |
| 論文目次 |
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 XI
第一章 前言 1
1-1 研究緣起 1
1-2 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2-1 揮發性有機廢氣熱氧化技術 4
2-1-1 直燃式熱氧化法 (Thermal Oxidization, TO) 5
2-1-2 蓄熱式熱氧化法 (Regenerative Thermal Oxidization, RTO) 5
2-1-3 觸媒熱氧化法 (Catalytic Thermal Oxidization, CTO) 6
2-2 RTO爐型比較 8
2-2-1 兩塔型蓄熱式焚化爐作動程序說明 9
2-2-2 三塔型蓄熱式焚化爐作動程序說明 10
2-3 沸石濃縮轉輪 13
2-4 陶瓷蓄熱材 15
2-5 緩衝模組 19
2-6 破壞溫度 20
2-7 揮發性有機化合物燃燒熱焓 21
2-8 揮發性有機污染物比熱 22
第三章 研究方法 23
3-1 研究方法 23
3-2 研究程序 24
3-3 質量與能量平衡計算 26
3-3-1 水份計算 27
3-3-2 乾空氣組成 28
3-3-3 沸石濃縮轉輪與RTO之處理效率計算 29
3-4 廢氣處理流程 29
第四章 結果與討論 32
4-1 操作條件 32
4-2 有機廢氣來源成份分析結果 35
4-3 處理效率分析 37
4-3-1 RTO#A緩衝模組設置前處理效率分析 38
4-3-2 RTO#A緩衝模組設置後處理效率分析 44
4-3-3 RTO#B緩衝模組設置後處理效率分析 51
4-4 設置緩衝模組之可行性評估 55
4-4-1 設置需求計算 56
4-4-2 設置效果評估 60
4-5 能源消耗評估 61
4-5-1 RTO#A能源消耗差異 61
4-5-2 RTO#B能源消耗差異 63
4-5-3 緩衝模組導入風量 64
4-6 爐體佔地面積比較 64
4-7 製造成本比較 66
4-7-1 兩塔型與三塔型RTO製造成本比較 66
4-7-2 緩衝模組材料成本估算 67
第五章 結論與建議 69
5-1 結論 69
5-2 建議 70
參考文獻 72
附錄 73 |
| 參考文獻 |
[1] Cooper, D. & Alley, F. Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach Fourth Edition, WAVELAND Press Inc., USA, 2011.
[2] Lewandowski, D. Design of Thermal Oxidation System for Volatile Organic Compounds, Lewis Publishers, USA, 1999.
[3] Niessen, W. Combustion and Incineration Process, third edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2002.
[4] Yaws, C. McGraw-Hill, Chemical properties handbook, Lamar University, Beaumont, 1999.
[5] Washington D.C., U.S. Standard Atmosphere, USA, 1976
[6] 洪守銘，2015，雙塔蓄熱式焚化爐切換峰值削減系統，中華民國新型第M511372號。
[7] 蔣少勇，「以蓄熱式焚化爐(RTO)處理銅箔基板業排氣中VOCs之效率探討」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國98年。
[8] 沈明宗，「實場蓄熱式焚化爐處理排氣中揮發性有機物之操作性能研究」，國立中山大學，碩士論文，民國90年。
[9] 周明顯，「光電半導體VOCs 處理成本分析及效益評估」。國立中山大學， 2003年。
[10] 江彥雄，有害廢物的處理技術，一版，中國環境科學出版社，北京市，1993年。
[11] 趙欽新、惠世恩主編，燃油燃氣鍋爐，西安交通大學出版社，西安市，2000年。
[12] 王秉銓主編，工業爐設計手冊，二版，機械工業出版社，北京市，1996年。
[13] 徐寶東主編，化工管路設計手冊，一版，化學工業出版社，北京市，2011年。
|
| 指導教授 |
張木彬
|
審核日期 |
2020-7-30 |
| 推文 |
 facebook  plurk  twitter  funp  google  live  udn  HD  myshare  reddit  netvibes  friend  youpush  delicious  baidu
|
| 網路書籤 |
 Google bookmarks  del.icio.us  hemidemi myshare
|
