應用混合社群媒體探勘分析聯合國永續發展目標的創新

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：59

、訪客IP：3.138.142.146

姓名

梁太河(Luong Thai Ha) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

應用混合社群媒體探勘分析聯合國永續發展目標的創新
(Hybrid Social Media Mining on Innovation within Sustainable Development Goals)

相關論文

★ 美國軟體產業創新活動與財務效率分析	★ Performance Measurements of Web 2.0, Social Media, and Mobile Apps for Municipal Emergency Management
★ 中國大陸股權結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性	★ 我國半導體產業下游公司法人說明會對供應鏈上游公司投資現金流量敏感度的影響
★ 線上串流音樂服務之使用者抗拒意圖研究	★ 從認知理論探討創業機會辨識對績效之影響
★ 影響Y世代消費者對智慧綠色產品購買意圖與使用意圖的因素：以智慧節能裝置為例	★ Application of social media mining on the comparison between two-dimensional barcode and near field communication
★ 應用社群探勘技術分析城市之創業精神與新創公司的特性	★ 科技接受度與學習風格對於頭戴式虛擬實境應用在學習行為意圖的影響
★ 電子發票巨量資料視覺化分析－以酒的消費為例	★ 應用文字探勘分析ERP之趨勢發展：以Twitter為例
★ 社群媒體文字採礦之研究：以第三方物流公司為例	★ 應用文字探勘技術分析遊戲產業趨勢：以兩大遊戲展之相關推文為例
★ 台灣有機食品消費與疾病死亡率之視覺化分析	★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-6-8以後開放)

摘要(中)

創新是聯合國永續發展目標（SDGs）極為重要的推動力，然而，全球社會如何看待創新對SDGs發展的關係，以及公眾對SDGs創新的參與度及情感仍未得到充分的了解。由於社群媒體用戶參與度、關注度和情感態度是不同的面向，因此，為了從各種角度了解永續發展目標的創新背景，一個混合的社群媒體探勘方法被應用於Twitter用戶的生成內容，以建立對三個主要目的更廣泛的理解: （1）在17個SDG的每個維度中社群媒體用戶對相關創新的參與度；（2）識別社群媒體用戶關注的主題；（3）在所探究的關注主題下衡量社交媒體用戶的情感態度。本研究亦在不同年份全面追踪社群媒體用戶對某一主題的參與度、關注度和情感態度的變化。資料分析使用Python Pandas的編碼庫，將檢索到涉及SGDs內的創新的推文分配到17個SDGs；因此，17個SDGs組的最愛推特貼文和具傳播力的推特貼文被定義為參與度的分析。此外，象限分佈的參與度分析檢驗了社群媒體用戶在不同年份對17個SDGs中的每一個創新的參與度和反應。基於Hashtag標籤的網絡分析則提出了SDGs中創新的基本主題。而潛在語義分析是一種主題建模方法，它從社交媒體用戶的推文中提取有關SDGs創新的主題；據此，使用基於Python的Vader庫發現這些被發掘的關注話題下的情感態度。本研究揭示了社群意見、參與度及情感之間關聯的複雜性，這在以前的研究中是未被充分開發的；同時也讓人們注意到解釋的潛在因素，即不同類型的參與度分析可能會突出社交媒體用戶如何參與和對特定主題做出反應的不同角度。Hashtag標籤的結構化網絡鏈接也被發現證實了推文的主題分析結果。本研究亦建議，主題分析應逐年地進行參與度分析和情感分析，從而能夠深入探索SDGs創新的現狀。

摘要(英)

Innovation is the imperative driving force of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, inquiries into how global societies perceive the crucial role of innovation upon the progress of SDGs, and how the social public’s engagement and sentiment is expressed toward different dimensions of innovation within SDGs remain under-tapped. Since the engagement, the concerns, and the sentiment of social media users are completely different concepts. Therefore, in order to understand the SDGs innovation context from various perspectives, a hybrid social media mining approach is implemented on knowledge extracted from Twitter’s user-generated content to establish broader understanding on three major purposes: (1) disclosing the social media users’ engagement on innovation within each individual dimension of 17 SDGs; (2) identifying topics of social media users’ concerns, thereby (3) measuring the social media users’ sentiment beneath the explored topics of concern. This approach comprehensively tracks how social media users’ engagement, concerns, and sentiment upon a certain topic change in different year. Retrieved tweets addressing innovation within SDGs are assigned to 17 SDGs groups using a codebook implemented by Python Pandas; thereby, favorite tweets and viral tweets of the 17 SDGs groups are defined for the preliminary descriptive analysis of engagement. The subsequent engagement analysis using quadrant distribution examines the participation and reaction of social media users toward the innovation within each of the 17 SDGs in different years. The fundamental topical themes of innovation within SDGs are presented by the hashtags-based network analysis. Latent semantic analysis, a topic-modeling approach, extracts topics of concern from social media users’ tweets regarding SDGs innovation; whereby the sentiment underneath those explored topics of concern is discovered using Python-based Vader library. This research unveils the complexity in association between opinion patterns, engagement, and sentiment that is unprecedentedly addressed in previous research; and also brings attention to the potential pitfall of interpretation where different types of engagement analysis may highlight different angles of how social media users attend and react to a certain subject. The structured network linkage of hashtags is also found to corroborate the findings of topic analysis of tweets. The study suggests that engagement analysis and sentiment analysis should be conducted back-to-back wherever topic analysis is applied, thus enabling the in-depth exploration of the status quo of the investigated domain such as innovation within SDGs.

