The other-race effect in attractiveness judgment and memory of faces

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：16

、訪客IP：18.118.145.114

姓名

麗麗(Muniba Khan) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

認知與神經科學研究所

論文名稱

(The other-race effect in attractiveness judgment and memory of faces)

相關論文

★ The influence of experience on the SNARC effect -the mapping between sequential information and spatial representation	★ 中文名詞動詞的具體效果的神經相關活動
★ 字形和語意對短期記憶的影響: 從行為及腦造影實驗而來的證據	★ 中文字音與字形相似度對語言短期記憶之影響
★ 非語音訊息對中英雙語使用者的語言短期記憶的貢獻	★ 中文短期記憶之字形表徵研究
★ The temporal dynamics of the code-switching between alphabetic and logographic languages in unbalancedChinese-English bilinguals	★ The acquisition of Chinese literacy as a second language correlates with statistical learning of implicit transitional probability
★ 以行為及腦造影證據探討英文字音及字形相似效果對中英雙語使用者之短期記憶的影響	★ The behavioral and neural correlates of orthographic lexicon and orthographic buffer in Chinese writing
★ How the Brain Deals with the Asymmetry between Chinese Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Support for a Dynamic Processing Theory	★ EXPLORATION OF THE NEURAL CORRELATES OF SYNTACTIC PROCESSING IN CHINESE USING FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
★ 視知覺相關能力以及統計學習能力對中文識字學習的影響：來自以中文為母語或外語學習者的證據	★ Correlation of statistical learning of different implicit transitional probabilities with Chinese literacy acquisition in non-native adult learners
★ 字形相似性、字義相似性以及視覺相似性對於中文工作記憶的影響	★ The Characteristics and Neurophysiological Correlates of Componential Visual Statistical Learning

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-6-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

異族效應（ORE）是一種穩定、強大並且跨文化的現象，指稱的是相較於辨識其他種族的臉孔，人們在識別與自己同種族的臉孔更為容易，而此效應被認為是由於對其他種族臉孔的經驗較少而產生的。然而，關於在判斷臉孔吸引力時是否會觀察到異族效應，還有待確定。過往研究指出熟悉度會影響對人臉的記憶和對人臉的吸引力程度判斷，但臉孔吸引力和熟悉度間的確切關係目前尚未有定論。
在本研究的實驗一中，受試者的記憶表現顯示出清晰的異族效應：在進行劍橋臉孔記憶測試作業（CFMT）時，高加索受試者對澳大利亞裔的臉孔比華裔的臉孔有更佳的記憶，東亞(台灣)受試者對華裔的臉孔比澳大利亞裔的臉孔有更佳的記憶，而南亞受試者則對兩個族裔的臉孔有相似的記憶表現。另一方面，三組受試者皆將澳大利亞裔的臉孔評為比華裔的臉孔更具吸引力。本實驗也利用種族接觸問卷（RCQ）衡量三組受試者與高加索人和華人的社會互動情況，但未發現有任何證據顯示受試者對不同族裔臉孔的記憶準確性和吸引力判斷，與他們在RCQ中的填答反應有相關。
為了檢視對同一張臉的吸引力判斷和再認記憶的表現，是否會展現出和實驗一相同的結果，我們在實驗二中檢視東亞(台灣)受試者對於相同臉孔的吸引力評分與再認記憶表現。本實驗的結果與實驗一結果一致，顯示受試者判斷澳大利亞裔臉孔比華裔臉孔更具吸引力。另一方面，在再認記憶作業中的表現則顯示：與其他種族（澳大利亞）臉孔相比，受試者對自己的種族（華人）的臉孔有更好的識別記憶，其結果反映在對刺激材料有較高的敏感度和較保守的辨識標準上。此外，我們將受試者對每張臉孔的吸引力評分與對該張臉孔的再認記憶表現進行相關分析，結果顯示受試者感知到的臉孔吸引力與相對應的記憶敏感度和判斷標準呈負相關；具體來說，吸引力低的臉孔比起吸引力高的臉孔更容易被人們記住。
在實驗三中，我們在東亞(台灣)受試者進行臉孔吸引力判斷和再認記憶作業時，同步記錄事件相關電位（ERPs）的神經生理訊號，比較對自身與其他種族、具吸引力與缺乏吸引力的男性/女性臉孔的大腦反應。對本實驗腦電波訊號的分析顯示：在兩個作業中，位於額葉、中央區電極記錄到的N1（60-80 ms），以及在頂葉、頂枕葉與枕葉區電極記錄到的P1（80-120 ms）、N170 （140-200 ms）和 LPC（500-700 ms）等事件相關電位成份，在處理臉孔時均有顯著的增強。在吸引力判斷作業中，自己種族的臉孔比起其他種族的臉孔引發更大的P1振幅；而在所有早期（N1、P1、N170）和晚期（LPC）的ERP成份中，由具吸引力的臉孔和不具吸引力的臉孔所引發的反應都沒有顯著差異。在再認記憶作業之"命中"回應(即正確辨認出有出現過的臉孔)的腦電波訊號中，其它種族的臉孔比起自己種族的臉孔引發更大的LPC振幅，但沒有偵測到臉孔吸引力的效果。
綜上所述，目前本研究的結果顯示，只有與種族有關的臉孔特徵、而非和臉孔吸引力有關的特徵，其處理才會直接受到對臉孔之熟悉度和經驗的調節。欲釐清臉孔吸引力、熟悉度和記憶在行為和神經生理層次的交互作用，則需要進一步的研究。

