員工對主管的信任與工作投入、組織公民行為之關聯性探討－以心理狀態為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：26

、訪客IP：3.129.243.161

姓名

任師萱(Shih-Hsuan Jen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

員工對主管的信任與工作投入、組織公民行為之關聯性探討－以心理狀態為中介變項
(The Relationship Between Employee’s Trust in Supervisor and Employee’s Job Involvement, Employee’s Organizational Citizenship Behavior - Psychological Condition as the Mediator Variables)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要研究員工對主管的信任，對於員工工作投入與員工組織公民行為之影響，並以員工的心理狀態（心理意義、心理可得性、心理安全感）作為中介效果。透過問卷調查法，以目前在台灣地區的從業人員為主要調查對象，共計207份問卷作為統計分析資料。研究結果顯示：(1)員工對主管的信任與心理意義有顯著正向影響效果；(2)員工對主管的信任與心理可得性有顯著正向影響效果；(3)員工對主管的信任與心理安全感有顯著正向影響效果；(4)心理意義與工作投入有顯著正向影響效果；(5)心理可得性與工作投入無顯著正向影響效果；(6)心理安全感與工作投入有顯著正向影響效果；(7)心理意義與組織公民行為有顯著正向影響效果；(8)心理可得性與組織公民行為有顯著正向影響效果；(9)心理安全感與組織公民行為有顯著正向影響效果。透過員工角度探討與直屬主管之間的信任關係，進而產生的心理狀態，期望提升員工自身工作投入的程度並且提高員工的組織公民行為。

摘要(英)

This research elaborates the influence of employee’s trust in supervisor on employee’s job involvement and employee’s organizational citizenship behavior. The psychological condition (psychological meaningfulness, psychological availability, psychological safety) are the mediator variables in the research. This study investigates the employees who work in Taiwan, and there are 207 questionnaire samples for statistical analysis. The research shows that: (1) Employee’s trust in supervisor has significant positive impact on employee’s psychological meaningfulness. (2) Employee’s trust in supervisor has significant positive impact on employee’s psychological availability. (3) Employee’s trust in supervisor has significant positive impact on employee’s psychological safety. (4) Psychological meaningfulness has significant positive impact on job involvement. (5) Psychological availability has nonsignificant impact on job involvement. (6) Psychological safety has significant positive impact on job involvement. (7) Psychological meaningfulness has significant positive impact on organizational citizenship behavior. (8) Psychological availability has significant positive impact on organizational citizenship behavior. (9) Psychological safety has significant positive impact on organizational citizenship behavior. Through the perspective of the employee, the trust relationship between employee and supervisor forms the psychological condition (psychological meaningfulness, psychological availability, psychological safety) to improve employee’s job involvement and employee’s organizational citizenship behavior.

關鍵字(中)

★ 信任
★ 心理意義
★ 心理可得性
★ 心理安全感
★ 工作投入
★ 組織公民行為

關鍵字(英)

★ Trust
★ Psychological meaningfulness
★ Psychological availability
★ Psychological safety
★ Job involvement
★ Organizational citizenship behavior

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究流程 3
第二章文獻探討 4
2.1 信任與心理意義 5
2.2 信任與心理可得性 5
2.3 信任與心理安全感 6
2.4 心理意義與工作投入 7
2.5 心理可得性與工作投入 7
2.6 心理安全感與工作投入 7
2.7 心理意義與組織公民行為 8
2.8 心理可得性與組織公民行為 8
2.9 心理安全感與組織公民行為 9
第三章研究方法 10
3.1 研究架構與假說 10
3.2 研究變項之操作 11
3.3 資料分析方法 15
第四章資料分析與研究結果 17
4.1 樣本敘述統計 17
4.2 信度與效度分析 18
4.3 相關分析 23
4.4 假說模型檢驗 24
第五章結論與建議 26
5.1 研究結果與討論 26
5.2 管理意涵 28
5.3 研究限制與對未來建議 29
參考文獻 30

