分期分級董事會制度與公司股價暴跌風險之關聯性研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：3.15.202.169

姓名

林芷岑(Lin, Chih-Tsen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

分期分級董事會制度與公司股價暴跌風險之關聯性研究
(The Relationship between the Staggered Board and Firm-Specific Stock Price Crash Risk)

相關論文

★ 本國壽險業內部管理制度與經營績效之探討	★ 企業購併宣告對股東財富效果之影響-以台灣金融業為例
★ 金融科技對台灣金融業之影響-以線上貸款為例	★ 銀行授信違約風險-財務比率評分之預警效果
★ 所得稅制優化修正與兩稅合一廢除之影響	★ 區塊鏈技術應用於金融科技公司企業資金電子調撥系統實作與驗證
★ 房屋貸款者風險特性與個人星座關係之研析-以個案銀行分行房貸業務為例	★ 金融科技浪潮下銀行分行經營績效之探討－以個案銀行為例
★ 中國A股正式納入MSCI指數之異常報酬探討	★ 企業信用管理政策之個案研究
★ 生技公司與醫美診所聯合經營商業模式探討與財務分析－以某公開發行公司為例	★ 公司併購之經營績效分析－以某併購案為例
★ 結構型商品投資個案探討-股價(權)連結型/基金連結型	★ 越南台商融資模式之研究
★ 低利環境利差縮減下銀行分行經營效率之探討-以個案銀行為例	★ 經濟供需模型評價死亡率債券

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

分期分級董事會制度在企業公司治理政策中是否為一正向的措施，在文獻中有許多不同面向的研究。本文利用股票價格建構三個企業股價暴跌風險之衡量指標作為應變數，並探討分期分級董事會制度對股價暴跌風險之影響。我們採用1999年至2018年美國上市公司的資料做為研究樣本，研究結果發現：分期分級董事會與股價暴跌風險之間呈現顯著負相關，此結果顯示此制度為一正向策略，能降低公司股價暴跌發生的可能性。此外，實證結果顯示，若公司的審計委員會規模較大或是機構投資人比例較高的話，在實施分期分級董事會制度的條件之下，更能降低公司股價暴跌的風險。同時，實證結果亦指出，若公司創立初期即實施分期分級董事會制度，股價暴跌的風險將能顯著的下降。

摘要(英)

Whether the adoption of staggered board policy has a positive effect in corporate governance remains controversial in the literature. In this study we use the stock price to construct three measures of stock price crash risk as dependent variables, and examine the effect of the adoption of staggered board on stock price crash risk. We use the data of listed firms in the United States with the period from 1999 to 2018 as our sample. The results show that there is a negative correlation between the adoption of staggered board and the risk of stock price crash, which confirms that this policy is positive for companies to reduce the occurrence of stock price crash. In addition, we find that a company with a larger audit committee or a higher proportion of institutional investors also reduces the risk of a stock price crash under the condition of adopting staggered board policy. Furthermore, the empirical evidence reveals that when the company adopts staggered board policy at the early stage of its establishment, the risk of stock price crash can be effectively reduced.

關鍵字(中)

★ 分期分級董事會制度
★ 股價暴跌風險
★ 公司治理

關鍵字(英)

★ Staggered board
★ Stock price crash risk
★ Corporate governance

論文目次

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
圖目錄 VI
第一章緒論 1
第二章文獻回顧與假說建立 4
2-1 文獻回顧 4
2-2 假說建立 6
第三章研究方法 9
3-1 樣本與資料來源 9
3-2 研究變數 9
3-2-1主要自變數 9
3-2-2 股價暴跌風險變數之定義 9
3-2-3 控制變數 11
3-3 模型設計 13
第四章實證結果 14
4-1 敘述統計量 14
4-2 相關係數表 18
4-3 迴歸結果 21
第五章穩健性測試 35
5-1 內生性問題 35
5-2 調整樣本期間 39
第六章結論 40
6-1 研究結論 40
6-2 未來研究方向 41
參考文獻 42

參考文獻

Andreou, P. C., Louca, C., and Petrou, A. P. (2017). CEO age and stock price crash risk. Review of Finance, 21(3), 1287-1325.
Bebchuk, L. A., and Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of financial economics, 78(2), 409-433.
Bebchuk, L. A., Coates IV, J. C., and Subramanian, G. (2002). The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Stanford Law Review, 54, 887-951.
Booth, J. R. (1992). Contract costs, bank loans, and the cross-monitoring hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics, 31(1), 25-41.
Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic RandD investment behavior. Accounting review, 305-333.
Catan, E. M., and Kahan, M. (2016). The Law and Finance of Antitakeover Statutes. Stanford Law Review, 68(3), 629.
Callen, J. L., and Fang, X. (2015). Short interest and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 60, 181-194.
Chen, Y., Fan, Q., Yang, X., and Zolotoy, L. (2021). CEO early-life disaster experience and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101928.
Chen, J., Hong, H., and Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381.
Chang, X., Chen, Y., and Zolotoy, L. (2017). Stock liquidity and stock price crash risk. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 52(4), 1605-1637.
Cremers, K. M., Litov, L. P., and Sepe, S. M. (2017). Staggered boards and long-term firm value, revisited. Journal of Financial Economics, 126(2), 422-444.
Daines, R., and Klausner, M. (2001). Do IPO charters maximize firm value? Antitakeover protection in IPOs. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17(1), 83-120.
Daines, R., Li, S. X., and Wang, C. C. (2021). Can Staggered Boards Improve Value? Causal Evidence from Massachusetts. Harvard Business School Accounting and Management Unit Working Paper, (16-105).
Dimson, E. (1979). Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2), 197-226.
Faleye, O. (2007). Classified boards, firm value, and managerial entrenchment. Journal of financial economics, 83(2), 501-529.
Ge, W., Tanlu, L., and Zhang, J. L. (2016). What are the consequences of board destaggering?. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(3), 808-858.
Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., and Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2 and crash risk. Journal of financial Economics, 94(1), 67-86.
Jiraporn, P., and Chintrakarn, P. (2009). Staggered boards, managerial entrenchment, and dividend policy. Journal of Financial Services Research, 36(1), 1-19.
Jin, L., and Myers, S. C. (2006). R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 257-292.
Karakas¸, O., and Mohseni, M. (2021). Staggered boards and the value of voting rights. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 10(3), 513-550.
Kim, J. B., Wang, Z., and Zhang, L. (2016). CEO overconfidence and stock price crash risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1720-1749.
Kim, J. B., Li, Y., and Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639-662.
Kim, Y., Li, H., and Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 43, 1-13.
Klausner, M. (2013). Fact and fiction in corporate law and governance. Stanford Law Review, 65(6), 1325-1371.
Lee, Y. S. (2013). The influence of institutional investors on firm value. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Moore, J. A., Suh, S., and Werner, E. M. (2017). Dual entrenchment and tax management: Classified boards and family firms. Journal of Business Research, 79, 161-172.
Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., and Williamson, R. (2016). Do US firms hold more cash than foreign firms do?. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(2), 309-348.
Zhao, Y., and Chen, K. H. (2008). Staggered boards and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1347-1381.
馬笑芳, 周中勝, 張蘇斌, 邵蔚, 張康建. (2018). 審計行業專長與股價暴跌風險的關係分析. 蘇州大學學報: 哲學社會科學版, 39(2), 90-100.

指導教授

黃泓人(Huang, Hong-Ren)

審核日期

2022-6-29

推文