談台灣電子與非電子產業CSR行為與財務績效之關係 -以GRI資料進行分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：75

、訪客IP：18.118.253.117

姓名

鄧宏恩(Hong-En Deng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

談台灣電子與非電子產業CSR行為與財務績效之關係 -以GRI資料進行分析
(The relationship between CSR behavior and financial performance of Taiwan′s electronics and non-electronic industries – Analysis with GRI data)

相關論文

★ 探討企業永續行為：從漂綠行為說起	★ 空氣汙染對臺灣太陽能發電之影響
★ 空氣汙染對於房價的影響-以桃園重劃區為例	★ 公司治理、創新與公司經營績效：台灣電子業之實證研究
★ 新冠肺炎與投保行為之研究-以S人壽保險公司之銀行保險通路為例	★ 公司產品多樣化對營運績效的影響:以台灣電子產業為例
★ 董事會性別組成比例與員工之關係：以台灣企業勞動訴訟為例子	★ 論我國破產免責制度-以消費者債務清理條例為研究核心
★ 董事會性別平衡對經營績效影響	★ 疫情、市場情緒、公司治理與股價波動度
★ 國家財富、最適外匯儲備水準與主權基金	★ 成人參與數位學習與個人特徵之關聯性分析
★ 女性董事及研發投資比例對公司經營績效的影響	★ 延長道路交通安全講習時數政策對年輕新手機車騎士常見事故型態影響之研究
★ 創新效率對於股價報酬之影響 —以台灣電子工業上市櫃公司為例	★ 疫情期間台股散戶投資人行為分析- (處置效果、過度自信、從眾效應)

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility [CSR])的推廣在全球已行之有年，台灣在
全球各產業鏈中都佔有一席之地，應責無旁貸的建立完整的企業永續環境。本文採用
2010 年至 2019 年全球報告倡議組織發布的全球企業社會責任行為通用標準(Global
Reporting Initiative [GRI])作為企業社會責任數據，並藉由區分電子與非電子產業，使
用固定效果模型來分析企業社會責任與財務績效的關係。研究結果顯示，非電子產業
的公司在三年期間中得到倒 U 型的關係，在第二年達到正向顯著的高峰。相反，電子
業則由第一年的負向不顯著逐年提昇至正向的效果。在進一步探討企業社會責任的分
類項目時，本文發現非電子業的公司治理（永續環境）為負向（正向）顯著、而社會
公益的投資則在第二年的正向回報達到峰值；反之，電子業的公司治理與永續環境在
第三年呈現不顯著的正向關係，而社會公益在三年內皆呈現負向不顯著的關係。
研究結果說明，台灣的電子產業需要更長時間才能從企業社會責任行為得到財務上的
回報，而非電子業則能在兩年時間從永續環境和社會公益收成正果。後續提出各類別
CSR 行為的建議，除了加強法規輔導，在公司治理的部分可藉由擴大監察人及獨董的設
立、評分機制的確立及問卷的實際訪查達成。在環境保護的部分，可藉由稅務優惠鼓
勵自發性永續環境行為、配套的能源轉型措施及補助、碳平衡方案及減碳設備安裝的
實施。另外，社會公益行為則藉由媒體表彰企業行為、社會企業及基金會的建立以達
成企業投入的成本效益最大化，使企業營運和社會發展達致良性循環的雙贏局面。

摘要(英)

