女性董事對企業社會責任治理之影響： 三種董事角色截然不同？

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：3.145.14.95

姓名

蔡芷如(Chih-Ju Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

女性董事對企業社會責任治理之影響：三種董事角色截然不同？
(The Impacts of the Female Directors on Governance of Corporate Social Responsibility: Are the Three Roles of Directors entirely different?)

相關論文

★ 利害關係人包容性：企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討	★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例	★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響	★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性	★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素	★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例
★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例	★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例
★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響：以企業社會責任願景為調節變數	★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果
★ 企業社會責任治理績效與財務績效之雙向因果關係-以無形資產為中介效果	★ 企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇：選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著國際提倡兩性平權，各國政府開始要求企業董事會納入女性董事，既有文獻也證實女性董事相較男性董事更願意落實CSR。然而，過去研究通常預設所有女性董事都能獲得該職位的實質權力，但未考慮是否所有女性董事皆能符合假設。是故，本研究將女性董事劃分為內部女性董事、灰色女性董事、獨立女性董事三類，欲從這三種女性董事角色的角度探究其對CSR治理架構決策之影響是否截然不同？
本研究以我國2014年至2020年強制揭露CSR報告書之上市公司為研究對象，實證結果發現，同為內部董事時，女性具有管理職能上之實質權力，在決策上有充分的管理能力及領導能力，較男性董事更能影響企業設置CSR治理架構之決策；而同為灰色（獨立）董事時，女性未具有管理職能上之實質權力，易受到象徵性問題或亞洲集體主義文化的影響，使其無法發揮功能；此外，同為女性董事，內部董事的執行效果與灰色（獨立）董事的監督效果相比，前者對企業設置CSR治理架構之決策帶來更佳影響。
綜合上述，本研究結論為：相較於男性，女性對CSR之影響，在擔任不同角色董事時確有差異；此影響在內部董事具有正面效果，而灰色（獨立）董事則產生負面效果，代表女性董事對CSR之影響不僅與董事性別有關，其所扮演之董事角色也同樣重要；另外，本研究亦支持女性對於CSR之影響，三種董事角色間的主要差異在於董事之執行效果，意味著女性擔任內部董事之執行效果有助於CSR。因此，本研究主要貢獻為促進董事會多元化文獻的發展，並能促使企業日後選任女性董事時，思考女性於董事職位能否獲得實質權力。

摘要(英)

With the advocacy of gender equality, many governments start to require companies to have female directors on boards of directors. Existing literatures have confirmed that female directors are more willing to implement CSR. However, past researches usually assume that all female directors can obtain real power in the position, but they don’t consider different roles of female directors. Therefore, our study divides female directors into three roles. We want to know if three roles of female directors are entirely different on their decision-making about CSR governance structure?
This study focuses on listed companies that have mandatory disclosure of CSR reports in Taiwan from 2014 to 2020. The empirical results show that inside female directors have sufficient management and leadership skills in decision-making due to their real power of management functions, so they will prefer to set up CSR governance structure; On the contrary, grey (independent) female directors don’t have real power in management functions, so the both are easily influenced by tokenism or Asian collective culture. In addition, inside female directors have stronger positive effects on the enterprises than grey (independent) female directors, indicating that the executive effects outweigh the monitoring effects.
Based on the above, this research proves that different roles of female directors compared with male directors have different effects on CSR. Inside female directors have positive effects, while grey or independent female directors have negative effects. It indicates the impact of female directors on CSR is not only related to the sex of directors but also the role of directors. In addition, this study also supports the impact of women on CSR and proves that the main difference between the three roles of female directors on CSR is about executive effects. Therefore, the main contribution of this study is to promote the development of the literature, and to encourage companies to consider whether women can gain substantial power in board positions when they elect female directors.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任治理
★ 女性董事
★ 內部女性董事
★ 灰色女性董事
★ 獨立女性董事

關鍵字(英)

★ Corporate Social Responsibility Governance
★ Female Directors
★ Inside Female Directors
★ Grey Female Directors
★ Independent Female Directors

論文目次

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究結果與貢獻 3
二、文獻探討與假說發展 4
2-1 CSR治理架構 4
2-2 女性董事與CSR治理架構 5
2-3 不同女性董事角色之CSR治理架構決策 8
三、研究設計 12
3-1 樣本選取 12
3-2 研究模型 15
3-3 變數衡量 16
四、實證結果 20
4-1 敘述性統計 20
4-2 相關性分析 21
4-3 主要迴歸結果 23
4-4 穩健性分析 28
4-5 額外分析：女性董事關鍵多數 34
五、結論與建議 39
5-1 研究結論與貢獻 39
5-2 研究限制與建議 41
參考文獻 42

