以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：31

、訪客IP：18.224.31.200

姓名	蕭資峻(zi-jun Xiao)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱	從先備知識的角度探討整合鷹架輔助與競爭式英語學習之影響 (An Investigation of Incorporating Scaffolding Instruction into Competitive English Learning Contexts: A Prior Knowledge Perspective)
相關論文	★ 將可用性整合融入遊戲式學習 ★ 探討認知風格對於行動學習與合作學習的影響 ★ 學習型網站的可用性評估：從問題到解決方案 ★ 從人因的觀點評估遊戲式學習 ★ 探討認知風格在遊戲式學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響 ★ 探討認知風格在行動學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響 ★ 性別差異與認知風格對合作化遊戲式學習的影響 ★ 探討認知風格如何影響使用者在行動載具下使用電子期刊 ★ 探討專家和新手對遊戲式學習進行可用性評估的觀感差異 ★ 毒品經驗與遊戲先備知識對客製化與個人化遊戲式反毒宣導系統的影響 ★ 探討背景音樂和認知風格對遊戲式學習的影響 ★ 以多媒體科技和數位遊戲為小小人兒及患者家屬發展線上生活百科 ★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境 ★ 從認知風格的角度探討提示對學習英文片語與文法的影響 ★ 探討先備知識對學習者在使用鷹架英文學習系統的影響: 限制與扣分機制 ★ 發展動畫電子書之研究：從性別差異到性別均等之歷程
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中)	一篇高品質的學術論文，必須使用正確的英文文法撰寫，才能夠清楚地表達思想，但學習英文文法對學習者而言是相當困難的，尤其是非英文母語的學習者，這是因為英文的語言結構與寫作風格與其他語言大不相同。因此非英文母語的學習者在學習的過程中可能產生挫敗感，並失去學習動機。 另一方面，遊戲式學習是一個能提升學習動機的數位學習工具，有鑑於此，本研究利用遊戲式學習來解決上述的問題。而本研究所發展的遊戲式學習有三個創新點，第一個創新點乃是本研究試圖將兩種不同類型的競爭遊戲納入遊戲式學習之中，以便能夠滿足學習者的多樣性。在各種不同的數位遊戲中，競爭遊戲被廣泛應用於遊戲式學習內，而競爭可以依據競爭對象的不同分成虛擬競爭和自我競爭，這兩種不同的競爭方式都有各自的優點。儘管如此它們依舊是屬於一種競爭，所以會有容易焦慮或分心的缺點，而非競爭遊戲較能使學習者專注於學習任務，因此本研究的第二個創新點乃是將虛擬競爭和自我競爭與非競爭遊戲進行整合。更明確的說，在研究一中開發了一項「競爭型遊戲式英語學習系統」，讓學生與虛擬競爭遊戲和非競爭遊戲互動，此「競爭型遊戲式英語學習系統」著重在讓學生經由單一的英文句子學習英語文法。另一方面，在研究二中開發了一項「競爭型遊戲式進階英語學習系統」，讓學生與自我競爭遊戲和非競爭遊戲互動，此「競爭型遊戲式進階英語學習系統」則強調幫助學生透過英語文章學習英語文法。此外，研究一的結果被用於開發研究二的「競爭型遊戲式進階英語學習系統」。 前述的「競爭型遊戲式英語學習系統」和「競爭型遊戲式進階英語學習系統」都提供了多樣化的鷹架輔助提示，這些鷹架輔助提示不僅可以幫助學習者完成學習任務，也可以使學習者獲取英語文法知識，此為本研究的第三個創新點。簡言之，本研究所發展的遊戲式學習有多項創新點。在另一方面，學習者也有多種特質，因此需要考慮個體差異性。在眾多個體差異性中發現，先備知識尤為重要，這是因為先備知識可以反映學習者在獲得新知識之前所具備的認知能力。有鑒於此，本研究之目的乃是運用上述之「競爭型遊戲式英語學習系統」和「競爭型遊戲式進階英語學習系統」，探討先備知識對學習英語文法的影響。而研究一和研究二則分別有與此研究目的呼應的研究問題。研究一為探討學習者先備知識如何影響學習者與「競爭型遊戲式英語學習系統」的互動，研究二為探討學習者先備知識如何影響學習者與「競爭型遊戲式進階英語學習系統」的互動。此兩個研究所探討的面向皆包括測驗成效、任務成效、學習行為與遊戲成效。 研究一與研究二的結果有一些相似處，也有一些相異處。關於相似處，在測驗成效和任務成效方面，高先備學習者都是優於低先備學習者。此外，高先備學習者與低先備學習者獲得相似的進步分數。另一方面，在學習行為方面，高先備學習者熱衷於使用各種鷹架輔助提示，而低先備學習者則專注於文法書。而在遊戲成效方面，高先備學習者在非競爭遊戲上表現優於低先備學習者，然而，高低先備學習者在競爭遊戲上卻有著相似的成效。不論是虛擬競爭或是自我競爭。關於相異處，在研究一中，低先備學習者的後測成績大於前測成績。然而，在研究二中，低先備學習者的後測成績與前測成績相當。此外，研究一的結果表明，鷹架輔助提示可能無法對全體學習者帶來正面或負面的影響。然而，研究二的結果表明，文法書和中文提示可以有效的幫助低先備學習者學習英文文法，相反地，中文提示可能不利於高先備學習者學習。 綜上所述，上述兩個研究有助於深入了解先備知識對使用鷹架輔助提示和遊戲式學習的影響。 同時，它們還指引了設計者如何有效地將競爭與非競爭遊戲和鷹架輔助提示納入遊戲式學習。這種貢獻的最終目標是善用遊戲式學習的特色，來滿足不同學習者的需求和偏好。
摘要(英)	Academic papers must be presented with correct English grammar so that ideas can be clearly delivered. However, learning English grammar is very difficult for learners. This might be due to the fact that English is different from other languages, in terms of language structure, ideas expression, and writing styles. Therefore, non-native English learners can encounter considerable barriers, which make students feel frustrated and lack motivation. On the other hand, game-based learning (GBL) is a digital learning tool, which can enhance learners’ learning motivation. Accordingly, GBL was employed to solve the aforesaid problem in this research. The GBL provided by this research possessed three aspects of novelty. The first aspect of novelty was that this research attempted to incorporate two different kinds of competition games into GBL to accommodate the diverse needs of learners. Among various digital games, competitive games are widely used in GBL. There are two types of competition, i.e., virtual competition and self-competition, which have different advantages. However, they still pertained to competition, which can cause distraction or anxiety. Conversely, non-competitive game can make learners concentrate on learning