智慧運輸發展在越南主要城市的可行性評估

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：24

、訪客IP：18.224.43.245

姓名

阮氏秋河(Nguyen Thi Thu Ha) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木工程學系

論文名稱

智慧運輸發展在越南主要城市的可行性評估
(Evaluating Feasibility of Smart Transportation Development in Major Cities in Vietnam)

相關論文

★ 運用深度神經網路建立H型鋼構件自動辨識系統之研究	★ 運用關聯法則探討協力廠商對營造廠報價行為之研究
★ 探討影響台灣工程顧問公司落實法律遵循反貪腐關鍵因素之研究	★ 以分包商角度探討對營造廠報價行為策略之研究
★ 運用SOMCM分群演算法開發設計雲端智慧平台之營運維護產業介面-以桃園市某園區為例	★ 專案管理在履約爭議處理機制之比較與研析
★ H型鋼構件智慧塗裝路徑優化研究	★ 以資料包絡分析法評估大型統包營造廠之經營績效-以上市櫃公司為例
★ 運用組織特徵映射圖動作軌跡相似度測量法探索預鑄工項生產效率與資源規劃之研究	★ 預鑄專案成本估算策略之研究
★ 新建工程建造執照查核缺失要項之探討--以台北市為例	★ 灰關聯分析探討古蹟與歷史建築再利用之研究
★ 營造工地管理人資量化與預測	★ 公共建設專案現金管理與控制之研究
★ 營建業ERP整合PDA模型之研究	★ 水庫營運效益評估之研究-以石門水庫為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-6-28以後開放)

摘要(中)

在過去數十年間，越南的城市如同許多開發中國家，正面臨著急遽的都市化過程，這樣的轉變可能導致原有城市產生許多問題，包含資源缺乏、基礎設施不足、能源短缺以及人類健康問題。這些挑戰持續增加都市計畫與政府治理的壓力，迫使他們做出改變使得城市更加宜居。其中，運輸系統以不同的形式作為人民所有活動的必要關聯，因此在城市永續發展中運輸系統是一個極為關鍵的因素，智慧化基礎運輸系統的實施，將有效改善城市的永續性。智慧化運輸可以被視為一個改善安全性、緩解交通壅塞、降低運輸成本並保護環境的系統化機制。通過整合資訊與通訊技術並應用於運輸管理，許多現代城市正踏入數位時代。智慧化運輸的發展逐漸成為全球各大城市與越南的主流趨勢。
本研究始於強弱危機分析，針對五個越南最著名的城市其中三個(胡志明市、芹苴市以及峴港)進行基礎評估，以提供智慧運輸在越南的概略發展狀況。接著，為了在智慧運輸發展的背景下提升大眾運輸系統的效率，本研究使用結構方程模型確立影響智慧運輸系統使用的關鍵因子-以越南芹苴市為例。透過粗糙集演算法與關聯性法則演算法建立影響智慧運輸發展的關鍵要素，本研究評估在越南城市實施智慧化運輸的可能性，並探討智慧化運輸在越南城市的發展模式。
本研究之結果提供城市發展智慧運輸可能面臨的關鍵議題，找出影響智慧運輸發展的關鍵因子，並研究不同因子之間與智慧化運輸成功的相關議題。
關鍵字: 智慧運輸、粗糙集演算法、強弱危機分析、結構方程模型、關聯性法則、發展中國家

摘要(英)

Similar to other developing countries, cities in Vietnam have been experiencing rapid urbanization over the past few decades. This rise in urbanization has caused cities to face many issues, including resource scarcity, insufficient infrastructure, energy shortages, and human health issues. These challenges have increased the pressure on urban planning and governance to make changes that will allow cities to become livable. Since all human activities are linked to transportation systems in various ways, the transportation system is the key component of sustainable development. The implication here is that if the transportation infrastructure is smart, the sustainability of these cities can be improved. Smart transportation can be seen as a mechanism to improve safety, mitigate congestion, reduce transportation costs, and preserve the environment. Through the integration of information and communication technologies into transportation and administration, many modern cities are transitioning into the digital age. The development of smart transportation is becoming popular in major cities around the world, including Vietnam.
This research process began with a SWOT analysis to provide an overview of smart transportation development in Vietnam based on the assessment of three of the five most prominent cities in Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh, Can Tho, Da Nang). Then, to increase the efficiency of public transportation in the context of smart transportation development, Structural Equation Modeling was used to identify the key factors affecting the intention of using the smart transportation system—a case study in Can Tho City, Vietnam. By Rough set-based ranking and association rules approach, the most significant factors affecting smart transportation development were identified. This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of smart transportation implementation in Vietnamese cities, followed by a discussion of how smart transportation can be deployed in Vietnamese cities.
The outcomes from this study hold important lessons for cities looking to implement smart transportation by outlining the key insights on the factors affecting the process of development of smart transportation and examining the complex relationship between the success of the deployment of smart transportation and the multitude of attributes, including infrastructure systems, policies, and actors.
Keywords: Smart transportation, Rough set theory, SWOT analysis, Structural Equation Modeling, Association rule, developing country.

關鍵字(中)

★ 智慧運輸
★ 粗糙集演算法
★ 強弱危機分析
★ 結構方程模型
★ 關聯性法則
★ 發展中國家

關鍵字(英)

★ Smart transportation
★ Rough set theory
★ SWOT analysis
★ Structural Equation Modeling
★ Association rule
★ developing country

論文目次

Contents
抽要 i
Abstract ii
Acknowledgements iv
List of figures viii
List of tables ix
I. Introduction 1
1.1. Research Background 1
1.2. Research Motivation 2
1.3. Research Objective 3
1.4. Methodology 4
1.5. Limitations 5
II. Literature Reviews 6
2.1. SWOT analysis 6
2.2. Structural Equation Modeling 6
2.3. Rough set theory 7
2.4. Association rules 8
2.5. Transit-Oriented Development 9
2.6. Factors influencing the citizens’ intention to engage public transportation systems 10
2.7. Factors affecting the implementation of smart transportation 11
2.7.1. Infrastructure system 11
2.7.2. Policy 12
2.7.3. Actors 13
III. Overview 15
3.1. Ho Chi Minh City 15
3.2. Can Tho City 16
3.3. Da Nang City 17
3.4. Strengths of Vietnam in smart transportation implementation 19
3.4.1. Economic Stability 19
3.4.2. Consistent Authority 19
3.4.3. Technology-related Infrastructure 20
3.5. Weaknesses of Vietnam in smart transportation implementation 20
3.5.1. Basic Infrastructure 20
3.5.2. Financial Issue 21
3.5.3. Trained Human Resources 21
3.6. Opportunities of Vietnam in smart transportation implementation 21
3.6.1. City Transformation 21
3.6.2. Institutional Interactions 22
3.7. Threats of Vietnam in smart transportation implementation 22
3.7.1. Governance Frameworks 22
3.7.2. Citizen’s Awareness and Traveling Habit 23
IV. Transit-Oriented Development feasibility 24
4.1. Research steps 24
4.2. Hypothesis development 25
4.3. Questionnaire survey 28
4.4. Results 29
4.4.1. Reliability 29
4.4.2. Exploratory factor analysis 30
4.4.3. Confirmatory factor analysis 32
4.4.4. Structural equation modeling 33
4.5. Discussion of TOD feasibility 35
V. Attribute priority for smart transportation implementation 37
5.1. Research framework 37
5.2. Data processing 38
5.3. Rough set theory implementation 44
5.3.1. Rough set-based ranking 44
5.3.2. Rough set-based association rules 52
5.4. Recommendation proposals 56
5.4.1. Proposing recommendations for the aspect of Infrastructure System 56
5.4.2. Proposing recommendations for the aspect of Policy 56
5.4.3. Proposing recommendations for the aspect of Actors 57
5.5. Discussion of smart transportation implementation 57
VI. Conclusion 60
6.1. Summary 60
6.2. Contributions 62
6.3. Suggestions 62
Bibliography 64

