企業社會責任與公司下方風險之關聯 : 台灣實證

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：235

、訪客IP：3.147.84.255

姓名

陳宥葳(Yu-Wei Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系在職專班

論文名稱

企業社會責任與公司下方風險之關聯 : 台灣實證
(The relationship between ESG and downside risks:Evidence from Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 避險基金之績效評估	★ 展望理論與共同基金績效
★ 生命週期基金 :行為財務學觀點	★ 行為特性與投資績效相關性之研究
★ 專業投資人行為特性探討	★ 中小型企業融資缺口與資訊不對稱之探討
★ 九型人格特質與理財偏誤行為之相關性研究	★ 銀行通路轉型策略個案研究
★ 銀行財富管理行銷策略分析-以兩家在台外商銀行為例	★ 羅盤玫瑰可預測型態之探討
★ 巢式與非巢式資產定價理論之比較與檢定	★ 投資者情緒與市場報酬
★ 資產定價模型樣本外績效之檢定	★ 規模效果和元月效應之微觀
★ 因子或特徵:全球觀點	★ 特徵與因子：日本證據

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

ESG代表的是企業社會責任，分別是環境保護（E，Environment）、社會責任（S，Social）以及公司治理（G，Governance）的縮寫，是一種新型態評估企業的數據與指標，同時被許多企業或投資人視為評估一間企業是否永續經營的重要指標及投資決策。本研究為ETF永豐台灣ESG (00888) 2022Q4公佈持股再加以110年度台灣公司治理評鑑結果前5%作為篩選，最後遴選出21家台灣上市櫃公司作為本文研究樣本ESG組，對照組則以同產業且市值規模相近並且110年度公司治理評鑑結果非為前5%的另21家台灣上市櫃公司，探討企業社會責任表現領先的公司投資績效能否較企業社會責任表現一般或落後的公司更加降低公司之下方風險？同時該結果是否也造成市場投資者情緒偏好符合企業社會責任表現領先的公司，及對其同樣產生較低的失望規避。本文以2002年至2021年期間逐月報酬率為研究樣本，結果發現，企業社會責任表現領先公司投資績效無法顯著地較表現一般或落後公司更為降低公司之下方風險，該結果與我們的假設不相符，而企業社會責任表現領先公司未能在市場情緒低落時降低投資者對於市場的「失望」程度及創造「失望規避」效果。

摘要(英)

ESG stands for corporate social responsibility, which is the abbreviation of environmental protection (E, Environment), social responsibility (S, Social) and corporate governance (G, Governance). It is a new type of data and indicators for evaluating enterprises. Many companies or investors regard it as an important indicator for evaluating whether a company is sustainable and making investment decisions. This research is based on the ETF Yongfeng Taiwan ESG (00888) 2022Q4 announcement of shareholding, and the top 5% of the 110-year Taiwan corporate governance evaluation results are selected as screening, and finally 21 Taiwan listed OTC companies are selected as the ESG group of this research sample, and the control group is Using another 21 Taiwanese listed OTC companies in the same industry with a similar market value and the 110-year corporate governance evaluation results are not in the top 5%, to explore whether the investment performance of companies with leading ESG performance is lower than that of companies with average or lagging ESG performance. Does the company further reduce the risk below the company? At the same time, does this result also cause the market investor sentiment to favor companies that are in line with the leading performance of corporate social responsibility, and also produce lower disappointment avoidance. This paper uses the monthly rate of return from 2002 to 2021 as a research sample, and finds that the investment performance of companies with leading corporate social responsibility performance cannot significantly reduce the company′s downside risk than companies with average or laggard performance. This result is consistent with our hypothesis. Not consistent, and ESG performance leaders failed to reduce investor “disappointment” and create “disappointment avoidance” effects when market sentiment was low.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 下方風險
★ 投資者情緒偏好
★ 失望規避

關鍵字(英)

★ ESG
★ Corporate Social Responsibility
★ Downside Risk
★ disappointment aversion

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究動機與目的 1
1-2 本文貢獻 3
1-3 論文架構 5
第二章文獻回顧 6
2-1 台灣公司ESG概況 6
2-2 台灣ESG投資概況 10
2-3 從CSR到ESG對公司風險的影響 11
2-4 行為財務之投資人情緒心理 12
第三章研究方法與模型 14
3-1 D-CAPM模型及迴歸分析 14
3-2 樣本資料來源及說明 15
3-3 樣本敘述統計 21
第四章實證分析與結果 24
4-1 ESG和對照組 24
4-2 實證分析結果 28
第五章結論 34
參考文獻 35

參考文獻

參考文獻
英文文獻
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.
Baron, D. P., Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1-46.
Benlemlih, M., Amama, S., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 613–626.Bawa, V. S. (1975). Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Journal of financial economics, 2(1), 95-121.
Bawa, V. S., & Lindenberg, E. B. (1977). Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. Journal of financial economics, 5(2), 189-200.
Black, F. (1986). Noise. The journal of finance, 41(3), 528-543.
Beurden, P., & Gossling, T. (2008). The worth of values—A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407–424.Brown, G. W., & Cliff, M. T. (2005). Investor sentiment and asset valuation. The Journal of Business, 78(2), 405-440.
Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social Responsibilities of The Businessman. New York, NY: Harper.
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.
Cormier, D., Aerts, W., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2009). Attributes of social and human capital disclosure and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(1), 71–88.
Estrada, J. (2002). Systematic risk in emerging markets: the D-CAPM. Emerging Markets Review, 3(4), 365-379.
Fishburn, P. C. (1977). Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 116-126.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA:
Pitman.
Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of management review, 30(4), 777-798.
Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 667-686.
Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P., & McInnes, M. (1993). An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting, organizations and society, 18(7-8), 587-604.
Husted, B. W. (2005). Risk management, real options, corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 60(2), 175-183.
Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.
Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of business ethics, 110(4), 441-456.
Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal
of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13.Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio selection. In: Yale
University Press New Haven.
Lamont, O., Polk, C., & Saá-Requejo, J. (2001). Financial constraints and stock returns. The
Review of Financial Studies,14(2), 529–554.
McElhaney, K. (2007). Strategic CSR. Sustainable Enterprise Quarterly, 4(1), 1–7.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 57-68.
Price, K., Price, B., & Nantell, T. J. (1982). Variance and lower partial moment measures of systematic risk: some analytical and empirical results. The journal of finance, 37(3), 843-855.
Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 431-449.
Salama, A., Anderson, K., & Toms, J. S. (2011). Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Business ethics: a European review, 20(2), 192-204.
Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442.
Shumway, T. (1997). Explaining returns with loss aversion. Available at SSRN 58442.
Wartick, S. L., and P. L. Cochran. 1985. “The evolution of the corporate social
performance model.” Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 758-769.
Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of management studies, 43(1), 93-114.
中文文獻
池祥麟. (2017). 企業社會責任-行為財務學的觀點. 證券市場發展季刊, 29(4), 63-104.
周賓凰, 池祥萱, 周冠男, & 龔怡霖. (2019). 行為財務學: 文獻回顧與展望. 證券市場發展季刊: 行為財務學特別專刊, 1.
潘景華.(2004). 社會責任投資(SRI)在台發展之芻議。證券暨期貨月刊，22(12)，23-50.
網址部分
台灣證券交易所-公司治理中心https://cgc.twse.com.tw
公司投資人關係整合平台https://irplatform.tdcc.com.tw/ir/zh/

指導教授

周賓凰(Pin Huang Chou)

審核日期

2022-7-14

推文