博碩士論文 90342014 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:62 、訪客IP:3.15.147.215
姓名 白志宏(Chih-Hung Pai)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 土木工程學系
論文名稱 地震引致人員罹難空間分佈之推估
(A Method for Estimating the Distribution of Death Tolls Induced from the Disastrous Earthquake)
相關論文
★ 花蓮溪安山岩含量之悲極效應研究★ 層狀岩盤之承載力
★ 海岸山脈安山岩之鹼-骨材反應特性及抑制方法★ 集集大地震罹難者居住建築物特性調查分析
★ 岩石三軸室應變量測改進★ 傾斜互層地層之承載力分析
★ 花蓮溪安山岩骨材之鹼反應行為及抑制方法★ 混成岩模型試體製作與體積比量測
★ 台灣骨材鹼反應潛能資料庫建置★ 平台式掃描器在影像擷取及長度量測之應用
★ 溫度及鹽水濃度對壓實膨潤土回脹性質之影響★ 鹼骨材反應引致之破裂行為
★ 巨觀等向性混成岩製作表面影像與力學性質★ 膨潤土與花崗岩碎石混合材料之熱傳導係數
★ 邊坡上基礎承載力之數值分析★ 鹼-骨材反應引致裂縫之量測與分析
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 由於劇烈地震所造成的人員傷亡數量,一直都是地震災害損失研究中極為關切的議題,重大地震發生後人員傷亡推估模式及數量估計之研究就變得非常重要。本研究以集集地震人員罹難資料作為基礎,針對2,039位罹難者完成GPS衛星定位、現地補充調查及書面資料檢核等程序,建立一集集地震「罹難者屬性資料庫」。以進行 (1)人員罹難空間分佈展示、(2)鄰近斷層罹難率探討、(3)罹難率損失曲線之建立、(4)人員罹難分佈之推估與驗證。本研究結合罹難者屬性資料庫、強地動測站紀錄、地震前人口統計資料及電子地圖,利用本研究所提出的「等震度」與「等母體數」的概念,透過GIS軟體的運算與分析,以建立強地動參數與罹難率之損失曲線,並以集集地震為模擬地震,鄉鎮別為行政單位進行罹難數量之推估及驗證。在「等震度」方面,選取PGA作為地震測站強地動參數並利用Kriging內插法完成全台灣PGA的等震度分佈。在「等母體數」方面,則分別以四種不同人口數尺度進行分析區域的罹難率探討,建立罹難率與強地動參數之損失曲線。研究成果顯示以「等震度」與「等母體數」方法所獲得之罹難率與強地動參數的關係曲線,資料點關連性遠較以「行政區域」為分析區域的方法來得佳。可採用不同人口數尺度的「等母體數」進行探討,也是本研究的另一特色。當以較小的等母體數進行分析時,損失曲線的資料點較多且反應真實地震人員罹難趨勢亦較為明顯。本研究以Logistic方程式對資料點進行迴歸分析,顯示以 PGA為強地動參數所建立的人員罹難損失曲線,不僅 較高且在推估人員罹難之空間分佈亦較佳,故建議採用。
摘要(英) In this study, the human-fatalities and strong motion data of the Chi-Chi earthquake are collected and the concepts of “iso-seismic intensity” and “equal-population intervals” is proposed. The relationship between the strong ground motion index and human-fatality rate by means of GIS software is established. Furthermore, the Chi-Chi earthquake event is taken as a study case and reach the distribution of death tolls in different districts induced from a disastrous earthquake. The values of Peah Ground Acceleration (PGA) in different seismic stations are used as the strong ground motion indices. The Kriging method is used to finish a spatial distribution of strong ground motion in Taiwan. The scales such as (1)200,000, (2)100,000, (3)50,000 and (4)25,000 death tolls are used as equal-population number to decide the analysis regions. Finally, The relationshship of the human-fatality rate as fuction of the strong ground motion indices is finished and obtained by means of the concepts of “iso-seismic intesnsity” and “equal-population intervals”. The analysis results show that data points are more concentrated than data points obtained by means of the districts-based methods. It clearly appears that the concept we proposed is reasonable and feasible. The smaller equal-population number we take to decide the analysis regions, the more data points we get. Therefore, the close tendency between the human-fatality and the strong ground motion is apparent. In the study, the Logistic regressive equation is used to fit our data points. The curve of human-fatality rate with respect to PGA is possessed of higher value of R2 and the estimation of the distribution of death tolls induced from the earthquake is able to obtain.
