以計算流體力學模擬風機氣動力負載

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：15

、訪客IP：3.138.35.228

姓名

黃昱宸(Yu-Chen Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

機械工程學系

論文名稱

以計算流體力學模擬風機氣動力負載

相關論文

★ 溫度調變對二元合金固液介面形態穩定的影響	★ 濃度調變對二元合金固液介面形態穩定的影響
★ 圓錐平板型生物反應器週期性流場研究	★ 圓錐平板型生物反應器二次週期流場研究
★ 圓錐平板型生物反應器脈動式流場研究	★ 濃度調變對單向固化形態穩定的影響
★ 圓錐平板型生物反應器脈動式二次流場研究	★ 模擬注流式生物反應器之流場及細胞生長
★ 週期式圓錐平板裝置之設計與量測	★ 模擬注流式生物反應器之細胞培養研究
★ 軟骨細胞在組織工程支架之培養研究	★ 細胞在組織工程支架之生長與遷移
★ 冷電漿沉積類鑽碳膜之製程模擬分析	★ 格狀自動機探討組織工程細胞體外培養研究
★ 細胞在注流式生物反應器之生長研究	★ 週期式圓錐平板裝置之流場分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本論文旨在以計算流體力學方法模擬葉片氣動力負載。風機葉片氣動力負載計算主要有兩種，分別為葉片元素動量理論(Blade Element Momentum, BEM)及計算流體力學(Computational Fluid Dynamics, CFD)，過去由於電腦計算速度較慢，以葉片元素動量理論(Blade Element Momentum, BEM)為主要方法，該方法須仰賴二維翼型的升力與阻力係數實驗數據，並以理論公式修正，以符合實際三維流場的影響，這對風機設計上帶來許多限制，近年來隨著電腦軟體的快速發展，電腦已可以負荷複雜的三維風機流場，計算流體力學不需依賴任何葉片翼型的氣動力實驗數據即可計算並可對葉片周圍的流場進行細部的探討，因此吸引許多研究的興趣。本研究使用商用軟體ANSYS Fluent，穩態RANS方程式，SST k-ω紊流模型，以移動座標方式(Moving Reference Frame, MRF)模擬計算氣動力負載，分析的條件參考歐盟Mexnext計畫之NewMexico 風洞實驗，條件為-2.3度節距角(pitch angle)，軸向均勻流10 m/s、15m/s、24 m/s三種風速，模擬結果與實驗結果實施比對，並探討葉片的氣動力負載，分析項目包括推力、扭矩、葉片表面壓力、正向力、切向力、升力係數、阻力係數及流線。結果顯示模擬的旋轉現象與理論相符，即翼根處有失速延遲(stall delay)的現象；而在翼尖處有翼尖損失(tip loss)的現象。由於模擬的正向力與切向力較高，使得扭矩值平均大於實驗值約15.33%，在高風速24 m/s與實驗誤差最大，葉片處於失速狀態流場較不穩定，推力計算誤差最大達16.4%。本文另以ANSYS Fluent模擬二維翼型之升阻力係數，結果顯示與與實驗值相近，可做為替代葉片元素動量理論中所需之二維翼型的升力與阻力係數實驗數據，以提升風機設計與模擬的效率。

摘要(英)

This research simulates and calculates aerodynamic loads using Moving Reference Frame (MRF) in the commercial software ANSYS Fluent. The flow field is modeled using steady-state RANS equations and SST k-ω turbulence model. The analysis conditions refer to the NewMexico wind tunnel experiment in the EU Mexnext project. The pitch angle is -2.3 degrees, and the axial wind speed is 10 m/s, 15 m/s, and 24 m/s, respectively. The simulation results are compared with the experimental results of EU Mexnext, and the aerodynamic load of the blades is discussed. The analysis items include thrust, torque, blade surface pressure, normal force, tangential force, lift coefficient, drag coefficient, and streamline. The results show that the simulated rotation phenomenon is consistent with the theory. There is a stall delay at the blade root and tip loss at the blade tip. Due to the high simulated normal and tangential forces, the relative error of torque is about 15.33%. The error is the largest at the high wind speed of 24 m/s. The blade is in a stalled state, the flow field is relatively unstable, and the thrust calculation error can be as large as 16.4%. We also use ANSYS Fluent to simulate the lift and drag coefficient of the two-dimensional airfoil. The results show that it is close to the experimental value. It can be used to replace the experimental data of the lift and drag coefficients of the two-dimensional airfoil required in the blade element momentum theory to improve the wind turbine design and simulation efficiency.

關鍵字(中)

★ 計算流體力學
★ Mexnext Phase 3
★ NewMexico
★ 風機氣動力
★ Fluent

關鍵字(英)

★ CFD
★ Mexnext Phase 3
★ NewMexico
★ Wind Turbine
★ Fluent

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract i
目錄 ii
圖目錄 iv
表目錄 iv
符號說明 vii
英文縮寫 vii
英文字母 vii
希臘字母 viii
上下標 viii
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究動機 1
1.2文獻回顧 2
1.3研究目的 5
第二章數值模擬方法 6
2.1問題描述 6
2.1.1參考實驗系統 6
2.1.2基本假設 11
2.1.3幾何模型 12
2.2統御方程式 16
2.3紊流模型 17
2.4二維翼型網格與計算域 22
2.5三維計算域網格與邊界條件 26
2.6旋轉參考坐標系 33
第三章結果與討論 34
3.1網格獨立性測試 34
3.2模擬結果 36
3.2.1推力及扭矩 37
3.2.2正向力與切向力 40
3.2.3升力係數與阻力係數 44
3.2.4壓力分佈 51
3.2.5流線 61
3.2.6葉片表面流線 78
第四章結論與未來展望 82
4.1結論 82
4.2未來展望 84
參考文獻 86

參考文獻

1. P. La Cour, 1927, “Forsøg med små Møllemodeller. Experiments with small wind turbine models”. Ingeniøren, (10).
2. A. Betz, 1920, “Das Maximum der theoretisch möglichen Ausnutzung des Windes durch Windmotoren”. Zeitschrift fur das gesamte Turbinenwesten, 20.
3. L. Prandtl and A. Betz, 1927, “Vier abhandlungen zur hydrodynamik und aerodynamik”, vol. 3.
4. H. Glauert, 1935, “Airplane propellers. In Aerodynamic theory (pp. 169-360). Springer”, Berlin, Heidelberg.
5. H. Himmelskamp, 1945, “Profile investigations on a rotating airscrew”. PhD Thesis, Gottingen University.
6. Z. Du and M.S. Selig, 1997, “A 3-D stall-delay model for horizontal axis wind turbine performance prediction”. Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana and Champaign.
7. S. Schreck, 2002, “The NREL full‐scale wind tunnel experiment Introduction to the special issue”. ind Energy 5(2‐3), pp. 77-84.
8. K. Boorsma, and J. Schepers, 2014, “New Mexico Experiment, Preliminary overview with initial validation”. Technical report.
9. H. Snel, J. Schepers and B. Montgomerie, 2007, The MEXICO project (Model Experiments in Controlled Conditions): The database and first results of data processing and interpretation. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
10. J. Schepers, K. Boorsma, T. Cho, S. Gomez Iradi, , P. Schaffarczyk, A. Jeromin, B. Stoevesandt, 2012. Final report of IEA Task 29, Mexnext (Phase 1): Analysis of Mexico wind tunnel measurements. Technical report.
11. H. Snel, G. Schepers and N. Siccama, 2009. “Mexico Project: the database and results of data processing and interpretation”. Paper presented at the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition.
12. W. Z. Shen, W. J. Zhu and J. N. Sørensen , 2012. Actuator line/Navier–Stokes computations for the MEXICO rotor: comparison with detailed measurements. Wind Energy 15(5), pp. 811-825.
13. L. Oggiano , K Boorsma, G. Schepers and M. Kloosterman, 2016. “Comparison of simulations on the NewMexico rotor operating in pitch fault conditions”. Arnhem, DNV-GLEnergy Utrechtseweg.
14. Ye Zhang, A. van Zuijlen, G. van Bussel, 2014. “Comparison of CFD simulations to non-rotating MEXICO blades experiment in the LTT wind tunnel of TUDelft”. Kluyverweg, TUDelft Faculty of Aerospace Engineering.
15. C. S. Ferreira, G. van Kuik, G. van Bussel and F. Scarano, 2009. Visualization by PIV of dynamic stall on a vertical axis wind turbine Exp Fluids 46, 97-108
16. F. R. Menter, 1994. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications”. AIAA journal 32(8), pp. 1598-1605.
17. D. C. Wilcox, 1993. Turbulence modeling for CFD, DCW Industries. California.
18. A. Jeromin , A. Bentamy , and A.P. Schaffarczyk, 2014. “Actuator disk modeling of the Mexico rotor with OpenFOAM. CEwind eG and University of Applied Sciences Kiel”, Grenzstr.
19. M. Carri´on, M. Woodgate, R. Steijl and G. Barakos, 2014. ‘CFD and Aeroelastic Analysis of the MEXICO Wind Turbine”. Computational Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Harrison Hughes Building, Liverpool
