朝向全球24小時研發專案管理模式之探討—以Yamaha Motor Taiwan為研究個案

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：92

、訪客IP：3.142.136.89

姓名

陳昱崴(Yu-Wei Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

高階主管企管碩士班

論文名稱

朝向全球24小時研發專案管理模式之探討—以Yamaha Motor Taiwan為研究個案
(Toward Global 24-Hour R&D Project Management - A Case Study of the Yamaha Motor Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 聯合國海洋法公約生效後，我國海洋管理策略及其因應作為之研究	★ 大陸供應鏈金融平台策略探討─以F公司昆山廠為例
★ 台資企業績效獎勵制度改善方案探討─以L 公司吳江廠為例	★ 自動光學檢測導入方案及其效益探討─以A電池公司為例
★ 以精實物流結合自動化進行倉儲系統再造之個案研究	★ 電腦產業出貨排程系統之發展：系統分析方法的應用
★ 筆記型電腦代工製造業供應鏈遷徙之個案研究：製造佈局的觀點	★ 零售業物流自動化技術導入與服務創新
★ 由精實生產助力轉型工業4.0－以C公司為例	★ 大型自動化專案工程估價方法之研究
★ ODM廠商工業4.0實踐模式之探討：工業模式轉型的觀點	★ 國際企業研發管理模式之探討─以M公司為例
★ 全球化企業研發管理模式之探討─以RobertBOSCH為研究個案	★ 企業併購案例分析：以L公司併購N公司為例
★ 筆記型電腦產業的工業4.0：一個以流程為導向的實踐案例	★ 台灣中小企業暨傳統產業的轉型探討─以L公司轉型研究探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

面臨氣候變遷各國政府相繼提出「2050淨零排放」目標與行動，臺灣政府也於2022年3月正式公布「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明」政策推動目標，宣布第一階段的電動機車市售在2030年要達35%。台灣機車產業面臨未來如何加快電動機車新產品上市，短縮研發專案開發時間的壓力。
有鑒於24小時連續生產用於提高產品製造效率，本研究旨在探討提供一種24小時連續不間斷的概念，應用於電動機車產品研發專案管理的可行性。24小時研發專案管理概念是國際企業可有效運用其3個全球化研發據點資源，利用時差約各8小時之團隊成員，在各自白天正常工作時區內工作，讓專案以3班制輪流24小時不停的交接方式進行，使原本需要在三天內完成的工作可以在一個24小時循環內完成。
透過對相關文獻24小時知識工廠概念的研究探討發現，將人腦知識的勞動類型工作數位化之後，可用24小時不停之地點間傳遞運轉，並且已有應用於軟體開發的實績。本研究模擬針對個案公司選擇3個海外據點，進行軟硬體環境建置與人才培育的事前準備、建立共通的技術與溝通語言以及明確的開發體制，依實際電動機車產品案例統計發生的總開發人力推算，可大幅減少專案研發時間。除了軟體與電動機車產品之外，也提供其他產業研究應用可能性的參考。

摘要(英)

In the face of climate change, governments have agreed to submit "2050 Net Zero Emissions" goals and actions. The Taiwan government also officially released " Taiwan’s Pathway to Net Zero Emissions in 2050 " in March 2022. In the first phase of 2030, 35% of scooter sales are electric. Taiwan′s scooter industry is facing the pressure of how to speed up the launch of new electric scooters and shorten the development time of R&D projects.
In consideration of 24-hour continuous manufacturing used to improve production efficiency, this study aims to explore the possibility of a 24-hour non-stop concept for R&D project management of electric scooters. The concept of a 24-hour R&D project management is that international companies can use their resources of three global R&D bases properly, each team member with a time difference of about 8 hours would work during the normal workday hours in their time zone, so the project can be rotated 24 hours a day in 3 shifts. The work that needed to be completed within three days may now be done within a 24-hour cycle.
Through the study on the concept of a 24-hour knowledge factory in the literature review, it found that after digitizing the labor work of human brain knowledge, it can be transferred and operated 24 hours a day, and it has been applied to software development. This study simulated the selection of 3 overseas bases for the case company, preparations for the establishment of the software and hardware environment and talent training, the establishment of the same technical language and communication language, and a defined development system. According to the calculated total development man-hours of the electric scooter product, the project development time can be substantially reduced. In addition to software and electric scooter products, this study also provided research references for other industrial application possibilities.