關鍵字(中) ★ 等震度
★ 集集地震
★ 損失曲線
★ 等人口母體數
★ 強地動參數
關鍵字(英) ★ PGA
★ equal population intervals
★ iso-seismic intensity
★ the Chi-Chi earthquake
★ death tolls estimation
論文目次 目錄
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究動機 1
1-2 研究方法與目標 2
1-3 內容大綱 3
第二章 文獻回顧 6
2-1 世界重大地震災情統計 6
2-2 集集地震概述 9
2-2-1 地震成因 10
2-2-2 強地動特性 14
2-2-3 建築物震害 15
2-2-4 人員傷亡 19
2-3 台灣主要地震災害評估系統 25
2-3-1 HAZ-Taiwan 25
2-3-2 TELES 26
2-4 地震災害損失相關研究 27
2-4-1 地震工程(Earthquake Engineering)領域 27
2-4-2 地震學(Seismology)領域 35
2-4-3 流行病學(Epidemiology)領域 43
第三章 資料蒐集與資料庫建置 52
3-1 罹難者基本資料 52
3-1-1 相驗屍體證明書 52
3-1-2 慰助金發放印領清冊 52
3-1-3 居住建築物型式 53
3-2 統計母體 53
3-2-1各村里人口總數及面積 53
3-2-2 各類建築物總數 54
3-3 強地動測站資料 54
3-4 使用軟體及電子地圖 60
3-4-1 地理資訊系統 60
3-4-2 SURFER軟體 61
3-4-3 相關電子地圖 62
3-5 罹難者屬性資料庫 62
3-5-1 罹難者衛星定位 63
3-5-2 罹難者屬性資料庫建置 65
3-5-3 罹難者空間分佈 67
第四章 鄰近斷層人員罹難率之探討 77
4-1 前言 77
4-2 研究方法 79
4-2-1 分析區域的選取 82
4-2-2 人口數的推估 88
4-2-3 死亡人數的決定 91
4-2-4 人員罹難率計算 91
4-3 研究結果 93
4-3-1 人員罹難率迴歸分析 93
4-3-2上下盤的差異性 96
4-3-3居住建築物類型的影響 100
4-3-4 強地動因素的探討 106
第五章 人員罹難損失曲線之建立 110
5-1 研究背景 110
5-2 分析原理 112
5-2-1 等震強度分佈 113
5-2-2 等母體數區間決定 120
5-2-3等母體數區間內資料點之運算 127
5-3人員罹難損失曲線之建立 ?131
5-3-1不同等母體數之選取 131
5-3-2 迴歸模式之選取 134
5-3-3人員罹難率與強地動參數迴歸分析 135
第六章 人員罹難分佈之推估與驗證 139
6-1 推估流程 139
6-2 不同母體數之人員罹難推估結果 143
第七章 結論與建議 154
7-1 結論 154
7-2 建議 157
參考文獻 158
附錄A 168
附錄B 173
參考文獻 參考文獻
1.中央氣象局,921 大地震主震資料,網頁資料:http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V4/index.htm
2.內政部建研所,「921集集大地震建築物震害調查報告」,台北,第23~42頁,(1999)。
3.王益良,「集集大地震罹難者居住建築物特性調查分析」 ,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,桃園 (2001)。
4.台中、南投、台北、板橋、新竹、台南、苗栗、嘉義地方檢署相驗證明書。
5.台中地檢署,「斷層上之烙痕」,台中,第24~34頁,(2000)。
6.田永銘、王益良、莊德興、吳柏林、林志寶,「九二一大地震罹難原因與建築物特性之關係」,九二一大地震建築物震害調查分析研討會,台灣科技大學,(2001)。
7.田永銘、白志宏,「以等震度、等人口數建立人員罹難曲線─以集集地震為例」,電子計算機於土木水利工程應用研討會,台南 (2005)。
8.田永銘、白志宏、莊德興、王益良,「集集地震近斷層罹難率之探討」,第十屆大地工程研討會,三峽,第1183~1186 頁(2003)。
9.田永銘、白志宏、郭明傳、羅啟源,「以等震度等母體數建立地震災損易損曲線—以集集地震為例」,九十四年電子計算機於土木水利工程應用研討會,台南成功大學,第19~31 頁(2005)。
10.田永銘、白志宏、羅啟源、郭明傳,「地震災害人員罹難易損曲線之建立與驗證」,第十屆大地工程研討會暨國科會成果發表會,台北縣萬里鄉,文章編號:J02 (2005)。
