摘要(英) |
Refrigerants HFC-134a and HFC-245fa are common refrigerants on the market at present. Both belong to the third generation refrigerants without chloride ions, which will not destroy the ozone layer. The difference between the two is the difference in working pressure. HFC-134a is a high-pressure refrigerant, so it is used in low-temperature places, such as freezers, car air conditioners, dehumidifiers or ice water machines and other refrigeration equipment. HFC-245fa is a lower pressure refrigerant, so it is used in higher temperature places, and is most commonly used in organic Rankine cycle(ORC)systems to recover industrial waste heat and improve energy efficiency.
In this study, the flow boiling performance of two refrigerants in a chevron plate heat exchanger was compared. The two refrigerants were used as working fluids to test a plate heat exchanger with a mountain-shaped pattern angle of 65°. The experiment condition was temperature at 30°C, and the refrigerant flow rates were respectively For G=10, 20, 30 to 40 (kg/m2s), a total of four flow rates were divided into flow boiling experiments, and the heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops were compared.
In general, HFC-134a has better heat transfer performance than HFC-245fa, so the former can be used in a wider range, but due to its high working pressure, if it is to be used, it must be ensured that the system can withstand his high work pressure. |
參考文獻 |
[1] Molina, M. J., and Rowland, F. S., 1974, "Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone," Nature, 249(5460), p. 810.
[2] B. Sundén, and R. M. Manglik, 2007, "Plate heat exchangers: design, applications and performance". Boston: Wit Press.
[3] A. Laval. "How gasketed plate heat exchangers work." Retrieved from https://www.alfalaval.com/microsites/gphe/tools/how-gphes-work/.
[4] Thonon, B., Feldman, A., Margat, L., and Marvillet, C., 1997, "Transition from nucleate boiling to convective boiling in compact heat exchangers," International Journal of Refrigeration, 20(8), pp. 592-597.
[5] Hsieh, Y. Y., Chiang, L. J., and Lin, T. F., 2002, "Subcooled flow boiling heat transfer of R-134a and the associated bubble characteristics in a vertical plate heat exchanger," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 45(9), pp. 1791-1806.
[6] Hyun Jin Kim, Leon Liebenberg & Anthony M. Jacobi, 2019, "Flow visualization of two-phase R-245fa at low mass flux in a plate heat exchanger near the micro-macroscale transition, " Science and Technology for the Built Environment, Volume 25, pp. 1292-1301
[7] D. Lee, D. Kim, S. Park, J. Lim, Y. Kim, 2017, "Evaporation heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop of R-1233zd(E) in a brazed plate heat exchanger, "Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 130, pp. 1147-1155
[8] 陳冠廷, "Experimental study on flow boiling and condensation heat transfer of refrigerants R-134a and R-1234yf in plate heat exchangers", 國立中央大學, 碩士, 2019年6月
[9] Ji Zhang, Martin Ryhl Kærn, Torben Ommen, Brian Elmegaard, Fredrik Haglind, "Condensation heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of R134a, R1234ze(E), R245fa and R1233zd(E) in a plate heat exchanger," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer ,Volume 128, pp. 136-149
[10] D. Briggs, and E. H. Young. "Modified Wilson plot techniques for obtaining heat transfer correlations for shell and tube heat exchangers", Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, pp. 35-45.1969
[11] R. K. Shah. "Assessment of modified Wilson plot techniques for obtaining heat exchanger design data", International Heat Transfer Conference Digital Library, pp. 51-56.1990 |