博碩士論文 108424025 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:44 、訪客IP:18.222.162.14
姓名 沈冠丞(Kuan-Cheng Shen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 產業經濟研究所
論文名稱 探討企業永續行為:從漂綠行為說起
相關論文
★ 空氣汙染對臺灣太陽能發電之影響★ 空氣汙染對於房價的影響-以桃園重劃區為例
★ 公司治理、創新與公司經營績效:台灣電子業之實證研究★ 新冠肺炎與投保行為之研究-以S人壽保險公司之銀行保險通路為例
★ 公司產品多樣化對營運績效的影響:以台灣電子產業為例★ 董事會性別組成比例與員工之關係:以台 灣企業勞動訴訟為例子
★ 論我國破產免責制度-以消費者債務清理條例為研究核心★ 董事會性別平衡對經營績效影響
★ 疫情、市場情緒、公司治理與股價波動度★ 談台灣電子與非電子產業CSR行為與財務績效之關係 -以GRI資料進行分析
★ 國家財富、最適外匯儲備水準與主權基金★ 成人參與數位學習與個人特徵之關聯性分析
★ 女性董事及研發投資比例對公司經營績效的影響★ 延長道路交通安全講習時數政策對年輕新手機車騎士常見事故型態影響之研究
★ 創新效率對於股價報酬之影響 —以台灣電子工業上市櫃公司為例★ 疫情期間台股散戶投資人行為分析- (處置效果、過度自信、從眾效應)
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 眾多文獻探討企業財務績效與企業ESG評級表現的關係,鮮少文獻探討企業ESG行為的真實性與否,以及現在ESG評分制度本身。本研究以企業規模和企業ESG資訊揭露程度作為主要觀察自變數,企業規模本文分別使用總資產、營收、員工人數以及市值四個變數來控制。而企業ESG資訊揭露程度,本文使用企業的GRI準則項目的達成比率。控制變數為資產報酬率 (ROA)、負債淨值比 (D/E)、財務槓桿度(LEV)以及商譽等財務數據。而應變數則使用公司治理評鑑的企業ESG評分和企業碳排放濃度 (總碳排放量除以企業規模作為應變數),分別代表企業永續表象行為以及企業永續實際行為 。企業ESG評分是取台灣證券交易所的公司治理評鑑,而碳排放在國際上被認為是衡量永續行動的重要指標。本文為了更進一步了解產業之間的差異,將台灣產業分為製造業與非製造業,並排除金融業,來進行研究與比較。
本研究依照所有產業、製造業和非製造業有不一樣的結果。本文發現所有產業下,企業規模與環境資訊揭露程度對ESG評級有正向影響,而製造業只有企業規模對ESG評分有正向影響,非製造業只在環境資訊揭露對ESG評分有正向影響。在碳排放濃度的部分,不論全產業或製造業與否,環境資訊揭露程度皆對碳排放濃度呈現正向顯著的結果。而企業規模對碳排放濃度沒有一致性的效果。
最後本文根據研究結果,討論相關的政策與建議。本文認為我國的相關法規可以參照歐盟近年來頒布的ESG法規,例如Directive 2014/95/EU和SDFR針對企業ESG資訊加以規範。ESG評鑑的部分,則可以參照天下CSR評鑑的企業規模分級來評估各個企業的ESG表現。透過政府與民間的同心協力,逐步改善我國企業漂綠行為的可能,並促進企業實質層面的減碳行動。
摘要(英) There is a branch of literature discussing the relationship between corporate financial performance and corporate ESG rating, but only a few hinge upon the reality of corporate ESG behavior and the current ESG rating system. This study takes firm size and the degree of corporate ESG information disclosure as main dependent variables, using total assets, revenue, number of employees, and market capitalization as controls for firm size and corporate GRI standard completion rate as proxy for corporate ESG information disclosure. Controlling for financial variables, namely return on assets (ROA), debt-to-equity ratio (D/E), leverage, and goodwill, this article utilizes corporate ESG score and carbon emission density to represent the symbolic and real actions of corporate sustainability, respectively. Corporate ESG scores are sourced from the ESG rating of Taiwan Stock Exchange, and carbon emission is universally perceived as an important index to measure sustainable actions. To further research on the differences across industries, this study analyzes and compares manufacturing to non-manufacturing industries (excluding the financial industry). This research finds different results in all industries, as well as between manufacturing and non-manufacturing industries. For all industries, firm size and the degree of environmental information disclosure have a positive effect on ESG ratings. In the manufacturing industry, specifically, only firm size has a positive effect on ESG ratings, while in the non-manufacturing industry, only environmental information disclosure bears a positive effect on ESG ratings. Regarding carbon emission concentration, the degree of environmental information disclosure has a positive and significant effect on carbon emission concentration whether all, manufacturing, or nonmanufacturing industries are considered. However, firm size does not have an unanimous effect on carbon emission concentration.Based on the results, this study makes several policy recommendations. This paper believes that Taiwan’s regulations can draw reference to the ESG regulations promulgated by the EU in recent years, such as Directive 2014/95/EU and SDFR, to further regulate corporate ESG information. As regards ESG evaluation, ESG performance of individual firms can be evaluated under the corporate scale of Excellence Corporate Social Responsibility. Through the concerted efforts of the government and private sectors, Taiwan will gradually reduce the possibility of greenwashing behaviors and promote substantive actions on carbon reduction for enterpris.