摘要(英)

The other-race effect (ORE) is a robust and cross-cultural phenomenon that shows people recognizing own-race faces better than other-race faces. The ORE is assumed to result from less experience with other-race than own-race faces. However, it remains to be determined whether the ORE would be observed in appreciating facial attractiveness. Previous research has shown that familiarity would affect attractiveness judgments and memory of faces, but the exact relationship between facial attractiveness and familiarity is still debated.
In Experiment 1 of the current study, participants’ performance in the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) showed a clear ORE in memory, as Caucasian participants remembered Australian faces better than Chinese faces, East-Asian (Taiwanese) participants remembered Chinese faces better than Australian faces, while South-Asian participants remembered faces of both races equally. On the other hand, Australian faces were rated as more attractive than Chinese faces by the participants from all three groups. Additionally, a Race Contact Questionnaire (RCQ) was administered to the participants to measure their social interaction with Caucasian and Chinese people. We did not find any evidence that participants’ memory accuracy and attractiveness judgment correlated with their answers in the RCQ.
To investigate the effect of facial attractiveness on recognition memory of the same faces, and whether participants are differentially sensitive to own-race and attractive faces, we collected attractiveness ratings and measured recognition memory performance on the same faces from East-Asian (Taiwanese) observers in Experiment 2. The results replicated the findings of attractiveness ratings in Experiment 1 by showing that Australian faces were rated as more attractive than Chinese faces. On the other hand, better recognition memory (as reflected in higher sensitivity and more conservative criterions) was found for own-race (Chinese) than other-race (Australian) faces. Further, an item-wise analysis was performed by correlating the mean attractiveness ratings of individual faces with the mean memory performance. The results revealed that perceived facial attractiveness negatively correlated with corresponding memory sensitivity and criterions. Specifically, attractive faces were remembered worse than unattractive faces.
In Experiment 3, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded simultaneously during the facial attractiveness judgment and the face recognition memory tasks, and ERP responses to own- vs. other-race and to attractive vs. unattractive male-female faces were compared. The analysis of the neurophysiological signals showed an enhanced N1 (60-80 ms) component at frontocentral sites and the P1 (80-120 ms), N170 (140-200 ms) and LPC (500-700 ms) components at parietal, parieto-occipital and occipital sites during face processing in both tasks. During the face attractiveness judgment task, a stronger P1 component was elicited by own- than other-race faces. No significant difference was observed at the early (N1, P1, N170) or late (LPC) ERP components for attractive vs. unattractive faces. During the face recognition memory task, a larger LPC component associated with the “hits” responses (i.e., correct identification of seen faces) to other-race than own-race faces was observed, while no effect of attractiveness was detected.
In summary, findings of the current study suggest that only the processing of facial characteristics related to race but not to attractiveness is directly modulated by familiarity and experience with faces. Further research is needed to clarify the behavioral and neurophysiological interactions among attractiveness, familiarity, and memory.

