財務寬鬆、公司治理與企業創新-以台灣半導體業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：58

、訪客IP：3.145.88.241

姓名

俞兆豐(Zhao-Feng Yu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

財務寬鬆、公司治理與企業創新-以台灣半導體業為例
(Financial Slack, Corporate Governance and Corporate Innovation: Evidence From the IC Industry in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 台灣建置碳排放權交易機制之分析	★ 保險業如何建立創造公司、顧客及員工三贏的RFP商業模式 —以全球人壽為例
★ 在IAS 21：「匯率變動之影響」規範下，我國企業如何應用商業模式選擇功能性貨幣之研究-以A公司為例	★ 台灣銀行業如何改變商業模式以因應ECFA下之變局-以個案銀行為例
★ 公司發行可轉債之宣告與長期績效	★ 申請上市櫃過程中股票價格之變化：來自興櫃市場的實證
★ 外資買賣超對個股之影響	★ 文創產業之融資模式探討
★ 私募股權基金入股後對台灣金融業的影響	★ 新舊承銷制度下首次公開發行公司盈餘管理之比較研究
★ 匯率風險與管理策略研究-以個案公司為例	★ 商業銀行併購融資之契機
★ 我國證券商辦理離境證券業務與海外子公司業務之比較：以個案銀行券商為例	★ 借殼公司之探討以台灣市場為例
★ 家族企業接班：專業經理人與家族成員之績效比較	★ 本國銀行Basel III 資本適足率與流動性覆蓋率探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究以 2009 年至 2019 年的半導體業上市櫃公司為樣本，探究企業的財務寬鬆資源如何影響企業不同種類的創新活動，以及這一過程是否會受到公司治理中機構所有權和董事獨立性的影響。基於過去文獻來選取財務寬鬆資源和創新活動的代理指標，將創新產出作為創新活動的代理，區分為探索式創新和利用式創新，將流動比率和負債權益比選作財務寬鬆資源中可用寬鬆和潛在寬鬆的代理。另外在迴歸模型中額外加入財務寬鬆資源的二次項來捕捉可能存在的非線性關係。實證結果顯示了半導體產業公司對於不同種類創新的重視程度存在差異，表明產業内創新的實務現況。除此之外，實證結果表明，代表企業流動變現能力的可用寬鬆越多，產業內企業的創新會減少；代表企業舉債能力的潛在寬鬆越多，產業內企業的創新會增加。公司治理中機構法人持股和獨立董事數量都無法顯著影響財務寬鬆資源和企業創新活動之間的關係。

摘要(英)

This study examines how financial slack affects different innovative activities within a company from the integrated circuit (IC) industry in Taiwan. Besides, this study explores whether institutional ownerships and independent directors can exert influence on the relationship between financial slack and innovation. As for the data, Firm-year observations are applied and the time period spans from the year 2009 to 2019. The whole sample includes all the companies from the IC industry that listed on the Taiwan stock exchange (TSE) and Taipei exchange (OTC). When it comes to the variables, the proxies of financial slack and innovation activities are chosen based on the prior literature. In this study, innovation outputs proxy for innovative activities and the types of patents are used to distinguish radical innovation from incremental innovation. Also, current ratio and debt-to-equity ratio proxy for available slack and potential slack respectively in order to learn the effect brought by the different aspects of financial slack. Moreover, we add quadratic terms of available slack and potential slack to test the curvilinear U-shaped or inverted U-shaped relationship between the financial slack and innovation. Our empirical results shows that companies from the IC industry in Taiwan pay much more attention to radical innovation than incremental innovation, which help draw a picture of innovative activities within this industry. In addition, other results demonstrate a negative relationship between available slack and innovative activities. And potential slack positively affects innovative activities. Finally, we haven′t found any significant impacts caused by institutional ownerships or independent directors which could change financial slack and innovative activities.

關鍵字(中)

★ 財務寬鬆
★ 公司治理
★ 企業創新
★ 探索式創新
★ 利用式創新
★ 半導體業

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機和目的 1
1.3 研究架構 3
第二章文獻探討與研究假說 3
2.1 寬鬆資源與創新活動 3
2.2 財務寬鬆與兩類創新之關係 4
2.3 財務寬鬆、機構所有權與兩類創新之關係 6
2.4 財務寬鬆、董事獨立性與兩類創新之關係 6
第三章研究方法 8
3.1 資料來源與樣本選取 8
3.2 變數說明 9
3.3 實證模型 13
第四章實證結果與分析 15
4.1 敘述性統計量 15
4.2 相關性分析 16
4.3 迴歸分析結果 17
4.4 額外測試 27
第五章研究結論與限制 43
參考文獻 45

