企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇：選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：3.137.216.77

姓名

許展銘(JHAN-MING HSU) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇：選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素
(The Choice Of The Assurance Providers Of Corporate Social Responsibility Report: The Influencing Factors Of Whether To Choose An Incumbent Accounting Firm)

相關論文

★ 利害關係人包容性：企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討	★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例	★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響	★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性	★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素	★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例
★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例	★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例
★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響：以企業社會責任願景為調節變數	★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果
★ 企業社會責任治理績效與財務績效之雙向因果關係-以無形資產為中介效果	★ CSR績效對CSR揭露量之影響：以社會參與面向為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究以台灣2014年到2019年有發行CSR報告書並經獨立第三方確信之上市上櫃公司作為研究對象，分別從CSR確信市場之供給者與需求者角度，探討公司是否選擇現任財簽事務所做CSR確信。由於會計師事務所提供之審計與確信所使用的方法、流程均有類似之處，故本研究認為若受查客戶選擇現任財簽事務所做CSR確信，則現任財簽事務所對受查客戶之查核經驗將可以外溢至其提供之確信服務，進而提高確信品質，將使受查公司更有意願委任現任財簽事務所做CSR確信。
本研究亦從CSR確信需求者角度，分別探討公司對於確信以及審計品質之需求是否影響其委任現任財簽事務所做CSR確信。根據合法性理論，影響社會層面較廣的公司，其受到的社會關注愈大，會使得公司較有誘因證明其在營運以及決策方面上符合社會期待，故其對於確信品質的需求較大；本研究探討合法性需求高的公司，是否委傾向任其現任財簽事務所做CSR確信，以獲得對確信品質的外溢效果。
此外，先前文獻指出，若會計師事務所同時對受查公司提供CSR確信服務，由於同時接觸受查公司的非財務資訊，而對這些非財務資訊取得了解，將有助於其執行審計服務，進而使會計師事務所提供較高的審計品質，造成知識外溢效果；本研究認為代理成本高的公司，審計品質需求也較高，會愈傾向將CSR報告書確信委任給公司現任財簽事務所，以獲得對審計品質的外溢效果。本研究實證結果指出，現任財簽事務所累積之審計經驗愈多，受查公司愈傾向委任其做CSR確信；本研究結果亦指出，合法性需求高以及代理成本高的公司，愈傾向選擇現任財簽事務所做CSR確信。

摘要(英)

From the perspective of the suppliers and demanders of the CSR assurance market, this study explores whether the company chooses incumbent audit firm for CSR assurance. This study uses Taiwan-listed and OTC companies which have submitted and have their CSR reports assured by independent third party from 2014 to 2019 as the sample and explores whether the audit knowledge accumulation of the incumbent audit firm affect sample company to choose incumbent audit firm for CSR assurance. This study explores whether the demand of assurance quality of company affect them to choose incumbent audit firm for CSR assurance from the perspective of CSR demanders. Moreover, previous literature point out that if audit firm also provide CSR assurance for company at the same time would improve their audit quality which called knowledge spillover effect. This study also explores whether the demand of audit quality of company affect them to choose incumbent audit firm for CSR assurance. The empirical results of this study found that more audit knowledge accumulated by the incumbent audit firm will help it obtain the CSR assurance appointment by their client. The empirical results also found that the higher legality requirements of the company and the higher agency cost of company, the more likely it chooses incumbent audit firm for CSR assurance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任報告書確信
★ 現任會計師事務所
★ 合法性需求
★ 代理成本
★ 知識外溢效果

關鍵字(英)

★ Corporate Social Responsibility Report assurance
★ Incumbent Audit Firm
★ Legitimacy Theory
★ Agency Cost
★ Knowledge spillover effect

論文目次

摘要 i
壹、緒論 1
貳、假說發展 3
2.1 制度背景 3
2.2 文獻探討與假說發展 5
參、研究設計 14
3.1 樣本選取與資料來源 14
3.2 主測自變數之代理變數 17
3.3 實證模型 18
3.4 變數衡量 19
肆、實證結果 22
4.1 敘述性統計 22
4.2 相關性分析 25
4.3 迴歸結果與分析 28
4.4 穩健性測試 31
4.5 額外測試 33
伍、研究結論與建議 36
5.1 研究結論 36
5.2 研究貢獻與建議 37
5.3 研究限制 38
參考文獻 39
附錄 42