11.田永銘、白志宏「集集大地震罹難者空間分佈調查分析」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告 (2002)。
12.田永銘、莊德興、白志宏、王益良,「集集地震罹難率與車籠埔斷層距離之關係」,第六屆結構工程學術研討會,編號:M51,墾丁(2002)。
13.田永銘、莊德興、白志宏、王益良,「應用GIS/GPS 探討集集地震罹難者空間分佈與車籠埔斷層之關係」,2002 中華地理資訊研討會,編號:B62,台中(2002)。
14.田永銘、莊德興、蕭江碧、陳建忠、白志宏、王益良,「從集集地震罹難者居住建築物特性看台灣耐震問題」,陸軍軍官學校七十八週年校慶綜合學術論文研討會,高雄鳳山 (2002)。
15.田永銘、蕭江碧、陳建忠、莊德興、王益良,「集集大地震建築物特性與人員罹難原因探討—以石岡鄉及中寮鄉例」,921集集大地震週年紀念學術研討會論文集,成功大學,(2000)。
16.白志宏、田永銘,「集集地震鄰近車籠埔斷層人員罹難率之探討」,第十屆台灣地區地球物理研討會暨2003 年中國地球物理學會年會,台灣嘉義,第109~115 頁(2003)。
17.白志宏、田永銘、莊德興、王益良,「集集地震罹難者空間分佈與車籠埔斷層之關係」,南亞技術學院研討會,中壢,第49~62 頁(2003)。
18.行政院主計處新聞稿,http://www.dgbasey.gov.tw/secr/news/新聞稿1124.doc,(1999)。
19.吳逸民,1999。地震速報與預警系統之發展-台灣經驗,國立中央大學博士論文。
20.吳逸民、辛在勤、蕭乃祺、陳承俊、江嘉豪、鍾仁光,「地震速報系統於集集大地震中之自動測報」,集集大地震特集,交通部中央氣象局及中國地球物理學會,第61~68頁,(1999)。
21.辛在勤,1998。台灣地區地震預警之初探訪(投稿氣象學報)。
22.孫思優、吳柏林、田永銘,「活動斷層附近禁、限建問題探討」,1999集集大地震調查研討會論文集,台南,第VI-33~VI-66頁,(1999)。
23.國家地震工程研究中心,「九二一大地震震災調查總結報告」,台北(2001)。
24.國家地震工程研究中心,「國家地震工程研究中心簡訊第四十六期」,台北 (2003)。
25.國家地震工程研究中心,http://www.ncree.gov.tw/,(2000)。
26.張建興、吳逸民、辛在勤、王乾盈、蕭乃祺,「集集大震初始破裂之探討」,集集大地震特集,交通部中央氣象局及中國地球物理學會,第1~6頁,(1999)。
27.郭鎧紋,1992。台北都會區強地動觀測網之地質特性,中央氣象局研究報告第CW81-1A-10 號。
28.郭鎧紋,1993。中央氣象局強地動觀測網之地質特性研究(二)-桃、竹、苗地區,中央氣象局研究報告第CW82-1A-11 號。
29.郭鎧紋,1994。中央氣象局強地動觀測網之地質特性研究(三)-嘉南地區,中央氣象局研究報告第CW83-1A-12 號。
30.曾士賢,「921 集集地震汙水管線災損之GIS 震害分析」 ,碩士論文,國立台北科技大學土木與防災研究所,台北 (2001)。
31.黃正耀,1995。台灣地區強地動特性及地震危害度參數之評估,國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文。
32.黃鈺琳,「台灣強地動地震資料彙整」,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學營建工程系,台北(2002)。
33.經濟部中央地質調查所,「九二一地震地質調查報告」,台北,第127~157頁,(1999)。
34.經濟部中央地質調查所,2000. 臺灣活動斷層概論:五十萬分之一臺灣活動斷層分析圖說明書。
35.葉祥海、蔡克銓、謝舜傑,「集集地震建築物震害初步調查之結果」,結構工程,第三、四期,第61~70頁,(1999)。
36.蔡博文,新一代地理資訊系統ArcView3.1 剖析,固地文化事業有限公司,台北 (1999)。
37.蔡義本、黃明偉、趙曉玲,「1999年9月21日台灣集集大地震的震源與強地動特性初步分析結果」,中國土木水利工程學會會刊,第二十六卷,第三期,第5~18頁,(1999)。
38.蕭江碧、田永銘、莊德興、陳建忠、王益良、白志宏,「集集大地震罹難者居住建築物特性調查及統計分析( I )」,內政部建築研究所專題研究計劃成果報告,台北 (2001)。
39.蕭江碧、田永銘、莊德興、陳建忠、王益良、白志宏,「集集大地震罹難者居住建築物特性調查及統計分析( II )」,內政部建築研究所專題研究計劃成果報告,台北 (2001)。
40.蕭江碧、李秉乾、周天穎,「九二一大地震建築震害特性分析與統計」,內政部建築研究所專題研究計劃成果報告,台北 (2001)。
