參考文獻 |
中文部分
1.趙紅丹、郭利敏、羅瑾璉(2021)。雙元領導的雙刃劍效應——基於認知緊張與工作活力雙路徑。管理評論,33(8),211。
2.黃芳銘(2015)。結構方程模式-理論與應用。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
英文部分
1. Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
3. Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & d′Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of management Studies, 45(8), 1424-1447.
4. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational Leadership, Innovative Behavior, and Task Performance: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1-25.
5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
6. Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. In: Springer.
7. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. In: Psychology press.
8. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual (Vol. 6). Multivariate software Encino, CA.
9. Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building an ambidextrous organization. MIT Sloan management review, 45(4), 47-55.
10. Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305-337.
11. Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246-257.
12. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance.
13. Bresman, H. (2010). External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organization Science, 21(1), 81-96.
14. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality social psychology bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
15. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
16. Brusoni, S., & Rosenkranz, N. A. (2014). Reading between the lines: Learning as a process between organizational context and individuals’ proclivities. European Management Journal, 32(1), 147-154.
17. Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 836-849.
18. Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Tavistock, London, 120-122.
19. Campbell, D. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 52-66.
20. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. Personnel selection in organizations, 3570, 35-70.
21. Chen, M.-J. (2002). Transcending Paradox: The Chinese “Middle Way” Perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2), 179-199.
22. Chen, X.-P., Xie, X., & Chang, S. (2011). Cooperative and Competitive Orientation among Chinese People: Scale Development and Validation. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 353-379.
23. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
24. Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.
25. Dambrun, M., & Ricard, M. (2011). Self-centeredness and selflessness: A theory of self-based psychological functioning and its consequences for happiness. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 138-157.
26. Dashuai, R., & Bin, Z. J. H. S. M. (2020). How does paradoxical leadership affect innovation in teams: An integrated multilevel dual process model. 39(1), 11-26.
27. De Spiegelaere, S., HIVA–KU, Guy Van, G., HIVA–KU, & Geert Van, H., CESO–KU. (2014). The Innovative Work Behaviour concept: definition and orientation.
28. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS quarterly, 453-461.
29. Fairhurst, G. T., Smith, W. K., Banghart, S. G., Lewis, M. W., Putnam, L. L., Raisch, S., & Schad, J. (2016). Diverging and converging: Integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 173-182.
30. Fang, T. (2010). Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1), 155-170.
31. Fang, T. (2012). Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25-50.
32. Fang, T. (2015). From "Onion" to "Ocean": Paradox and Change in National Cultures. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(4), 71-90.
33. Feldman, S. P. (1989). The broken wheel: The inseparability of autonomy and control in innovation within organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 83-102.
34. Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of management review, 25(1), 154-177.
35. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
36. Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37-63.
37. Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21(3), 593-608.
38. Getz, I., & Robinson, A. G. (2003). Innovate or die: is that a fact? Creativity and Innovation Management, 12(3), 130-136.
39. Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. The Journal of psychology, 147(5), 435-453.
40. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
41. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706.
42. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5). Prentice hall, Upper Saddle River.
43. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. In: University of Kansas, KS.
44. Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517-534.
45. Howell, J. M., Neufeld, D. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2005). Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(2), 273-285.
46. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
47. Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1991). Job design and roles. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2, 165-207.
48. Ishaq, E., Bashir, S., & Khan, A. K. (2021). Paradoxical leader behaviors: Leader personality and follower outcomes. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 342-357.
49. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
50. Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1039-1050.
51. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2). Wiley New York.
52. Keller, T., & Weibler, J. (2015). What it takes and costs to be an ambidextrous manager: Linking leadership and cognitive strain to balancing exploration and exploitation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 54-71.
53. Kobarg, S., Wollersheim, J., Welpe, I. M., & Spoerrle, M. (2017). Individual ambidexterity and performance in the public sector: A multilevel analysis. International Public Management Journal, 20(2), 226-260.
54. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where is the “Me” Among the “We”? Identity Work and the Search for Optimal Balance. 49(5), 1031-1057.
55. Laureiro‐Martínez, D., Brusoni, S., Canessa, N., & Zollo, M. (2015). Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision‐making performance. Strategic management journal, 36(3), 319-338.
56. Leong, C. T., & Rasli, A. (2013). Differences in innovative work behaviour and everyday work role performance of employees: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Economics, 3(5C), 94-99.
57. Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide. 25(4), 760-776.
58. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465.
59. Liu, D., Chen, X.-P., & Yao, X. (2011). From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 294.
60. Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr, H. P. (1981). Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Academy of management review, 6(1), 105-113.
61. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
62. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
63. McCarthy, J. M., Trougakos, J. P., & Cheng, B. H. (2016). Are anxious workers less productive workers? It depends on the quality of social exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 279.
64. Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229-240.
65. Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers′ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812-828.
66. Mom, T. J. M., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating Managers′ Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910-931.
67. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
68. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 430.
69. Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The Dynamics of Intense Work Groups: A Study of British String Quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 165-186.
70. Myers, C. G. (2020). Performance benefits of reciprocal vicarious learning in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 64(3).
71. Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The effect of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using Sarason′s Reactions to Tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 75-97.
72. Neal, A., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Technology and performance (D. I. a. D. Pulakos, Ed.). Jossey-Bass.
73. Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education.
74. O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator′s dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 185-206.
75. Oeser, O. A., & Harary, F. (1964). A mathematical model for structural role theory, II. Human Relations, 17(1), 3-17.
76. Offermann, L. R., & Coats, M. R. (2018). Implicit theories of leadership: Stability and change over two decades. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 513-522.
77. Offermann, L. R., Kennedy Jr, J. K., & Wirtz, P. W. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(1), 43-58.
78. Olchi, W. G. (1978). The transmission of control through organizational hierarchy. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 173-192.
79. Parker, S. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self‐efficacy. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 447-469.
80. Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual review of psychology, 65, 661-691.
81. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636.
82. Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741-754.
83. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 194-208.
84. Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612.
85. Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150.
86. Robinson, A. G., & Schroeder, D. M. (2004). Ideas are free: How the idea revolution is liberating people and transforming organizations. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
87. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956-974.
88. Rosing, K., & Zacher, H. (2017). Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 26(5), 694-709.
89. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
90. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
91. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 45(1), 3-10.
92. Shao, Y., Nijstad, B. A., & Täuber, S. (2019). Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 7-19.
93. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management review, 36(2), 381-403.
94. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536.
95. Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239-1251.
96. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of management review, 28(3), 397-415.
97. Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590-607.
98. Van der Borgh, M., de Jong, A., & Nijssen, E. J. (2017). Alternative mechanisms guiding salespersons’ ambidextrous product selling. British Journal of Management, 28(2), 331-353.
99. Vihari, N. S., Yadav, M., & Panda, T. K. (2021). Impact of soft TQM practices on employee work role performance: role of innovative work behaviour and initiative climate. The TQM Journal.
100. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 17-24.
101. Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The Role-Based Performance Scale: Validity Analysis of a Theory-Based Measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540-555.
102. Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 118-154.
103. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.
104. Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and employees′ self‐reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24-46.
105. Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566. |