語意網路上代理人溝通機制研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：35

、訪客IP：18.119.143.4

姓名

林永峰(Yong-Feng Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

語意網路上代理人溝通機制研究
(A Study on Agent Communication over the Semantic Web)

相關論文

★ 以極致編程為基礎的嵌入式系統雙層測試工具	★ 極致編程的兩個延伸：繪製草圖及英詞中句虛擬碼
★ 應用DAML建立代理人社群以整合網路服務	★ 以DAML為基礎的目標導向個人代理人
★ 攜帶可延伸的ontology以增進agent間的溝通	★ 使用代理人支援eXtreme Programming(XP)環境的建構系統
★ 使用代理人輔助XP環境之驗收測試	★ 使用代理人輔助eXtreme Programming環境之單元測試
★ 使用代理人輔助eXtreme Programming環境之版本控制	★ 行動代理人使用DAML Ontology於進階用路人資訊系統
★ 網路服務描述的整合驗證環境	★ 適用OWL-S服務模型之新的正規技術
★ 用於代理人互動的知識本體增強的多代理人閘道系統	★ 文件製作活動：極致編程在嵌入式系統上之延伸
★ 測試驅動開發用於高職生程式教學	★ 使用極致編程在嵌入式系統中移植開放原始碼

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

語意網路是目前熱門的研究領域。它以現有的網路為基礎，為其內容增添語意，組成網路知識本體。因此，網路上的應用程式可以藉由知識本體達到跨平台運算的目的。另一方面，代理人是一門提昇軟體抽象化的理論。它使軟體由物件典範移轉到智慧運算層次，將軟體模塑成一個具有心智的個體。我們的研究便是將代理人技術應用在語意網路上，藉由代理人讓語意網路應用程式具有智慧化的運算。另一方面，代理人也可以藉由語意網路上的知識本體，實現代理人平台之間的資訊整合。
我們提出代理人在語意網路上的溝通架構，代理人藉由知識本體來運算，因此，我們為溝通架構定義了一套代理人溝通知識本體，藉由這一套知識本體我們可以將代理人的溝通移植至語意網路。我們定義了相對應於每一個代理人溝通階層架構的知識本體以描述階層內的子元件以及階層之間的元件。不同的是，我們也提出一個新的代理人溝通階層，我們在訊息傳遞層與內容語言層之間插入一個代理人心智層，(1) 這樣可以讓訊息傳遞元件可以傳送代理人的心智以朝向到代理人平台之間開放的心智傳遞前進。(2)將心智表示法與內容語言表示法分開，讓心智態度可以不被某些語言所限制，以利分享。
我們的架構嘗試著與語意網路上的程式互動，如：語意網路服務與語意網路應用程式。這些過程與成果都在本文中所描述。

摘要(英)

The Semantics Web is one of the popular research areas these days. It is based on the current Web, and adds more semantics to it, on purpose of building the Ontology of Web content. So, application program on Web can make the purpose of cross-platform calculation come true by taking advantage of Ontology. On the other side of coin, agent is a theory able to enhance abstraction of software itself. This theory makes software shift from object paradigm to intelligence agent paradigm, and thus constructs the software into an object with mental model. The purpose of our study is to apply agent technique to Semantics Web, and our method is to make application program of Semantic Web be able to make intelligent computing by utilizing agents. Moreover, agents can realize the information integration among platforms of agents by making capital of Ontology on Semantics Web.
This study brings up the communication architecture on the Semantic Web; precisely speaking, agents make computing with Ontology, and we define an agent’s communication ontology for this communication framework. We can transplant agent’s communication to Semantics Web by using this Ontology. Our researches define corresponding ontologies for all agent communication layers for the sake of describing ways of construction of subcomponents inside layers and of components among layers. On the contrary, we want to propose a new agent mental layer. We insert it between the message transport layer and the content language layer in the cause of: (1) Making any message transport component be capable of transmitting mental attitudes of agents, which leads to the openness of mental attitude conveyance amid platforms, (2) Separating the content representation from the mental representation, which can cause mental attitudes not to be limited by certain languages and thus facilitate sharing.
Our architecture attempts to interact with a popular the application of Semantic Web such as Semantic Web Service and Semantic Web Application. The experience and effort are also described in this paper.