參考文獻

Bibliography
1. Nations United, World urbanization prospects. United Nations: San Francisco, CA, USA 2014.
2. Washburn, D.; Sindhu, U.; Balaouras, S.; Dines, R. A.; Hayes, N.; Nelson, L. E., Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives. Growth 2009, 17 (2), 1-17.
3. Litman, T.; Burwell, D., Issues in sustainable transportation. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 2006, 6 (4), 331-347.
4. Hall, P., Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies 2000, 37 (4), 639-649.
5. Mulligan, C. E.; Olsson, M., Architectural implications of smart city business models: an evolutionary perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine 2013, 51 (6), 80-85.
6. Deakin, M.; Hirst, P.; Hummerstone, E.; Webb, S.; Karlsson, A.; Blin, A.; Duff, M.; Jordanou, M., JESSICA for smart and sustainable cities. London: European Investment Bank, Mazars LLP: 2012.
7. CIVITAS Intelligent Transport Systems and Traffic Management In Urban Areas.; 2018.
8. Benevolo, C.; Dameri, R. P.; D’auria, B., Smart mobility in smart city. In Empowering organizations, Springer: 2016; pp 13-28.
9. World Bank Overview of Vietnam’s development https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/vietnam/overview.
10. Portal, V. G. Vietnam cities 2020. http://baochinhphu.vn/Hoat-dong-cua-lanh-dao-Dang-Nha-nuoc/Ca-nuoc-co-862-do-thi-dong-gop-70-GDP/418045.vgp.
11. The Prime Minister, Decision No. 950QD/TTg of August 1st, 2018 approving "The Scheme on Sustainable Urban Development and Smart Cities in Vietnam for period of 2018-2025 and orientation to 2030" 2018.
12. World Bank Vietnam 2035: Toward Prosperity, Creativity, Equity, and Democracy; World Bank Group: Washington DC, USA, 2016.
13. Warren, K., Strategic management dynamics. John Wiley & Sons: 2008.
14. Coman, A.; Ronen, B., Focused SWOT: diagnosing critical strengths and weaknesses. International journal of production Research 2009, 47 (20), 5677-5689.
15. Grant, R. M., Why strategy teaching should be theory based. Journal of Management Inquiry 2008, 17 (4), 276-281.
16. Marques, J. F., How politically correct is political correctness? A SWOT analysis of this phenomenon. Business & society 2009, 48 (2), 257-266.
17. Evans, C.; Wright, A., How to conduct a SWOT analysis. The British Journal of Administrative Management 2009, 24 (65), 10-34.
18. Houben, G.; Lenie, K.; Vanhoof, K., A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises. Decision support systems 1999, 26 (2), 125-135.
19. Helms, M. M.; Nixon, J., Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of strategy and management 2010.
20. Gunn, R.; Williams, W., Strategic tools: an empirical investigation into strategy in practice in the UK. Strategic Change 2007, 16 (5), 201-216.
21. Gibis, B.; Artiles, J.; Corabian, P.; Meiesaar, K.; Koppel, A.; Jacobs, P.; Serrano, P.; Menon, D., Application of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis in the development of a health technology assessment program. Health Policy 2001, 58 (1), 27-35.
22. Williams, L. J.; Vandenberg, R. J.; Edwards, J. R., 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals 2009, 3 (1), 543-604.
23. Shook, C. L.; Ketchen Jr, D. J.; Cycyota, C. S.; Crockett, D., Data analytic trends and training in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24 (12), 1231-1237.
24. Hair Jr, J. F.; Hult, G. T. M.; Ringle, C. M.; Sarstedt, M., A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications: 2021.
25. Mueller, R. O.; Hancock, G. R., Structural equation modeling. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group: 2019.
26. Scherer, R.; Siddiq, F.; Tondeur, J., The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education 2019, 128, 13-35.
27. Tarhini, A.; Al-Busaidi, K. A.; Mohammed, A. B.; Maqableh, M., Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business 2017.
28. Makransky, G.; Lilleholt, L., A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development 2018, 66 (5), 1141-1164.
29. Hult, G. T. M.; Hair Jr, J. F.; Proksch, D.; Sarstedt, M.; Pinkwart, A.; Ringle, C. M., Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing 2018, 26 (3), 1-21.
30. Yeni, K.; Tulek, Z.; Simsek, O. F.; Bebek, N., Relationships between knowledge, attitudes, stigma, anxiety and depression, and quality of life in epilepsy: A structural equation modeling. Epilepsy & Behavior 2018, 85, 212-217.
31. Henseler, J., Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of advertising 2017, 46 (1), 178-192.
32. Pawlak, Z., Rough sets and intelligent data analysis. Information sciences 2002, 147 (1-4), 1-12.
33. Pawlak, Z., Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Springer Science & Business Media: 2012; Vol. 9.
34. Greco, S.; Matarazzo, B.; Slowinski, R., Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European journal of operational research 2001, 129 (1), 1-47.
35. Singh, S.; Dey, L., A rough-fuzzy document grading system for customized text information retrieval. Information processing & management 2005, 41 (2), 195-216.
36. Khoo, L.; Tor, S.; Zhai, L., A rough-set-based approach for classification and rule induction. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1999, 15 (6), 438-444.
37. Zhang, X., Concept integration of document databases using different indexing languages. Information processing & management 2006, 42 (1), 121-135.
38. Li, D.; Lv, Q.; Xie, X.; Shang, L.; Xia, H.; Lu, T.; Gu, N., Interest-based real-time content recommendation in online social communities. Knowledge-Based Systems 2012, 28, 1-12.
39. Kazienko, P., Associations: discovery, analysis and applications. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej: 2008.
40. Agrawal, R.; Imieliński, T.; Swami, A. In Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 1993; pp 207-216.
41. Agrawal, R.; Srikant, R. In Fast algorithms for mining association rules, Proc. 20th int. conf. very large data bases, VLDB, Citeseer: 1994; pp 487-499.
42. Park, J. S.; Chen, M.-S.; Yu, P. S., Using a hash-based method with transaction trimming for mining association rules. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 1997, 9 (5), 813-825.
43. Han, J.; Pei, J.; Yin, Y.; Mao, R., Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: A frequent-pattern tree approach. Data mining and knowledge discovery 2004, 8 (1), 53-87.
44. Tsay, Y.-J.; Chiang, J.-Y., CBAR: an efficient method for mining association rules. Knowledge-Based Systems 2005, 18 (2-3), 99-105.
45. Morzy, M. In Efficient mining of dissociation rules, International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, Springer: 2006; pp 228-237.
46. Deng, X.; Jin, C.; Higuchi, Y.; Han, C. J. In An Efficient Association Rule Mining Me-thod for Personalized Recommendation in Mobile E-commerce, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on E-Business Intelligence (ICEBI2010), Atlantis Press: 2010.
47. Renne, J. L., Transit-oriented development: Developing a strategy to measure success. Transportation Research Board: 2005.
48. Knowles, R. D., Transit oriented development in Copenhagen, Denmark: from the finger plan to Orestad. Journal of transport geography 2012, 22, 251-261.
49. Acampa, G.; Contino, F.; Grasso, M.; Ticali, D. In Evaluation of infrastructure: Application of TOD to Catania underground metro station, AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC: 2019; p 160010.
50. Calthorpe, P., The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton architectural press: 1993.
51. Bernick, M.; Cervero, R., Transit villages in the 21st century. 1997.
52. TransLink, Transit-oriented communities guidelines. Creating more livable places around transit in metro Vancouver. TransLink Vancouver: 2012.
53. Cervero, R., Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects. Transportation Research Board: 2004; Vol. 102.
54. Duncan, M., The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA. Urban studies 2011, 48 (1), 101-127.
55. Hess, D. B.; Lombardi, P. A., Policy support for and barriers to transit-oriented development in the inner city: Literature review. Transportation research record 2004, 1887 (1), 26-33.
56. Nasri, A.; Zhang, L., The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas. Transport Policy 2014, 32, 172-179.
57. Jacobson, J.; Forsyth, A., Seven American TODs: Good practices for urban design in transit-oriented development projects. Journal of transport and land use 2008, 1 (2), 51-88.
58. Kimball, M.; Chester, M.; Gino, C.; Reyna, J., Assessing the potential for reducing life-cycle environmental impacts through transit-oriented development infill along existing light rail in Phoenix. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2013, 33 (4), 395-410.
59. Dittmar, H.; Poticha, S., Defining transit-oriented development: The new regional building block. The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development 2004, 19-40.
60. Pal, S., Measuring Transit Oriented Development of Existing Urban Areas around Metro Stations in Faridabad City. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability 2018, 5.
61. Stefansson, G.; Lumsden, K., Performance issues of Smart Transportation Management systems. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 2009, 58 (1), 55-70.
62. Transportation, U. S. D. O., Smart Seattle: A Prototype for the New Century′s Digital City. Beyond Traffic: U.S. DOT Smart City Challenge Application. . Transportation, S. D. o., Ed. Seattle, Washington, 2016.
63. Beck, K., Smart Security? Evaluating Security Resiliency in the US Department of Transportation′s Smart City Challenge. Transportation Research Record 2017, 2604 (1), 37-43.
