主管視角的內隱追隨力對部屬職涯成功的影響-以主管喜愛部屬、職涯贊助為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：3.138.102.82

姓名

王品茜(Pin-Chien Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

主管視角的內隱追隨力對部屬職涯成功的影響-以主管喜愛部屬、職涯贊助為中介變項
(The Relationship between Leader’s Implicit Followership and career success: The Mediating Effect of Liking and career sponsorship)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

過去許多研究都聚焦於領導理論的發展，但領導者和追隨者並無誰更為重要，而是存在著相互影響，近年內隱追隨理論成為管理領域中的新興研究，深入探討追隨者所帶來的影響。本研究主要針對主管視角的內隱追隨力(勤奮、熱情、公民行為)將如何對職涯成功產生影響進行探討，同時加入主管喜愛部屬以及主管對部屬的職涯贊助作為中介因子，進一步分析兩者之間的關係是否受到中介因子的影響。
本研究以主管部屬配對的方式進行問卷發放，最終蒐集有效樣本共 212 份，並利用結構方程式分析，了解主管視角的內隱追隨力如何影響部屬的職涯成功，以及主管喜愛部屬和主管對部屬的職涯贊助在兩者間扮演怎樣的角色。研究結果顯示，主管視角的內隱追隨力中的勤奮、公民行為會正向影響主管喜愛部屬，而主管視角的內隱追隨力中的熱情則和主管喜愛部屬無顯著關係;主管喜愛部屬會正向影響主管對部屬的職涯贊助; 主管對部屬的職涯贊助會正向影響部屬的職涯滿意度，而主管對部屬的職涯贊助和主管對部屬的晉升力評分則無顯著關係。綜上所述，當部屬展現勤奮和公民行為的特質與行為時，將會增強主管對部屬的喜愛程度，而當主管對部屬喜愛程度增加時，也會對部屬提供更多的職涯贊助，進而提升部屬的職涯滿意度。
最後，本研究亦針對研究結果提出討論，並說明其學術貢獻、管理意涵，於研究限制與建議中也對未來內隱追隨領域的發展提供不同的研究方向。

摘要(英)

The purpose of the study was to investigate how the implicit followership from the leader’s perspective affected career success, with adding the mediating effect of liking and career sponsorship. In the past, a myriad of studies focused on the development of leadership theory. However, both of the leadership and the followership were equally essential as well. In recent years, implicit followership theory even had become a new direction in the field of management.
Questionnaire Distribution was adopted to collect the data. A supervisor and a subordinate were regarded as a match. With two hundred and twelve valid samples and structural equation analysis, the results revealed that the industry and good citizen were positive affect liking, but the enthusiasm had no significant relationship with the liking; and liking was positive affect career sponsorship; and career sponsorship was positive affect career satisfaction, but the promotability had no significant relationship with career sponsorship.
In summary, when the subordinates demonstrated the characteristics and behaviors of industry and good citizen, the supervisor’s liking for subordinates would be enhanced, and when the supervisor’s liking for subordinates increases, they would also provide more career sponsorship to the subordinates, then the subordinate’s career satisfaction would improve. After all, the study proposed a discussion on the research results. In the research limitations and recommendations, the study was recommended different research directions for the future development of the field of implicit followership.

關鍵字(中)

★ 內隱追隨力
★ 主管喜愛部屬
★ 職涯贊助
★ 晉升力評分
★ 職涯滿意度

關鍵字(英)

★ implicit followership
★ liking
★ career sponsorship
★ promotability
★ career satisfaction

論文目次

中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 5
二、文獻探討 6
2-1 內隱追隨理論 6
2-1-1 內隱追隨力之量測 7
2-2 職涯贊助 9
2-3 職涯成功 10
2-4 內隱追隨力與主管喜愛部屬的關係 12
2-5 主管喜愛部屬與職涯贊助的關係 13
2-6 職涯贊助與職涯成功的關係 14
2-7 內隱追隨力、主管喜愛部屬與職涯贊助的關係 15
2-8 主管喜愛部屬、職涯贊助與職涯成功的關係 16
三、研究方法 17
3-1 研究架構 17
3-2 研究對象與程序 18
3-3 研究變項衡量 19
3-3-1 內隱追隨力 19
3-3-2 主管喜愛部屬 19
3-3-4 職涯滿意度 20
3-3-5 晉升力評分 20
3-3-5 控制變項 20
3-4 資料分析與統計方式 21
四、研究結果 22
4-1 資料來源與樣本特性 22
4-2 信效度檢測 24
4-2-1 信度分析 24
4-2-2 收斂效度 25
4-2-3 區辨效度 27
4-2-4 驗證性因素分析 28
4-3 PEARSON相關分析 29
4-4 假設模型檢驗 30
4-4-1 結構方程式檢驗 30
4-4-2 假設檢驗 32
五、結論與建議 35
5-1 研究結論 35
5-2 學術貢獻 38
5-3 管理意涵 39
5-4 研究限制與建議 40
參考文獻 41

參考文獻

王弘鈺、李雲劍(2018)。中國本土情境下內隱追隨的維度與量表開發—基於形成性指標的維度構建方法。廈門大學學報:哲學社會科學版(1)，78-85。
孔茗(2016)。內隱追隨研究進展-從員工視角分析領導過程。技術經濟，35(2)， 124-130。
孔茗、錢小軍(2015)。被領導者“看好”的員工其行為也一定好嗎?-內隱追隨對員工行為的影響。心理學報，47(9)，1162-1171。
孔茗、袁悅、錢小軍(2019)。“看好”與“做好”:內隱原型交互對員工行為的影響。Science of Science and Management of S. & T.，40(1)。
胡昌亞，「知識經濟時代師徒制功能」，載於李誠(主編)人力資源管理的 12 堂課，頁 336-350，遠見天下文化，台北，民 101。
祝振兵、羅文豪(2017)。中國組織情境下的內隱追隨:內容、結構與測量。江西社會科學，37(3)，235-244。
曹元坤、祝振兵(2015)。內隱追隨理論:概念、測量、前因及後果。心理科學進展，23(2)，280-288。
郭衍宏、蘭玲(2017)。中國情境下內隱追隨理論的建構與測量。中國人力資源開發(7)，25-37。
彭堅、王震(2018)。做上司的“意中人”:負擔還是賦能?追隨原型-特質匹配的雙刃劍效應。心理學報，50(2)，216-225。
彭堅、冉雅璇、康勇軍、韓雪亮(2016)。事必躬親還是權利共享?內隱追隨理論視角下的領導者授權行為研究。心理科學，39(5)，1197-1203。
楊紅玲、彭堅(2015)。內隱追隨理論研究述評。外國經濟與管理，37(3)，16-26。
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. Anderson, J. C., Milkovich, G. T., & Tsui, A. (1981). A model of intra-organizational mobility. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 529-538.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bjugstad, K., Thach, E. C., Thompson, K. J., & Morris, A. (2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership styles. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(3), 304.
Breaugh, J. A. (2011). Modeling the managerial promotion process. Journal of managerial Psychology.
Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The leadership quarterly, 21(3), 543-562.
Chao, G. T., Walz, P., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel psychology, 45(3), 619-636.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 541-560.
Chen, Y., Wen, Z., Peng, J., & Liu, X. (2016). Leader-follower congruence in loneliness, LMX and turnover intention. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
Cox Jr, T., & Nkomo, S. M. (1992). Candidate age as a factor in promotability ratings. Public Personnel Management, 21(2), 197-210.
De Pater, I. E., Van Vianen, A. E., Bechtoldt, M. N., & KLEHE, U. C. (2009). EMPLOYEES′CHALLENGING JOB EXPERIENCES AND SUPERVISORS′EVALUATIONS OF PROMOTABILITY. Personnel psychology, 62(2), 297-325.
Dixon, G., & Westbrook, J. (2003). Followers revealed. Engineering Management Journal, 15(1), 19-26.
Dreher, G. F., & Ash, R. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of applied psychology, 75(5), 539.
Eby, L. T. (1997). Alternative forms of mentoring in changing organizational environments: A conceptual extension of the mentoring literature. Journal of vocational behavior, 51(1), 125-144.
Eby, L. T., Butts, M., & Lockwood, A. (2003). Predictors of success in the era of the boundaryless career. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(6), 689-708. Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of applied psychology, 89(2), 293.
Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information- processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The leadership quarterly, 24(6), 858-881.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Gao, P., & Wu, W. (2019). Effect of leaders’ implicit followership theory on subordinates’ career success. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 47(5), 1-14.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of applied psychology, 82(6), 827.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self- esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review, 102(1), 4.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed) Upper Saddle River.
Heslin, P. A. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(2), 113-136.
Hollander, E. P. (1992). The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 71-75.
Hutchison, S., Sowa, D., Eisenberger, R., & Huntington, R. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 233-244.
Jawahar, I., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A longitudinal investigation of task and contextual performance influences on promotability judgments. Human Performance, 24(3), 251- 269.
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz Jr, R. D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel psychology, 48(3), 485-519.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel psychology, 52(3), 621-652.
Junker, N. M., Stegmann, S., Braun, S., & Van Dick, R. (2016). The ideal and the counter-ideal follower–advancing implicit followership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1990). The credibility factor: What followers expect from their leaders. Management Review, 79(1), 29.
Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., Wang, D., & Wang, L. (2000). Effect of supervisor– subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 751-765.
Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 367-408. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). Human capital and objective indicators of career success: The mediating effects of cognitive ability and conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 207-235.
Notgrass, D. (2014). The relationship between followers’ perceived quality of relationship and preferred leadership style. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric Theory, ed. New York McGraw. Poole, P. P., Gioia, D. A., & Gray, B. (1989). Influence modes, schema change, and organizational transformation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25(3), 271- 289.
Rosenbaum, J. E. (1984). Career mobility in a corporate hierarchy: Academic Pr. Rosenthal, R. (1993). Interpersonal expectations: Some antecedents and some consequences. Interpersonal expectations: Theory, research, and applications, 3-24. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 224-253.
Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1994). Leader-member exchange and supervisor career mentoring as complementary constructs in leadership research. Academy of management Journal, 37(6), 1588-1602.
Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of vocational behavior, 58(1), 1-21.
Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543-554.
Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84.
Thacker, R. A. (1999). Perceptions of trust, upward influence tactics, and performance ratings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(3_suppl), 1059-1070.
Tram-Quon, S. (2013). An exploratory study on the development of an implicit measure of implicit followership theory using the implicit association test (Doctoral dissertation, UC Riverside).
Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American sociological review, 855-867.
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The leadership quarterly, 25(1), 83-104.
Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 526.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: An empirical study in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1809-1824.
Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of applied psychology, 75(5), 487.
Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of organizational behavior, 20(5), 577-595.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3): Sage.
Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders′ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The leadership quarterly, 23(5), 822-834.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2021-6-25

推文