關鍵字(中)

★ 劍橋臉孔記憶測試作業（CFMT）
★ 臉孔性別
★ 種族臉孔
★ 事件相關電位
★ 臉孔美感

關鍵字(英)

★ Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT)
★ face gender
★ face race
★ event-related potentials
★ face beauty

論文目次

Table of Contents
Chinese Abstract i
English Abstract iii
Acknowledgment v
List of Figures x
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
1.1 The definition of facial attractiveness 1
1.2 Common factors influencing facial attractiveness 2
1.2.1 Symmetry 2
1.2.2 Averageness 4
1.2.3 Masculinity/Femininity 4
1.3 The other-race effect of face processing 6
1.3.1 The ORE of face perception 7
1.3.2. The ORE of face memory 10
1.3.3 Theoretical accounts of the ORE 11
1.4 Neural correlates of face processing 14
1.4.1 Face processing and facial attractiveness brain imaging studies (fMRI) 15
1.4.2 Face processing and facial attractiveness event-related potentials (ERP’s) 16
1.5 Motivation of the current study 19
Chapter 2: Experiment 1 21
2.1 Methods 21
2.1.1 Participants 21
2.1.2 Design and materials 22
2.1.3 Procedure 29
2.2 Results 29
2.2.1 Facial attractiveness judgment 30
2.2.2 Face recognition memory 40
2.3 Discussion 56
Chapter 3: Experiment 2 64
3.1 Method 64
3.1.1 Participants 64
3.1.2 Design and materials 64
3.1.3 Procedure 65
3.2 Results 67
3.2.1 Facial attractiveness judgment 67
3.2.2 Face recognition memory 69
3.2.3 The correlation of attractiveness judgment and memory accuracy 72
3.3 Discussion 83
Chapter 4: Experiment 3 88
4.1 Method 88
4.1.1 Participants 88
4.1.2 Design and Materials 88
4.1.3 Procedure 88
4.1.4 EEG recording 89
4.2 Results 91
4.2.1 Behavioral results 91
4.2.2 ERP results 97
4.3 Discussion 109
Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion 114
5.1 Limitations of this study 117
5.2 Future research directions 117
5.3 Conclusion 118

