以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：86

、訪客IP：3.137.216.109

姓名	莊千慧(Chien-Hui Chuang)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	認知與神經科學研究所
論文名稱	以行為及事件相關電位實驗探討情緒情境轉換與事件分割 (Behavioral and ERP Studies of Emotional Context Change and Event Segmentation.)
相關論文	★ 意旁結合度、意旁表意透明度對中文閱讀的影響 ★ 以行為及事件相關電位探討中文雙字詞的記憶聯結錯誤 ★ 項目指示遺忘效果的行為與事件相關電位研究 ★ 項目指示遺忘作業中記憶登錄及提取歷程的行為及事件相關腦電位研究 ★ 以語意促發作業探討項目指示遺忘中線索對於記憶登錄歷程影響之行為及事件相關腦電位研究 ★ 特定與非特定來源記憶提取的行為及事件相關腦電位 ★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位探討處理層次與聯結性登錄方式對記憶連結錯誤之影響 ★ 中文字詞辨識的語音運作單位 ★ 由語意透明度所引發的再認記憶鏡像效應：行為與事件相關腦電位研究 ★ 登錄作業對於中文雙字詞語意透明度在再認記憶中所引發鏡像效應之影響：行為及事件相關腦電位實驗 ★ 以事件相關腦電位探討細節性與概要性記憶的提取導向 ★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位實驗探討前瞻記憶線索出現機率對於前瞻干擾效果的影響 ★ 以跨顱電刺激與事件相關腦電位探討左側後頂葉腦區於再認記憶中所扮演之角色 ★ 測驗表現回饋對測驗效應之調控的行為與事件相關腦電位研究 ★ 以非侵入式腦刺激探討左後側頂葉與情節記憶提取之因果關係 ★ 中文假字形聲限制高低對於試誤與無誤學習之影響的行為與事件相關腦電位研究
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載] 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中)	在日常生活中，當我們經歷到知覺或是概念的情境轉換時（即感知到了事件邊界時），我們會將那些所接收到的連續不斷的訊息分割成不同的事件。然而，目前還不清楚的是，當情緒上的情境轉換時，是否也會對於我們的事件記憶有著同樣的處理？為了研究這個問題，我們做了四個學習-測驗的行為實驗及一個腦波實驗。在實驗中，我們操弄了情境圖片的情緒及時間間隔與否。受試者在學習階段需要對情緒性情境圖片做缺口大小判斷，在這之間每八張圖片會根據實驗而有或無一個五秒鐘的時間間隔。之後，受試者對情緒性圖片會有一個預期外的再認記憶測驗。在實驗一中，受試者同時經歷了時間間隔和正負向情境轉換，結果顯示受試者對於事件邊界後的圖片比起其他圖片有顯著較好的再認記憶表現。表示當人們同時經歷了時間間隔及情緒情境轉換時，人們能夠感知到事件邊界。但是還不清楚的是，是否如果只經歷時間間隔或是只經歷情緒情境轉換也足以能讓人們將正在經歷中的訊息分割成為不同事件？因此在實驗二中，受試者在中性的情緒情境下只經歷時間間隔；在實驗三中，受試者則只經歷正負向情緒情境轉換。結果顯示，當受試者只經歷時間間隔時，並沒有展現出事件邊界對記憶的增強效果；而當受試者只經歷情緒情境轉換時，事件邊界對負向圖片記憶的增強效果消失了。比較實驗一和實驗三後發現，結果的不同並不是因為休息而造成的，也就是說休息並沒有影響到對於事件的記憶。接著，我們想了解是否影響受試者在學習階段的編碼會影響人們對於事件邊界的感知？因此在實驗四中，我們增加了學習階段的難度，結果發現受試者並沒有展現出事件邊界對記憶的增強效果。比較實驗三和實驗四後發現，影響受試者的學習階段並不影響我們對於事件的記憶。另外，透過這兩次實驗之間的比較，我們發現事件邊界的記憶增強效果只特定於正向情境，即只有從負向情境轉換成正向情境的情況下，人們才能夠感知到事件邊界。我們推測是否在事件邊界後的正向圖片比起其他正向圖片能記得更好其實是被之前的負向圖片所影響？因此在腦波實驗中，我們用中性圖片取代了正向圖片，發現在事件邊界後的中性圖片並沒有比其他中性圖片記得更好，因此並不支持先前的負向圖片增強了前面的圖片記憶表現的推測。總和這些結果，我們推測這可能是因為負向情緒能使記憶更加鮮明，而導致在負向情境下事件邊界對記憶的增強效果並不明顯。而在腦波結果發現，對於中性和負向圖片都出現一個大的N300，在900毫秒到1900毫秒有一個晚期的LPP；以及在200毫秒到1900毫秒時，邊界後圖片比起邊界前圖片還要來得負。除了這些結果之外，我們發現負向圖片比起正向圖片會引起更大的刺激前之隨後記憶效果，並且這效果在900毫秒到1900毫秒時只出現在邊界後圖片。總結來說，我們的行為結果顯示只有從負向情境轉換成正向情境的情況下，人們才能夠穩定的感知到事件邊界。神經生理結果則顯示，邊界前和邊界後可能存有不同的神經處理機制。
摘要(英)	When experiencing a perceptual or conceptual context shift (i.e., experiencing an event boundary), the continuous information we perceived is segmented into discrete events in our daily life. However, whether the change of emotional context also has the same process on our event memories remains unclear. To investigate this question, we manipulated the emotional context images and temporal breaks on our four study-test behavioral experiments and one EEG experiment. Participants studied a series of emotional context images with or without temporal break followed by an incidental recognition task. In experiment 1, participants experienced positive and negative context change along with temporal break. The result showed a significantly better recognition memory for the post-boundary items than the others, indicating that people would perceive an event boundary when they experienced an emotional context change with a temporal break. However, whether the pure emotional context shift or pure temporal break is sufficient for segmenting ongoing information into events remains unclear. Therefore, participants encountered only temporal break with the neutral context in experiment 2 and only positive and negative context shift in experiment 3. These results revealed no boundary enhancement effect when participants only experienced temporal break while the boundary enhancement effect for negative pictures was diminished when participants encountered pure emotional context shift. After comparing Experiment 3 with Experiment 1, we found that the difference between these two experiments was not caused by temporal breaks. Later, we considered whether disturbing encoding phase would impact the perception of event boundaries. In experiment 4, we increased the difficulty of the gap judgment task and found that there was no event boundary enhancement effect. However, after comparing Experiment 4 with Experiment 3, we found that the difference of the results between these two experiments was not caused by increasing the study difficulty. From two comparisons, we found the event boundary enhancement effect was specific to the positive context, thus, we consider whether this enhancement was influenced by the prior negative pictures. To address this issue, we replaced the positive pictures with neutral pictures to test in a more realistic way in EEG experiment. The behavioral results showed that there was no boundary enhancement effect, suggesting that the negative stimuli did not facilitate the later stimuli. For ERP results, we found a large N300 for both neutral and negative pictures, a late LPP started from 900 and lasted to 1900 ms, and a more negative waveform for post-boundary items than pre-boundary items in the time window from 200 to 1900 ms. Besides, the subsequent recognition memory was better for negative pictures than neutral pictures and there was a subsequent memory effect for post-boundary pictures in the time window from 1600 to 1900 ms but not for pre-boundary pictures. In summary, our behavioral results indicated that emotional context shift could be perceived as event boundaries in conditions that the context changed from negative to positive. Neural physiological results suggested that there might involve different processing for pre-boundary and post-boundary.