關鍵字(中)

★ 24小時研發
★ 研發管理
★ 專案管理
★ 研發專案管理
★ TRIZ
★ 24小時知識工廠

關鍵字(英)

★ 24-hour R&D
★ R&D management
★ project management
★ R&D project management
★ TRIZ
★ 24-hour knowledge factory

論文目次

一、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景及動機 1
1.2 研究目的 1
二、相關文獻探討 2
2.1 研發管理 2
2.2 專案管理 8
2.3 研發專案管理 16
2.4 產品研發創新管理 21
三、個案問題陳述與分析 25
3.1 個案公司介紹 25
3.2 問題陳述 39
四、問題的解決 45
4.1 問題分析 45
4.2 解決方案的構想 67
4.3 解決方案的實行 67
4.4 結果說明 72
五、研究討論 74
5.1 從相關學術研究進行論述 74
5.2 實務應用上的討論與發現 75
六、結論與後續研究 77
6.1 研究結論 77
6.2 後續研究 78
參考文獻 79

參考文獻

中文參考文獻
Hill, C. W. L., & Hult, G. T. M. (2022). 國際企業12版。(許嘉文譯；6版) 華泰文化。
YMRT (2019)。商品開發營運與開發品質管理流程。
YMRT (2022)。台灣山葉發動機研究開發中心(股)。擷取自 https://www.ymrt.com.tw/
中華民國國家發展委員會(2022)。臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明_簡報。擷取自 https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=FD76ECBAE77D9811&upn=5CE3D7B70507FB38
全球時區查詢(2022)。2022年5月1日擷取自 GMT 世界標準時間：https://time.artjoey.com/
麥克費安德魯、布林優夫森艾瑞克(2017)。機器，平台，群眾：如何駕馭我們的數位未來。(李芳齡譯；1版)。天下文化。
傑恩、川迪斯(2011)。研發管理聖經。(柳卸林、陳勁、高旭東譯；2版)。博雅書屋。
曾清枝(2018)。專案管理-以系統手法管理專案 (第 2 版)。雙葉書廊。

日文參考文獻
今野浩一郎(1993)。研究開発マネジメント入門 (日経文庫)。日本経済新聞社。
木村壽男(2002)。研究開発が企業を変える-Dynamic R&D。学文社。
木谷強(2010)。[第3回]海外との時差を利用した開発で工期短縮「24時間開発」。擷取自 NTT DATA Corporation 技術ブログ: https://www.nttdata.com/jp/ja/data-insight/2010/062901/
林勝昭(1995)。トヨタ生産方式と新製品開発について。生産管理，2(1)，頁120-132。doi:10.14846/seisankanri1995.2.120

英文參考文獻
Altshuller, G. (2002). 40 principles: TRIZ keys to innovation (Vol. 1). Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International journal of project management, 17(6), pp. 337-342. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6
Balaji, S., & Murugaiyan, M. S. (2012). Waterfall vs. V-Model vs. Agile: A comparative study on SDLC. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 2(1), pp. 26-30.
Blackburn, M., Alexander, J., Legan, D. J., & Klabjan, D. (2017). Big Data and the Future of R&D Management: The rise of big data and big data analytics will have significant implications for R&D and innovation management in the next decade. Research-Technology Management, 60(5), pp. 43-51. doi:10.1080/08956308.2017.1348135
Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2005). Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE software, 22(5), pp. 30-39.
Cocchi, N., Dosi, C., & Vignoli, M. (2021). The Hybrid Model MatrixEnhancing Stage-Gate with Design Thinking, Lean Startup, and Agile: Managers can use the Hybrid Model Matrix to decide when to use design thinking, Lean Startup, or Agile with Stage-Gate to boost new product development. Research-Technology Management, 64(5), pp. 18-30. doi:10.1080/08956308.2021.1942645
Collyer, S., & Warren, C. M. (2009). Project management approaches for dynamic environments. International journal of project management, 27(4), pp. 355-364. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.004
Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business horizons, 33(3), pp. 44-54. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I
Cooper, R. G. (2014). What′s next?: After stage-gate. Research-Technology Management, 57(1), pp. 20-31. doi:10.5437/08956308X5606963
Cooper, R. G. (2016). Agile–Stage-Gate Hybrids: The Next Stage for Product Development Blending Agile and Stage-Gate methods can provide flexibility, speed, and improved communication in new-product development. Research-Technology Management, 59(1), pp. 21-29. doi:10.1080/08956308.2016.1117317
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2016). Agile-Stage-Gate: New idea-to-launch method for manufactured new products is faster, more responsive. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, pp. 167-180. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.006
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2018). Agile–Stage-Gate for Manufacturers: Changing the Way New Products Are Developed Integrating Agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges. Research-Technology Management, 61(2), pp. 17-26. doi:10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380
Farrington, T. (2020). The Never-ending Journey Toward Globalization of R&D. Research-Technology Management, 63(6), pp. 22-30. doi:10.1080/08956308.2020.1813491
Gupta, A., & Seshasai, S. (2004). Toward the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory. MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4455-04. doi:10.2139/ssrn.486127
Gupta, A., & Seshasai, S. (2007). 24-hour knowledge factory: Using internet technology to leverage spatial and temporal separations. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 7(3), pp. 14-es. doi:10.1145/1275505.1275507
Gupta, A., Hou, L., Hedberg, T., Prendergast, C., & Crk, I. (2012). Creating the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory. Information Systems Management, 29(2), pp. 100-111. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.661631
Huemann, M. (2022). Celebrating the power of projects and their management. International Journal of Project Management, 40(1), pp. 1-3. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.02.001
Moehrle, M. G. (2005). What is TRIZ? From conceptual basics to a framework for research. Creativity and innovation management, 14(1), pp. 3-13. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00320.x
Morris, P. W. (2013). The trajectory of project management: Why EPOS is important. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 3(2), pp. 66-70. doi:10.1080/21573727.2013.775943
Mueller, S. (2005). The TRIZ resource analysis tool for solving management tasks: previous classifications and their modification. Creativity and innovation management, 14(1), pp. 43-58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00324.x
National Science Board (US). (1996). Science and Engineering Indicators. Washington, D. C.: National Science Board.