關鍵字(中)

★ 語意網路
★ 知識本體
★ 代理人
★ 代理人溝通
★ 語意網路服務
★ 語意網路應用程式

關鍵字(英)

★ Semantic Web
★ Ontology
★ Agent
★ Semantic Web Service
★ Agent Communication
★ Semantic Web Application

論文目次

Abstract....................................................................................................................................ii
Table of Contents....................................................................................................................vii
List of Figures.........................................................................................................................ix
List of Tables...........................................................................................................................xi
1. Introduction to Agent Communication and the Semantic Web...................................1
1.1. Agent......................................................................................................................1
1.2. Agent Communication............................................................................................5
1.2.1. Message Transport Layer...........................................................................6
1.2.2. Content Language Layer............................................................................8
1.2.3. Performative Layer...................................................................................11
1.2.4. Interaction Protocol Layer........................................................................13
1.3. Web and Semantic Web........................................................................................14
1.4. Related Work........................................................................................................17
2. A New Agent Mental Layer...........................................................................................19
2.1. Agent Communication and its Ontologies...........................................................20
2.2. Architecture..........................................................................................................22
2.3. Selecting Agent Communication Description......................................................27
2.4. Agent Communication Enhanced 3APL Deliberation Cycle...............................29
3. Agent Communication Ontology...................................................................................30
3.1. Content Language Ontology..............................................................................31
3.1.1. Object.......................................................................................................32
3.1.2. Action.......................................................................................................33
3.1.3. Proposition................................................................................................33
3.1.4. Content.....................................................................................................35
3.2. Proposition Ontology....................................................................................36
3.2.1. Extended Proposition................................................................................38
3.2.2. Embedded Proposition..............................................................................38
3.2.3. Agent........................................................................................................40
3.3. Communicative Act Ontology............................................................................42
3.3.1. Communicative Act (CA).........................................................................44
3.3.2. Feasibility Precondition (FP)....................................................................45
3.3.3. Rational Effect (RE).................................................................................46
3.4. Interaction Protocol Ontology...........................................................................47
3.4.1. Initiator & Participant(s)...........................................................................47
3.4.2. State..........................................................................................................48
3.4.3. Transition..................................................................................................48
3.4.4. Protocol.....................................................................................................49
4. Mental Model and Belief................................................................................................50
4.1. Formal Model.......................................................................................................50
4.2. KD45 Algorithm...................................................................................................54
5. An Example of Integrated Movie Service....................................................................57
5.1. Relation between SWS and Web Service.............................................................59
5.2. SWS implementations..........................................................................................62
5.2.1. Information Retrieval Service..................................................................62
5.2.2. Video Broadcast Service...........................................................................63
5.2.3. Video Abstract Service.............................................................................64
5.2.4. Recommendation Service.........................................................................65
5.3. Extended Agent Communication Architecture for OWL-S..................................66
5.4. Interaction with SWS...........................................................................................68
6. An Example of Extreme Programming Environment.................................................72
6.1. Using Agent to Support Unit Testing of XP.........................................................74
6.1.1. Architecture..............................................................................................74
6.1.2. Implementation Using Agent Communication Architecture....................78
6.2. Interaction with Web applications........................................................................79
6.2.1. Facilitate XP practices..............................................................................80
6.2.2. Service search and agent recovery............................................................82
7. Conclusions....................................................................................................................82
References...............................................................................................................................84
Appendix A..............................................................................................................................93
VITA.......................................................................................................................................94