64. Tekin Bilbil, E., The Operationalizing Aspects of Smart Cities: the Case of Turkey’s Smart Strategies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2017, 8 (3), 1032-1048.
65. Gandy, J., Oscar H.; Nemorin, S., Transportation and Smart City Imaginaries: A Critical Analysis of Proposals for the USDOT Smart City Challenge. 2020; Vol. 14.
66. Pathak, P.; Singhal, A.; Bhutani, S., Intelligent Transportation System in India. Telecom Business Review 2018, 11 (1), 25.
67. Urban, J. M., Privacy issues in smart grid deployment. In Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change, Edward Elgar Publishing: 2016.
68. Tan, S. Y.; Taeihagh, A., Smart City Governance in Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12 (3), 899.
69. Alawadhi, S.; Aldama-Nalda, A.; Chourabi, H.; Gil-Garcia, J. R.; Leung, S.; Mellouli, S.; Nam, T.; Pardo, T. A.; Scholl, H. J.; Walker, S. In Building Understanding of Smart City Initiatives, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012; pp 40-53.
70. Transportation, U. S. D. O., City of Richmond, Virginia Beyond Traffic: The Smart City Challenge Grant Application. Richmond, Virginia, 2016.
71. Silva, B. N.; Khan, M.; Han, K., Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018, 38, 697-713.
72. Jonek-Kowalska, I.; Wolniak, R., Economic opportunities for creating smart cities in Poland. Does wealth matter? Cities 2021, 114, 103222.
73. Ali, N.; Rahim, A. In Scenario-based impediments for intelligent freight transportation in Pakistan, 2018 15th International Conference on Smart Cities: Improving Quality of Life Using ICT & IoT (HONET-ICT), IEEE: 2018; pp 97-101.
74. Litman, T., Smart Transportation Economic Stimulation. Infrastructure Investments that Support Strategic Planning, Objectives Provide True Economic Development, Victoria Transport Policy Institute 2009.
75. Elizabeth Deakin, K. T. F.; Skabardonis, A. A., Intelligent Transport Systems. Linking Technology And Transport Policy To Help Steer The Future. Access 2009, No. 34.
76. Mishra, A. K., Henry George and Mohring–Harwitz Theorems: Lessons for Financing Smart Cities in Developing Countries*. Environment and Urbanization ASIA 2019, 10 (1), 13-30.
77. Handy, S., Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us? International Regional Science Review 2005, 28 (2), 146-167.
78. Pearce, P.; Hodgson, H., Promoting smart travel through tax policy. The Tax Specialist 2015, 19, 2-8.
79. Kelley, S. B.; Lane, B. W.; Stanley, B. W.; Kane, K.; Nielsen, E.; Strachan, S., Smart Transportation for All? A Typology of Recent U.S. Smart Transportation Projects in Midsized Cities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 2020, 110 (2), 547-558.
80. Ruhlandt, R. W. S., The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities 2018, 81, 1-23.
81. Goodman, N.; Zwick, A.; Spicer, Z.; Carlsen, N., Public engagement in smart city development: Lessons from communities in Canada′s Smart City Challenge. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien 2020, 64 (3), 416-432.
82. Castelnovo, W.; Misuraca, G.; Savoldelli, A., Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Science Computer Review 2016, 34 (6), 724-739.
83. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond. Information Polity 2012, 17, 269-280.
84. Klimovský, D.; PINTERIČ, U.; ŠAPARNIENĖ, D., Human limitations to introduction of smart cities: Comparative analysis from two CEE cities. Transylvanian review of administrative sciences 2016, 12 (47), 80-96.
85. Assembly, T. S. C. O. N., Resolution No. 1111/NQ-UBTVQH14 dated May 25, 2016 of the Standing Committee of National Assembly on Arrangement of Commune-Level And District-Level Administrative Divisions and Establishment Of Thu Duc City Affiliated To Ho Chi Minh City. 2020.
86. Adhikari, R. K.; Mohanasundaram, S.; Shrestha, S., Impacts of land-use changes on the groundwater recharge in the Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. Environmental Research 2020, 185, 109440.
87. Office, G. S., Statistical Yearbook of Viet Nam 2019. Statistical Publishing House: 2020; p 1034.
88. Vietnamplus, Traffic jams cost Ho Chi Minh City $820 million each year. VNExpress 2016.
89. Thanh, D.; Nguyen, T.; Tran, T., Isolation and characterization of nitrogen removal bacteria from sewage and fecal sludge of dairy cow farms in Cu Chi, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2019, 8, 042-052.
90. Vietnam, G. S. O., Population projections for Vietnam 2009-2049. Ministry of Planning and Investment.: Hanoi, 2011.
91. Committee, C. T. C. s. P., Decision No. 3522/QD-UBND of November 24, 2015 approving "The adjustment of transportation planning of Can Tho City towards 2030". 2015.
