視覺化創意發想互動式平台之研究：可操作性經營模式創新之雛型系統

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：58

、訪客IP：3.15.197.123

姓名

高詡鴻(Hsu-Hung Kao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

視覺化創意發想互動式平台之研究：可操作性經營模式創新之雛型系統
(The Study on Interactive Idea Generation Platform with Visualization: A Prototype System for Operable Business Model Innovate)

相關論文

★ 半導體先進批次製程控制系統平台設計與實作	★ 應用當責觀點建構即時運算及自動化平台之研究 — 以 A 公司 ERP 物料供需流程改善為例
★ 矽智財的評價與訂價之建議模式	★ 半導體晶圓專製業經營模式主宰設計之探索性研究：聯電與台積電之比較分析
★ 智慧型手機應用程式之Logo吸引力探索	★ 探討感性廣告引起情緒效價與喚起影響分享意圖之分析
★ 網路時代小眾市場營運模式之研究	★ 旅行業創新商業模式之個案研究
★ 創業家精神啟動新創業活動網絡之研究－以紮根理論觀點探討	★ 代工廠商與品牌商動態協力合作演進之研究—筆記型電腦產業中價值能力移轉個案探索
★ 經營模式創新之探索性研究－以台積電為例	★ 開放原始碼平台型初創公司演進中經營模式結構之探索性研究：以Canonical公司為例
★ 演進中經營模式結構之紮根研究：後深次微米時代TSMC與UMC之比較分析	★ 雙基因平衡企業系統：Google演進中經營模式結構之探索性研究
★ 產品/服務發展及經營模式設計之研究─以系統觀點論華碩 Eee PC 之發展	★ 中小企業型ERP 軟體公司經營模式結構之探索性研究：Compiere Inc.與SAP B1 事業單位之比較分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2024-6-24以後開放)

摘要(中)

視覺化創意發想互動式平台之研究幫助生意人在資源有限的情況下建立與其他生意人交流之共同語言，並提供視覺化解決方案幫助生意人在商場上成功獲利。該視覺化解決方案為因果脈絡圖的沙盤推演。
在此平台上使用者可以運用可操作性經營元件資料庫自行操縱因果脈絡圖元件關連：釐清各種經營要素間背後的驅動關係，結合自身經驗從中尋找合適的經營模式發展方向。該平台還整合了過去平台使用者的創業經驗使創新者或創業者們能更輕易地自行發想並建構經營模式之因果脈絡圖，也能進行線上的腦力激盪，利用此平台蒐集的群眾智慧所創造出的經營元件要素建立共同語言供各領域的創新者或創業者們進行視覺化交流，與平台其他用戶討論出最適當的經營模式活動連結。
本研究也利用了紮根理論質性資料分析方法來補足十大經營元件中科技元件之認知，讓創新者或創業們在規劃因果脈絡圖時能提供後續更多科技元件使用上的思維。
如果生意人有效利用此平台之可操作性的經營模式元件資料庫進行創新或設計經營模式，就能透過視覺化的解決方案幫助生意人思考下一步該如何前進才能使自身經營模式邁向成功。

摘要(英)

The study on the interactive idea generation platform with Visualization can help business people to establish a common language to communicate with other business people with limited resources. This platform also provides visualization solutions to help business people succeed in the market and profit. The visualization solution is a scenario planning of the cause and effect diagrams.
This study′s platform allows users to manipulate the components using a database of the Operable Business model component. It clarifies the driving relationship between the various operating factors and combines our experience to find the appropriate business model development direction. The platform also integrates the entrepreneurial expertise of past platform users to make it easier for innovators or entrepreneurs to develop and construct their cause and effect diagrams of business models. They can also do online brainstorming by using the experience of the public to collect data from the past, and a common language creates visual communication among innovators or entrepreneurs in various fields. They communicate with other users to find the most appropriate business model activity link.
This study also uses the qualitative data analysis method of grounded theory to complement the knowledge of technological components in the top ten business model components. It provides further ideas on the use of technology components when planning their cause and effect diagrams.
Business people use the platform′s operable business model components database to innovate or design business models. In that case, the visual solutions will help them think about the next step forward to make their business models successful.