參考文獻

李伶珠，2013。影響董事會獨立性之決定因素。國立屏東商業技術學院學報，第十五卷：121-148。(Lee, L. C. 2013. The Determinants of Board Independence. Bulletin of National Pingtung Institute of Commerce, 15: 121-148. )
何莉芸與李佳玲，2017。企業永續發展與社會責任報告之趨勢與實務。中華會計學刊，第十二卷：359-366。(Ho, J. L. & Lee, C. L. 2017. Trends and Practices of Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility Report. Taiwan Accounting Review, 12: 359-366. )
林秀柑、方文碩與王冠閔，2009。集團核心企業董事會特性與經營績效之研究。臺灣企業績效學刊，第三卷第一期：25-48。(Lin, H. K., Fang, W. S., & Wang, K. M. 2009. The Relationship of Core Business Groups between Board Characteristics and Operating Performance. Taiwan Business Performance Journal, 3(1): 25-48. )
邱慈觀與黃啟瑞，2019。治理結構對企業社會責任的影響。中山管理評論，第二十七卷第三期：511-550。(Chiu, T. K., & Huang, C. J. 2019. The Effects of Governance Structures on Corporate Social Responsibility. Sun Yat-sen Management Review, 27(3):511-550. )
陳建中與林依璇，2020。家族企業、女性董事與外資持股對企業社會責任治理之影響。會計與公司治理，第十六卷第二期：37-65。(Chen, C. C., & Lin, Y. X. 2020. The Impacts of Family Firms、Female Directors and Foreign Shareholder on Governance of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance, 16(2): 37-65. )
陳建中與賴育絜，2019。企業社會責任治理對企業社會責任績效之影響。中央大學會計研究所碩士論文。(Chen, C. C., & Lai, Y. C. 2019. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. Unpublished master′s thesis, National Central University, Taoyuan City. )
張元與王筱瑩，2016。董事會及高階管理階層的性別多樣性與企業社會責任的關聯。亞太經濟管理評論，第二十卷第一期：-44。(Chang, Y. & Wong, C. Y. 2016. The Linkage between Gender Diversity on Corporate Board/Top Management and Corporate Social Responsibility. Asia-Pacific Economic and Management Review, 20(1): -44. )
張彥文，2021。上市櫃女董事長20強。https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/2989。搜尋日期：2022年4月30日。(Zhang, Y. W. 2021. Top 20 female chairmen of listed companies. https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/2989. Accessed April 30, 2022. )
廖秀梅、李建然與吳祥華，2006。董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響。東吳經濟商學學報，第五十四期：117-160。(.Liao, X. M., Li, J. R., & Wu, X. G. 2006. The Relationships between Board Structure and Firm Performance－And the Influence of Family Control in Taiwan Listed Company. School Journal of Economics and Business, 54: 117-160. )
鄭宇茹，2020。ESG成天下企業公民新共識。https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41625。搜尋日期：2022年4月30日。(Cheng, Y. J. 2020. ESG has become the new consensus of corporate citizenship in the world. https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41625. Accessed April 30, 2022. )
戴怡蕙與林彥宏，2022。內部董事比例、獨立董事比例與資訊揭露品質之關聯。當代會計，第二十三卷：71-95。(Tai, Y. H., & Lin, Y. H. 2022. The Relationships among the Proportions of Inside Directors, Independent Directors, and the Quality of Information Disclosure The Role of Family Ownership. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 23: 71-95. )
謝錦堂，2009。董事會功能理論模型之驗證:台灣上市公司董監事的觀點。管理學報，第二十六卷第二期：127-144。(Shieh, J. T. 2009. The Empirical Examination of Theoretical Model for the Functions of Board of Directors: Evidences from Director′s Perception of Listed Companies in Taiwan. Journal of Management and Business Research, 26(2): 127-144. )
Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2): 291-309.
Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Fisscher, OAM. 2013. An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56(1): 7-17.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38(1): 33-53.
Chang, Y. K., Oh, W. Y., Park, J. H., & Jang, M. G. 2017. Exploring the relationship between board characteristics and CSR: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2): 225-242.
Cho, Y., Kim, S., You, J., Han, H., Kim, M. & Yoon, S. 2021. How South Korean women leaders respond to their token status: Assimilation and resistance. Human Resource Development International, 24(4): 377-400.
Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. 2018. The presence of female directors on boards. An empirical investigation about its effects on CSR. In Paoloni, P., & Lombardi, R., Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics: 151-165. Springer, Cham.
Cruz, C., Justo, R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Garces-Galdeano, L. 2019. When do women make a better table? Examining the influence of women directors on family firm’s corporate social performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2): 282-301.
Cullinan, C. P., Mahoney, L., & Roush, P. B. 2019. Directors and corporate social responsibility: Joint consideration of director gender and the director’s role. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 39(2): 100-123.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. 1999. Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 647-686.
Dewi, D. M. 2014. CSR effect on market and financial performance. Islamic Banking and Finance Journal, 1(2): 198-216.
De Masi, S., Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., & Paci, A. 2021. Women on boards and monitoring tasks: An empirical application of Kanter′s theory. Management Decision, 59(13): 56-72.
Dobija, D., Hryckiewicz, A., Zaman, M., & Puławska, K. 2022. Critical mass and voice: Board gender diversity and financial reporting quality. European Management Journal, 40(1): 29-44.
Du, X. 2016. Does confucianism reduce board gender diversity? Firm-level evidence from China. Journal of business ethics, 136(2): 399-436.
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. 2003. Transformational, transactional, and Laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4): 569-591.
Elmaghrabi, M. E. 2021. CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence. Corporate Governance, 21(5): 892-919.
Endrikat, J., Villiers, C. D., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. 2021. Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic investigation. Business and Society, 60(8): 2099-2135.
Grayson CBE, D. & Kakabadse, A. 2012. Towards a sustainability mindset: How boards organise oversight and governance of corporate responsibility. Research report, Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility.
Gustavson, R. 2009. The company directors’ perspective of corporate social responsibility. In Idowu, S. O., & Filho, W. L., Professionals′ Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility: 97-117. London, UK: Springer Publications.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. 1988. The determinants of board composition. The Rand journal of economics, 19(4): 589-606.
He, R., Zhou, M., Liu, J., & Yang, Q. 2021. Female directors and carbon information disclosure: Evidence from China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.
Jahdi, K. S. & Acikdilli, G. 2009. Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility（CSR）: Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1): 103-113.
Jiraporn, P. & Withisuphakorn, P. 2015. The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility（CSR）: Do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters, 23(4): 298-301.
Jouber, H. 2020. Is the effect of board diversity on CSR diverse? New insights from one-tier vs two-tier corporate board models. Corporate Governance, 21(1): 23-61.
Kanter, R. M. 1977. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5): 965–990.
Khan, HUZ. 2010. The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management, 52(2): 82-109.
Kirsch, A. 2018. The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2): 346-364.
Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3): 761-796.
Konrad, Alison M., Vicki Kramer, and Sumru Erkut (2008), “The impact of three or more women on corporate boards,” Organizational dynamics, 37(2), 145-164.
Liu, H., Wang, H., & Wu, L. 2016. Removing vacant chairs: Does independent directors’ attendance at board meetings matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 133: 375–393.
Liu, Y., Wei Z., & Xie, F. 2014. Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of corporate finance, 28: 169-184.
Lock, I., & Seele, P. 2016. CSR governance and departmental organization: A typology of best practices. Corporate Governance, 16(1): 211-230.
Maignan, Isabelle, O. C. Ferrell, and Linda Ferrell (2005), “A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility,” European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 956-977.
Mallin, C. A., & Michelon, G. 2011. Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research, 41(2): 119–144.
Masud, A. K., Nurunnabi, M., & Bae, S. M. 2018. The effects of corporate governance on environmental sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from South Asian countries. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 3(1): 1-26.
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. 2017. The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42: 75-99.
Minciullo, M. 2019. The early stage of the governance of sustainability in Italy and the UK: The scenario in 2013. In Minciullo, M., Corporate Governance and Sustainability: 47-96. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Nuber, C., & Velte, P. 2021. Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4): 1958-1992.
Orlitzky, M. 2001. Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2): 167-180.
Rubino, F. E., Tenuta, P., & Cambrea, D. R. 2021. Five shades of women: Evidence from Italian listed firms. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(7): 54-74.
Singh, A. K., Kota, H. B., Sardana, V., & Singhania, S. 2021. Does gender diversity on board promote corporate social responsibility? An empirical analysis of sustainable development goals. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 15(5): 22-40.
Sundarasen, S. D. D., Tan, J. Y., & Rajangam, N. 2016. Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corporate Governance, 16(1): 35-53.
Wang, Y., Luo, X., Wang, T. & Hu, D. 2021. Go beyond tokens: Number and type both matter. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 30(4): 639-656.
Yang, W., Yang, J., & Gao, Z. 2019. Do female board directors promote corporate social responsibility? An empirical study based on the critical mass theory. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(15): 3452-3471.
Zhuang, Y., Chang, X., & Lee, Y. 2018. Board composition and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from Chinese public firms. Sustainability, 10(8): -2752.
Zou, Z., Wu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Yang, S. 2018. Do female executives prioritize corporate social responsibility? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(13): 2965-2981.

指導教授

陳建中(Chien-Chung Chen)

審核日期

2022-7-7

推文