41.Amin, N. R. et al.: 2001, Performance of structures, Earthquake Spectra, 17 (S1), 81-130.
42.Armenian, H. K., Melkonian, A., Noji, E. K., and Hovanesian, A. P.: 1997, Deaths and injuries due to the Earthquake in Armenia: A Cohort Approach, International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 806-813.
43.Blondet, M., Garcia, G. V., and Brzev, S.: 2003, Earthquake-resistant construction of adobe buildings: a tutorial, http://www.world-housing.net/Tutorials/AdobeTutorial/Adobe_Tutori-al.pdf, 25pp.
44.Central Geological Survey of Taiwan: 1999, Report on geological investigations of the 921 earthquake (in Chinese), 315pp.
45.Chang, C. H., Wu, Y.M., Shin, T. C., and Wang, C. Y.: 2000, Relocation of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan, TAO, 11(3), 581-590.
46.Chih-Hung Pai, and Yong-Ming Tien, “Development of Fragility Curve for Human Fatality from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake.” 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, USA (2006).
47.Chih-Hung Pai, Yong-Ming Tien, and Ta-Liang Teng, “A Method for Estimation of Death Tolls in Disastrous Earthquake.” 2004 AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, Paper No. S21A-0260, (2004).
48.Chih-Hung Pai, Yong-Ming Tien, and Ta-Liang Teng, “A Study on Near-fault Mortality from the 1999 Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake.” 2004 AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, Paper No. S21A-0261, (2004).
49.Chih-Hung Pai, Yong-Ming Tien, Der-Shin Juang, Yi-Liang Wang, “A Study on Near-fault Mortality from the 1999 Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake.” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, (2004).
50.Chih-Hung Pai, Yong-Ming Tien, Ta-Liang Teng, “A Study on Human-Fatality Rate in Near-Fault Regions Using the Victims Attributes Database.” Natural Hazards, (2005). (Accepted)
51.Jang, J.J., and Lee C.S., “A preliminary study of earthquake building damage and life loss due to the Chi-Chi earthquake,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 567-576 (2002).
