拍賣畫作投資報酬率的影響因素

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：57

、訪客IP：3.144.48.194

姓名

歐姿璇(Tzu-Hsuan Ou) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

拍賣畫作投資報酬率的影響因素
(The Key Factors of Repeat-sales Painting Investment Return)

相關論文

★ 國內股票型共同基金異常報酬之特徵研究	★ 台灣境外高收益債券型基金績效分析
★ 財富管理客戶選擇銀行之因素探討	★ 境外匯回專法實施前後境外資金解決方案比較－以個案分析為例
★ 利用隨機優勢方法探究商品指數之投資績效	★ 承銷關係是否會影響未來承銷業務?
★ 併購動能:以台灣市場為例	★ 機構法人對股票報酬與公司價值之影響
★ 投資者情緒與期貨價格關聯性	★ 避險基金指數是否能夠提供風險分散效果？- 利用均異擴張檢定
★ Model-Free隱含波動度價差之遠期資訊	★ 公開市場購回股票之研究
★ Modeling Long Run Risk with Macroeconomic Fundamentals	★ Exploration of Jumps and Cojumps in Financial Markets
★ 社會責任指數與環境、社會及公司治理之關聯性分析-以FTSE4Good系列指數為例	★ 運用檢定資產價格泡沫模型建構動態財務危機預警之驗證

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

有別於過往對於拍賣畫作價值的研究，大多都是衡量各種因素對拍賣畫作成交價的影響，本研究站在投資人衡量投資績效的立場，透過爬蟲技術搜集 askArt 網站的畫作拍賣交易資料，建立重複拍賣畫作樣本，並結合特徵定價模型能夠捕捉各個不同因子對成交價的影響以及重複拍賣迴歸模型能夠分析拍賣品價值變動的特性，建構以投資報酬率作為應變數，並將藝術家、畫作風格、畫作持有年數、買入成交價以及畫作交易的拍賣行等各因子設為自變數，探討影響拍賣畫作投資報酬率的因素，找出投資拍賣畫作投資人所關心的投資議題。結果顯示，藝術家對於畫作投資報酬率的解釋能力並不高，而抽象風格的畫作投資報酬率優於寫實風格的畫作。除了畫作本身以外，投資人尚需關心投資期間以及交易的議題。本研究發現，持有畫作的年數會顯著為獲利的畫作投資帶來負面的影響。而交易畫作的拍賣行也會顯著影響畫作投資報酬率，於大型拍賣行交易的畫作投資報酬率遜於在小型拍賣行交易的畫作，然而在小型拍賣行交易的畫作投資報酬率變異程度則高於在大型拍賣行交易的畫作，並且交易拍賣行與畫作買入成交價彼此間具有交互影響的效果。投資人在進入畫作拍賣市場以前，應充分考量本研究所列舉對於報酬率的影響因素。

摘要(英)

Most of previous studies on the value of paintings in auction measure the impact of various factors on the auction price of paintings. However, this research measures the influence of several factors on rate of return of investment (ROI) of the paintings in auction from perspective of investors. We collect auction records of paintings from askArt through crawler technology and build the sample of repeat-sales paintings. Moreover, our model combined with hedonic pricing model, which captures the effects of various factors on sale prices of paintings in auction, and repeat-sales regression model, which analyze the changes in the value of the paintings. Aiming to find what are important for investing in paintings in auction, we use the ROI as dependent variable to capture the impact of artists, painting styles, holding years of paintings, sale prices and auction houses where paintings were traded on ROI. The results show that artist is not the key factor for paintings investment but painting style has a little effect. Abstract paintings perform better then realistic paintings. Besides, investors should consider holding year of their painting investment and where they trade the paintings. We find that the number of holding years has significant negative effect on the ROI of paintings. Trading auction houses also significantly affect the return of painting investment. The ROI of paintings traded at large auction houses is lower than that of paintings traded at small auction houses. However, the ROI of paintings traded at small auction houses is more volatile than paintings traded at large auction houses, and there is cross effect between trading auction houses and sale prices of the painting. Therefore, before entering the painting auction market, investors should fully consider the factors that affect the rate of return listed in this study.

關鍵字(中)

★ 藝術投資
★ 畫作投資
★ 拍賣模型
★ 特徵模型
★ 投資報酬率
★ 拍賣

關鍵字(英)

★ Art investment
★ painting investment
★ Auction
★ repeat-sale regression model
★ hedonic regression model
★ return of investment

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
第一章緒論 1
第二章文獻回顧 2
2.1 藝術拍賣市場 2
2.2 藝術拍賣品定價模型 3
第三章研究方法 5
3.1 研究模型 5
3.2 資料樣本 5
3.3 變數衡量 6
3.4 迴歸模型 11
第四章實證結果分析 13
4.1 敘述性統計 13
4.2 迴歸結果 18
第五章結論 28
參考文獻 29
附錄 31

參考文獻

Agnello, R. J., & Pierce, R. K. (1996). Financial returns, price determinants, and genre effects in American art investment. Journal of Cultural Economics, 20(4), 359-383.
Anderson, R. C. (1974). Paintings as an investment. Economic Inquiry, 12(1), 13.
Bailey, M. J., Muth, R. F., & Nourse, H. O. (1963). A regression method for real estate price index construction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(304), 933-942.
Biey, M. L., & Zanola, R. (2005). The market for Picasso prints: A hybrid model approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 29(2), 127-136.
Buelens, N., & Ginsburgh, V. (1993). Revisiting Baumol′s ‘art as floating crap game’. European Economic Review, 37(7), 1351-1371.
Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1987). Prices of single family homes since 1970: New indexes for four cities.
Chanel, O. (1995). Is art market behaviour predictable?. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 519-527.
Clare McAndrew (2021). The Art Market 2021
Collins, A., Scorcu, A., & Zanola, R. (2009). Reconsidering hedonic art price indexes. Economics Letters, 104(2), 57-60.
De la Barre, M., Docclo, S., & Ginsburgh, V. (1994). Returns of impressionist, modern and contemporary European paintings 1962-1991. Annales d′Economie et de Statistique, 143-181.
Ginsburgh, V., & Jeanfils, P. (1995). Long-term comovements in international markets for paintings. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 538-548.
Goetzmann, W. N. (1992). The accuracy of real estate indices: Repeat sale estimators. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 5(1), 5-53.
Goetzmann, W. N. (1993). Accounting for taste: Art and the financial markets over three centuries. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1370-1376.
Grampp, W. D. (1989). Pricing the priceless: art, artists, and economics.
Hodgson, D. J., & Vorkink, K. P. (2004). Asset pricing theory and the valuation of Canadian paintings. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d′économique, 37(3), 629-655.
Kräussl, R., & Elsland, N. V. (2008). Constructing the true art market index: A novel 2-step hedonic approach and its application to the German art market (No. 2008/11). CFS working paper.
Marinelli, N., & Palomba, G. (2011). A model for pricing Italian Contemporary Art paintings at auction. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 51(2), 212-224.
Mei, J., & Moses, M. (2002). Art as an investment and the underperformance of masterpieces. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1656-1668.
Pesando, J. E. (1993). Art as an investment: The market for modern prints. The American Economic Review, 1075-1089.
Renneboog, L., & Van Houtte, T. (2002). The monetary appreciation of paintings: From realism to Magritte. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(3), 331-358.
Scorcu, A. E., & Zanola, R. (2011). The “right” price for art collectibles: a quantile hedonic regression investigation of Picasso paintings. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 14(2), 89-99.
Wang, F., & Zheng, X. (2018). The comparison of the hedonic, repeat sales, and hybrid models: Evidence from the Chinese paintings market. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1443372.
Wolverton, M., & Senteza, J. (2000). Hedonic estimates of regional constant quality house prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 19(3), 235-253.
Worthington, A. C., & Higgs, H. (2004). Art as an investment: Risk, return and portfolio diversification in major painting markets. Accounting & Finance, 44(2), 257-271.

指導教授

葉錦徽(Jin-Huei Yeh)

審核日期

2021-8-5

推文