From Objectification to Responsibility: A Phenomenological Approach for human connection

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：10

、訪客IP：18.223.209.243

姓名

陳娜裴(Napat Chaipraditkul) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

哲學研究所

論文名稱

(From Objectification to Responsibility: A Phenomenological Approach for human connection)

相關論文

★ 論謝勒的情感現象學與人格理論— 一種文本詮釋的進路	★ 佛教對「心身關係」中「心理疾病」本質的詮解 ──以廣義的心識哲學為中心
★ 康德的《單?理性限度?的宗教》之哲學研究	★ 人格同一與道德責任:從初期佛教聖典對神經科學的挑戰的回應
★ 存在哲學諮商之探討─以歐文‧亞隆為例	★ 德瓦Ruci的故事的意義, 根據哈吉Mutamakkin說 (Cebolek 書中的闡釋學研究及其與伊斯蘭教的關係）
★ 民族的身體-空間：以中國武術與漢文化民間信仰為核心的開展	★ Imam Al-Ghazali的觀點下看家族學中的祖靈
★ 活用建築哲學	★ 盧梭《愛彌兒》的教育理念在小學現場實踐的可能
★ 從羅爾斯的《正義論》探討在國小教育中的公平議題	★ 泰王普美蓬的「適足經濟哲學」之研究---依據佛教倫理與中道思想來解析
★ THE MEANING OF MYSTICAL CULTURE IN THE KEJAWEN COMMUNITY ACCORDING TO R. NGANEHI RANGGAWARSITA′S SULUK SALOKA JIWA	★ 從女性主義視野看商業代理孕母爭議
★ 台灣保全業經營者倫理思考之建構	★ 尼采早期的歷史思想

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

「物化(objectification)」是一種透過傷害自己以及傷害他者，並以縮限人與人之間的關係及連結的方式來掌控權力的方式。許多人只能依據社會賦予他們的印象而活著，若非如此則會受到許多負面的批評。這使得許多人都只能根據被賦予的角色形象而活著。許多男女都受困於這樣的刻板印象以及規範之中。物化也是對他者的不同想像，而在這種想像中的他者，可能低我一等，或著高我一等。這取決於我們曾經因為哪些的經驗而受創過（例如某些婦女受過來自男性的暴力迫害等）。
我們有義務理解人跟人之間的連結是如何建立的，即便在物理上以及在文化上，我們透過性別跟種族在人群當中做出了區隔，但是物化則使得我們對人際關係感到麻木，並使得我們對他者採取基於刻板印象而來的行為。這是一個影響著所有人類的問題。
伊曼紐爾．列維納斯(Emmanuel Levinas)以及馬丁．海德格(Martin Heidegger)都曾描述過，作為人類，我們如何與他者一起體驗世界，並且這些體驗是如何影響著我們。然而，在這種共享體驗的關係當中，我們可能會進一步的疏遠彼此。本論文旨在找出使這兩位哲學家的論述能夠共存的共同點，並使我們能夠用更好的方式來理解自己以及理解他者。

摘要(英)

Objectification compromises ourselves and others, limiting human connection or relationships as a form of control and power play. Many people live under the impression of being expected to behave or act in fear of negative repercussions. Roles are given, and everyone should act accordingly. Many women and men suffer from the stereotypes and norms forced upon them.
Objectification is an imagination of other human beings as different. They can be inferior or superior, depending on what experience we have, such as violence against women and the suffering of men.
The way we understand human connection is our responsibility. Gender and race seem to separate us by our physical and cultural differences. Objectification desensitizes human relationships, indoctrinating the way we relate to others. Objectification is a problem that impacts us all.
Emmanuel Levinas and Martin Heidegger have described how human beings experience the world with others; and how experiences impact us. The relationship we share altogether might persuade us to isolate and detach from the others. However, in this thesis, we will look for a common ground that the ideas of both philosophers can coexist and make a better understanding of ourselves and others

關鍵字(中)

★ 物化
★ 刻板印象
★ 列維納斯
★ 海德格
★ 疏離

關鍵字(英)