參考文獻

Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O’Connor, E., &Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00491-3
Bar, M., Neta, M., &Linz, H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., &McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
Brigham, J. C., &Barkowitz, P. (1978). Do “They all look alike?” The Effect of Race, Sex, Experience, and Attitudes on the Ability to Recognize Faces. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00786.x
Brigham, J. C., Bennett, L. B., Meissner, C. A., &Mitchell, T. L. (2007). The influence of race on eyewitness memory. In The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Volume II: Memory for People. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936368-18
Brigham, J. C., Maass, A., Snyder, L. D., &Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.673
Brigham, J. C., &Malpass, R. S. (1985). The Role of Experience and Contact in the Recognition of Faces Of Own‐ and Other‐Race Persons. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01133.x
Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non‐visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01795.x
Bukach, C. M., Cottle, J., Ubiwa, J. A., &Miller, J. (2012). Individuation experience predicts other-race effects in holistic processing for both Caucasian and Black participants. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.007
Burke, D., Nolan, C., Hayward, W. G., Russell, R., &Sulikowski, D. (2013). Is there an own-race preference in attractiveness? Evolutionary Psychology, 11(4), 855–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100410
Caldara, R., Rossion, B., Bovet, P., &Hauert, C. A. (2004). Event-related potentials and time course of the “other-race” face classification advantage. NeuroReport. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200404090-00034
Chatterjee, A., Thomas, A., Smith, S. E., &Aguirre, G. K. (2009). The Neural Response to Facial Attractiveness. Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014430
Chiroro, P., &Valentine, T. (1995). An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401421
Coetzee, V., Greeff, J. M., Stephen, I. D., &Perrett, D. I. (2014). Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender. PLoS ONE, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629
Cooper, P. A., &Maurer, D. (2008). The influence of recent experience on perceptions of attractiveness. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5865
Crookes, K., Favelle, S., &Hayward, W. G. (2013). Holistic processing for other-race faces in Chinese participants occurs for upright but not inverted faces. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00029
Cross, J. F., Cross, J., &Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210319
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., &Wu, C. H. (1995). “Their Ideas of Beauty Are, on the Whole, the Same as Ours”: Consistency and Variability in the Cross-Cultural Perception of Female Physical Attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261
Currie, T. E., &Little, A. C. (2009). The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.005
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., …Tiddeman, B. P. (2006). Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner’s masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3445
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Smith, F. G., &Little, A. C. (2010). Are attractive men’s faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016457
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., &Griskevicius, V. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.003
DeGutis, J., Mercado, R. J., Wilmer, J., &Rosenblatt, A. (2013). Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict the Own-Race Advantage in Recognition Memory. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058253
Démuthová, S. (2015). Masculinity and femininity in attractiveness of human face according to sex , brain dimorphism , and mating preferences. 0638, 10–15.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., &Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
Duchaine, B., &Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
Eimer, M. (2012). The Face-Sensitive N170 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential. In Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0017
Eimer, M., &Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. NeuroReport. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200203250-00013
Enquist, M., &Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/372169a0
Estudillo, A. J., &Bindemann, M. (2014). Generalization across view in face memory and face matching. I-Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0669
Estudillo, A. J., Lee, J. K. W., Mennie, N., &Burns, E. (2020). No evidence of other-race effect for Chinese faces in Malaysian non-Chinese population. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3609
Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. (n.d.).
Feng, L., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Li, J., Li, L., Ge, L., …Lee, K. (2011). The other face of the other-race effect: An fMRI investigation of the other-race face categorization advantage. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.031
Fleishman, J. J., Buckley, M. L., Klosinsky, M. J., Smith, N., &Tuck, B. (1976). Judged attractiveness in recognition memory of women’s faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1976.43.3.709
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., &Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3
Golby, A. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Chiao, J. Y., &Eberhardt, J. L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/90565
Goldstein, A. G., &Chance, J. (1978). Judging face similarity in own and other races. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1978.9915960