參考文獻

[1] M. Wooldridge, N. R. Jennings, "Pitfalls of Agent-Oriented Development", in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents ‘98), Minneapolis, Minnesota, May 1998.
[2] J. Hendler, Agents and the Semantic Web, Intelligent Systems, Volume 16, Issue 2, pages 30-37, Mar.-Apr. 2001.
[3] H. S. Nwana, Software Agents: An Overview, In the Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, pages 205-244, Oct.-Nov. 1996.
[4] N. R. Jennings and M. Wooldridge, Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, In Handbook of Agent Technology, AAAI/MIT Press, 2001.
[5] N. R. Jennings, "On Agent-Based Software Engineering", Artificial Intelligence 117 (2000), pages 277-296, Elsevier Press, April, 2000.
[6] Jürgen Lind, Issues in Agent-oriented Software Engineering, In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE-2000) held at the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Springer Verlag, 2001.
[7] Yong-Feng Lin and Jason Jen-Yen Chen, Semantic Web Communication Framework Towards Agent-based Software Engineering, the 2006 International Computer Symposium (ICS2006), Vol. I, pages 414-419, Dec. 4-6, Taipei, Taiwan.
[8] S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, Second Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
[9] M. Barbuceanu, Coordinating agents by role based social constraints and conversation plans, In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '97), pages 16--21, 1997.
[10] M.P. Singh, Agent communication languages: rethinking the principles, Computer, Volume 31, Issue 12, pages 40-47, Dec. 1998.
[11] Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng, Agent communication languages: the current landscape, IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, Vol. 14, Issue 2, pages 45-52, March-April 1999.
[12] A. Cheyer and D. Martin, Open Agent Architecture, Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, pages 143-148, March 2001.
[13] M. R. Genesereth and E. F. Richard, "Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0 Reference Manual," Technical Report Logic-92-1, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1992. Also available online at http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/kif.html.
[14] M. L. Ginsberg, Knowledge Interchange Format: the KIF of Death, AI Magazine 12(3): 57-63, 1991.
[15] F. Bellifemine, A. Poggi, and G. Rimassa, JADE - A FIPA-compliant agent framework, CSELT internal technical report. Part of this report has been also published in Proceedings of PAAM'99, London, pages 97-108, April 1999.
[16] J. L. Austin, How to do Things with Words, Clarendon, Oxford, UK, 1962.
[17] T. Finin, Y. Labrou, and J. Mayfield, KQML as an agent communication language, In “Software Agents'”, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.
[18] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Content Language Library Specification, Jul. 31, 2000, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00007/XC00007A.pdf.
[19] M. Barbuceanu and M. S. Fox, Cool: A language for describing coordination in multiagent systems, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), pages 17–24, 1995.
[20] Takuo Doi, Yasuyuki Tahara and Shinichi Honiden, IOM/T: an interaction description language for multi-agent systems, International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS-05), pages 778-785, 2005.
[21] E. Cerami, Web Services Essentials, O'Reilly Press, pages 102-133, Feb. 2002.
[22] T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler and O. Lassila, the Semantic Web, Scientific American, May 2001.
[23] N. Shadbolt, T. Berners-Lee and W. Hall, The Semantic Web Revisited, IEEE Intelligent Systems Vol. 21, Number 3, pages 96-101, May.-Jun. 2006.
[24] S. B. Palmer, The Semantic Web: An Introduction, available at: http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/
[25] G. Antoniou and F. van Harmelen, A Semantic Web Primer, The MIT Press, Apr. 1, 2004, ISBN 0-262-01210-3.
[26] S. Bechhofer, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and L. A. Stein, OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation, Feb. 10, 2004.
[27] G. Antoniou, E. Franconi, and F. van Harmelen, Introduction to Semantic Web Ontology Languages, In N. Eisinger and J. Maluszynski (Eds.) REWERSE 2005, Springer-Verlag, 2005.
[28] C. Brewster and K. O'Hara, Knowledge Representation with Ontologies: The Present and Future, IEEE Intelligent Systems, pages 72-73. Jan, 2004.
[29] I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean, SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission, May 21, 2004.
[30] N. F. Noy & D. L. McGuinness, Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, 2001.
[31] A. Pease, I. Niles, and J. Li, The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology: A Large Ontology for the Semantic Web and its Applications, In Working Notes of the AAAI-2002 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web, Edmonton, Canada, Jul.-Aug. 2002.
[32] M. Dastani, F. Dignum, and J. J. Meyer, Autonomy and Agent Deliberation, In Proceedings of The First International Workshop on Computational Autonomy - Potential, Risks, Solutions (Autonomous 2003), to be held at AAMAS'03, Melbourne, Jul. 2003.
[33] M. Dastani, 3APL Platform: User Guide, Nov. 16, 2006, available at: http://www.cs.uu.nl/3apl/download/java/userguide.pdf.