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業永續經營
★ ESG
★ 漂綠
★ 企業規模
★ 碳排放
關鍵字(英) ★ CSR
★ ESG
★ Greenwashing
★ Firm size
★ carbon emission
論文目次 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
壹、 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 3
貳、 文獻回顧 5
參、 研究方法 8
3.1 研究假說 8
3.2 資料來源與變數說明 10
3.2.1 企業規模與ESG資訊揭露衡量 10
3.2.2 ESG評級與企業ESG行為衡量 11
3.2.3 控制變數 13
3.3 研究方法 17
肆、 實證結果 19
4.1 企業的ESG評級表現與企業規模和ESG資訊揭露的關係 19
4.2 企業的實際ESG行為與企業規模和ESG資訊揭露的關係 22
伍、 結論 25
5.1 實證結果與討論 25
5.1.1 ESG資訊揭露程度 25
5.1.2 企業規模對碳排放濃度的影響 27
5.2 政策討論 29
5.3 研究限制與建議 32
參考文獻 33
參考文獻 • Abrahamson E., & Park C. (1994). Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal. 37(5), 1302–1334.
• Adams, C.A., Hill, W.Y., & Roberts, C.B. (1998). Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behavior? The British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1–21.
• Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2016). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from International data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027–1047.
• Baird, P.L., Geylani, P.C., & Roberts, J.A. (2012). Corporate social and financial performance re-examined: Industry effects in a linear mixed model analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 367–388.
• Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1),71–86.
• Barnum, L.T., Mussio, D., Houlihan, M.B., & Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP (2020, March 6). Potential Impact of New SEC Guidance on Performance Metrics on Disclosure of ESG Metrics. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/06/potential-impact-of-new-sec-guidance-on-performance-metrics-on-disclosure-of-esg-metrics
• Bergman, M.S., Deckelbaum, A.J., Johnson, J.C., Karp, B.S., Lynch, L.E., Rosen, R.A., Soloway, A.J., Mi, F.F., Curran, D., & Martos, S.D. (2020, July 31). The U.S. Regulatory Framework for ESG Disclosures. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/esg-thought-leadership/publications/the-us-regulatory-framework-for-esg-disclosures?id=37633
• Birindelli, G., Ferretti, P., Intonti, M., & Iannuzzi, A.P. (2015). On the drivers of corporate social responsibility in banks: Evidence from an ethical rating model. Journal of Management and Governance,19(2), 303–340.
• Boone, T., Ganeshan, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2012). Carbon foot print of products: Supply chain approach. In T. Boone, V. Jayaraman, & R. Ganeshan (Eds.), Sustainable Supply Chains: Models, Methods, and Public Policy Implications, 175–191. New York, NY: Springer New York.
• Bromley, P., & Powell, W.W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals. 6(1), 483–530.
• Busch, T., Johnson, M., Pioch, T., & Kopp, M. (2018). Consistency of Corporate Carbon Emission Data. Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg.
• Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2019). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics,157(2), 543–565.
• Chatterji, A., Durand, R., Levine, D., & Touboul, S. (2014). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614.
• Chauhan, S. (2014). A relational study of firm’s characteristics and CSR expenditure. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 23–32.
• Chen, R.C.Y., Hung, S.-W., & Lee, C.H. (2017). Does corporate value affect the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and stock returns? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 7(2), 188–196.
• Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal. 35(1),1–23.
• Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D., & Vasvari, F.P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327.
• Clarkson, P.M., Overell, M.B., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 27–60.
• Clayton, J. (2020, May 20). Remarks at Meeting of the Asset Management Advisory Committee. https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/clayton-amac-opening-2020-05-27
• Coates, J. (2021, March 11). ESG Disclosure – Keeping Pace with Developments Affecting Investors, Public Companies and the Capital Markets. https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/coates-esg-disclosure-keeping-pace-031121#_ftn1
• Dawkins, C., & Fraas, J.W. (2011). Coming clean: The impact of environmental performance and visibility on corporate climate change disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 303–322.
• Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures - A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.
• Delmas, M., & Blass, V.D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245–260
• Delmas, M.A., & Burbano, V.C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review. 54(1), 64–87.
• Delmas M.A., & Montes-Sancho, M.J. (2010). Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 575–601.
• Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
• Doda, B., Gennaioli, C., Gouldson, A., Grover, D., & Sullivan, R. (2016). Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(5), 257–270.
• Döpfner, C. (2016). Wie nützlich sind Nachhaltigkeitsratings für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung von Unternehmen? In: Kopp H. (eds) CSR und Finanzratings. Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Gabler.
• Drempetic, S., Klein, C. & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 333–360.
• Dubbink, W., Graafland, J., & van Liedekerke, L. (2008). CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 391–406.
• Durand, R., Paugam, L., & Stolowy, H. (2019). Do investors actually value sustainability indices? Replication, development, and new evidence on CSR visibility. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9), 1471–1490.
• Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Stony Creek, CT: New Society.
• El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C.Y., & Mishra, D.R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.
• Fiandrino, S., Busso, D., & Vrontis, D. (2019). Sustainable responsible conduct
beyond the boundaries of compliance. British Food Journal, 121(5), 1035–1049.
• Franceschelli, M.V., Santoro, G., & Candelo, E. (2018). Business model innovation for sustainability: a food start-up case study. British Food Journal, 120(10), 2483–2494.
• Franceschelli, M.V., Santoro, G., Giacosa, E., & Quaglia, R. (2019). Assessing the determinants of performance in the recycling business: evidence from the Italian context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5), 1086–1099.
• Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2–3), 233–262.
• Gallo, P.J., & Christensen, L.J. (2011). Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society, 50(2), 315–349.
• Gangi, F., & D’Angelo, E. (2016). The virtuous circle of corporate social performance and corporate social disclosure. Modern Economy, 07(12), 1396–1418.
• Gao, S.S., Heravi, S., & Xiao, J.Z. (2005). Determinants of corporate social and environmental reporting in Hong Kong: A research note. Accounting Forum, 29(2), 233–242.
• Gardberg, N.A., & Fombrun, C.J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.
• Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A.M. (2017). The effect of equity and bond issues on sustainability disclosure. Family vs non-family Italian firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 126–142.
• Ghouri, A.M., Akhtar, P., Shahbaz, M., & Shabbir, H. (2019). Affective organizational commitment in global strategic partnerships: The role of individual-level microfoundations and social change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 320–330.
• Glachant, M. (2007). Non-binding voluntary agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(1), 32–48.
• Graafland, J., van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 45–60.
• Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101.
• Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M.J. (2015a). Buying Green? Field Experimental Tests of Consumer Support for Environmentalism. Working paper. Boston, MA: Harvard University. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/hiscox/files/buying_green.pdf
• Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M.J. (2015b). The Socially Conscious Consumer? Field Experimental Tests of Consumer Support for Fair Labor Standards. MIT Political Science Department Research Paper (No. 2012–15). Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.
• Hartzmark, S.M., & Sussman, A.B. (2018). Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837.
• Hasegawa, H. (2010). Analyzing tourists′ satisfaction: A multivariate ordered probit approach. Tourism Management, 31(1), 86-97.
• Heflin, F., Subramanyam, K.R., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Regulation FD and the financial information environment: Early evidence. Accounting Review. 78(1), 1–37.
• Hernández, J.P.S.-I., Yañez-Araque, B., & Moreno-García, J. (2020). Moderating effect of firm size on the influence of corporate social responsibility in the economic performance of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119774.
• Hörisch, J., Johnson, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). Implementation of sustainability management and company size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 765–779.
• Hou, J., & Reber, B.H. (2011). Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 166–168.
• Hughey, C.J., & Sulkoski, A.J. (2012). More disclosure = Better CSR reputation? An examination of CSR reputation leaders and laggards in the global oil & gas industry. Journal of Academy of Business & Economics, 12(2), 24–34.
• Inigo, E.A., & Albareda, L. (2019). Sustainability oriented innovation dynamics: Levels of dynamic capabilities and their path-dependent and self-reinforcing logics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 334–351.
• Jira, C.F., & Toffel, M.W. (2013). Engaging supply chains in climate change. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15(4), 559–577.
• King, A., & Bartels, W. (2015). Currents of change: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. https ://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/11/kpmg-international-survey-of-corporate responsibility-reporting-2015.pdf
• Kirk, M., & Vincent, J. (2014). Professional investor relations within the firm. Accounting Review, 89(4), 1421–1452.
• Lauer, C. (2003). Family background, cohort and education: A French–German comparison based on a multivariate ordered probit model of educational attainment. Labour Economics, 10(2), 231–251.
• Lee, A.H., (2020 January 30). “Modernizing” Regulation S-K: Ignoring the Elephant in the Room. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/lee-mda-2020-01-30#_ftn19
• Lenox, M.J. (2006). The role of private decentralized institutions in sustaining industry self-regulation. Organization Science, 17(6), 677–690.
• Lewis, S. (2003). Reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), 356–366.
• Li, J., Haider, Z. A., Jin, X., & Yuan, W. (2019). Corporate controversy, social responsibility and market performance: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 60, 1–18.
• Liu, M.T., Wong, I. A., Shi, G., Chu, R., & Brock, J.L. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and perceived brand quality on customer-based brand preference. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(3), 181–194.
• Lyon, T.P., & Maxwell, J.W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41.
• Matthieu, G. (2007). Non-binding voluntary agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(1), 32–48.
• Marquis, C., Michael, W.T., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483–504.
• Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419–438.
• McDonnell, M.H., & King, B.G. (2013). Keeping up appearances: Reputation threat and prosocial responses to social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 387–419.
• Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527–556.
• Meyer, J.W., & Rowan B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
• Naser, K., Al-Hussaini, A., Al-Kwari, D., & Nuseibeh, R. (2006). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in developing countries: The case of Qatar. Advances in International Accounting, 19, 1–23.
• Nirino, N., Miglietta, N., & Salvi, A. (2020). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firms’ financial performance, evidence from the food and beverage industry. British Food Journal, 122(1), 1–13.
• Oh, W.-Y., Cha, J., & Chang, Y.K. (2017). Does ownership structure matter? The effects of insider and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 111–124.
• Okhmatovskiy, I., & David, R.J. (2012). Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organization Science, 23(1), 155–176.
• Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15–28.
• Perez, F., & Sanchez, L.E. (2009). Assessing the evolution of sustainability reporting in the mining sector. Environmental Management, 43(6), 949–961.
• Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4, 1–52.
• Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
• Power, M. (1994). The Audit Explosion (Paper No. 7). London, UK Demos. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/theauditexplosion.pdf
• Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391–424.
• Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365–379.
• Raimo, N., de Nuccio, E., Giakoumelou, A., Petruzzella, F., & Vitolla, F. (2020). Non-financial information and cost of equity capital: An empirical analysis in the food and beverage industry. British Food Journal, 123(1), 49–65.
• Rettab, B., Brik, A.B., & Mellahi, K. (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 371–390.
• Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., Bertoldi, B., & Liu, Y. (2019). Cause-related marketing, brand loyalty and corporate social responsibility. International Marketing Review, 37(4), 773-791.
• Schäfer, H. (2005). International corporate social responsibility rating systems. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 20 (2005), 107–120.
• Schaltegger, S., & Hörisch, J. (2017). In search of the dominant rationale in sustainability management: Legitimacy- or profit-seeking? Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 259–276.
• Schwaiger, M., Eberhardt, J., & Mahr, S. (2016). Corporate Reputation als optimale Steuerungsgröße für die Unternehmenskommunikation. Handbuch Controlling der Kommunikation, 1–20. Berlin, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
• Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Sulaiman, M., Abdullah, N., & Fatima, A.H. (2014). Determinants of environmental reporting quality in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 22(1), 63–90.
• Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167–175.
• Veronica Siregar, S., & Bachtiar, Y. (2010). Corporate social reporting: Empirical evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(3), 241–252.
• Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.
• Winkelmann, R. (2005). Subjective well-being and the family: Results from an ordered probit model with multiple random effects. Empirical Economics, 30, 749–761.
• Zajac, E.J., & Westphal, J.D. (2004). The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 433–457.
指導教授 蔡栢昇(Pak-Sing Choi) 審核日期 2021-7-28
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明