參考文獻

[1] Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York, NY: Wiley.
[2] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[3] Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
[4] Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 74, 400–417. DOI:10.1177/1094428104268542
[5] Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implication for theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560–569. DOI:10.5465/AMR.1982.4285240
[6] Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
[7] Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 185–216. DOI:10.1177/135910457000100301
[8] Brower, H. H., Lester, S.W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35, 327–347. DOI:10.1177/0149206307312511
[9] Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 358–368. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358
[10] Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[11] Christian MS, Garza AS, Slaughter JE. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 64, 89–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
[12] Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
[13] Colquitt, J., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
[14] Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563–576. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266 (200005)21:5<563: AID-SMJ99>3.0.CO;2-0
[15] De Jong, B. A., & Elfring T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549. DOI:10.1007/s12529-010-9077-x
[16] Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 55, 869–884. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
[17] Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445
[18] Dirks, K. T (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004–1012. DOI:10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.1004
[19] Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4): 450–467. DOI:10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
[20] Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628. DOI:10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.611
[21] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. DOI:10.2307/2666999
[22] Edmondson AC, Lei Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
[23] Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1 22. DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
[24] Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. DOI:10.1002/job.322
[25] Gerstner, G. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844. DOI:10.1037//0021-9010.82.6.827
[26] Gibbard, G. S., Hartman, J. J., & Mann, R. D. (1974). Analysis of groups. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[27] Hackman, J. R. (1986). The psychology of self-management in organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
[28] Harvey, S., Kelloway, E. K., & Duncan-Leiper, L. (2003). Trust in management as a buffer of the relationships between overload and strain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 306–315. DOI:10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.306
[29] Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
[30] Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships (187–220). Newbury Park, NY: Sage.
[31] House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–338. DOI:10.2307/2391905
[32] House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds). (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[33] Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118
[34] Judd, C.M.,&Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimatingmediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619. DOI:10.1177/0193841X8100500502
[35] Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. DOI:10.2307/256287
[36] Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45, 321–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500402
[37] Kanungo, R.N. (1982), “Measurement of job and work involvement”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67 No. 3, pp. 341-349.
[38] Konovsky, A. M., Pugh, D. S. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656–669. DOI:10.2307/256704
[39] Kramer, R.M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
[40] Lee, F. (1997). When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help-seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Process, 72, 336–363. DOI:10.1006/obhd.1997.2746
[41] Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142.
[42] Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985. DOI:10.2307/2578601
[43] Li, A. N., & Tan, H. H. (2012). What happens when you trust your supervisor? Mediators of individual performance in trust relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 407–425.
[44] Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2): 395–404. DOI:10.1037/a0018079
[45] Lodahl, T.M. and Kejner, M. (1965), “The definition and measurement of job involvement”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 24-33.
[46] MacDuffie, J. P. (1997). The road to ‘root cause’: Shop-floor problem-solving at three assembly plants. Management Science, 43, 479–502. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.43.4.479
[47] MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. DOI:10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.83
[48] MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
[49] March, J. G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
[50] May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. DOI:10.1348/096317904322915892
[51] May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
[52] Mayer, R.C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The Effect of the Performance Appraisal System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasi-Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
[53] Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874–888. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803928
[54] Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. DOI:10.2307/258792
[55] McAllister, D. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59. DOI:10.2307/256727
[56] McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 23–63. DOI:10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
[57] Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[58] Moorman, R.H. and Blakely, G.L. (1995), “Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 127-142
[59] Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behaviors in organizations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
[60] Nelson, D., & Sutton, C. D. (1990). Chronic work stress and coping: A longitudinal study and suggested new directions. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 845–858. DOI:10.2307/256295
[61] Organ, D.W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
[62] Organ, D.W. (1990), “The subtle significance of job satisfaction”, Clinical Laboratory Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 94-98.
[63] Organ, D.W. and Konovsky, M. (1989), “Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 157-164.
[64] Organ, D.W. and Lingl, A. (1995), “Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior”, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 135 No. 3, pp. 339-350.
[65] Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (2006), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[66] Parker, C. P., Dipboye, R. L., & Jackson, S. L. (1995). Perceptions of organizational politics: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 21, 891–912. DOI:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90046-2
[67] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[68] Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. DOI:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
[69] Premeaux, S. F., & Bedeian, A. G. (2003). Breaking the silence: The moderating effects of selfmonitoring in predicting speaking up in the workplace. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1537–1562. https://doi.org/bgbfzb
[70] Rabindra N. Kanungo (1982). Measurement of Job and Work Involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349.
[71] Riipinen, M. (1997), “The relationship between job involvement and well-being”, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 131 No. 1, pp. 81-89.
[72] Rogers, C. R. (1958). The characteristics of a helping relationship. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 37, 6–16. DOI:10.1002/j.2164-4918. 1958.tb01147.x
[73] Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
[74] Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404. DOI:10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
[75] Sanchez-Burks, J. (2005). Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an American anomaly. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 265–305.
[76] Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediator of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863–871. DOI:10.1037/a0022625
[77] Schyns, B., & Day, D. (2010). Critique and review of leader-member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 1–29. DOI:10.1080/13594320903024922
[78] Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9–32. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.23463672
[79] Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[80] Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121. DOI:10.2307/256928
[81] Vroom, V. H., &MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Toward a stochasticmodel of managerial careers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 26–46. DOI:10.2307/2391260
[82] Walumbwa FO, Schaubroeck J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior:Mediating roles of ethical leadership andwork group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275–1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015848
[83] Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–530. DOI:10.2307/259292
[84] Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1–26. DOI:10.1177/014662168500900101
[85] Williams, M. (2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32, 595–621. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351867
[86] Williams, J., &MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23–51. DOI:10.1080/10705510701758166
[87] Wong, Y.-T., Ngo, H.-Y., & Wong, C.-S. (2003). Antecedents and outcomes of employees’ trust in Chinese joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 481–499. https://doi.org/fhw3rq
[88] Woods, S. A., & Sofat, J. A. (2013). Personality and engagement at work: The mediating role of psychological meaningfulness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2203–2210.
[89] Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. DOI:10.2307/259118

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-Yuan Chen)

審核日期

2022-7-11

推文