關鍵字(中)

★ 經營模式
★ 視覺化聚焦
★ 可操作性
★ 因果脈絡圖
★ 團體腦力激盪

關鍵字(英)

★ business model
★ visualization focus
★ operability
★ cause and effect diagram
★ group of brainstorming

論文目次

摘要 i
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 4
1.3 研究重要性 6
1.3.1 實務重要性 6
1.3.2 學術重要性 8
1.4 論文架構 9
第二章文獻探討 11
2.1 經營模式之定義 11
2.2 經營模式十大元件 13
2.3 未來科技演變的十二種模式 25
2.4 認知圖與因果脈絡圖 30
2.4.1 經濟部技術處學界科專創新能耐要素檢核手冊 30
2.4.2 認知圖與因果脈絡圖應用於視覺化經營模式創新之重要性 32
2.4.3 以特徵分析識別經營模式結構之核心元件 34
2.5 使用者介面與使用者體驗 36
2.5.1 非同步載入 37
第三章視覺化創意發想互動式平台核心建構思維 40
3.1 個人釐清思維以及團體聚焦腦力激盪 40
3.1.1 個人釐清思維觀點模擬 41
3.1.2 團體聚焦腦力激盪觀點模擬 45
3.2 可操作性經營元件資料庫 50
3.3 非同步視覺化雙向互動式平台 51
第四章深化科技元件初探 53
4.1 科技的影響力 53
4.2 質性研究方法：紮根理論 56
4.2.1 紮根理論研究方法 56
4.2.2 紮根理論中的特徵分析 57
4.2.3 紮根理論編碼程序 61
4.3 科技元件初探結果 64
4.3.1 科技元件之無因果指示詞編碼 64
4.3.2 科技元件之有因果指示詞編碼 67
第五章視覺化創意發想互動式平台之實作 71
5.1 視覺化創意發想互動式平台之設計理念 71
5.2 視覺化創意發想互動式平台之開發環境與系統設計 72
5.2.1 開發環境建立 72
5.2.2 資料庫設計 74
5.2.3 使用案例圖 75
5.3 視覺化創意發想互動式平台之功能模組 78
5.3.1 創業者需求之功能設計 78
5.3.2 系統模組設計與功能描述 80
5.4 視覺化創意發想互動式平台之初步驗證 91
5.4.1 個人釐清思維以及團體腦力激盪初步驗證 91
5.4.2 可操作性經營元件資料庫初步驗證 98
第六章結論 101
6.1 研究成果 101
6.2 管理意涵 103
6.3 研究限制 105
6.4 未來研究方向：實作事前分析 106
參考文獻 107

參考文獻

中文文獻
[1] 林裕得 (2008)。雙基因平衡企業系統：Google演進中經營模式結構之探索性研究 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
[2] 張雅晴 (2020)。經營模式認知圖像化平台之試作及前導研究 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
[3] 張博閔 (2008)。演進中經營模式結構之紮根研究：後深次微米時代TSMC與UMC之比較分析 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
[4] 陳銑鈞 (2006)。經營模式元件及其間關係之紮根研究 (碩士論文)。國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
[5] 蔡明宏、林裕得、蘇雅惠、連文雄 (出版中，2022)。活動互賴觀點之經營模式創新歷程的札根研究－以 Google 1996–2008 為展示實例。管理評論。
[6] Anselam Strausss & Juliet Corbin (2001)。質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法 (吳芝儀、廖梅花譯)。濤石。(原著出版年：1997)
[7] Kevin Kelly (2016)。必然 (嚴麗娟譯)。貓頭鷹。(原著出版年：2016)
[8] Walter Isaacson (2015)。創新者們 (齊若蘭、陳以禮譯)。遠見天下。(原著出版年：2014)

