分期分級董事會制度與財務報表可比性之關聯性研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：3.146.65.134

姓名

鍾鳴(Ming Chung) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

分期分級董事會制度與財務報表可比性之關聯性研究
(The Relationship between the Staggered Board and Financial Statement Comparability)

相關論文

★ 本國壽險業內部管理制度與經營績效之探討	★ 企業購併宣告對股東財富效果之影響-以台灣金融業為例
★ 金融科技對台灣金融業之影響-以線上貸款為例	★ 銀行授信違約風險-財務比率評分之預警效果
★ 所得稅制優化修正與兩稅合一廢除之影響	★ 區塊鏈技術應用於金融科技公司企業資金電子調撥系統實作與驗證
★ 房屋貸款者風險特性與個人星座關係之研析-以個案銀行分行房貸業務為例	★ 金融科技浪潮下銀行分行經營績效之探討－以個案銀行為例
★ 中國A股正式納入MSCI指數之異常報酬探討	★ 企業信用管理政策之個案研究
★ 生技公司與醫美診所聯合經營商業模式探討與財務分析－以某公開發行公司為例	★ 公司併購之經營績效分析－以某併購案為例
★ 結構型商品投資個案探討-股價(權)連結型/基金連結型	★ 越南台商融資模式之研究
★ 低利環境利差縮減下銀行分行經營效率之探討-以個案銀行為例	★ 經濟供需模型評價死亡率債券

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來，分期分級董事會制度(Staggered Board)作為公司治理的議題之一，逐漸廣為人知、並開始被全球的企業所採用。本文旨在探討分期分級董事會制度對財務報表可比性(Financial Statement Comparability)的影響、以及兩者間的關聯性。我們使用西元1998年至2018年之美國上市公司作為研究樣本進行實證分析，且本文之分期分級董事會制度之定義方式沿襲Faleye (2007)與Zhao and Chen (2008)；財務報表可比性的計算方法則參照De Franco et al. (2011)。

實證結果顯示，分期分級董事會制度與財務報表可比性呈現顯著之正相關，顯示分期分級董事會制度的存在將使公司高層的職位穩定性增加，進而減少、甚至停止為了不被解雇而執行的盈餘操縱行為，從而提升財務報表的可比程度。從實證結果中亦可發現，在使用分期分級董事會制度的情況下，年齡較輕、受機構投資人監督程度高的公司，將對財務報表可比性產生相對更強的效果；此外，本文發現上述分期分級董事會制度對於財務報表可比性之顯著效力顯著集中於營運績效並非在排名前段的公司之中。

摘要(英)

In last decades, the policy of staggered board has gradually become widely known and has been adopted by the firms around the world. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the staggered board and financial statement comparability. We use the data of listed firms in the United States with the period from 1998 to 2018 as our sample. Besides, we follow Faleye (2007), Zhao and Chen (2008) to define the variable for firms’ adoption of staggered board. As for the definition of financial statement comparability, we use the methodology proposed by De Franco et al. (2011) to calculate it.

The empirical results show that the adoption of staggered board increase the quality of firms’ financial statement comparability significantly. It reveals that the adoption of staggered board prevents the directors and managers from being laid off, which will consequently stop their earning manipulation behavior for the purpose of keeping their jobs and then improve the financial statement comparability. The empirical results also show that the effects of the adoption of staggered board are greater in firms with younger age or higher institutional ownership. Furthermore, we find that these effects are more pronounced in non-outperform firms.

關鍵字(中)

★ 分期分級董事會制度
★ 財務報表可比性
★ 盈餘操縱
★ 公司治理

關鍵字(英)

★ Staggered Board
★ Financial Statement Comparability
★ Earning Manipulation
★ Corporate Governance

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章緒論 1
第二章文獻回顧與假說建立 4
2-1 分期分級董事會制度相關研究 4
2-2 財務報表可比性相關研究 5
2-3 分期分級董事會制度與財務報表可比性 6
第三章資料與研究方法 9
3-1 樣本與資料來源 9
3-2 研究變數 9
3-2-1 分期分級董事會制度 9
3-2-2 財務報表可比性 9
3-2-3 控制變數 10
3-3 研究模型 11
3-4 樣本分析 13
第四章實證結果 18
4-1 迴歸分析 18
4-2 子樣本檢定 20
第五章穩健性測試 25
5-1 內生性檢定 25
5-2 檢驗財務報表可比性之替代變數 29
5-3 樣本性質檢驗 31
第六章結論 33
參考文獻 35

參考文獻

陳一如、王衍智和吳政祐，「美國分期分級董事會與公司創新之間的探討」，管理學報, 36(1), 1-28，2019。 doi:10.6504/jmbr.201903_36(1).0001

Amihud, Y., and Stoyanov, S. (2017). Do staggered boards harm shareholders? Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2), 432-439. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.04.002

Arun, T. G., Almahrog, Y. E., and Aribi, Z. A. (2015). Female directors and earnings management: Evidence from UK companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 39, 137-146. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2015.03.002

Bebchuk, L., and Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 409-433. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.006

Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., and Ferrell, A. (2009). What Matters in Corporate Governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783-827. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn099

Brochet, F., Jagolinzer, A. D., and Riedl, E. J. (2013). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1373-1400. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12002

Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305-333. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000074921900001

Chen, C. W., Collins, D. W., Kravet, T. D., and Mergenthaler, R. D. (2018). Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 164-202. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12380

Chen, R. Y., Guedhami, O., Yang, Y., and Zaynutdinova, G. R. (2020). Corporate governance and cash holdings: Evidence from worldwide board reforms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101771

Choi, J. H., Choi, S., Myers, L. A., and Ziebart, D. (2019). Financial Statement Comparability and the Informativeness of Stock Prices About Future Earnings.Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 389-417. doi:10.1111/19113846.12442

Chung, R., Firth, M., and Kim, J. B. (2002). Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 29-48. doi:10.1016/s09291199(01)00039-6

Cohen, A., and Wang, C. C. Y. (2013). How do staggered boards affect shareholder value? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 627-641. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.005

Cremers, K. J. M., Litov, L. P., and Sepe, S. M. (2017). Staggered boards and long-term firm value, revisited. Journal of Financial Economics, 126(2), 422-444. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.08.003

Daines, R., Li, S. X., and Wang, C. C. Y. (2021). Can Staggered Boards Improve Value? Causal Evidence from Massachusetts*. Contemporary Accounting Research. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12709

De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., and Verdi, R. S. (2011). The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895-931. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00415.x

DeAngelo, H., and Rice, E. M. (1983). Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1), 329-359. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(83)90016-8

DeFond, M., Hu, X. S., Hung, M. Y., and Li, S. Q. (2011). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 240-258. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.02.001

DeFond, M. L., and Hung, M. Y. (2003). An empirical analysis of analysts′ cash flow forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(1), 73-100. doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(02)00098-8

Dhole, S., Liu, L., Lobo, G. J., and Mishra, S. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(1), 106800. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106800

Dhole, S., Lobo, G. J., Mishra, S., and Pal, A. M. (2015). Effects of the SEC′s XBRL mandate on financial reporting comparability. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 19, 29-44. doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2015.11.002

Endrawes, M., Feng, Z. A., Lu, M. T., and Shan, Y. W. (2020). Audit committee characteristics and financial statement comparability. Accounting and Finance, 60(3), 2361-2395. doi:10.1111/acfi.12354

Faleye, O. (2007). Classified boards, firm value, and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(2), 501-529. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.01.005

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information, FASB, Norwalk, 1980, CT.

Francis, J. R., Pinnuck, M. L., and Watanabe, O. (2014). Auditor Style and Financial Statement Comparability. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 605-633. doi:10.2308/accr-50642

Jiraporn, P., and Chintrakarn, P. (2009). Staggered Boards, Managerial Entrenchment, and Dividend Policy. Journal of Financial Services Research, 36(1), 1-19. doi:10.1007/s10693-009-0059-6

Jiraporn, P., Chintrakarn, P., and Kim, Y. S. (2012). Analyst following, staggered boards, and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(11), 30913100. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.07.013

Kim, J. B., Li, L. Y., Lu, L. Y., and Yu, Y. X. (2016). Financial statement comparability and expected crash risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2-3), 294-312. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.12.003

Li, L. C., Qi, B. L., and Zhang, J. Y. (2021). The Effect of Engagement Auditors on Financial Statement Comparability. Auditing-a Journal of Practice and Theory, 40(3), 73-104. doi:10.2308/ajpt-19-061

Majeed, M. A., Yan, C., and Tauni, M. Z. (2018). How does competition shape managerial decisions? Product market competition and financial statement comparability. Management Decision, 56(11), 2437-2471. doi:10.1108/md-04-
2017-0319

Murphy, K. J., and Zimmerman, J. L. (1993). Financial performance surrounding CEO turnover. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1-3), 273-315. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(93)90014-7

Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., and Williamson, R. (2016). Do US Firms Hold More Cash than Foreign Firms Do? Review of Financial Studies, 29(2), 309-348. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhv064

Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Yu, F. (2008). Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 245-271. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.008

Zhang, J. H. (2018). Accounting Comparability, Audit Effort, and Audit Outcomes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 245-276. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12381

Zhao, Y. J., and Chen, K. H. (2008). Staggered Boards and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1347-1381. doi:10.2308/accr.2008.83.5.1347

指導教授

黃泓人(Hong-Ren Huang)

審核日期

2022-6-22

推文