博碩士論文 108322033 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:94 、訪客IP:3.135.198.150
姓名 汪祐毅(Yu-Yi Wang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 土木工程學系
論文名稱 以離心模型試驗探討不同隧道與連續壁間距的動態反應
(Centrifuge modeling on the dynamic response of tunnel and diaphragm wall with different spacing)
相關論文
★ 以離心振動臺試驗模擬緩衝材料中廢棄物罐之振動反應★ 緩衝材料在不同圍壓下之工程性質
★ 具裂縫的緩衝材料自癒行為模擬★ 具不同上部結構之樁基礎受振行為
★ 基盤土壤液化對上方土堤位移的影響★ 回填與緩衝材料之動態強度
★ 砂質土壤中柔性擋土牆在動態載重下的行為★ Effect of Vertical Drain Methods on The Soil Liquefaction
★ Centrifuge Modelling on Failure Behaviours of Sandy Slope Caused by Gravity, Rainfall and Earthquake★ 微生物膠結作用對砂質土壤性質的影響
★ 基盤土壤液化引致的側潰對上方土堤之影響及其改善對策★ 土壤液化引致側向滑移對樁基礎之影響及其對策
★ 挖掘機鏟斗上土壤黏附問題的基礎研究★ 低放射性廢棄物最終處置回填材料於不同配比下之工程力學特性
★ 以離心振動台試驗探討 基盤振動方向與坡向夾角對側向滑移之反應★ 應用時域反射法於地層下陷監測之改善研發
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 隨著城市的快速發展,地下空間的使用率逐漸增加,鄰近工程的施工也日漸普及,既存隧道旁的基坑開挖工程就屬於上述鄰近施工的一種。而淺層的地下隧道多使用明挖覆蓋法(Cut-and cover)並以矩形(箱形)隧道形式建造,其優點在於方便施工且相關設施可最大化利用開挖空間。基坑開挖會對周遭的土壤產生解壓的作用,進而影響鄰近隧道產生內力及形變,以目前正在興建的捷運線段為例,當鄰近區域發生新建工程基地開挖時,捷運線段就監測到了不小的隧道徑向變形及軌道位移;台灣位在菲律賓海板塊及歐亞板塊的交界上,倘若開挖的過程中發生地震,則不僅僅只有隧道,開挖工程也會連帶受到影響,上述的變形量也可能會增加;但在過往的文獻中,卻鮮少探討地震對基坑開挖及鄰近隧道的影響,僅著重在開挖時既存隧道的變形行為而已。
本研究進行四組動態離心模型試驗,透過改變隧道與開挖面連續壁的間距,探討受震時兩者間相互影響的關係。試驗結果表示,當隧道愈鄰近開挖面連續壁時,連續壁的傾斜角度及頂部最大側向位移有增加的趨勢,隧道自身受到的形變量及沉陷量也較大;地表最大沉陷量發生於鄰近連續壁之背填土側,並且在隧道與連續壁間距最小時達到最大;隧道的變形量主要發生在開挖及架設支撐的過程中,與此相比,受振時的變形量較小。
摘要(英) The underground mass transit system network is developed rapidly in Taiwan urban area. The density of tunnel for subway or mass rapid transit is increasing year by year. Taiwan is located at the ring of fire, there are many active faults and earthquakes. The tunnel would be
damaged and deformed induced by the strong ground motion. When the urban renewal plan is carried out in the future, if there is an existed tunnel nearby the deep excavation site, the unloading of soil would make the tunnel deform.
The main objective of the present study is to verify the seismic efficiency of tunnel and excavation site, study the influence of distance between tunnel and retaining wall. Four groups of dynamic centrifuge tests are conducted under different distance. The test results show that the maximum lateral displacement and tilting angle of diaphragm wall and the deformation and settlement of tunnel become larger when the distance between tunnel and excavation site become smaller. The maximum ground settlement located in back-filled area, where is very
close to continuous wall. The ground settlement become bigger when the distance of tunnel to
excavation site become smaller. In addition, the deformation of tunnel is mainly caused by
excavation, instead of shaking events.