★ objectification
★ stereotypes
★ Levinas
★ Heidegger
★ isolate

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Summary ii
Table of Content: iii
Introduction 1
Chapter 1: What is Objectification? 5
1.1 Objectification and Oppression 6
1.2 How Objectification Represent Women and Young Girls 9
1.3 Female Objectification in Media and Culture 16
Chapter 2: Male Experience of Objectification 26
2.1 Objectification of Masculinities: Concepts that Objectify Men 26
2.2 How Female Objectification Emphasized on Male Objectification 33
2.3 How Objectification Perpetuate Victimization 39
Chapter 3 Ethical Recognition and Responsibility 44
3.1 Reliability and Codependency on Meanings 45
3.2 Objectification: Limitation and Separation 49
3.3 Acknowledging Vulnerability is Responsibility 59
Chapter 4: Heidegger’s Dasein and its Responsibility towards oneself. 67
4.1 Dasein as human-being: Situating Ourselves into the unknown 67
4.2 Conditional Being and Meaning 70
4.3 Objectification or Redefinition of our life and meaning. 76
Conclusion 83
Bibliography: 89

參考文獻

Abrams, L. S. (2003). Contexual Variations in Young Women′s Gender Identity Negotiations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 64-74.
Behm-Morawitz, E., & Mastro, D. (2009). The Effects of the Sexualization of Female Video Game Characters on Gender Stereotyping and Female Self-Concept. Sex Roles.
Bordo, S. (2003). Unbearable Weight: Feminism Western Culture and the Body (10th Anniversary ed.). USA.
Burt, M. (1980 ). Cultural Myths and Support for Rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), pp. 217-230.
Cahill, A. J. (2011). Overcoming Objectification: A Carnal Ethics. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Calogero, R. M. (Ed.) (2012) Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, (Vols. 2). San Diego: Academic Press.
Campbell, B., & Manning, J. (2018). The Rise of Victimhood Culture Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars Cham, Switzerland: Nature Springer
Cohen, C. (2014). Male Rape is a Feminist Issue: Feminism, Govermentality and Male Rape. In R. Walters & D. Drake (Eds.), Critical Criminology Perspective
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender & Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. UK: Polity Press.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities: University of California Press.
Davis, S. E. (2018). Objectification, Sexualization, and Misrepresentation: Social Media and the College Experience. Social Media + Society, pp. 1-9.
de Beauvoir, S. (1989). The Second Sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans. September 1989 ed.). United States of America: Vintage Books.
Director of controversial movie Cuties reveals she was sent DEATH THREATS after Netflix promoted the film with ′hyper-sexualized′ poster featuring young girls twerking in hot pants. (2020). Daily Mail Online. Retrieved from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8695409/Cuties-director-says-sent-death-threats-Netflix-controversy.html
Dworkin, A. (1989). Pornography: Men Possessing Women. USA: Penguin Books.
Ertan, S., Monroy, C., Vallejo, J. P., & Romero, G. (2018). Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Gender Violence Across the World. In C. Gentle-Genitty & C. Renguette (Eds.), Gender Violence: Prevalence, Implication and Global Perspectives (pp. pp. 1-38).
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women′s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 36.
Gilbert, P., Pehl, J., & Allan, S. (1994). The Phenomenology of Shame and Guilt: An Empirical Investigation. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 23-36.
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women′s Development. United States of America: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C., & Snider, N. (2017). The Loss of Pleasure, or Why We Are Still Talking about Oedipus. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 53(2), 173-195.
Haritaworn, J. (2011). Reckoning with Prostitutes: Performing Thai Femininity. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity (pp. 215-229). United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and Time. New York: HarperCollins Publishers
Hemmann, K. (2020). Short Skirts, Superpowers, and the Evolution of the Beautiful Fighting Girl. In Y. Kuwahara & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Manga Culture and the Female Gaze (pp. 17-46). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Ho, J. (2003). From Spice Girls to Enjo-Kosai: Formations of Teenage Girls′ Sexualities in Taiwan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4(2), pp. 325-336.
Irigaray, L. (2017). To be Born: Genesis of a New Human Being. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Jackson, S., Cram, F., & Seymour, F. W. (2000). Violence and Sexual Coercion in High School Students′ Dating Relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 23-36.
Javiad, A. (2020). Violence in Everyday Life: Power, Gender and Sexuality
Jensen, R., & Dines, G. (1998a). The Content of Mass-Market Pornography. In G. Dine, R. Jensen & A. Russo (Eds.), Pornography : The Production of Consumption of Inequality (pp. 65-100). New York, United States of America: Routledge.