參考文獻

1. 李馨蘋與鄭誌偉,2008,從管理者薪酬與機構法人持股之觀點看企業創新投資之影響因素,東吳經濟商學學報,第62期：47-68。
2. 洪榮耀,2015,機構投資人是短視交易者亦或是精明交易者–從無形資產的觀點出發,商業現代化學刊,第8卷第1期：91-114。
3. 陳紅、張玉與劉東霞,2019,政府補助、稅收優惠與企業創新績效–不同生命週期階段的實證研究,南開管理評論，第22卷第3期:187-200。
4. 劉正田,2003,企業研發投資與淨值市價比現象,風險管理學報,第5卷第2期：261-285。
5. 劉俊儒、張育琳與劉均怡,2017,在不同企業生命週期下經營績效對高階經理團隊薪酬之影響,當代會計,第18卷第1期：79-120。
6. 謝淑旦與柯育芝,2010,企業研究發展支出與公司治理機制關聯性之研究,高雄應用科技大學學報,第39期：1-26。
7. 戴彩惠,2011,創新活動與經營績效間關係之探討–以台灣半導體產業為例,國立台中教育大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
8. 蘇國章,2008,創新力對公司績效影響：美國與台灣半導體產業實證分析,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
9. Adams, R. B. and D. Ferreira, 2007, A theory of friendly boards, Journal of Finance 62: 217‒250.
10. Atanassov, J., 2012, Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting, Journal of Finance 68: 1097‒1131.
11. Baker, T. and R. E. Nelson, 2005, Creating something from nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 329‒366.
12. Balsmeier, B., L. Fleming, and G. Manso, 2017, Independent boards and innovation, Journal of Financial Economics 123: 536‒557.
13. Bange, M. M. and W. DeBondt, 1998, R&D Budgets and Corporate Earnings Targets, Journal of Corporate Finance 4: 153‒184.
14. Bernstein, S., 2015, Does Going Public Affect Innovation? Journal of Finance 70: 1365‒1403.
15. Benner, M. J. and M. L. Tushman, 2003, Exploitation, Exploration and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review 28: 238‒256.
16. Bourgeois, L., 1981, On the measurement of organizational slack, The Academy of Management Review 6: 29‒39.
17. Bourgeois, L. and V. Singh, 1983, Organizational slack and political behavior within top management teams, Academy of management proceedings
18. Bromiley, P., 1991, Testing a Causal Model of Corporate Risk Taking and Performance, The Academy of Management Journal 34: 37‒59.
19. Brochet, F. and S. Srinivasan, 2014, Accountability of independent directors: evidence from firms subject to securities litigation, Journal of Financial Economics 111: 430‒449.
20. Brush, T., P. Bromiley and M. Hendrickx, 2000, The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal 21: 455‒472.
21. Bushee, B. J., 2001, Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-term Earnings Over Long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research 18: 207‒246.
22. Chemmanur, T. J., E. Loutskina and X. Tian, 2014, Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation, Review of Financial Studies 27: 2434‒2473.
23. Chen, W. R. and K. D. Miller, 2007, Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity, Strategic Management Journal 28: 369‒381.
24. Chen, W. R., 2008, Determinants of Firms’ Backward- and Forward-Looking R&D Search Behavior, Organization Science 19: 609‒622.
25. Chung, K. H., and H. Zhang, 2011, Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 46: 247‒273.
26. Cohen, L., K. Diether and C. Malloy, 2013, Misvaluing innovation, Review of Financial Studies 26: 635‒666.
27. Combs, J. and D. Jr. Ketchen, 1999, Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predicitions from the resource-based view and organizational economics, Strategic Management Journal 20: 867‒888.
28. Cyert, R. and J. March, 1963, The behavioral theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs(NJ) : Prentice-Hall.
29. Daniel, F., F. T. Lohrke, C. J. Fornaciari and R. A. Turner, 2004, Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis, Journal of Business Research 57: 565‒574.
30. Fama, E. F., 1980, Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political Economy 88: 288‒307.
31. Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen, 1983, Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301‒324.
32. Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, 1998, Value versus Growth: The International Evidence, Journal of Finance 53: 1975‒1999.
33. Fang, V. W., X. Tian and S. Tice, 2014, Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? Journal of Finance 69: 2085‒2125.
34. Finkelstein, S. and D. C. Hambrick, 1990, Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 484‒503.
35. George, G., 2005, Slack resources and the performance of privately held firm, The Academy of Management Journal 48: 661‒676.
36. Greenley, G., M. Okemgil, 1998, A comparison of slack resources in high and low performing British companies, Journal of Management Studies 35: 377‒398.
37. Joe, J. R., H. Louis and D. Robinson, 2009, Managers′ and Investors′ Responses to Media Exposure of Board Ineffectiveness, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44: 579‒605.
38. John, K., Y. Z. Li and J. R. Pang, 2017, Does Corporate Governance Matter More For High Financial Slack Firms? Management Science 63: 1872‒1891.
39. Kim, Hi., He. Kim and P. M. Lee, 2008, Ownership Structure and Relationship between Financial Slack and R&D Investments: Evidence from Korean Firms, Organization Science 19: 404‒418.
40. Lev, B. and P. Zarowin, 1999, The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them, Journal of Accounting Research 37: 353‒385.
41. Levinthal, D. and J. G. March, 1981, A model of adaptive organizational search, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizational 2: 307‒333.
42. Lungeanu, R., I. Stern and E. J. Zajac, 2016, When do firms change technology-sourcing vehicles? The role of poor innovative performance and financial slack, Strategic Management Journal 37: 855‒869.
43. Manso, G., 2011, Motivating innovation, Journal of Finance 66: 1823‒1860.
44. Masulis, R. W. and S. Mobbs, 2014, Independent director incentives: where do talented directors spend their limited time and energy? Journal of Financial Economics 111: 406‒429.
45. Nohria, N. and R. Gulati, 1996, Is slack good or bad for innovation? The Academy of Management Journal 39: 1245‒1264.
46. O′Brien, J. P., 2003, The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation, Strategic Management Journal 24: 415‒431.
47. Palmer, T. and R. Wiseman, 1999, Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: a holistic model of risk, Strategic Management Journal 20: 1037‒1062.
48. Pound, J., 1988, Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight, Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237‒265.
49. Sapra, H., A. Subramanian and K. V. Subramanian, 2014, Corporate Governance and Innovation: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 49: 957‒1003.
50. Singh, J., 1986, Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making, The Academy of Management Journal 29: 562‒585.
51. Weisbach, M. S., 1988, Outside directors and CEO turnover, Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431‒460.
52. Xin, K., Y. C. Sun, R. Zhang and X. Liu, 2019, Debt Financing and Technological Innovation: Evidence from China, Journal of Business Economics and Management 20: 841‒859.

指導教授

徐政義

審核日期

2021-4-16

推文