52.Kao, H., and W. P. Chen, 2000. The Chi-Chi earthquake sequence of September 20, 1999 in Taiwan : seismotectonics of an active, out-ofsequence thrust, submitted to Science, Feb., 17, 2000.
53.Lee, B.J., Chou, T.Y., and Lei, T.C., “Development of hazard damaged buildings model by Chi-Chi earthquake data,” (2003).
54.Lee, B.J., Chou, T.Y., Hsiao, C.P., Chung, L.K., Huang, P.H. and Wu, Y.B., “The statistics and analysis of building damage on Chi-Chi earthquake,” Handout of International Training Programs for Seismic Design of Building Structures, Host 130 by National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 166-178(2001).
55.Lee, B.J., Chou, T.Y., Lei, T.C., Lin J.Y., and Wu, C.T., “Study on the seismic building damage assessment model based on the Chi-Chi earthquake damage data:Ⅱ.fragility curves and seismic building risk analysis,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.17, No.2, pp. 293-300 (2005).
56.Lee, B.J., Chou, T.Y., Lei, T.C., Lin J.Y., Wu, C.T., and Huang, P.H., “Study on the seismic building damage assessment model based on the Chi-Chi earthquake damage data:Ⅰ. building damage database,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 121-131 (2005).
57.Lee, C. T., C. T. Cheng, C. W. Liao and Y. B. Tsai, 2001. Site classification of Taiwan free-field strong-motion stations, The Chi-Chi special issue of the Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
58.Lee, C. T., Kang, K. H., Cheng, C. T., and Liao, C.W.: 2000, Surface rupture and ground deformation associated with the Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake (in Chinese), SINO-GEOTECHNICS, 81, 5-16.
59.Lee, W. H. K., T. C. Shin, K. W. Kau, K. C. Chen and C. F. Wu, 2001. CWB Free-Field Strong-Motion Data from 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake Sequence: Vol. 1, Digital Acceleration Files of Main Shock on CD-ROM.
60.Liu, K. S., T. C. Shin and Y. B. Tsai, 1999. A free field strong motion network in Taiwan: TSMIP, TAO, Vol. 10, No 2, 377-396.
61.Ma, K. F., Lee, C. T., Tsai, Y. B., Shin, T. C., and Mori, J.: 1999, The Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake: large surface displacements on inland thrust fault, EOS, 80, 605-611.
62.Naeim, F., and Anderson, J., “Classification and evaluation of earthquake records for design,” A Report to Earthquake Engineering Research Institute and Federal Emergency Management Agency (1993).
63.Ohta, Y., Goto, N., and Ohashi, H.: 1983, An empirical construction of equations for estimating number of victims by earthquake. Zisin II, 36, 463-466.
64.Oike, K., and Hori, T.: 1998, History of earthquakes and seismic disasters in East Asia, Science, 68, 409-415.
65.Oike, K.: 1991, A discussion on the relation between magnitude and number of deaths by earthquakes, In: Proc. of the Int. Seminar on Earthquake and Hazard Mitigation Technology, Tsukuba, Japan, 333-341.
66.Osaki, Y., and Minowa, M.: 2001, Factors associated with earthquake deaths in the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, 1995, American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 153-156.
67.Pai, C. H., Tien, Y. M., Juang, D. S., and Wang, Y. L.: 2004, A Study on near-fault mortality from the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, Paper No. 2542.
68.Pai, C.H., Tien, Y.M., and Teng, T.L., “A Method for estimation of death tolls in disastrous earthquake,” 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2006).
69.Peek-Asa, C., Ramirez, M. R., Seligson, H., et al.: 2003, Seismic, structural, and individual factors associated with earthquake related injury, Injury Prevention, 9, 62-66.
70.Peek-Asa, C., Ramirez, M. R., Shoaf, K., et al.: 2000, GIS mapping of earthquake-related deaths and hospital admissions from the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake, Ann. Epidemiol., 10, 5-13.