關鍵字(中)

★ 創新
★ 永續發展目標
★ 參與度分析
★ 網絡分析
★ 主題建模
★ 情感分析

關鍵字(英)

★ Innovation
★ Sustainable Development Goals
★ Engagement analysis
★ Network analysis
★ Topic Modeling
★ Sentiment Analysis

論文目次

Cover Page i
Authorization for Thesis/Dissertation ii
Advisor’s Recommendation for Graduate Students iii
Verification Letter from the Oral Examination Committee for Ph.D. Student iv
ABSTRACT v
摘要 vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS xii
LIST OF TABLES xiv
LIST OF FIGURES xv
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Objectives 2
2. Literature review 5
2.1 Sustainable Development Goals 5
2.2 Innovation toward Sustainable Development Goals 9
3. Methodology 11
3.1 Preliminary Descriptive Analysis of Engagement 11
3.2 Engagement Analysis 12
3.3 Network analysis of hashtags 14
3.4 Topic analysis 16
3.5 Sentiment analysis 19
4. Result 21
4.1 Preliminary descriptive statistics of the engagement 21
4.2 Engagement analysis 36
4.3 Network analysis of hashtags 45
4.4 Topic analysis 53
4.5 Sentiment analysis 58
5. Discussion 63
6. Conclusion and Implication 67
References 70

參考文獻

Altıntaş, H., & Kassouri, Y. (2020). The impact of energy technology innovations on cleaner energy supply and carbon footprints in Europe: A linear versus nonlinear approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124140
Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2019). Sustainable development goal indicators: Analyzing trade-offs and complementarities. World Development, 122, 295-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.026
Barbieri, R., & Santos, D. F. L. (2020). Sustainable business models and eco-innovation: A life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121954
Bechtsis, D., Tsolakis, N., Vlachos, D., & Srai, J. S. (2018). Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles in digital supply chains: A framework for integrating innovations towards sustainable value networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 60-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.173
Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112
Bonsón, E., Perea, D., & Bednárová, M. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 36 480–489. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015). Citizens′ engagement on local governments′ Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 52-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2014.11.001
Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123 –132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2011.10.001
Dang, H.-A. H., & Serajuddin, U. (2020). Tracking the sustainable development goals: Emerging measurement challenges and further reflections. World Development, 127 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.024
Dhahri, S., & Omri, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 106, 64-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008
Endl, A., Tost, M., Hitch, M., Moser, P., & Feiel, S. (2019). Europe′s mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points. Resources Policy. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101440
Fitchett, J. R., & Atun, R. (2014). Sustainable development goals and country-specific targets. Lancet, 2.
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2019). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Reputation – Insights from Tweets on Sustainable Development Goals by CEOs. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 39-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.009
Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., Boer, Y. d., . . . Kok, M. (2015). Beyond Cockpit-ism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7, 1651-1660.
Hellsmark, H., Mossberg, J., Söderholm, P., & Frishammar, J. (2016). Innovation system strengths and weaknesses in progressing sustainable technology: the case of Swedish biorefinery development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 702-715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.109
Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. (2015). VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Karlsson, N. P. E., Hoveskog, M., Halila, F., & Mattsson, M. (2018). Early phases of the business model innovation process for sustainability: Addressing the status quo of a Swedish biogas-producing farm cooperative. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2759-2772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.136
Keesstra, S. D., Bouma, J., Wallinga, J., Tittonell, P., Smith, P., Cerdà, A., . . . Fresco, L. O. (2016). The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil, 2, 111-128. doi: 10.5194/soil-2-111-2016
Khurana, S., Haleem, A., Luthra, S., & Mannan, B. (2021). Evaluating critical factors to implement sustainable oriented innovation practices: An analysis of micro, small, and medium manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125377
Kim, S., Park, H., & Lee, J. (2020). Word2vec-based latent semantic analysis (W2V-LSA) for topic modeling: A study on blockchain technology trend analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113401
Kwon, H., Kim, J., & Park, Y. (2017). Applying LSA text mining technique in envisioning social impacts of emerging technologies: The case of drone technology. Technovation, 60, 15–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.001
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 259-284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545028
Lu, Y., Nakicenovic, N., Visbeck, M., & Stevance, A.-S. (2016). Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Madsen, H. L. (2020). Business model innovation and the global ecosystem for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119102
McArthur, J. W., & Rasmussen, K. (2019). Classifying Sustainable Development Goal trajectories: A country-level methodology for identifying which issues and people are getting left behind. World Development, 123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.031
OECD. (2012). Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). OECD Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017). Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
Oliveira, D. J. S., Bermejo, P. H. d. S., & Santos, P. A. d. (2017). Can social media reveal the preferences of voters? A comparison between sentiment analysis and traditional opinion polls. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14(1), 34-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1214094
Patnaik, J., & Bhowmick, B. (2020). Promise of inclusive innovation: A Re-look into the opportunities at the grassroots. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121124
Peng, B., Zheng, C., Wei, G., & Elahi, E. (2020). The cultivation mechanism of green technology innovation in manufacturing industry: From the perspective of ecological niche. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119711
Peters, H. P. F., & Raan, A. F. J. v. (1993). Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part II: Representations by combined clustering and multidimensional scaling. Research Policy, 22(1), 47-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)90032-D
Pinho-Costa, L., Yakubu, K., Hoedebecke, K., Laranjo, L., Reichel, C. P., Colon-Gonzalez, M. d. C., . . . Errami, H. (2016). Healthcare hashtag index development: Identifying global impact in social media. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 63, 390–399. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.010
Pizzi, S., Caputo, A., Corvino, A., & Venturelli, A. (2020). Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs): A bibliometric investigation and systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124033
Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015). A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 14-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0
Sachs, J. r. D. (2012). From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet, 379, 2206-2211.
Schmidt, H., Gostin, L. O., & Emanuel, E. J. (2015). Public health, universal health coverage, and Sustainable Development Goals: can they coexist? Lancet. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60244-6
Shen, C.-W., & Ho, J.-T. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior 104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177
Shen, C.-w., Luong, T.-h., Ho, J.-t., & Djailani, I. (2019). Social media marketing of IT service companies: Analysis using a concept-linking mining approach. Industrial Marketing Management. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.014
Siebers, V., Gradus, R., & Grotens, R. (2019). Citizen engagement and trust: A study among citizen panel members in three Dutch municipalities. 545-554 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.010
Siegel, K. M., & Lima, M. G. B. (2020). When international sustainability frameworks encounter domestic politics: The sustainable development goals and agri-food governance in South America. World Development, 135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105053
Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Alvarado, R. (2020). Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118549
Sridhar, D. (2016). Making the SDGs useful: a Herculean task. Lancet, 1813. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31635-X
Staniškis, J. K., & Katiliūtė, E. (2019). Unsustainability reduction in enterprises by incremental innovations implementation and management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.017
Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Ross, B., & Neuberger, C. (2018). Social media analytics – Challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 156–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.002
Suebvises, P. (2018). Social capital, citizen participation in public administration, and public sector performance in Thailand. World Development, 109, 236-248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.007
Swain, R. B., & Karimu, A. (2020). Renewable electricity and sustainable development goals in the EU. World Development, 125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104693
UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on Inclusion for Education.
UnitedNations. (2015). Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. doi: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
Valdez, D., Pickett, A. C., & Goodson, P. (2018). Topic modeling: Latent semantic analysis for the social sciences. Social Science Quarterly, 99(5), 1665–1679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12528.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Visvizi, A., & Lytras, M. D. (2019). Politics and Technology in the Post-Truth Era. Emerald Studies in Politics and Technology.
Visvizi, A., Jussila, J., Lytras, M. D., & Ijäs, M. (2020). Tweeting and mining OECD-related microcontent in the post-truth era: A cloud-based app. Computers in Human Behavior, 107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.022
Waage, J., Yap, C., Bell, S., Levy, C., Mace, G., Pegram, T., . . . Poole, N. (2015). Governing the UN Sustainable Development Goals: interactions, infrastructures, and institutions. Lancet. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70112-9
Walsh, P. P., Murphy, E., & Horande, D. (2020). The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119957
Watkins, K. (2016). Longer lives and unfi nished agendas on child survival. Lancet, 388.
WorldEducationForum. (2000). The Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitment. World Education Forum.
Zhou, M., Govindan, K., & Xie, X. (2020). How fairness perceptions, embeddedness, and knowledge sharing drive green innovation in sustainable supply chains: An equity theory and network perspective to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120950
Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627–657. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005632319799

指導教授

沈建文(Shen Chien-wen)

審核日期

2021-6-9

推文