20. Borja Plaza , Rafael Bardera, Sergio Visiedo, 2015. “Comparison of BEM and CFD results for MEXICO rotor aerodynamics”. Spain, a Computational Fluid Dynamics Branch, INTA, ISDEFE consultant, Torrejón de Ardoz.
21. A. Bouhelal, A. Smaili1, O. Guerri and C. Masson, 2016. “Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Flow around a Recent Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine using Low and High Reynolds Models”. Algeria, Mechanical Engineering and Development Laboratory, École Nationale Polytechnique, B.P
22. J. Schepers, K. Boorsma, S. Gomez Iradi, I. Herraez, L. Oggiano, P. Schaffarczyk, 2012. Final report of IEA Task 29, Mexnext (Phase 3): Analysis of Mexico wind tunnel measurements. Technical report.
23. Simms, D., Schreck, S., Hand, M. and Fingersh, L. J., 2001, "NREL unsteady aerodynamics experiment in the NASA-Ames wind tunnel: a comparison of predictions to measurements," National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO (US).
24. 劉家源, 2019, "風機葉片氣動力的計算流體力學建模與模擬," 國立中央大學碩士論文
25. Muhammad A. Khan, Carlos Simão Ferreira, Gerard J. Schepers, Niels N. Sørensen, 2019. “Spectral analysis of New MEXICO standstill measurements to investigate vortex shedding in deep stall”. Aerospace Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
26. A. Bechmann, N. N. Sørensen and F. Zahle, 2018. “CFD simulations of the MEXICO rotor”. Denmark, National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy.
27. El Khchine, Y. and Sriti, M., 2017, "Boundary Layer and Amplified Grid Effects on Aerodynamic Performances of S809 Airfoil for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT)," J. Eng. Sci. Technol, 12(11), pp. 3011-3022.
28. J. Schepers, K. Boorsma, S. Gomez Iradi, I. Herraez, L. Oggiano, P. Schaffarczyk, 2012. Final report of IEA Task 29, Mexnext (Phase 3), pp. 305-309
29. 郭耀仁, 2020, "使用計算流體力學模擬小型風力機葉片旋轉效應," 國立中央大學碩士論文
30. White, F.M. and I. Corfield, Viscous fluid flow. Vol. 3. 2006: McGraw-Hill New York.
31. A. Bouhelal, A. Smaili1, O. Guerri, C. Masson, 2017. “Comparison of BEM and Full Navier-Stokes CFD Methods for Prediction of Aerodynamics Performance of HAWT Rotors”, Algeria , Mechanical Engineering and Development Laboratory, École Nationale Polytechnique.
32. S. Guntur, and N. N. Sørensen, 2014,"An evaluation of several methods of determining the local angle of attack on wind turbine blades," Proc. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, p. 012045.
33. Rahimi, H., Schepers, J., Shen, W. Z., García, N. R., Schneider, M., Micallef, D., Ferreira, C. S., Jost, E., Klein, L. and Herráez, I., 2018, "Evaluation of different methods for determining the angle of attack on wind turbine blades with CFD results under axial inflow conditions," Renewable Energy, 125, pp. 866-876.
34. A. P. Schaffarczyk, 2020, “Introduction to Wind Turbine Aerodynamics”, pp. 177-205.
35. V. Esfahanian, A. Salavati Pour, I. Harsini, A. Haghani, R. Pasandeh, A. Shahbazi , G. Ahmadi, 2013, “Numerical analysis of flow field around NREL Phase II wind turbine by a hybrid CFD/BEM method”, Iran, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 120, 29–36.
36. Horia Dumitrescu, Cardos Vladimir, and Florin Frunzulica, 2012, “An insight into the rotational stall delay”, Romania, POLITEHNICA University of Bucharest, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Polizu 1–6, 011061.
37. G. Narayan, B. John, 2016. Effect of winglets induced tip vortex structure on the performance of subsonic wings. Aerospace Science and Technology, 58, 328–340.

指導教授

鍾志昂(Chih-Ang Chung)

審核日期

2021-10-12

推文