tasks. Therefore, the second aspect of novelty was the integrations of a virtual competitive game and self-competitive game with non-competitive game. More specifically, a Competitive Entertaining English Learning (CEEL) was developed in Study One, where learners could interact with the virtual competitive game and non-competitive game. The CEEL was applied to help students learn English grammar via English sentences. On the other hand, an Advanced-Competitive Entertaining English Learning (Advanced-CEEL) was developed in Study Two, where learners could interact with the self-competitive game and non-competitive game. The Advanced-CEEL was used to support students learn English grammar via English articles. Furthermore, the results from Study One were employed to develop the Advanced-CEEL in Study Two. The CEEL and the Advanced-CEEL both provided diverse scaffolding hints, which could not only help learners to undertake learning tasks smoothly but also enabled learners to acquire the knowledge of English grammar. This was the third aspect of novelty. In brief, the GBL developed by this research has diverse aspects of novelty. On the other hand, learners also have diverse characteristics so there is a need to consider individual differences of learners. Among various individual differences, prior knowledge is essential because it can reflect cognitive abilities that learners possess before they acquire new knowledge. Owing to such essence, the aim of this research was to provide a deep understanding of the effects of prior knowledge on learners’ reactions to the CEEL and the Advanced-CEEL. Research questions of Study One and Study Two corresponded to this aim. Study One examined how learners′ prior knowledge affected learners’ interactions with CEEL while Study Two investigated how learners′ prior knowledge influenced learners′ interactions with Advanced-CEEL. Regardless of Study One or Study Two, comprehensive investigation was conducted, including test performance, task performance, learning behavior, and game performance. Results from Study One and those from Study Two shared some similarities: (1) High Prior Knowledge learners (HPK) performed better than Low Prior Knowledge Learners (LPK) in test performance and task performance; (2) HPK and LPK possessed similar gaining scores; (3) HPK were keen to used diverse scaffolding hints while LPK focused on the grammar book only; (4) HPK performed better than LPK in the non-competitive game, However HPK and LPK showed compatible performance in the competitive game, in irrespective of the virtual competitive game or self-competitive game. There were also differences between Study One and Study Two. The post-test scores of LPK was significantly higher than their pre-test scores in Study One. However, the LPK’s pre-test score scores and post-test scores were not significantly different in Study Two. Furthermore, the usage frequencies of scaffolding hints might be associated with neither good performance nor bad performance in Study One. On the other hand, the use of the Chinses hint and the grammar book could effectively support LPK to learn English grammar. However, the Chinese hint might not be beneficial for HPK. In summary, these two empirical studies contributed to developing the deep understanding of the effects of prior knowledge on the use of scaffolding hints and GBL. Meanwhile, they also provided guidance for designer on how to incorporate the competitive game, the non-competitive game and scaffolding hints into GBL effectively. The ultimate goal of such contributions was to make the best use of GBL to accommodate the needs and preferences of diverse learners.