關鍵字(中) ★ 離心模型試驗
★ 隧道
★ 連續壁
★ 開挖
★ 傾倒角
★ 地表沉陷
關鍵字(英) ★ centrifuge modelling test
★ tunnel
★ diaphragm wall
★ excavation
★ tilting angle
★ ground settlement
論文目次 目錄
摘要 ............................................................................................................................................i
Abstract .....................................................................................................................................ii
致謝 ..........................................................................................................................................iii
目錄 ..........................................................................................................................................iv
圖目錄 ......................................................................................................................................vi
表目錄 .....................................................................................................................................xv
一、緒論 ...................................................................................................................................1
1-1 研究動機與目的 ................................................................................................ 1
1-2 研究架構 ............................................................................................................ 2
1-3 論文內容 ............................................................................................................ 2
二、文獻回顧 ...........................................................................................................................3
2-1 離心模型原理 .................................................................................................... 3
2-2 隧道基礎設計與安全性評估 .......................................................................... 11
2-3 地下連續壁及擋土支撐設計 .......................................................................... 17
2-4 擋土設施安全檢核 .......................................................................................... 21
2-5 開挖對旁側離心模型隧道之影響 .................................................................. 29
三、試驗設備與試體製作 .....................................................................................................33
3-1 試驗儀器與設備 .............................................................................................. 33
3-2 試驗材料 .......................................................................................................... 45
3-3 離心模型設計與製作 ...................................................................................... 49
3-4 試體準備 .......................................................................................................... 58
四、試驗規劃與結果討論 .....................................................................................................81
4-1 試驗規劃 .......................................................................................................... 81
4-2 試驗數據分析方法 .......................................................................................... 91
iv
4-3 試驗結果 ........................................................................................................ 104
4-4 綜合討論 ........................................................................................................ 192
五、結論與建議 ...................................................................................................................212
5-1 結論 ................................................................................................................ 212
5-2 建議 ................................................................................................................ 214
參考文獻 ...............................................................................................................................215
參考文獻 [1] Giovanni Lanzano, Emilio Bilotta, Gianpiero Russo, Francesco Silvestri, and S. P.
Gopal Madabhushi, “Centrifuge Modeling of Seismic Loading on Tunnels in Sand”
Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 1–16, No. 6 (2012)
[2] Iida, H., Hiroto, T., Yoshida, N., Iwafuji, M., “Damage to Daikai Subway Station,”
Special Issue of Soils and Foundations, Jpn. Geotech. Soc., pp.283–300 (1996)
[3] Hashash, Y.M.A., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., Yao, J.I., “Seismic design and analysis of
underground structures,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology., vol.16,
pp.247–293 (2001)
[4] Wang, W.L., Wang, T.T., Su, J.J., Lin, C.H., Seng, C.R., Huang, T.H., “Assessment of
damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake,” Tunnelling and
Underground Space Technology, Vol.16, No.3, pp. 133-150 (2001)
[5] Kontoe, S., Zdravkovic, L., Potts, D., Menkiti, C.O., “Case study on seismic tunnel
response,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 45, pp. 1743-1764 (2008)
[6] Patil, M., Choudhury, D., Ranjithc, P.G., Zhao, J., “Behavior of shallow tunnel in soft
soil under seismic conditions,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, No. 82,
pp. 30–38 (2018)
[7] Hashash Y.M.A., Romero-Arduz M.I., “Seismic Design of Tunnels,” In: Beer, M.,
Kougioumtzoglou, I.A., Patelli, E., Au, SK. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake
Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2015)
[8] Sharma, S. and Judd, W.R., “Underground opening damage from earthquakes,”
Engineering Geology, Vol. 30, pp. 263-276 (1991)
[9] Nakamura, S., Yoshida, N., “Damage to daikai subway station during the 1995
hyogoken-nambu earthquake and its investigation,” Japan Society of Civil Engineers,
Committee of Earthquake Engineering, Damage to Daikai Subway Station During the
1995 Hyogoken Nanbu Earthquake and Its Investigation. pp. 287-295 (1996)
[10] Debiasi, E., Gajo, A., Zonta, D., “On the seismic response of shallow-buried rectangular
structures,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 38, pp. 99-113 (2013)
[11] 張徽正、林啟文、陳勉銘、盧詩丁,台灣活動斷層概論,經濟部中央地質調查所特
刊第十號,第 4-6 頁(1998)。
[12] Lin, M. L, Chung C. F., and Jeng F. S., “Deformation of overburden soil induced by
thrust fault slip,” Engineering Geology, Vol. 88, pp. 70-89 (2006).
