摘要(英) |
In the early days, Taiwan’s electronics manufacturing industry focused on the development of Contract Manufacturing business. Through obtaining Contract Manufacturing orders from major international manufacturers, they learned the technical knowledge and management systems of major international manufacturers. However, as market competition became more and more fierce, Taiwanese contract manufacturers faced with the pressure of competition in the same industry and customer requirements to reduce fees, in order to get rid of the dilemma of meager profit, in order to improve the profitability of the company and continue to operate, many companies have begun to think after years of accumulated manufacturing experience and cost management capabilities. Establishing its own brand, under the background of developing OEM business and own brand at the same time, it has become a common way to raise the brand by OEM. However, when the brand business has grown to a certain extent, it begins to threaten existing OEM customers. Facing the conflict between the brand business and the Contract Manufacturing business, customers often respond by drawing orders or reducing orders. At this time, the company is facing a difficult decision, whether to separate the Contract Manufacturing from the brand business?
This study adopts the case study method of qualitative research, taking the spin-off of Pegatron by Asustek as a case study to explore whether the corporate spin-off is beneficial to the operating performance of ASUS and Pegatron. A comparative analysis with peer companies shows that after the separation of brand business and Contract Manufacturing business between Asustek and Pegatron, the two companies are reintegrating their own resources to refocus on core competitiveness and implement professional business. The operating performance is significantly better than the peer group companies. After the spin-off, Asustek was able to focus on brand marketing and business promotion, and its share of the global notebook computer market has increased. After the spin-off, Pegatron was able to focus on Contract Manufacturing operations and win new customers and orders. In recent years, both revenue and profit have grown substantially. This corporate spin-off between ASUS and Pegatron is a successful typical case in recent years and can be used as a reference for companies to resolve conflicts between OEM and Contract Manufacturing. |
參考文獻 |
一﹑中文部分:
王曉玟(2011),華碩減資分家 施崇棠下險棋,天下雜誌437期。
王泰銓(1998),歐洲事業法(一)歐洲公司企業組織法,五南圖書出版公司。
江雪鈴(2006),公司分割策略之研究,國立台灣科技大學財務金融所碩士班碩士學位論文。
李山(2012),代工廠商自創品牌動態競合策略探討。國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
李依蓉(2004),論公司分割制度。國立政治大學法律系財經法組碩士論文。
吳華音(2016),台灣企業分割之個案研究-以友訊﹑華碩為例,國立交通大學管理學院財務金融學程碩士班碩士論文。
林文山(2013),資訊工業企業分割之個案研究,國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士班碩士論文。
林卦緣(2007),母子公司的關係強弱對於分割後母公司長短期績效的影響-以台灣上市櫃公司為例。國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
林盷諭,(2015),雷射半導體產業品牌與代工策略發展之研究,國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
施振榮(2004),「宏碁的世紀變革:淡出製造,成就品牌」,天下文化出版公司。
郭櫻枝,李文智,蔡彥卿(2005),企業價值鏈分割與策略聯盟個案研究:以裕隆汽車為例(上),會計研究月刊,第239期。
郭櫻枝,李文智,蔡彥卿(2004),企業分割策略之研究-以康師傅分割飲料事業個案為例,證交資料,第511期,2004年11月,P.9。
徐婉萍(2005),自有品牌開發對客戶權益的影響分析-以電腦代工業為例。私立東吳大學國際貿易學研究所碩士論文。
陳映竹(2005),從核心競爭能力發展之觀點探討代工廠轉型及多元布局-以和碩為例,國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
陳巧樺(2011),品牌與代工分割策略之研究,康寧大學運籌與科技管理研究所碩士論文。
陳振祥(1996),ODM策略之理論架構與實證。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
張偉明(2007),企業分割之探討-華碩電腦,國立台灣大學會計與管理決策組碩士論文。
黃蕙娟(1990),台灣企業國際上自創品牌策略之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
黃郁卿(2005),企業分割策略效益-以閎暉公司為個案探討。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程財管組碩士論文。
梁昱雯(2015),企業分割與經營績效,國立中正大學會計資訊與法律數位學習碩士在職專班論文。
萬秀惠(2018),以個案分析方法探討台灣企業分割之決策與成效,天主教輔仁大學金融與國際企業學系金融碩士在職專班碩士論文。
劉康鈞(2009),影響台灣企業品牌與代工業務分割時間關鍵因素之探討-以宏碁﹑明碁﹑華碩為例,國中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
劉昶靜(2004),分割活動對公司經營績效的影響,國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
劉福運(2011),上市櫃公司股權分割(Equity Carve-Outs)後營運績效之表現,國立臺北大學會計學系碩士論文。
劉秀美(1993),台灣自行車產業品牌化決策之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡靜怡(1997),我國廠商國際自創品牌策略之研究。國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
蔡冰妤(2006),以實質選擇權評估OBM廠商兼營OEM之最適分割時點,國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
蘇文彬(2007),華碩品牌與代工事業分家。取自https://www.ithome.com.tw/node/44158
蘇淑玲(2017),品牌與代工並存之關鍵成功因素,國立台北科技大學工業工程與管理系EMBA班碩士學位論文。
公開資訊觀測站,https://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/t05st01
維基百科網站,https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki
宏碁集團台灣官方網站,https://www.acer-group.com/ag/zh/TW/content/home
仁寶電腦官方網站,https://www.compal.com/
台灣博碩士論文網站,https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=d
Goodinfo!台灣股市資訊網,https://goodinfo.tw/StockInfo/index.asp
Robert K.Yin 著,尚榮安譯(2001)。「個案研究法(Case Study Research)」。台北:弘智文化出版社。
華碩年報(2008~2019)。
和碩年報(2010~2019)。
宏碁年報(2010~2019)。
仁寶年報(2010~2019)。
緯創年報(2010~2019)。
台灣經濟新報資料庫。
二﹑英文部分
Allen, J.W., and McConnell, J.J., (1998). Equity Crave-outs and Managerial Discretion, Journal of Finance, Vol.53, 1998, pp. 163-186.
Chen, S.-F. (2005).Extending internalization theory: A new perspective on international technology transfer and its generalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 231-245.
Cusatis, P., Miles, J. A. and Woolridge, J.R.,(2001).“Some new evidence that spinoffs create value", In Chew Jr., Donald H., The new corporate finance, McGraw-Hill 3rd. ed., pp.592~599.
Gerner, R., E. Powers, E., and Scharfstein, D., (2002). Learning about Internal Capital Markets from Corporate Spin-offs, Journal of Finance, Vol.57, No. 6.
Johnson, S.A., Klein, D. P. and Thibodeaux, V. L. (1996). “The effects of spin-offs on corporate investment and performance.” Journal of Financial Research 19 (2): 293-307.
Kimberly, E. F. & J.W. Harden. (2001). “Corporate Restructurings: A Comparison of Equity Craves-outs and Spin-offs,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol.28, No.3&4, pp.503-529.
Schipper, K. and Smith, A. (1986). “A Comparison of Equity Carve-Outs and Seasoned Equity Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics 15: 153-186.
Stewart III G, B. and Glassman, D. M., (2001). “The motives and methods of corporate restructuring", In Chew Jr., Donald H., The new corporate finance, McGraw-Hill 3rd.ed., pp.529~543.
Venkatraman, N., and Ramanujam, V. (1986). “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 801-814. |