Grammer, K., &Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983). https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233
Grammer, Karl, Fink, B., Møller, A. P., &Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793102006085
Gutierres, S. E., Kenrick, D. T., &Partch, J. J. (1999). Beauty, dominance, and the mating game: Contrast effects in self-assessment reflect gender differences in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512006
Hancock, K. J., &Rhodes, G. (2008). Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X199981
Hayward, W. G., Rhodes, G., &Schwaninger, A. (2008). An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.002
He, Y., Johnson, M. K., Dovidio, J. F., &McCarthy, G. (2009). The relation between race-related implicit associations and scalp-recorded neural activity evoked by faces from different races. Social Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910902949184
Herrmann, M. J., Schreppel, T., Jäger, D., Koehler, S., Ehlis, A. C., &Fallgatter, A. J. (2007). The other-race effect for face perception: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-007-0624-9
Hillyard, S. A., &Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.781
Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., &Luck, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0281
Hodsoll, J., Quinn, K. A., &Hodsoll, S. (2010). Attentional prioritization of infant faces is limited to own-race infants. PLoS ONE, 5(9), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012509
Hugenberg, K., Miller, J., &Claypool, H. M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.010
Hugenberg, K., Wilson, J. P., See, P. E., &Young, S. G. (2013). Towards a synthetic model of own group biases in face memory. Visual Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.821429
Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., &Sacco, D. F. (2010). The Categorization-Individuation Model: An Integrative Account of the Other-Race Recognition Deficit. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020463
Ito, T. A., &Bartholow, B. D. (2009). The neural correlates of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.002
Ito, T. A., Thompson, E., &Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). Tracking the timecourse of social perception: The effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264335
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., &Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00066-6
Johnston, V. S., &Oliver-Rodriguez, J. C. (1997). Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551884
Kiiski, H. S. M., Cullen, B., Clavin, S. L., &Newell, F. N. (2016). Perceptual and social attributes underlining age-related preferences for faces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00437
Kim, J. S., Yoon, H. W., Kim, B. S., Jeun, S. S., Jung, S. L., &Choe, B. Y. (2006). Racial distinction of the unknown facial identity recognition mechanism by event-related fMRI. Neuroscience Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.061
Koehler, N., Simmons, L. W., Rhodes, G., &Peters, M. (2004). The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0146
Kou, H., Xie, Q., &Bi, T. (2020). Mechanisms for the Cognitive Processing of Attractiveness in Adult and Infant Faces: From the Evolutionary Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00436
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., &Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
Langlois, J. H., &Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Casey, R. J., Ritter, J. M., Rieser-Danner, L. A., &Jenkins, V. Y. (1987). Infant Preferences for Attractive Faces: Rudiments of a Stereotype? Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.363
Laurence, S., Zhou, X., &Mondloch, C. J. (2016). The flip side of the other-race coin: They all look different to me. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12147
Levin, D. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1364
Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.559
Lewis, M. B. (2011). Who is the fairest of them all? Race, attractiveness and skin color sexual dimorphism. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.018
Lewis, M. B. (2012). A facial attractiveness account of gender asymmetries in interracial marriage. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031703
Liang, X., Zebrowitz, L. A., &Zhang, Y. (2010). Neural activation in the “reward circuit” shows a nonlinear response to facial attractiveness. Social Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470911003619916
Light, L. L., Hollander, S., &Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981). Why Attractive People are Harder to Remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172014
Little, A. C., &Hancock, P. J. B. (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602761381349
Little, A. C., &Jones, B. C. (2003). Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2445
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., &Debruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404
Lopez-Calderon, J., &Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
Lovén, J., Herlitz, A., &Rehnman, J. (2011). Women’s Own-Gender Bias in Face Recognition Memory. Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000100
Lu, Y., Wang, J., Wang, L., Wang, J., &Qin, J. (2014). Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-013-1401-4
Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (cognitive neuroscience). In The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.
Malpass, R. S., &Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028434
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C. J., &Neuberg, S. L. (2003). Sexually Selective Cognition: Beauty Captures the Mind of the Beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1107
Marzi, T., &Viggiano, M. P. (2010). When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.013
McBain, R., Norton, D., &Chen, Y. (2009). Females excel at basic face perception. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.005
McKone, E., Hall, A., Pidcock, M., Palermo, R., Wilkinson, R. B., Rivolta, D., …O’Connor, K. B. (2011). Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence from the Cambridge face memory test-Australian. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2011.616880
McKone, E., Stokes, S., Liu, J., Cohan, S., Fiorentini, C., Pidcock, M., …Pelleg, M. (2012). A Robust Method of Measuring Other-Race and Other-Ethnicity Effects: The Cambridge Face Memory Test Format. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047956
Meissner, C. A., &Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty Years of Investigating the Own-Race Bias in Memory for Faces: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., &Butz, D. A. (2005). Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1097
Mishra, M.V., Likitlersuang, J., B Wilmer, J., Cohan, S., Germine, L., &DeGutis, J. M. (2019). Gender Differences in Familiar Face Recognition and the Influence of Sociocultural Gender Inequality. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54074-5
Nakamura, K., &Kawabata, H. (2018). Preferential access to awareness of attractive faces in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.010
O’Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M., &Dolan, R. J. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00145-8
Oliver-Rodríguez, J. C., Guan, Z., &Johnston, V. S. (1999). Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577299971354
Olson, I. R., &Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.498
Paller, K. A., Voss, J. L., &Boehm, S. G. (2007). Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.002
Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P., &Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female Condition Influences Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism in Faces of Male Humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.264
Penton-Voak, Ian S., &Chang, H. Y. (2008). Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.2008.1011
Penton-Voak, Ian S., &Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.003
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., …Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/29772
Pizzagalli, D. A., Lehmann, D., Hendrick, A. M., Regard, M., Pascual-Marqui, R. D., &Davidson, R. J. (2002). Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (∼160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1126
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., &Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Rehnman, J., &Herlitz, A. (2007). Women remember more faces than men do. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.04.004
Reynolds, J. K., &Pezdek, K. (1992). Face recognition memory: The effects of exposure duration and encoding instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060402
Rhodes, Gilliain, Hayward, W. G., &Winkler, C. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193876
Rhodes, Gillian. (2006). The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Rhodes, Gillian, Brake, S., Taylor, K., &Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02323.x
Rhodes, Gillian, Ewing, L., Hayward, W. G., Maurer, D., Mondloch, C. J., &Tanaka, J. W. (2009). Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. British Journal of Psychology, 100(4), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X396503
Rhodes, Gillian, Halberstadt, J., &Brajkovich, G. (2001). Generalization of mere exposure effects to averaged composite faces. Social Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.1.57.18961
Rhodes, Gillian, Hickford, C., &Jeffery, L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161718
Rhodes, Gillian, Lee, K., Palermo, R., Weiss, M., Yoshikawa, S., Clissa, P., …Jeffery, L. (2005). Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5191
Rhodes, Gillian, Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., &Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208842
Rhodes, Gillian, Sumich, A., &Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00106
Rhodes, Gillian, Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Kieran, L., McKay, R., &Akamatsu, S. (2001). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3123
Rhodes, M. G., &Anastasi, J. S. (2012). The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025750
Rossion, B., Delvenne, J. F., Debatisse, D., Goffaux, V., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., &Guérit, J. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: An event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00013-7
Roye, A., Höfel, L., &Jacobsen, T. (2008). Aesthetics of faces: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of evaluative and descriptive judgment processes. Journal of Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.22.1.41
Rugg, M. D., &Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004
Rymer, B. C., &Choa, R. M. (2015). A worldwide bibliometric analysis of published literature in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.05.024
Sangrigoli, S., Pallier, C., Argenti, A. M., Ventureyra, V. A. G., &DeSchonen, S. (2005). Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01554.x
Schacht, A., Werheid, K., &Sommer, W. (2008). The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.2.132
Senholzi, K. B., &Ito, T. A. (2013). Structural face encoding: How task affects the N170’s sensitivity to race. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss091
Shepherd, J. W., &Ellis, H. D. (1973). The effect of attractiveness on recognition memory for faces. AMER.J.PSYCHOL. https://doi.org/10.2307/1421948
Smith, S. M., Stinson, V., &Prosser, M. A. (2004). Do they all look alike? An exploration of decision-making strategies in cross-race facial identifications. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087225
Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing Faces of Other Ethnic Groups: An Integration of Theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.36
Stahl, J., Wiese, H., &Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f97b4d
Talamas, S. N., Mavor, K. I., &Perrett, D. I. (2016). Blinded by beauty: Attractiveness bias and accurate perceptions of academic performance. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148284
Tanaka, J. W., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401045
Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., &Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
Thornhill, R., &Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)81051-2
Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., &Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
Trujillo, L. T., Jankowitsch, J. M., &Langlois, J. H. (2014). Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: A neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0230-2
Tsukiura, T., &Cabeza, R. (2011). Remembering beauty: Roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.046
Tullis, J. G., Benjamin, A. S., &Liu, X. (2014). Self-pacing study of faces of different races: metacognitive control over study does not eliminate the cross-race recognition effect. Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0409-y
Valentine, T. (1991). A Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400966
Valentine, T., &Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(86)90085-5
vanHooff, J. C., Crawford, H., &vanVugt, M. (2011). The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq066
Vingilis-Jaremko, L., Maurer, D., Rhodes, G., &Jeffery, L. (2016). The Influence of Averageness on Adults’ Perceptions of Attractiveness: The Effect of Early Visual Deprivation. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616661913
Vogel, E. K., &Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577200981265
Walker, M., &Vetter, T. (2016). Changing the personality of a face: Perceived big two and big five personality factors modeled in real photographs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000064
Walker, P. M., &Hewstone, M. (2008). The influence of social factors and implicit racial bias on a generalized own-race effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1382
Walker, P. M., &Tanaka, J. W. (2003). An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5098
Wan, L., Crookes, K., Reynolds, K. J., Irons, J. L., &McKone, E. (2015). A cultural setting where the other-race effect on face recognition has no social-motivational component and derives entirely from lifetime perceptual experience. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.011
Watkins, C. D., Nicholls, M. J., Batres, C., Xiao, D., Talamas, S., &Perrett, D. I. (2017). Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007
Watson, P. J., &Thornhill, R. (1994). Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90227-5
WEN, F.-F., &ZUO, B. (2013). The Effects of Transformed Gender Facial Features on Face Preference of College Students: Based on the Test of Computer Graphics and Eye Movement Tracks. Acta Psychologica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2012.00014
Werheid, K., Schacht, A., &Sommer, W. (2007). Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.008
Wiese, H. (2013). Do neural correlates of face expertise vary with task demands? event-related potential correlates of own- And other-race face inversion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00898
Wiese, H., Altmann, C. S., &Schweinberger, S. R. (2014). Effects of attractiveness on face memory separated from distinctiveness: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.023
Willis, J., &Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
Winston, J. S., O’Doherty, J., Kilner, J. M., Perrett, D. I., &Dolan, R. J. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.009
Woodman, G. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196680
Wright, D. B., Boyd, C. E., &Tredoux, C. G. (2003). Inter-racial contact and the own-race bias for face recognition in South Africa and England. Applied Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.898
Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., &Hugenberg, K. (2010). When do own-group biases in face recognition occur? encoding versus post-encoding. Social Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.240
Young, S. G., &Hugenberg, K. (2012). Individuation motivation and face experience can operate jointly to produce the own-race bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611409759
Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, P. M., &Montepare, J. M. (2011). An Ecological Theory of Face Perception. In The Science of Social Vision. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333176.003.0002
Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M., &Lee, H. K. (1993). They Don’t All Look Alike: Individuated Impressions of Other Racial Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.85
Zebrowitz, L. A., Wang, R., Bronstad, P. M., Eisenberg, D., Undurraga, E., Reyes-García, V., &Godoy, R. (2012). First impressions from faces among U.S. and culturally isolated tsimane’ people in the Bolivian rainforest. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111411386
Zhang, Y., Kong, F., Chen, H., Jackson, T., Han, L., Meng, J., …Najam ul Hasan, A. (2011). Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: An event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22724
Zhang, Z., &Deng, Z. (2012). Gender, facial attractiveness, and early and late event-related potential components. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219635212500306
Zhao, M., Hayward, W. G., &Bülthoff, I. (2014). Holistic processing, contact, and the other-race effect in face recognition. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.09.006

指導教授

吳嫻(Denise H. Wu)

審核日期

2021-10-22

推文