外文文獻
[1] Afuah, A. (2004). Does a focal firm′s technology entry timing depend on the impact of the technology on co-opetitors? Research Policy, 33(8), 1231-1246.
[2] Alsswey, A. and H. Al-Samarraie (2020). Elderly users’ acceptance of mHealth user interface (UI) design-based culture: the moderator role of age. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 14(1), 49-59.
[3] Ansari, F., et al. (2018). Rethinking human-machine learning in industry 4.0: how does the paradigm shift treat the role of human learning?. Procedia manufacturing, 23, 117-122.
[4] Bellman, R., et al. (1957). On the construction of a multi-stage, multi-person business game. Operations Research, 5(4), 469-503.
[5] Berger, P. L. and H. Kellner (1981). Sociology reinterpreted: An essay on method and vocation. Anchor Books.
[6] Birkinshaw, J., & Goddard, J. (2009). What is your management model?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 81-90.
[7] Bocken, N., et al. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 67-81.
[8] Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
[9] Carlo, J. L., et al. (2011). Internet computing as a disruptive information technology innovation: the role of strong order effects 1. Information systems journal, 21(1), 91-122.
[10] Casadesus-Masanell, R. and J. E. Ricart (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 195-215.
[11] Cong, W. (2014). USABILITY EVALUATION OF PUBLIC WEB MAPPING SITES. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 2(4), 285-289.
[12] Cossette, P. 2002. Analysing the thinking of FW Taylor using cognitive mapping. Management Decision, 40(2): 168-182.
[13] Cutcliffe, J. R. (2000). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of advanced nursing, 31(6), 1476-1484.
[14] Cybulski, P. and T. Horbiński (2020). User experience in using graphical user interfaces of web maps. Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 412.
[15] DaSilva, C. M. and P. Trkman (2014). Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Planning, 47(6), 379-389.
[16] Ford, D., et al. (2003). Managing Business Relationships. Chichester. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/947226.947237
[17] Ford, D. and S. Mouzas (2010). Networking under uncertainty: Concepts and research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(6), 956-962.
[18] Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239.
[19] George, G. and A. J. Bock (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(1), 83-111.
[20] Ghaziani, A. and M. J. Ventresca (2005). Keywords and cultural change: Frame analysis of business model public talk, 1975–2000. Sociological Forum, 20, 523- 559.
[21] Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
[22] Hamel, G. (2002). Leading the Revolution: How to Thrive in Turbulent Times by Making Innovation a Way of Life. Plume.
[23] Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harper.
[24] Jacelon, C. S. and K. K. O’Dell (2005). Case and grounded theory as qualitative research methods. Urologic nursing, 25(1), 49-52.
[25] Kelly, K. (1992). Out Of Control: The New Biology Of Machines, Social Systems, And The Economic World. Basic Books.
[26] Kelly, K. (2010). What Technology Wants. Viking.
[27] Li, G. P., et al. (2017). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Technological Drivers, Impacts and Coping Methods. Chinese Geographical Science, 27(4), 626-637.
[28] Lund, M. and C. Nielsen (2014). The evolution of network-based business models illustrated through the case study of an entrepreneurship project. Journal of Business Models, 2(1), 105-121.
[29] Martins, L. L., et al. (2015). Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1), 99-117.
[30] Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books.
[31] Nuvolari, A. (2019). Understanding successive industrial revolutions: A development block approach. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 32, 33-44.
[32] Osterwalder, A., et al. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.
[33] Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
[34] Roome, N. and C. Louche (2016). Journeying toward business models for sustainability: A conceptual model found inside the black box of organisational transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 11-35.
[35] Siggelkow, N. (2002). Evolution toward fit. Administrative science quarterly, 47(1), 125-159.
[36] Sinfield, J. V., et al. (2012). How to identify new business models. MIT Sloan management review, 53(2), 85-90.
[37] Stern, P. N., et al. (1982). The nurse as grounded theorist: History, process, and uses. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7(142), 200-215.
[38] Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. APA PsycInfo.
[39] Tikkanen, H., et al. (2005). Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Management decision, 43(6), 789-809.
[40] Turner, B. A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: one way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Quality and quantity, 15(3), 225-247.
[41] Wirtz, B. W., et al. (2016). Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 36-54.
[42] Zott, C., et al. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of management, 37(4), 1019-1042.

網路資源
[1] 莊清瑋 (2021，4月21日)。第四次工業革命正在發生5G和AIoT扮關鍵要角。https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&id=607628
[2] They Make Design (2019, Feb 25). What is UI design? What is UX design? UI vs UX: What’s the difference. https://uxplanet.org/what-is-ui-vs-ux-design-and-the-difference-d9113f6612de
[3] Philip Roberts (2014, Oct 9). What the heck is the event loop anyway?. https://2014.jsconf.eu/speakers/philip-roberts-what-the-heck-is-the-event-loop-anyway.html
[4] Tom Friedman (2017, Aug 1). Closing Lunch: In Conversation with Tom Friedman. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmMPpq9PwGg
[5] Sivaramakirshnan Somasegar and Daniel Li (2016, Nov 29). Every company is a technology company, but most don’t behave like one. https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/29/every-company-is-a-technology-company-but-most-dont-behave-like-one/
[6] shin ken (2021, Jan 9). My Event Loop Note. https://metal852794613.medium.com/%E6%88%91%E7%9A%84event-loop%E7%AD%86%E8%A8%98-bf096050b976

指導教授

蘇雅惠(Yea-Huey Su)

審核日期

2022-7-19

推文