The promotion of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been around the world for
decades, and Taiwan, given its prominence in the global supply chain, is of no exception to
the formation of sustainable business environment. Using CSR data from 2010 to 2019 from
the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), we use fixed effect model to analyze the relationship
between CSR and financial performance in electronic and other industries. Our results show
that non-electronic industries exhibit an inverted U-shape relationship and attain the peak in
the second year, while electronic industries turn from non-significantly negative to positive
relationship. Further classifying the CSR behavior, we find that in non-electronic industries,
the effect of corporate governance (sustainable environment) is negatively (positively)
significant, while social welfare poses the maximum positive effect in the second year. In
electronic industries, corporate governance and sustainable environment are positively
insignificant in the third year, and social welfare is negatively insignificant in all three years.
Our results indicate that it takes longer period of time for electronic industries in Taiwan to
obtain financial rewards from investments in CSR, while for non-electronic industries,
investments in sustainable development and social welfare pay off in the second year. Our
paper thus calls for strengthening regulatory directives to promote cooperate governance, such
as broadening the board of directors and supervisors and inaugurating a scoring system
iii
verified with on-site studies. In addition, to advance environmental protection, offering tax
breaks for investments in sustainable environment, incentives for energy transformation, and
subsidies for carbon neutralization and the installation of pollution abatement devices can be
considered. Finally, media recognition of cooperate CSR efforts and the establishment of nongovernmental organizations and foundations can maximize the returns from social welfare,
furthering the virtuous circle of win-win situation between cooperate and social development

關鍵字(中)

★ 財務績效
★ 企業社會責任
★ 永續環境
★ 公司治理
★ 社會公益
★ 電子產業

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… ii
誌謝 ………………………………………………………………… iv
目錄 ………………………………………………………………… v
表目錄 ………………………………………………………………… vii
一、緒論
1-1 研究動機與目的…………………………………………………1
1-2 國際發展比較……………………………………………………3
1-3 研究架構與流程…………………………………………………5
二、文獻回顧
2-1 文獻回顧……………………………………………………… 7
2-2 企業社會責任與績效………………………………………… 8
2-3 企業社會責任與環境………………………………………… 10
三、研究內容與資料來源
3-1 研究設計…………………………………………………………12
3-2 回歸模型…………………………………………………………13
3-3 計量分析方法理論 …………………………………………… 15
vi
3-4 資料來源……………………………………………………… 17
3-5 敘述統計……………………………………………………… 18
3-6 多重共線性檢驗……………………………………………… 19
四、實證結果………………………………………………………21
五、結論
5-1 研究發現…………………………………………………… 27
六、評論與政策建議
6-1 分類建議…………………………………………………… 29
6-2 小結………………………………………………………… 31
6-3 後續研究之建議…………………………………………… 31
七、參考文獻 …………………………………………………… 32
7-1 英文文獻…………………………………………………… 32
7-2 中文文獻…………………………………………………… 36

參考文獻

Ariely, D., Bracha, A., and Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image
motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic
Review, 99(1), 544-55.
⚫ Balestra, P., and Nerlove, M. (1966). Pooling cross-section and time-series data in the
estimation of a dynamic economic model: The demand for natural gas. Econometrica,
34(3), 585-612.
⚫ Bragdon, J. H., and Marlin, J. A. T. (1972). Is pollution profitable? Risk Management,
19(4), 9-18.
⚫ Brown, T. J., and Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate
associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
⚫ Barnea, A., and Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between
owners. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71-86.
⚫ Barnett, M. L., and Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear
relationship between social responsibility and financial performance.
Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101-1122.
⚫ Brekke, K. A., and Nyborg, K. (2008). Moral hazard and moral motivation: Corporate
social responsibility as labor market screening. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(4),
509-26.
⚫ Brown H. S., De Jong M., and Lessidrenska T. (2009). The rise of global reporting
initiative as a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 182-200
Bénabou, R., and Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility.
Economica 77(305), 1-19.
⚫ Creyer, E. H. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do
consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6),
421-432.
⚫ Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/
correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
⚫ Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and
practices. In Crane, A., Matten, D., McWilliams, A., Moon, J., and Siegel D. S. (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002
⚫ Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., and Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial
disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility
reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
⚫ Endrikat, J., Güenther, E., and Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical
findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental
and financial performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 735-751.
⚫ Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.
Corporate ethics and corporate governance, 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
540-70818-6_14
⚫ Fan, J. P. H., and Wong, T. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the
informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and
Economics, 33(3), 401-425.
⚫ Freeman, R. E. (1984). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions.
Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.
Goss, A. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial distress. Proceedings of the
Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, 29, 1-18.
⚫ Goss, A., and Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the
cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
⚫ Golicic, S. L., and Smith, C. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable
supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain
Management, 49(2), 78-95.
⚫ Friede, G., Busch, T., and Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance:
Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable
Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
⚫ Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data (No. 54). Cambridge University Press.
⚫ Jensen, M. C., and Ruback, R. S. (1983). Market for corporate control: Empirical
evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
⚫ Kim, E. H., and Lyon, T. P. (2015). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue
modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705-723.
⚫ Kim, S., and Yoon, A. (2020). Analyzing active managers′ commitment to ESG: Evidence
from United Nations principles for responsible investment. Kellogg School of
Management Northwestern University. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555984
⚫ Kitzmueller, M., and Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspective on corporate social
responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51-84.
⚫ Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial
Economics, 115(2), 304-329.
⚫ Mullen, J. (1997). Performance-based corporate philanthropy: How giving smart can
further corporate goals. Public Relations Quarterly, 42(2), 42-48.
⚫ McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5),603-609.
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., and Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good? A
meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social
and financial performance. Unpublished working paper. University of Michigan.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1866371
⚫ Pedhazur, E. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and
prediction (3rd ed.). Harcourt Brace.
⚫ Preston, L. E., and O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance
relationship. Business and Society, 36(4), 419-429.
⚫ Reinhardt, F. L., and Stavins, R. N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, business
strategy, and the environment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(2), 164-181.
⚫ Rubera, G., and Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes:
A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130-
147.
⚫ Rashid, N. R. N. A., Rahman, N. I. A., and Khalid, S. A. (2014). Environmental
corporate social responsibility (ECSR) as a strategic marketing initiatives. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Science, 130, 499-508.
⚫ Rodriguez-Gomez, S., Arco-Castro, M. L., Lopez-Perez, M. V., and Rodríguez-Ariza, L.
(2020). Where does CSR come from and where does it go? A review of the state of the
art. Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 60.
⚫ Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial
performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
⚫ Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., and Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial
performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5),
463-490.
⚫ Schultze, W., and Trommer, R. (2012). The concept of environmental performance andits measurement in empirical studies. Journal of Management Control, 22(4), 375-412.
⚫ Toutsoura, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance.
Working paper. Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley.
⚫ Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the
relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of
U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557.
⚫ 池祥萱、繆文娟、莊瀅臻（2014）。企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面
刃嗎？來自全球 500 大公司的證據。管理學報，31(1)，1-19。
⚫ 楊雅智（2015）。淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況。金融監督
管理委員會證券期貨局。
⚫ 林孟杰（2015）。The Impact of Employee CSR Perception on Customer Satisfaction
through Employees′ Attitudes and Behaviors。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論
文。
⚫ 邱皓政（2017）。多元迴歸的自變數比較與多元共線性之影響：效果量、優勢性與
相對權數指標的估計與應用。台大管理論叢，27(3), 1-44。
⚫ 張育琳（2019）。節能減碳、企業綠色環境管理策略與公司績效之關連性。中山管
理評論，27(2)，279-326。
⚫ 陳秉霖（2017）。企業社會責任負面的感受對於公司價值與財務績效之影響。中興
大學財務金融學系所學位論文。
⚫ 李振北、戴宏穎（2016）。5 分鐘掌握全球 CSR 政策法規的最新動態－ KPMG 胡
蘿蔔與棍子。CSRone。https://csrone.com/topics/3182
⚫ 林苑卿（2021）。碳揭露排名爬升至 A 評等！王文淵領軍台塑麥寮園區廢氣減排
逼近 96％。https://www.wealth.com.tw/home/articles/31905
黃靖萱（2011）。台塑全台灣種最多樹的企業。取自
https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5002929。天下雜誌 393 期。

指導教授

蔡栢昇(Pak Choi)

審核日期

2021-9-15

推文