92. Committee, C. T. C. P. s., Decision No. 1254/QD-UBND of May16, 2018 approving the Scheme “Building mechanisms and policies to encourage and develop public transportation in Can Tho city in the period of 2016-2020 and orientation after 2020” 2018.
93. Institute., D. N. U. P., The Project of Adjusting the General Planning of Da
Nang City to 2030 with a Vision to 2050. . 2013.
94. The Prime Minister, Decision No: 2357/QD-TTg of December 4th, 2013 on Approving "Adjustment of General Planning of Da Nang City by 2030 with A Vision Toward 2050". Ha Noi, 2013.
95. Tu, N., Da Nang is in the top 10 places worth living in the world. 2018.
96. Liu, J.; Low, S. P.; Wang, L. F., Critical success factors for eco-city development in China. International Journal of Construction Management 2018, 18 (6), 497-506.
97. Joshi, S.; Saxena, S.; Godbole, T., Developing smart cities: An integrated framework. Procedia Computer Science 2016, 93, 902-909.
98. Neirotti, P.; De Marco, A.; Cagliano, A. C.; Mangano, G.; Scorrano, F., Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 2014, 38, 25-36.
99. Rana, N. P.; Luthra, S.; Mangla, S. K.; Islam, R.; Roderick, S.; Dwivedi, Y. K., Barriers to the development of smart cities in Indian context. Information Systems Frontiers 2019, 21 (3), 503-525.
100. Praharaj, S.; Han, J. H.; Hawken, S., Innovative civic engagement and digital urban infrastructure: Lessons from 100 smart cities mission in India. Procedia engineering 2017, 180, 1423-1432.
101. Chen, Y.; Ardila-Gomez, A.; Frame, G., Achieving energy savings by intelligent transportation systems investments in the context of smart cities. World Bank: 2016.
102. Praharaj, S.; Han, J. H.; Hawken, S., Towards the right model of smart city governance in India. Sustainable Development Studies 2018, 1.
103. Lu, H.; de Jong, M.; ten Heuvelhof, E., Explaining the variety in smart eco city development in China-What policy network theory can teach us about overcoming barriers in implementation? Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 196, 135-149.
104. Reddy, D. S.; Babu, K. G.; Murthy, D., Transportation planning aspects of a smart city–case study of GIFT City, Gujarat. Transportation Research Procedia 2016, 17, 134-144.
105. Zan, T. T. T.; Gueta, L. B.; Okochi, T. In Enabling technology for smart city transportation in developing countries, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity), IEEE: 2015; pp 170-174.
106. Peprah, C.; Amponsah, O.; Oduro, C., A system view of smart mobility and its implications for Ghanaian cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2019, 44, 739-747.
107. Wu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Shen, J.; Mo, Z.; Peng, Y., Smart city with Chinese characteristics against the background of big data: Idea, action and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 173, 60-66.
108. Communications, M. o. I. a. Statistical Information. http://english.vnta.gov.vn/thongke/Trang/dulieuthongkeeng.aspx?
109. Pojani, D.; Stead, D., Policy design for sustainable urban transport in the global south. Policy Design and Practice 2018, 1 (2), 90-102.
110. Shah, S. A. A.; Mahalik, N.; Ha, A. B., Strategic niche management of intelligent transport systems deployment and development in developing countries. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 2009, 2 (2-3), 218-233.
111. Cheng, H.; Hu, Y., Planning for sustainability in China′s urban development: Status and challenges for Dongtan eco-city project. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2010, 12 (1), 119-126.
112. Vu, K.; Hartley, K., Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam. Telecommunications Policy 2018, 42 (10), 845-859.
113. Mahesa, R.; Yudoko, G.; Anggoro, Y. In Platform ecosystems for Indonesia smart cities, 2018 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications (IC3INA), IEEE: 2018; pp 34-39.
114. Idele, P.; Mboup, G., Smart social development key for smart African cities. In Smart Economy in Smart African Cities, Springer: 2019; pp 393-421.
115. Mboup, G.; Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B., Relevance of smart economy in smart cities in Africa. In Smart Economy in Smart African Cities, Springer: 2019; pp 1-49.
116. Cochran, W. G., Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons: 2007.
117. Chen, J.-H.; Hsu, S., Quantifying impact factors of corporate financing: engineering consulting firms. Journal of Management in Engineering 2008, 24 (2), 96-104.
118. Kline, R. B., Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications: 2015.
119. Plant, J., Handbook of transportation policy and administration. CRC Press: 2007.
120. Renne, J. L., Measuring the success of transit oriented development. In Transit Oriented Development, Routledge: 2016; pp 261-276.
121. Renne, J. L., Transit oriented development: making it happen. Routledge: 2016.

指導教授

陳介豪(Jieh-Haur Chen)

審核日期

2021-7-22

推文