71.Ramirez, M., and Peek-Asa, C.: 2005, Epidemiology of traumatic injuries from earthquakes, Epidemiology Reviews, 27, 47-55.
72.Shabestari, K. T., and Yamazaki, F.: 2003, Near-fault spatial variation in strong ground motion due to rupture directivity and hanging wall effects from the Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32, 2197-2219.
73.Shin, T. C., 2000. Some Seimological Aspects of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan, TAO, Vol. 11, No 3, 555-566.
74.Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T., “Statistical analysis of fragility curves,” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 126, Issue 12, pp. 1224-1231 (2000).
75.Stein, S. and Wysession, M.: 2003, An Introduction to Seismology, Earthquakes, and Earth Structure, Blackwell, USA, pp. 218.
76.Stratou, M., Savvaidis, A., Papodopoulou, M., and Panagiotopoulos, D. G.: 2004, Using GIS and earthquake scenarios for the assessment of emergency response in case of a strong earthquake. An application in the urban area of Thessaloniki, Greece, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, XXXVI, 1519-1528.
77.Su, E.: 2002, Building Structural Types in Taiwan, In: International Training Programs for Seismic Design of Building Structures, Taipei, Taiwan.
78.Tien, Y. M., D. S. Juang., C.H. Pai, C. P. Hisao., and C. J. Chen., “Statistical Analyses of Relation Between Mortality and Building Type in the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake.” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol.25, No.5, pp.577-590 (2002).
79.Tien, Y. M., Juang, D.S., Pai, C.H., Hisao, C.P. and Chen, C.J., “Statistical analyses of relation between mortality and building type in the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 577-590 (2002).
80.Tsai, Y. B., M. W. Huang, 2000. Strong ground motion characteristics of the Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake of Spectember 21, 1999, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, Vol. 2, 1-22.
81.Tsai, Y. B., Yu, T. M., Chao, H. L., and Lee, C. P.: 2001, Spatial distribution and age dependence of human-fatality rates from the Ch-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake of 21human-fatality rates from the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake of 21 September 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5), 1298-1309.
82.Tsai, Y.B., Yu, T.M., Chao, H.L., and Lee, C.P., “Spatial distribution and age dependence of human-fatality rates from the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake of 21 September 1999,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 1298-1309 (2001).
83.Wang, G. Q., Zhou, X. Y., Zhang, P. Z., Igel, H.: 2002, Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(1), 73-96.
84.Wen, K.L., Peng, H.Y., Tsai, Y.B., and Chen, K.C., “Why 1g was recorded at TCU129 site during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake,” Bulletin of the 131 Seismological Society of America, Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 1255-1266(2001).
85.Wu, Y.M., Hsiao, N.C., Teng, T.L., and Shin, T.C., “Near real-time seismic damage assessment of the rapid reporting system,” Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Vol. 13, pp. 313-324(2002).
86.Wu, Y.M., Shin, T.C., and Chang, C.H., “Near real-time mapping of peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity following a strong earthquake,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 1218-1228 (2001).
87.Wu, Y.M., Teng T.L., and Shin T.C., “Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and intensity in Taiwan,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp.386-396 (2003).
88.Yagi, Y and M. kikuchi, 2000. Source rupture process of the Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake of determined by seismic wave and GPS data, EOS Trans. AGU, vol. 81 No 22, S21A-05.
89.Yamaguchi, N., and Yamazaki, F., “Estimation of strong motion distribution in the 1995 Kobe earthquake based on building damage data,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 30, pp. 787-801(2001).
90.Yamaguchi, N., and Yamazaki, F., “Fragility curves for building in Japan based on damage surveys after the 1995 KOBE earthquake,” Proceedings of the 12th conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand(2000).
91.Yong-Ming Tien, and Chih-Hung Pai, “A Study on Near-Fault Mortality from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake.” Taiwan-Japan Symposium on Advancement of Urban earthquake Hazard Mitigation Technology, Jhongli, Taiwan, Paper No. B02, (2005).
指導教授 田永銘(Yong-Ming Tien) 審核日期 2006-7-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明