關鍵字(中)	★ 事件邊界 ★ 情緒 ★ 再認記憶 ★ 事件相關腦電位	關鍵字(英)	★ event boundary ★ emotion ★ recognition memory ★ event-related potentials (ERPs)
論文目次	摘要 i Abstract iii 致謝 v Content table vi List of Tables viii List of Figures x 1. General Introduction 1 1.1 Segmenting Continuous Experience into Events 1 1.2 The Influence of Emotion on Episodic Memory 6 1.3 The Potential Relationship between Emotion and Event Segmentation 8 2. Aim of this study 10 3. General Methods 12 3.1 Materials 12 3.2 Procedures 12 4. Experiment 1: Boundaries Facilitate Recognition Memory when Encountered Emotional Context Shifts with Temporal Break. 17 4.1 Methods 18 4.2 Results and Discussion 20 Experiment 2: Boundary Enhancement Effect Does Not Exist When Only Experienced Temporal Break. 32 5.1 Methods 32 5.2 Results and Discussion 33 5. Experiment 3: Boundaries Facilitate Partial Recognition Memory When Only Experienced Emotional Context Shifts. 43 6.1 Methods 43 6.2 Results and Discussion 44 6. Experiment 4: Boundaries Did not Facilitate Recognition Memory When Experienced a more interference Encoding. 56 7.1 Methods 56 7.2 Results and Discussion 57 7. Experiment 5 : An ERP Experiment 69 8.1 Methods 71 8.2 Results and Discussion 73 8.2.1 Behavioral data 73 8.2.2 ERP data analysis 83 8. General Discussion and Conclusion 96 References 101 Appendixes 109
參考文獻	Baldassano, C., Chen, J., Zadbood, A., Pillow, J. W., Hasson, U., &Norman, K. A. (2017). Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory. Neuron, 95(3), 709-721.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.041 Bilkey, D. K., &Jensen, C. (2019). Neural Markers of Event Boundaries. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12470 Buchanan, T. W., Denburg, N. L., Tranel, D., &Adolphs, R. (2001). Verbal and nonverbal emotional memory following unilateral amygdala damage. Learning and Memory, 8(6), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.40101 Buodo, G., Sarlo, M., &Palomba, D. (2002). Attentional resources measured by reaction times highlight differences within pleasant and unpleasant, high arousing stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 26(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019886501965 Clewett, D., &Davachi, L. (2017). The ebb and flow of experience determines the temporal structure of memory. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.013 Clewett, D., DuBrow, S., &Davachi, L. (2019). Transcending time in the brain: How event memories are constructed from experience. Hippocampus, 29(3), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23074 Delogu, F., Drenhaus, H., &Crocker, M. W. (2018). On the predictability of event boundaries in discourse: An ERP investigation. Memory and Cognition, 46(2), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0766-4 Delorme, A., &Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 13, 9–21. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 Dolcos, F., &Cabeza, R. (2002). Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.2.3.252 DuBrow, S., &Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034024 DuBrow, S., &Davachi, L. (2016). Temporal binding within and across events. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 134, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.011 Dunsmoor, J. E., &Kroes, M. C. W. (2019). ScienceDirect Episodic memory and Pavlovian conditioning : ships passing in the night. COBEHA, 26, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.019 Dunsmoor, J. E., Kroes, M. C. W., Moscatelli, C. M., Evans, M. D., Davachi, L., &Phelps, E. A. (2018). Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4 Earles, J. L., Kersten, A. W., Vernon, L. L., &Starkings, R. (2017). Memory for Positive, Negative, and Neutral Events in Younger and Older Adults : Does Emotion Influence Binding in Event, 30(2), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.996530.Memory Erk, S., Kiefer, M., Grothe, J., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., & Walter, H. (2003). Emotional context modulates subsequent memory effect. Neuroimage, 18(2), 439-447. Ezzyat, Y., &Davachi, L. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory? Psychological Science, 22(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610393742 Ezzyat, Y., &Davachi, L. (2014). Similarity breeds proximity: Pattern similarity within and across contexts is related to later mnemonic judgments of temporal proximity. Neuron, 81(5), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.042 Fisher, J. E., Sass, S. M., Heller, W., Silton, R. L., Edgar, J. C., Stewart, J. L., &Miller, G. A. (2010). Time course of processing emotional stimuli as a function of perceived emotional intelligence, anxiety, and depression. Emotion, 10(4), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018691 Flores, S., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., &Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event segmentation improves event memory up to one month later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 43(8), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000367 Gibney, K. D., Kypriotakis, G., Cinciripini, P. M., Robinson, J. D., Minnix, J. A., &Versace, F. (2020). Estimating statistical power for event-related potential studies using the late positive potential. Psychophysiology, 57(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13482 Gold, D. A., Zacks, J. M., &Flores, S. (2017). Effects of cues to event segmentation on subsequent memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0043-2 Heusser, A. C., Ezzyat, Y., Shiff, I., &Davachi, L. (2018). Perceptual boundaries cause mnemonic trade-offs between local boundary processing and across-trial associative binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(7), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000503 Holland, A. C., & Kensinger, E. A. (2013). Emotion in Episodic Memory. The Cambridge handbook of human affective neuroscience, 465-488. Jia, X., Gao, C., Wang, Y., Han, M., Cui, L., &Guo, C. (2019). Emotional Arousal Influences Remembrance of Goal- Relevant Stimuli. Emotion, (August). https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000657 Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Remembering the details: Effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908100432 Kurby, C. A., &Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004 Ladouceur, C. D., Conway, A., &Dahl, R. E. (2010). Attentional control moderates relations between negative affect and neural correlates of action monitoring in adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640903526553 Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., &Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 39–58. Lopez-Calderon, J., &Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(1 APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213 Lyubomirsky, S. (2011). Hedonic adaptation to positive and negative experiences. Oxford University Press. Maratos, E. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates of the retrieval of emotional and non-emotional context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(7), 877-891. O’Hare, A. J., Atchley, R. A., &Young, K. M. (2017). Valence and arousal influence the late positive potential during central and lateralized presentation of images. Laterality, 22(5), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2016.1241257 Pettijohn, K. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory and Cognition, 44(7), 1064–1075. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0619-6 Radvansky, G. A., &Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006 Reagh, Z. M., Delarazan, A. I., Garber, A., &Ranganath, C. (2020). Aging alters neural activity at event boundaries in the hippocampus and Posterior Medial network. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17713-4 Sargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Hambrick, D. Z., Zacks, R. T., Kurby, C. A., Bailey, H. R., …Beck, T. M. (2013). Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition, 129(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.002 Schwan, S., &Garsoffky, B. (2004). The cognitive representation of filmic event summaries. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.940 Sherrill, A. M., Kurby, C. A., Lilly, M. M., &Magliano, J. P. (2019). The effects of state anxiety on analogue peritraumatic encoding and event memory: introducing the stressful event segmentation paradigm. Memory, 27(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1492619 Silva, M., Baldassano, C., &Fuentemilla, L. (2019). Rapid Memory Reactivation at Movie Event Boundaries Promotes Episodic Encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 39(43), 8538–8548. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0360-19.2019 Sols, I., DuBrow, S., Davachi, L., &Fuentemilla, L. (2017). Event Boundaries Trigger Rapid Memory Reinstatement of the Prior Events to Promote Their Representation in Long-Term Memory. Current Biology, 27(22), 3499-3504.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.057 Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., &Zacks, J. M. (2003). Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.335 Speer, N. K., &Zacks, J. M. (2005). Temporal changes as event boundaries: Processing and memory consequences of narrative time shifts. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.009 Speer, N. K., Zacks, J. M., &Reynolds, J. R. (2001). Perceiving Narrated Events Results & Conclusions Materials & Method Acknowledgments, 1637. Speer, N. K., Zacks, J. M., &Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries: Research article. Psychological Science, 18(5), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01920.x Spielberger, C. D., Vagg, P. R., Barker, L. R., Donham, G. W., & Westberry, L. G. (1980). The factor structure of the state-trait anxiety inventory. Stress and anxiety, 7, 95-109. Steinmetz, K. R. M., &Kensinger, E. A. (2010). The effects of valence and arousal on the neural activity leading to subsequent memory, 46(6), 1190–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00868.x.The Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., &Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event Boundaries in Perception Affect Memory Encoding and Updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015631 Talmi, D., Anderson, A. K., Riggs, L., Caplan, J. B., &Moscovitch, M. (2008). Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures. Learning and Memory, 15(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.722908 Tambini, A., Rimmele, U., Phelps, E. A., &Davachi, L. (2017). Emotional brain states carry over and enhance future memory formation. Nature Neuroscience, 20(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4468 Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., &Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(AUG). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454 Wang, P., Li, J., Li, H., Li, B., Jiang, Y., Bao, F., &Zhang, S. (2013). Is emotional memory enhancement preserved in amnestic mild cognitive impairment? Evidence from separating recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychology, 27(6), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033973 Watson, D., Clark, L. A., &Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. EPJ Web of Conferences, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714006017 Yen, N. S., Chen, K. H., &Liu, E. H. (2010). Emotional modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) generalizes to Chinese individuals. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.12.014 Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., …Raichle, M. E. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 651–655. Retrieved from http://neurosci.nature.com Zacks, J. M., &Swallow, K. M. (2007). Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00480.x Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., &Zacks, J. M. (n.d.). Event Structure in Perception and Conception 1.
指導教授	鄭仕坤(Shih-kuen Cheng)	審核日期	2021-1-29
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare