網路期刊評量系統：建構合於規範的邊際參與環境及作品集評量系統

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：55

、訪客IP：3.15.144.108

姓名

李良一(Liang-Yi Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

網路期刊評量系統：建構合於規範的邊際參與環境及作品集評量系統
(Journal Based Assessment System:Constructing a learning environment of Legitimate Peripheral Participation and portfolios assessment system)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在傳統的教學環境中老師都是採用一套教學策略來教導全部的學生，並沒有依據學生能力及專長的不同來給予不同的教學策略，所以並不是所有學生都能有適合自己的學習方式。且學生只能由作業及討論區來貢獻及分享知識使分散專精知識難以有效的整合。
本篇論文依據Lave的情境學習理念，及學術上期刊投稿的方式建立了網路期刊評量系統，以實現LPP(合法的邊際參與)由邊際參與到完全參與的過程。系統中利用作業、投稿、評審及觀摩讓學生貢獻及分享學習經驗，並利用學生作品集、ZPD及由Decision Tree所找出的規則，依學生知識、理解、應用、分析、綜合、評鑑及創意能力將學生分成不同的角色，最後再依各角色專長及能力缺乏的地方給予不同的工作，使學生能由不同工作的訓練漸漸的朝學習的核心前進。並能由作業、投稿、評審、創意及擔任角色來多元評量學生的學習成效。
我們由51位資工系大一學生使用本系統的資料及反應，發現大部分學生能由本系統而越來越願意貢獻他們的學習經驗，也能由瀏覽其他人的作品來提昇投稿及評審的能力，並由不同工作的訓練下漸漸的提高學習成效，而朝學習的核心前進。另外在問卷中大部分學生也認為本系統對學習是有幫助的並願意推薦給其他班級使用。

摘要(英)

In traditional teaching environment，teacher use one teaching strategy to all student，and no use different strategy by student ‘s ability，so not all student has suitable learning way，and student’s learning experiment only contribute and share in discuss board and homework submitting，so distribute expertise is difficult to integrate。
This paper according situated learning by Lave and journal publication process to construct Journal Based Assessment System to achieve LPP from peripheral participation to full participation。We use homework , journal submitting , review and learn from peer’s work to acquisition student’s Learning experiment and use portfolios、ZPD and rules by decision tree to separate different roles by student’s Knowledge、Comprehension、application、analysis、synthesis、Evaluation and creativity ability，finally give different student different task to improve their ability ，and archive the goal of multiple evaluation。
Subject were 51 computer science majors show that they like to contribute their experiment more and more，and can improve their submitting and evaluation ability by peer’s work and lift learning performance by different task . Besides questionnaire show this system is useful to learning and student want to promote to other classes。

關鍵字(中)

★ 學生模組
★ 決策樹
★ 多元評量
★ 情境學習
★ 作品集

關鍵字(英)

★ portfolios
★ situated learning
★ multiple assessment
★ Decision Tree
★ student model

論文目次

摘要 I
誌謝 II
目錄 III
圖形索引 VII
第 1 章緒論 1
1-1 、研究背景與動機 1
1-2 、研究目標 2
1-3 、問題與對策 3
1-4 、相關技術 3
1-4-1 Decision Tree 3
1-5 論文架構 4
第 2 章相關研究 5
2-1 學習理念 5
2-2 近側發展區 (ZPD) 6
2-3 Student Model 6
2-4 作品集評量 6
2-5 同儕評量系統 7
第 3 章 Web Journal 評量系統 9
3-1 系統架構 9
3-2 Knowledge Acquisition Model 10
3-2-1 投稿項目及表格製作分析 10
3-2-2 Knowledge Acquisition 的過程 10
3-3 Streaming Model 12
3-4 多元評量 16
第 4 章系統實作 18
4-1 、環境與平台 18
4-2 、系統實作架構圖 18
4-2-1 學生投稿系統 19
4-2-2 狀態查詢系統 20
4-2-3 作品觀摩系統 20
4-2-4 作品審查系統 21
4-2-5 教師監控系統 21
第 5 章實驗分析與討論 24
5-1 Web Journal各項統計結果 24
5-1-1 投稿量統計 24
5-1-2 投稿人數統計 25
5-1-3 瀏覽量統計 26
5-1-4 瀏覽人數統計 26
5-1-5 角色人數變化統計 27
5-1-6 角色成績分布統計 27
5-1-7 角色平均瀏覽量統計 28
5-1-8 成績平均瀏覽量統計 28
5-1-9 角色平均投稿量統計 29
5-1-10 成績平均投稿量統計 29
5-1-11 角色與瀏覽查詢狀態統計 30
5-1-12 成績與瀏覽查詢狀態統計 30
5-2 考試成績與Web Journal成績相關性分析 31
5-3 各項量值平均數差異性分析 33
5-3-1 瀏覽量高低其投稿成績平均數差異性分析 33
5-3-2 獲得Editor Feedback前後Reviewer 評審的成績差異性分析 33
5-3-3 瀏覽評審表次數高低其Reviewer評審成績平均數差異性分析 35
5-4 Web Journal 問卷分析 36
第 6 章結論 42
參考文獻 43
附錄一問卷 48
附錄二 Decision Tree Rules 51

參考文獻

1. 林明松，“依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統”，國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，2000。
2. 呂靜芳 “由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統”，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2000
3. 邱貴發，”情境學習理念與電腦輔助學習－學習社群理念探討” ，師大書苑 1996
4. 許涵雲“行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統”，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2001
5. 倪家祥“以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式”，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2001
6. Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The Knowledge Integration Environment: Theory and Design. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 1995 Conference
7. Barrett, H. Collaborative Planning for Electronic Portfolios: Asking Strategic Questions, National Educational Computing Conference, June, 1997
8. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
9. Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4-12.
10. Brown, A. L., and Campione, J. C. (1992). Interactive learning environments: A new look at assessment and instruction. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O’’Conner (Eds), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 121-211). Boston: Kluwer.
11. Brown, A. L., and Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.
12. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-288). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Burton, R. B., Diagnosing bugs in a simple procedural skill. In D.Sleeman & J. S. Brown(Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, London: Academic Press, 1982.
14. Chi, M.T.H, R. Glaser and E. Rees, Expertise in problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg(Ed.) Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 1, 1982
15. Davis R. & Berrow,T. (1998). An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer reviewe for developing higher-level skills. Computers and Education,30 (1/2)
16. Fletcher, J.D., Modeling of learner in computer-based instruction, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, vol. 1, pp. 118-126, 1975.
17. Kwok, R.C.W., & Ma, J. (1999). Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers and Education, 32 (2), 109-125.
18. Kwan,K.-P., & Leung,R.(1996). Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a simulation training exercise. Assesment & Evaluation in Higher Education,21,205-214
19. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated Learning: Legitimate Periperal Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
21. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., Wang, W. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Albatross Ⅲ: A Web-Based Course Support System. International Journal of Instructional Media, Vol. 28, No. 4.
22. Liu, E. Z. –F., Lin, S. S. –J., & Yuan, S. –M. Alternatives to instructor assessment: A case study of comparing self and peer assessment with instructor assessment under networked innovative assessment procedures. International Journal of Instructional Media, Vol.29，No 4.
23. Liu, E. Z. –F., Lin, S. S. –J., Chiu, C. –H., & Yuan, S. –M. (In press). Peer review: An effective web-learning strategy with the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol.44，No 3.
24. Lin, S. S. –J., Liu, E. Z. –F., & Yuan, S. –M. Learning effects of Web-based peer assessment for students with various thinking styles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association,New Orleans,Louisiana.
25. Lin, S. S. –J., Liu, E. Z. –F., & Yuan, S. –M. Web-Based Peer Assessment: Attitude and Achievement. IEEE Transactions on Education,Vol.44,No 2 13-13.
26. IBM DB2 Intelligent Miner for Data. In http://www-4.ibm.com/software/data/iminer/fordata/
27. Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber, Data Mining : Concepts and Techniques, MORGAN KAUFMANN PUBLISHERS , 2001
28. Marsha Leeman-Conley, The How and the Why of Electronic Portfolios in Higher Education, Technology in Education International Conference 1999.
29. Microsoft SQL Server 2000-Analysis Services develop by Microsoft at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/BI/analysis.asp
30. Mitrovic, A., S. Djordjevic-Kajan, L. Stoimenov, INSTRUCT: Modeling Students by Asking Questions. In User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 273-302, 1996.
31. Pea, R., Gomez, L. & Edelson, D. (1995) Science Education as a Driver of Cyberspace Technology Development. Proceedings of the INET’’95 International Conference, Hawaii. Reston, VA: Internet Society, 375-384
32. Pea, R.D. (1993). The collaborative visualization project. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 61-63
33. portfolio system at Illinois State University, URL at http://portfolio.ilstu.edu/
34. Quinlan, J. R. C4.5 Programs for machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California, 1993
35. Rada, R. (1998). Efficiency and effectiveness in computer-supported peer-peer learning.Computers and Education, 30 (3/4), 137-146
36. Resnick, M. (1996). Distributed Constructionism. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University
37. Rogoff，B (1991) Social interaction as apprenticeship in thinking：guidance and participation in spatial.In L. B. Resnick，J.M.Levine，& S.D.Teasley(Eds),Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 349-383 , Washington , DC：APA
38. Roth , W.M. (1997). From everyday science and science education：how science and technology studies inspired curriculum design and classroom research . Science and Education , 6 , 373-296
39. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). An architecture for collaborative knowledge building. In E. D. Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 41-65). Berlin: Springer.
40. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge-building discourse. Communications of the ACM, Vol .36 No. 5, 37-41.
41. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
42. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilly (ed.), Classroom lessons - Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
43. Spitzer, W., & Wedding, K. (1995). LabNet: An international electronic community for professional development. Computers and Education, 24(3), 247-256
44. Stiggins, Richard J. Student-Centered Classroom Assessment, New York: Merrill Publishing Co, 1994
45. Tom M. Mitchell , Machine Learing , McGRAW-HILL INTERNATIONAL EDITIONS,1997
46. VanLehn, K., Student modeling. In M. Polson & Richardson(Eds), Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Hillsdale, 1988.
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
48. Wolf, Kenneth; Siu-Runyan, Yvonne Portfolio purposes and possibilities, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Sep96, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p30

指導教授

陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2002-7-4

推文