Navas, H. V., Tenera, A. M., & Machado, V. A. (2015). Integrating TRIZ in project management processes: an ARIZ contribution. Procedia engineering, 131, pp. 224-231. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.381
Nobelius, D. (2004). Towards the sixth generation of R&D management. International Journal of Project Management, 22(5), pp. 369-375. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.10.002
Picciotto, R. (2020). Towards a New Project Management’ movement? An international development perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 38(8), pp. 474-485. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.08.002
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (3 ed.). Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (6 ed.). Newton Square: Project Management Institute.
Reusch, P. J., & Zadnepryanets, M. (2015, 9). TRIZ 40 inventive principles application in project management. 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS) (pp. 521-526). IEEE. doi:10.1109/IDAACS.2015.7341360
Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), pp. 7-31. doi:10.1108/02651339410057491
Salvato, J. J., & Laplume, A. O. (2020). Agile stage‐gate management (ASGM) for physical products. R&d Management, 50(5), pp. 631-647. doi:10.1111/radm.12426
Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum Guide. Retrieved 5 19, 2022, from Scrum.org: https://scrumguides.org/index.html
Seshasai, S., & Gupta, A. (2009). 24-Hour knowledge factory paradigm and its role in IT collaborations in organizations. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 11(4), pp. 11-29. doi:10.1080/15228053.2009.10856169
Seshasai, S., Malter, A. J., & Gupta, A. (2006). The Use of Information Systems in Collocated and Distributed Teams: A Test of the 24-Hour Knowledge Factory. Eller College of Management Working Paper No. 1034-06. doi:10.2139/ssrn.935106
UNEP. (2021). Emissions Gap Report 2021. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2021
Verworn, B., Herstatt, C., & Nagahira, A. (2007). The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects. R&d Management, 38(1), pp. 1-19.
Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Creating Project Plans to Focus Product Development. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1992/03/creating-project-plans-to-focus-product-development
Wysocki, R. K. (2011). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme (6 ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (2021). Financial Data. Retrieved 3 20, 2022, from https://global.yamaha-motor.com/ir/data/chart/
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (2022a). About Us. Retrieved from https://global.yamaha-motor.com/about/
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (2022b). Overview of "Yamaha Motor Group Environmental Plan 2050". Retrieved 3 25, 2022, from https://global.yamaha-motor.com/about/csr/the_environment/plan-2050/
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (2022c). Yamaha Motor History. Retrieved from https://global.yamaha-motor.com/stories/history/
Žužek, T., Kušar, J., Rihar, L., & Berlec, T. (2020). Agile-Concurrent hybrid: A framework for concurrent product development using Scrum. Concurrent Engineering, 28(4), pp. 255-264. doi:10.1177/1063293X20958541

指導教授

呂俊德

審核日期

2022-7-15

推文