[34] M. Dastani, B. van Riemsdijk, F. Dignum, and J.-J. C. Meyer, "A Programming Language for Cognitive Agents: Goal-directed 3APL," in Proc. the ProMAS 2003.
[35] F. Bellifemine, A. Poggi, and G. Rimassa, JADE - A FIPA-compliant agent framework, CSELT internal technical report, Part of this report has been also published in Proceedings of PAAM'99, London, pages 97-108, April 1999.
[36] D. Greenwood, J. Nagy, M. Calisti, Semantic Enhancement of a Web Service Integration Gateway, Service Oriented Computing and Agent Based Engineering (SOCABE) Workshop, Netherlands, 2005.
[37] A. Helsinger, M. Thome, and T. Wright, Cougaar: A Scalable, Distributed Multi-Agent Architecture, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Vol. 2, pages 10-13, Oct. 2004.
[38] M. Dastani, J. van der Ham, and F. Dignum, Communication for goal directed agents, In Communication in Multi-agent Systems - Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies, LNCS 2650, pages 239-252. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
[39] F. Dignum and M. Greaves (Eds.), Issues in Agent Communication, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1916, Springer 2000.
[40] J. Yen, X. Fan, S. Sun, T. Hanratty, and J. Dumer, Agents with shared mental models for enhancing team decision makings, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 41, pages 634-653, 2006.
[41] F. Koch, J. J. Meyer, F. Dignum, and I. Rahwan, Programming Deliberative Agents for Mobile Services: the 3APL-M Platform, AAMAS'05 Workshop on Programming Multi-Agent Systems (ProMAS05).
[42] L. Winkelhagen, M. Dastani, J. Broersen, Beliefs in Agent Implementation, In Proceedings of the third International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT 2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3904, Springer, 2006.
[43] J. Broekstra, A. Kampman, and F. van Harmelen. Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF schema. In the Semantic Web - ISWC 2002, Vol. 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 54-68. Springer, 2002.
[44] J. Clasen, P. Eyerich, G. Lakemeyer, and B. Nebel, Towards an Integration of Golog and Planning, In 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-07), AAAI Press, 2007.
[45] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Contract Net Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00029/SC00029H.pdf.
[46] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Iterated Contract Net Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00030/SC00030H.pdf.
[47] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA English Auction Interaction Protocol Specification, Aug. 15, 2001, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00031/XC00031F.pdf.
[48] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Dutch Auction Interaction Protocol Specification, Aug. 15, 2001, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00032/XC00032F.pdf.
[49] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Propose Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00036/SC00036H.pdf.
[50] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Request Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00026/SC00026H.pdf.
[51] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Request When Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00028/SC00028H.pdf.
[52] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Query Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00027/SC00027H.pdf.
[53] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Subscribe Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00035/SC00035H.pdf.
[54] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Brokering Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00033/SC00033H.pdf.
[55] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Recruiting Interaction Protocol Specification, Dec. 6, 2002, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00034/SC00034H.pdf.
[56] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA Content Language Library Specification, Jul. 31, 2000, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00007/XC00007A.pdf.
[57] Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, FIPA RDF Content Language Specification, Aug. 16, 2001, available at: http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00011/XC00011B.pdf.
[58] D. Martin, M. Burstein, J. Hobbs, O. Lassila, D. McDermott, S. McIlraith, S. Narayanan, M. Paolucci, B. Parsia, T. Payne, E. Sirin, N. Srinivasan, and K. Sycara, OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services, W3C Member Submission, Nov. 22, 2004.
[59] The World Wide Web Consortium, RDF Primer, W3C Recommendation, editor: Frank Manola and Eric Miller, W3C Recommendation, Feb. 10, 2004.
[60] Y. Zou, T. Finin, L. Ding, H. Chen, R. Pan, “Using Semantic Web technology in Multi-Agent Systems: a case study in the TAGA trading agent environment”, In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages: 95-101, 2003.
[61] M. J. O'Connor, H. Knublauch, S. W. Tu, & M. A. Musen. Writing Rules for the Semantic Web Using SWRL and Jess. 8th International Protege Conference, Protege with Rules Workshop, Madrid, Spain, 2005.
[62] J. R. Hobbs and F. Pan, An Ontology of Time for the Semantic Web, ACM Transactions on Asian Language Processing (TALIP): Special issue on Temporal Information Processing, Vol. 3, No. 1, pages. 66-85, March 2004.