關鍵字(中)	★ 先備知識 ★ 競爭遊戲 ★ 遊戲式學習 ★ 鷹架輔助	關鍵字(英)	★ Prior Knowledge ★ Competitive game ★ Game-Based Learning ★ Scaffolding
論文目次	摘要 i ABSTRACT iii Table of Contents vi List of Figures viii List of Tables ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Aim and Novelty 3 1.3 Contributions 4 1.4 Chapter Outline 5 1.5 Summary 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 Game-Based Learning 7 2.2 Scaffolding Hints 9 2.3 Prior Knowledge 11 2.4 Summary 13 Chapter 3 Methodology Design 14 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Conceptual Framework 16 3.3 Pre-test and Post-test 17 3.4 CEEL & Advanced-CEEL 17 3.5 Data Analysis 18 3.6 Summary 19 Chapter 4 Study One – Competition vs. Non-Competition 20 4 .1 Participants 20 4.2 Research Instruments 20 4.2.1 Competitive Entertaining English Learning (CEEL) 20 4.2.2 Pre-test and Post-test 26 4.3 Experimental Procedures 26 4.4 Data Analyses 26 4.5 Results: Learning Performance 27 4.6 Results: Gaming Performance 29 4.7 Results: Learning Behavior 31 4.8 Discussions 40 4.9 Summary 41 Chapter 5 Study Two – Non-Competition vs. Self-Competition 42 5.1 Participants 42 5.2 Research Instruments 42 5.2.1 Advanced Competitive Entertaining English Learning (Advanced-CEEL) 42 5.2.2 Pre-test and Post-test 49 5.3 Experimental Procedures 49 5.4 Data Analyses 50 5.5 Results: Learning Performance 50 5.6 Results: Gaming Performance 53 5.7 Results: Learning Behavior 55 5.8 Discussions 64 5.9 Summary 66 Chapter 6 Conclusions 67 6.1 Main Conclusions 67 6.2 Summary of Results 71 6.3 Development of a Framework 73 6.4 Contributions of Research 74 6.5 Limitations and Future Works 75 References 76
參考文獻	Abdelaziz, H. A., & Al Zehmi, O. (2021). E-cognitive scaffolding: does it have an impact on the English grammar competencies of middle school underachieving students?. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(1), 5-28. Arslan-Ari, I. (2018). Learning from instructional animations: How does prior knowledge mediate the effect of visual cues? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2), 140-149. Blessing, R. H. (1997). Outlier treatment in data merging. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 30(4), 421-426. Brod, G. (2021). Toward an understanding of when prior knowledge helps or hinders learning. Science of Learning, 6(1), 1-3. Brunyé, T. T., Taylor, H. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2008). Repetition and dual coding in procedural multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(7), 877-895. Cam, L., & Tran, T. M. T. (2017). An evaluation of using games in teaching English grammar for first year English-majored students at Dong Nai Technology University. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(7), 55-71. Cagiltay, N. E., Ozcelik, E., & Ozcelik, N. S. (2015). The effect of competition on learning in games. Computers & Education, 87, 35-41. Chen, S. Y., Fan, J. P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 251-266. Chen, C. H., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2019). The roles of engagement and competition on learner’s performance and motivation in game-based science learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 1003-1024. Chen, C. H. (2019). The impacts of peer competition-based science gameplay on conceptual knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and learning behavioral patterns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 179-198. Chen, Z. H. (2014). Learning preferences and motivation of different ability students for social-competition or self-competition. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 283-293. Chen, C. H., Liu, J. H., & Shou, W. C. (2018). How competition in a game-based science learning environment influences students′ learning achievement, flow experience, and learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 164-176. Chen, C. M., Liu, H., & Huang, H. B. (2019). Effects of a mobile game-based English vocabulary learning app on learners’ perceptions and learning performance: A case study of Taiwanese EFL learners. ReCALL, 31(2), 170-188. Chen, S. Y., & Chang, Y. M. (2020). The impacts of real competition and virtual competition in digital game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106171. Chen, H. L., & Liao, Y. C. (2022). Effects of Panoramic Image Virtual Reality on the Workplace English Learning Performance of Vocational High School Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1601-1622. Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, Y. F. (2021). The impacts of scaffolding e-assessment English learning: A cognitive style perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1105-1127. Chen, Z. H., Chien, T. C., & Chan, T. W. (2011, September). Using Self-competition to Enhance Students’ Learning. In International Conference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment (pp. 234-235). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Choi, E. T., Kim, Y. N., Cho, W. S., & Lee, D. K. (2016). The effects of visual control whole body vibration exercise on balance and gait function of stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(11), 3149-3152. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational psychology review, 3(3), 149-210. Courtad, J. C., & Courtad, C. A. (2019). The Use of English Grammar and the Confidence Level of the Student when Writing in Spanish. The Journal for Research and Practice in College Teaching, 4(1), 170-191. Deng, L., Wu, S., Chen, Y., & Peng, Z. (2020). Digital game‐based learning in a Shanghai primary‐school mathematics class: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 709-717. Dong, A., Jong, M. S. Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How does prior knowledge influence learning engagement? The mediating roles of cognitive load and help-seeking. Frontiers in psychology, 2992. Eltahir, M., Alsalhi, N. R., Al-Qatawneh, S., AlQudah, H. A., & Jaradat, M. (2021). The impact of game-based learning (GBL) on students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance on an Arabic language grammar course in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3251-3278. Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28, 48-63. Fuster-Guillo, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Azorin-Lopez, J., Soliveres, M. L. R., & Restrepo-Calle, F. (2019). Evaluating Impact on Motivation and Academic Performance of a GBL Experience Using Kahoot. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016). Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 82. Halim, M. S. A. A., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2020). Pupils′ Motivation and Perceptions on ESL Lessons through Online Quiz-Games. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 229-234. Hickendorff, M., Edelsbrunner, P. A., McMullen, J., Schneider, M., & Trezise, K. (2018). Informative tools for characterizing individual differences in learning: Latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 4-15. Hooshyar, D., Malva, L., Yang, Y., Pedaste, M., Wang, M., & Lim, H. (2021). An adaptive educational computer game: Effects on students′ knowledge and learning attitude in computational thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106575. Hou, H. T., Wu, C. S., & Wu, C. H. (2022). Evaluation of a mobile-based scaffolding board game developed by scaffolding-based game editor: analysis of learners’ performance, anxiety and behavior patterns. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-19. Huang, D. (2019). The Potential of Sentence Trees in English Grammar Teaching. English Language Teaching, 12(3), 178-190. Huang, B. G., Yang, J. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2021). An investigation of the approaches for integrating learning materials and digital games: a prior ability perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20(1), 57-68. Huizenga, J., Ten Dam, G., Voogt, J., & Admiraal, W. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education. Computers & Education, 110, 105-115. Husnussalam, H. (2021). The effects of online learning on PG-PAUD students’ English learning achievement assessed from wheir prior knowledge in the even semester of 2019/2020 academic year. Professional Journal of English Education, 4(6), 1076-1082. Hwang, G. H., Chen, B., Chen, R. S., Wu, T. T., & Lai, Y. L. (2019). Differences between students’ learning behaviors and performances of adopting a competitive game-based item bank practice approach for learning procedural and declarative knowledge. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5-6), 740-753. Kang, J., Moon, J., & Diederich, M. (2019). Educational games and gamification: from foundations to applications of data analytics. In Data Analytics Approaches in Educational Games and Gamification Systems (pp. 3-23). Springer, Singapore. Ku, O., Chen, S. Y., Wu, D. H., Lao, A. C., & Chan, T. W. (2014). The effects of game-based learning on mathematical confidence and performance: High ability vs. low ability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 65-78. Larmuseau, C., Elen, J., & Depaepe, F. (2018, March). The influence of students′ cognitive and motivational characteristics on students′ use of a 4C/ID-based online learning environment and their learning gain. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 171-180). Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. P. (2009). A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: The effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Computers & Education, 52(3), 530-542. Lee, J. Y., Donkers, J., Jarodzka, H., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). How prior knowledge affects problem-solving performance in a medical simulation game: Using game-logs and eye-tracking. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 268-277. Li, L. Y. (2019). Effect of prior knowledge on attitudes, behavior, and learning performance in video lecture viewing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 415-426. Lin, C. H., Huang, S. H., Shih, J. L., Covaci, A., & Ghinea, G. (2017). Game-based learning effectiveness and motivation study between competitive and cooperative modes. In 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 123-127). IEEE. López-Fernández, D., Gordillo, A., Alarcón, P. P., & Tovar, E. (2021). Comparing traditional teaching and game-based learning using teacher-authored games on computer science education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(4), 367-373. McLaren, B. M., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Forlizzi, J. (2017). A computer-based game that promotes mathematics learning more than a conventional approach. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 7(1), 36-56. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse processes, 22(3), 247-288. Michael, A., & Lutteroth, C. (2020, April). Race yourselves: A longitudinal exploration of self-competition between past, present, and future performances in a vr exergame. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17). Mirazna, M. N., & Hikmah, N. (2019). Students’ Perceptions Toward Grammar in English Classroom. Professional Journal of English Education, 2(5), 682-686. Naik, N. (2017). The use of GBL to teach mathematics in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 238-246. Park, J., Kim, S., Kim, A., & Mun, Y. Y. (2019). Learning to be better at the game: Performance vs. completion contingent reward for game-based learning. Computers & Education, 139, 1-15. Perrotta, C., Featherstone, G., Aston, H., & Houghton, E. (2013). Game-based learning: Latest evidence and future directions. Slough: NFER. Pitt, M. B., Borman-Shoap, E. C., & Eppich, W. J. (2015). Twelve tips for maximizing the effectiveness of game-based learning. Medical Teacher, 37(11), 1013-1017. Poole, S. M., Maier, T. A., Wiss, B., & Smith, S. (2021). Game-based learning in wine education. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 1-6. Purba, F. A., & Katemba, C. V. (2022). English Teachers Perception of Using Game-Based Learning (GBL) to Enhance Students’ Vocabulary. 8ISC Proceedings: Arts and Education, 35-46. Reeves, N., West, P., & Simperl, E. (2018, June). A game without competition is hardly a game: The impact of competitions on player activity in a human computation game. In Sixth AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing. Zurich. Riesen, S. A., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327-1344. Sari, M. P., Putri, N. H., Zahriana, E., & Safwan, M. (2022). Picture and Picture Learning Model to Improve Students’ Achievement in Writing Recount Text. JETLEE: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 2(1). Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Chantarangkul, V. (2020). Promoting Thai EFL Learners′ Ability to Self-Correct Errors in Written English Sentences through Games. English Language Teaching, 13(6), 118-126. Shalley, C. E., & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Competition and creative performance: Effects of competitor presence and visibility. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 337-345. Shaw, L. A., Buckley, J., Corballis, P. M., Lutteroth, C., & Wünsche, B. C. (2016). Competition and cooperation with virtual players in an exergame. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e92. Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational leadership, 63(3), 66-70. Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., Lin, C. J., & Hong, T. W. (2017). Experiencing the Analects of Confucius: An experiential game-based learning approach to promoting students′ motivation and conception of learning. Computers & Education, 110, 143-153. Supakorn, P., Feng, M., & Limmun, W. (2018). Strategies for Better Learning of English Grammar: Chinese vs. Thais. English Language Teaching, 11(3), 24-39. Tahir, F., Mitrovic, A., & Sotardi, V. (2021, July). Do Gaming Experience and Prior Knowledge Matter When Learning with a Gamified ITS?. In 2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 75-77). IEEE. Tang, J. T. (2020). Comparative study of game-based learning on preschoolers’ English vocabulary acquisition in Taiwan. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16. Tejedor-Garcia, C., Escudero-Mancebo, D., Cardenoso-Payo, V., & Gonzalez-Ferreras, C. (2020). Using challenges to enhance a learning game for pronunciation training of English as a second language. IEEE Access, 8, 74250-74266. Tofighi, Z., Taghiyareh, F., & Abdolmaleki, R. (2019). Learner’s Outcome Enhancement through Scaffolding in Collaborative Game Based Learning. In 14th International Conference on Virtual Learning (ICVL 2019 Conference Location Bucharest, Romania (pp. 573-577). Bucharest University Press Location Bucharest. Tsai, M. J., Huang, L. J., Hou, H. T., Hsu, C. Y., & Chiou, G. L. (2016). Visual behavior, flow and achievement in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 98, 115-129. Tsai, F. H., Kuang-Chao, Y., & Hsiao, H. S. (2010). Exploring the factors that influence learning behaviors and learning transfer in digital game-based learning. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2), 167. Ueno, M., & Miyazawa, Y. (2017). IRT-based adaptive hints to scaffold learning in programming. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(4), 415-428. Utami, C. P., & Bharati, D. A. L. (2020). Teachers’ Perceptions, Planning, and Implementation of Game-Based Learning in English Extracurricular Program (A Case Of Smp 40 Semarang). English Education Journal, 10(3), 307-320. Vanbecelaere, S., Cornillie, F., Sasanguie, D., Reynvoet, B., & Depaepe, F. (2021). The effectiveness of an adaptive digital educational game for the training of early numerical abilities in terms of cognitive, noncognitive and efficiency outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 112-124. Vasilica, I., Silva, R., Costa, P., Figueira, B., & Vaz, L. (2022). Games Based Learning Influence in Portuguese Referees Motivation to study Laws of the Game and Competition Rules: A Longitudinal Study. Sport Mont, 20(1), 51-57. Wang, D., & Khambari, M. N. M. (2020). The Application of a Game-Based AR Learning Model in English Sentence Learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 63-71. Wang, J., Stebbins, A., & Ferdig, R. E. (2022). Examining the effects of students′ self-efficacy and prior knowledge on learning and visual behavior in a physics game. Computers & Education, 178, 104405. Wei, C. W., Kao, H. Y., Lu, H. H., & Liu, Y. C. (2018). The effects of competitive gaming scenarios and personalized assistance strategies on English vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 146-158. Williams, R. B., & Clippinger, C. A. (2002). Aggression, competition and computer games: computer and human opponents. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 495-506. Winkler, R., Hobert, S., Salovaara, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020, April). Sara, the lecturer: Improving learning in online education with a scaffolding-based conversational agent. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14). Wu, C. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2002). Exploring the interrelationship between tenth-graders’ problem-solving abilities and their prior knowledge and reasoning skills in earth science. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 135-156. Yang, Q. F., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity 78 and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competitive game on EFL students′ English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behaviors. Computers & Education, 148, 103808. Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Effects of prior knowledge on learning performance and anxiety in an English learning online role-playing game. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 174-185. Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Individual differences in an English learning achievement system: Gaming flow experience, gender differences and learning motivation. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 351-366. Yang, T. C., Chen, M. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). The influences of self-regulated learning support and prior knowledge on improving learning performance. Computers & Education, 126, 37-52. Yukselturk, E., Altıok, S., & Başer, Z. (2018). Using game-based learning with kinect technology in foreign language education course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 159-173. Yurko, N., & Vorobel, M. (2020). Learning English grammar online: the main resources. Collective monographs, 115-123. Zhou, Y., Andres-Bray, J. M., Hutt, S., Ostrow, K., & Baker, R. S. (2021, June). A Comparison of Hints vs. Scaffolding in a MOOC with Adult Learners. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 427-432). Springer, Cham. Zou, D., Zhang, R., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Digital game-based learning of information literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 152-170.
指導教授	陳攸華(Sherry-Y Chen)	審核日期	2022-6-27
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare