博碩士論文 109429002 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:25 、訪客IP:3.235.180.245
姓名 甯翔(Hsiang Ning)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 經濟學系
論文名稱 選擇性信用管制對六都和新竹縣市房價的影響
相關論文
★ 消費財富效果不對稱分析: 馬可夫轉換共同趨勢模型之應用★ 股票市場報酬與波動性外溢效果分析
★ 中國大陸勞動合同法與企業所得稅法對台商的衝擊與因應★ 結構FAVAR模型與台灣貨幣政策分析
★ 通貨膨脹率預測:考慮結構變動之動態因子模型應用★ 匯率因子與市場基要之預測表現
★ 台灣大小公司報酬與流動性之實證研究★ 台灣外匯暨股票市場流動性與景氣循環關係之探討
★ 台灣經濟成長率之混合頻率預測-MIDAS迴歸應用★ 油價對匯率預測能力之分析
★ 重新驗證遠期匯率不偏性假說: Bonferroni Q 檢定之應用★ 台灣期貨市場處份效果之研究
★ 寡占廠商成本歧異下之最適產業與貿易政策★ The Macroeconomic Effects of Foreign Direct Investment
★ 平行輸入、仿冒與服務品質★ 經濟成長、消費者信心與銀行風險
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-7-19以後開放)
摘要(中) 我國央行有鑑於中美貿易戰、台商回台投資和銀行過度集中不動產授信,從2020年12月8日起已經實施多次房市措施。本文主要探討央行於2021年9月24日針對台北市、新北市、桃園市、台中市、台南市、高雄市、新竹縣及新竹市實施之選擇性信用管制。為了探討選擇性信用管制,即針對上述八個城市是否能有效抑制房價,本研究蒐集政策開始前後半年之全國房價資料共121,723筆。本次使用差異中的差異法(difference in differences),以第二戶購屋貸款不得有寬限期之八個城市為實驗組,全國其餘區域為對照組進行分析。從本文實證結果可得知:第一,全體樣本在政策實施後對房價沒有顯著影響。第二,針對四種建物型包含公寓、住宅大樓、套房和華夏。住宅大樓在政策實施後對房價有正向顯著影響,華夏有負向顯著影響,其餘建物型態皆無顯著影響。第三,將八個縣市的房價個別分析。台北市和新北市在政策開始後對房價有負向顯著影響,高雄市有正向顯著影響,其餘縣市皆無顯著影響。
摘要(英) In view of the US-China trade war, the return of Taiwanese businessmen to invest in Taiwan, and the concentration of excessive funds in the real estate market, the central bank has implemented several housing market policies since December 8, 2019. This article mainly discusses the selective credit controls implemented by the central bank on September 24, 2021 for Taipei City, New Taipei City, Taoyuan City, Taichung City, Tainan City, Kaohsiung City, Hsinchu County and Hsinchu City. In order to explore whether selective credit control can effectively restrain housing prices, this research collects housing price data for the first and last half years of the policy. The difference in difference measurement method is adopted this time. Eight cities where there is no grace period for second home purchase loans as the experimental group. The others of Taiwan as the control group. First of all, the entire sample has no significant impact on housing prices after the implementation of the policy. Secondly, for the four types of buildings, including apartments, residential buildings, suites and condominium. Buildings has a positive and significant impact on housing prices, condominium has a negative and significant impact, while the rest of the building types have no significant impact. Thirdly, individual analysis of housing prices in eight counties and cities. Taipei City and New Taipei City have a negative and significant impact on housing prices after the policy begins, Kaohsiung City had a positive and significant impact, and the rest of the counties and cities have no significant impact.
關鍵字(中) ★ 選擇性信用管制
★ 房價
★ 成交量
★ 差異中的差異
關鍵字(英) ★ Selective credit controls
★ house price
★ volume
★ difference in difference
論文目次 摘要..............................................................................................................................................i
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................ii
致謝...........................................................................................................................................iii
目錄............................................................................................................................................iv
表目錄.........................................................................................................................................v
第一章 緒論.............................................................................................................................1
第二章 文獻回顧.....................................................................................................................4
2.1 選擇性信用管制簡介.................................................................................................4
2.2 相關文獻回顧.............................................................................................................4
第三章 資料樣本與研究方法.................................................................................................7
3.1 資料來源及樣本選取.................................................................................................7
3.2 變數說明.....................................................................................................................7
3.3 模型介紹...................................................................................................................10
第四章 實證結果與分析.......................................................................................................12
4.1 敘述統計...................................................................................................................12
4.2 迴歸分析...................................................................................................................15
第五章 結論...........................................................................................................................32
參考文獻...................................................................................................................................34
參考文獻 吳欣諭 (2021) ,“洪災對鄰近房價之影響-特徵價格模型實證分析” ,中央大學,產業經
濟研究所碩士論文。
林正隆 (2014),“選擇性信用管制政策對房地產價個與成交量之影響-以台北市及新北市
為例”,國立中正大學,國際經濟學碩士學位論文。
邱司杰 (2014) ,“基於時價登陸的房價模型研究”,國立交通大學,資訊科學與工程研
究所碩士論文。
徐士勛、陳琮仁、林士淵、張金鶚 (2020) ,“高雄氣爆後的房價被市場暴棄了?”,經濟
論文,48,33-68。
陳敬筌 (2019) ,“應用深度學習預測區域住房平均價格-以台北市時價登錄為例”,銘傳
大學,資訊管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
郭又瑋 (2020) ,“以DID劑量方法分析:央行貸款成數限制對房貸逾期之影響”,國立台
灣大學,社會科學院經濟學系在職專班碩士論文。
蔡佩珊 (2021) ,“放寬購屋貸款規範對於雙北地區房價之影響”,國立清華大學,計量
財務金融學系碩士論文。
Armstrong, J., Skilling, H. and Yao, F. (2019). "Loan-to-Value Ratio Restrictions and House
Prices: Micro Evidence from New Zealand". Journal of Housing Economics, 44, 88-98.
Cannaday, R. E. and Sunderman, M.A. (1986). "Estimation of Depreciation for Single-Family
Appraisal", Real Estate Economics, 14, 255-273.
Card, D. and Krueger, A.B. (1994). "Wages and Employment: A Case Study of The Fast-Food
Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania", American Economic Review, 84, 772–793.
Fisher, J. D., Smith, B. C., Stern, J., and Webb, R. B. (2006). "Analysis of Economic
Depreciationfor Multi-Family Propty", Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(4): 1-24.
Follain, J. R. and Malpezzi, S. (1980). "Dissecting Housing Value and Rent", Washington,
DC:The Urban Institute.
Fredriksson, A. and Oliveira, G.M.d. (2019), "Impact Evaluation Using Difference-In-
Differences", RAUSP Management Journal, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 519-532.
Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A., and Zietz, E. N. (2005). "The Composition of Hedonic
Pricing Models", Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1): 3-44.
Wooldridge, J. and Imbens, G. (2007), "Difference In Differences Estimation", Lecture Notes,
10.
Yi Wu and Yunong Li (2018). "Impact of Government Intervention in The Housing Market:
Evidence from The Housing Purchase Restriction Policy in China", Applied Economics,
50:6, 691-705.
指導教授 徐之強 審核日期 2022-7-21
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明