參考文獻

中文文獻
李宜樺、張瑞婷與柯沛均，2014，如何提升企業社會責任報告的公信力，會計研究月刊，340期:69-75。
李建然、廖秀梅與黃雨頎，2010，審計與非審計服務之知識外溢效果，中華管理評論國際學報，13卷（2期）：頁1-23。(Lee Jan-Zen, Liao Hsiu-Mei and Huang Yu-Chi. 2010. The knowledge spillover effect between audit and non-audit services. Journal of Chinese Management Review 13(2): 1-23)。
西文文獻
Antle, R., E. Gordon, G. Narayanamoorthy, and L. Zhou. 2006. The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 27: 235–266.
Barker, R., and R. Eccles. 2019. Should FASB and IASB be responsible for setting standards for nonfinancial information? The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
Barth, M. E., S. F.Cahan, L. Chen, , and E. R. Venter. 2017. The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: Capital market and real effects. Accounting, Organizations and Society 62: 43-64.
Beelde, I. D., and S. Tuybens. 2015. Enhancing the credibility of reporting on corporate social responsibility in europe. Business Strategy and the Environment 24(3): 190-216.
Bock, G.-W., R. Zmud, Y.-G. Kim, and J.-N Lee. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. Management Information System Quarterly 29: 87–111.
Che, L., O.-K. Hope, and J. C. Langli. 2020. How big-4 firms improve audit quality. Management Science 66(10): 4552–4572.
Cho, C., M. Laine , R. Roberts, and M. Rodrigue. 2015. Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 40: 78-94.
Datt, R. R., L. Luo, and Q. Tang. 2019. The impact of legitimacy threaton the choice of external carbon assurance: Evidence from the US. Accounting Research Journal 32(2): 181–202.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981a. Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(2): 113–127.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981b. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(3): 183–199.
DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do non–audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40(4): 1247–1274.
Duh, R. R., Lee, W. C., and Hua, C. Y. (2009). Non-audit service and auditor independence: An examination of the Procomp effect. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 32(1): 33-59.
Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301–325.
Francis, J. R., and D. Wang. 2008. The joint effect of investor protection and big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(1): 157–191.
Francis, J. R., and E. R. Wilson. 1988. Auditor changes: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. The Accounting Review 63(4): 663–682.
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., and Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors′ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77(s-1): 71-105.
Geiger, M., and D. Rama. 2006. Audit firm size and going-concern reporting accuracy. Accounting Horizons 20: 1–17.
Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2003. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review, 80(2): 585-612.
He, L.-J., and H.-T. Chiang. 2019. Does providing non-audit service impact audit quality? evidence of corporate social responsibility report assurance and financial report audit quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting 20: 117–172.
Heninger, W. G. 2001. The association between auditor litigation and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 76(1): 111–126.
Huggins, A., W. Green, and R. Simnett. 2011. The competitive market for assurance engagements on greenhouse gas statements: Is there a role for assurers from the accounting profession? Current Issues in Auditing 5: A1–A12.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.
Khan, A., M. Muttakin, and D. Mihret. 2016. Corporate political connections, agency costs and audit quality. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management 24(4): 357-374.
Knechel, W. R., Sharma, D. S., and Sharma, V. D. (2012). Non‐audit services and knowledge spillovers: Evidence from New Zealand. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 39(1‐2): 60-81.
Kuo, L., Kuo, -W. P. and C.-C. Chen. 2021. Mandatory csr disclosure, csr assurance, and the cost of debt capital: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability 13(4): 1–19.
Lee, H.-Y., V. Mande, and M. Son. 2009. Do lengthy auditor tenure and the provision of non-audit services by the external auditor reduce audit report lags? International Journal of Auditing 13(2): 87–104.
Lim, C. Y., D. K. Ding , and C. Charoenwong. 2013. Non-audit fees, institutional monitoring, and audit quality. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 41(2): 343–384.
Lu, M., Simnett, R., and S. Zhou.2019. Using the same provider for financial statement audit and assurance of extended external reports: choices and consequences (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3361616). Social Science Research Network.
Martínez-Ferrero, J., and I.-M. García-Sánchez. 2018. The level of sustainability assurance: The effects of brand reputation and industry specialisation of assurance providers. Journal of Business Ethics 150(4): 971–990.
Maso, L. D., G. J. Lobo , F. Mazzi , and L. Paugam. 2020. Implications of the joint provision of csr assurance and financial audit for auditors’ assessment of going-concern risk. Contemporary Accounting Research 37(2): 1248–1289.
Mazzotta, R., G. Bronzetti , and S. Veltri. 2020. Are mandatory non-financial disclosures credible? Evidence from italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(4): 1900–1913.
Moroney, R., C. Windsor, and Y. T. Aw. 2012. Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: An empirical analysis. Accounting and Finance 52(3): 903–939.
Myers, J., L. Myers, and T. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78: 779–799.
O’Dwyer, B., D. Owen, and J. Unerman. 2011. Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 36: 31–52.
Perego, P. 2009. Causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers: An international study of sustainability reporting. International Journal of Management 26(3): 412–425.
Piot, C. 2001. Agency costs and audit quality: Evidence from France. European Accounting Review 10: 461–499.
Power, M. K. 2003. Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28(4): 379–394.
Quick, R., and P. Inwinkl. 2020. Assurance on csr reports:Impact on the credibility perceptions of non-financial information by bank directors. Meditari Accountancy Research 28(5): 833–862.
Robinson, D. (2008). Auditor independence and auditor-provided tax service: Evidence from going-concern audit opinions prior to bankruptcy filings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 27(2): 31-54.
Simnett, R. 2015. CSR and assurance services: A research agenda. Auditing A Journal of Practice and Theory 34(1): 59-74.
Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 2006. Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. TheJournal of Law and Economics 26(3): 613-633.

指導教授

陳建中

審核日期

2021-7-6

推文