Jensen, R., & Dines, G. (1998b). Pornography : The Production of Consumption of Inequality. New York, United States of America: Routledge.
Kappeler, S. (1986a). The Pornography of Representation Avenue South East, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kappeler, S. (1986b). Subjects, Objects and Equal Opportunities The Pornography of Representation (pp. 49-62). Avenue South East, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kepner, S. F. (1999). Dropping the Towel: Images of the Body in Contemporary Thai Women′s Writing Transnational Asia Pacific Gender, Culture and the Public Sphere (pp. 159-179): University of Illinois.
Langton, R. (2009). Projection and Objectification Sexual Solipism (pp. 241-266): Oxford University Press.
Levinas, E. (1969a). A. Metaphysics and Transendence (A. Lingis, Trans.) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (pp. 33-52): Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1969b). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.): Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1987). Time and The Other and Additional Essays. USA: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise then being or, Beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). USA: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Levinas, E. (2001). Existence and Existents (A. Lingis, Trans.). USA: Duquesne University Press.
Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E. A., & Puvia, E. (2013). Sexual Objectification Increases Rape Victim Blame and Decreases Perceived Suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4).
MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. USA: Harvard University Press.
Mahavongtrakul, M. (2019). Ruling on rape. Bangkok Post. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokpost.com/life/social-and-lifestyle/1692424/ruling-on-rape
Malikhao, P. (2017). Violence Against Thai Women Culture and Communication in Thailand (pp. 37-47): Spinger.
Miller, C. C. (2018, 14 September 2018). Many Ways to Be a Girl, but One Way to Be a Boy: The New Gender Rules. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/14/upshot/gender-stereotypes-survey-girls-boys.html
Mulvey, L. (1999). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. In L. Braudy & M. Cohen (Eds.), Film Theory and Criticism : Introductory Readings. (pp. 833-844). New York: Oxford UP,.
Newsom, J. S. (Writer). (2015). The Mask You Live In. In J. S. Newsom (Producer). United States.
Poojitha, S. S., Padma, T. M., Pratap, K. V. N. R., Kalyan, V. S., & Srikanth, P. (2019). Eve-Teasing and its Psychological Influence Among Health Care Students. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 2(12), pp. 508-510.
Rubin, G. (1996). The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ′Political Economy′ of Sex. In J. W. Scott (Ed.), Feminism and History (pp. 105-151). New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.
Russell, D. E. H. (1993). Pornography and Rape: A Causal Model. In E. H. D. Russell (Ed.), Making Violence Sexy: Feminist Views on Pornography (pp. 120-150). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Salter, A., & Blodgett, B. (2017). Toxic Geek Masculinity in Media: Sexism, Trolling, and Identity Policing. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Seidler, V. J. (1989a). Control Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality (pp. 44-71). New York Routledge.
Seidler, V. J. (1989b). Identity Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality (pp. 107-122). New York Routledge.
Seidler, V. J. (1989c). Intimacy Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality (pp. 157-176). New York Routledge.
Seidler, V. J. (1989d). Language Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality (pp. 123-142). New York Routledge.
Seidler, V. J. (1989e). Reason Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality (pp. 14-21). New York Routledge.
Seidler, V. J. (1989f). Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality. New York Routledge.
Stack, L. (2016, 8 June 2016). In Stanford Rape Case, Brock Turner Blamed Drinking and Promiscuity. The NewYork Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/09/us/brock-turner-blamed-drinking-and-promiscuity-in-sexual-assault-at-stanford.html
Telegraph, T. (2017). #metoo: Six reasons why men do not report sexual harassment.
Thiesmeyer, L. (1999). The West "Comfort Women" and the Discourses of Seduction Transnational Asia Pacific Gender, Culture and the Public Sphere (pp. 69-92): University of Illinois.
Tolentino, R. B. (1999). Bodies, Letters, Catalogs: Filipinas in Transnational Space Transnational Asia Pacific Gender, Culture and the Public Sphere (pp. 43-68): University of Illinois.
Townsend, R. (2016). Prisoner of love: sexual violence on Thai television. Critical Asian Studies, 48 (4), pp. 579–596.
Vogel, D. L., Heimerdinger-Edwards, S. R., Hammer, J. H., & Hubbard, A. (2011). “Boys Don’t Cry”: Examination of the Links Between Endorsement of Masculine Norms, Self-Stigma, and Help-Seeking Attitudes for Men From Diverse Backgrounds. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(3), 368–382.
Yokata, F. (2006). Sex behaviour of male Japanese tourists in Bangkok, Thailand. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 8(2), pp. 115-131.

指導教授

孫雲平

審核日期

2022-7-18

推文