[13] Charatpangoon, B., Kiyono, J., Furukawa, A., and Hansapinyo, C., “Dynamic analysis of
earth dam damaged by the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake,” Soil
Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 64, pp. 50-62 (2014).
[14] Tubaldi, E., Tassotti, L., Dall’Asta, A., and Dezi, L., “Seismic response analysis of
slender bridge piers,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 43, pp.
1503-1519 (2014).
[15] DeAlbaAlvarez, R.O., Ferguson, N.S., and Mace, B.R., “A robust spot weld model for
structural vibration analysis,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 89, pp. 1-7
(2014).
[16] Damgaard, M., Andersen, L.V., and Ibsen, L.B., “Computationally efficient modelling of
dynamic soil-structure interaction of offshore wind turbines on gravity footings,”
Renewable Energy, Vol. 68, pp. 289-603 (2014).
[17] Natarajan, S., Haboussi, M., and Manickam, G., “Application of higher-order structural
theory to bending and free vibration analysis of sandwich plates with CNT reinforced
composite facesheets,” Composite Structures, Vol. 113, pp. 197-207 (2014).
[18] Hung, W.Y., Lee, C.J., Chung, W.Y., Tsai, C.H., Chen, T., Huang, C.C., Wu, Y.C.,
“Seismic behavior of pile in liquefiable soil ground by centrifuge shaking table tests,”
Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 712-720 (2014).
[19] Stone, K. J. L. and Wood, D. M., “Effects of dilatancy and particle size observed in
model tests on sand,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 43-57 (1992).
[20] Moosavi, S. M., Jafari, M. K., Kamalian, M. and Shafiee, “Experimental investigation of
reverse fault rupture-rigid shallow foundation interaction,” International Journal of Civil
Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 85-98 (2010).
[21] Tani, K., Ueta, K. and Onizuka, N., “Discussion on Earthquake fault rupture propagation
through soil,” Journal of geotechnical engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 1, pp. 80-82
(1996).
[22] 劉守華、董津城、徐光明、蔡正銀,「地下斷裂對不同土質上覆土層的工程影響,」
岩石力學與工程學報,第 24 期,第 11 卷,第 1868-1874 頁(2005)。
[23] Bransby, M. F., Davies, M. C. R., and Nahas, A. El., “Centrifuge modeling of normal
fault-foundation interaction,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 6, pp. 585-605
(2008a).
[24] Bransby, M. F., Davies, M. C. R., and Nahas, A. El., “Centrifuge modeling of reverse
fault-foundation interaction,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 6, pp. 607-628
(2008b).
[25] Johansson, J., Konagai, K., “Fault induced permanent ground deformations:
Experimental verification of wet and dry soil, numerical findings’ relation to field
observations of tunnel damage and implications for design,” Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 27, pp. 938-956 (2007)
[26] Baziar, M.H., Nabizadeh, A., Khalafian, N., Lee, C.L. and Hung, W.Y., “Evaluation of
reverse faulting effects on the mechanical response of tunnel lining using centrifuge tests
and numerical analysis,” Géotechnique, doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.019, (2019).
[27] 李崇正,「離心機模型原理」,實驗土壤力學講義,臺灣,(1997)。
[28] 鄭文隆,「隧道工址旁之岩體分類」,隧道施工技術規範,(2003)。
[29] 日本隧道工學委員會,日本隧道工程標準規範及解說-[明挖覆蓋篇],(2003)。
[30] 交通部公路工程部,「隧道設計標準」,市區道路及附屬工程設計規範,(2003)。
[31] 簡茂洲,「擋土設施及支撐之種類及其工作原理」,台北市土木技師公會,(2003)
指導教授 洪汶宜(Wen-Yi Hung) 審核日期 2021-9-2
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明