[63] J. R. Searle. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pages 344-369, 1975.
[64] E. Arnautovic, Language Specification for Communicative Acts, Technical Report, 2005.
[65] S. Poslad and P. Charlton, Standardizing Agent Interoperability: the FIPA Approach, European Agent Systems Summer School (EASSS), pages 98-117, 2001.
[66] A. S. Rao and M. Georgeff, BDI Agents: from Theory to Practice, In Proceedings 1st International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), pages 312-319, 1996.
[67] Goal-Directed Agent Technology: A Radical New Approach to Lowering Time to Market and Total Cost of Ownership, Agentis International, Inc.
[68] L. Winkelhagen, M. Dastani, J. Broersen, Beliefs in Agent Implementation, In Proceedings of the third International Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT 2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3904, Springer, 2006.
[69] A. H. Dekker, Possible Worlds, Belief, and Modal Logic: a Tutorial, Oct. 5, 2004
[70] Linh Anh Nguyen, Reasoning about Epistemic States of Agents by Modal Logic Programming, Proceedings of Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA) VI, LNAI 3900, pages 37-56, Springer-Verlag, 2006.
[71] D. Booth, H. Haas, F. McCabe, E. Newcomer, M. Champion, C. Ferris, and D. Orchard, Web Services Architecture, W3C Working Group Note, Feb. 11, 2004.
[72] Dumitru Roman, Uwe Keller, Holger Lausen, Jos de Bruijn, Ruben Lara, Michael Stollberg, Axel Polleres, Cristina Feier, Christoph Bussler, and Dieter Fensel, Web Service Modeling Ontology, Applied Ontology, Vol. 1, Number 1, pages 77-106, 2005.
[73] S. McIlraith, T.C. Son, and H. Zeng, Semantic Web Services, IEEE Intelligent Systems Special Issue on the Semantic Web, pp. 46-53, Mar.-Apr. 2001.
[74] N. J. Davis, D. Fensel, and M. Richarson, The future of Web Services, BT Technology Journal, Vol. 22, Number 1, pages 118-130, 2004.
[75] T. Sollazzo, S. Handschuh, S. Staab, and M. Frank, Semantic Web Service Architecture - Evolving Web Service Standards toward the Semantic Web. Proc. of the 15th International FLAIRS Conference. Pensacola, Florida, May 16-18, 2002.
[76] S. Balzer, T. Liebig and M. Wagner, Pitfalls of OWL-S - A practical Semantic Web Use Case, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC2004), pages 289-298, New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2004.
[77] D. Greenwood, J. Nagy, and M. Calisti, Semantic Enhancement of a Web Service Integration Gateway, AAMAS 2005 workshop on Service Oriented Computing and Agent Based Engineering, July 2005.
[78] D. Martin, M. Burstein, J. Hobbs, O. Lassila, D. McDermott, S. McIlraith, S. Narayanan, M. Paolucci, B. Parsia, T. Payne, E. Sirin, N. Srinivasan, and K. Sycara, OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services, editor: David Martin, W3C Member Submission, Nov. 22, 2004.
[79] T. Berners-Lee, Notation 3 (N3): A readable language for data on the Web, available at: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html.
[80] D. Beckett, Turtle: Terse RDF Triple Language, available at: http://www.dajobe.org/2004/01/turtle.
[81] N. Srinivasan, M. Paolucci, and K. Sycara, An Efficient Algorithm for OWL-S based Semantic Search in UDDI, In 1st International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC 2004), pages 6-9, San Diego, California, USA, 2004.
[82] R. Chinnici, M. Gudgin, J-J. Moreau, J. Schlimmer, and S. Weerawarana, Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, W3C Working Draft, Nov. 10, 2003
[83] K. S. Jones, S. Walker, and S. E. Robertson, A Probabilistic Model of Information Retrieval: Development and Comparative Experiments (parts 1 and 2). Information Processing and Management, Vol. 36, Number 6, pages 779-840, 2000.
[84] E. Sirin, OWL-S API, available at HTTP: http://www.mindswap.org/2004/owl-s/api/.
[85] J. J. Carroll, I. Dickinson, C. Dollin, D. Reynolds, A. Seaborne, and K. Wilkinson, Jena: Implementing the Semantic Web recommendations, Technical Report HPL-2003.
[86] K. Wilkinson, C. Sayers, H. Kuno, and D. Reynolds. Efficient RDF storage and retrieval in Jena2. In Proceedings of VLDB Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases, pages 131-150, 2003.
[87] Axis, Apache Software Foundation, available at: http://ws.apache.org/axis/.
[88] M. Fowler, the New Methodology, 2003, available at: http://martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html
[89] M. Cohn and D. Ford, Introducing an Agile Process to an Organization, IEEE Computer, pages. 74-78, Jun. 2003.
[90] W. C. Wake, Extreme Programming Explored, Addison-Wesley, 2000, Chapter 2.
[91] B. George, L. Williams, “An Initial Investigation of Test Driven Development in Industry,” Proc. ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Mar. 2002, pp. 159-163.
[92] L. Cao, K. Mohan, P. Xu, B. Ramesh, How Extreme Does Extreme Programming Have to be Adapting XP Practices to Large-scale Projects, Proc. 37th Int. Conf. on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2004, p. 30083c.
[93] J. Highsmith and A. Cockburn, Agile Software Development: The Business of Innovation, IEEE Computer, 2001, Vol. 34, pages 120-122.
[94] M. Burke, “About the DAML,” Aug. 2000. Available at: http://www.daml.org/

指導教授

陳振炎(Jason Jen-Yen Chen)

審核日期

2007-10-7

推文