建立教室內具適性化之教學支援與學習輔助的師生即時互動系統

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：85

、訪客IP：3.145.79.65

姓名

吳國彰(Kuo-Chang Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

建立教室內具適性化之教學支援與學習輔助的師生即時互動系統
(Building interaction system in the classroom: provide teaching supporting and learning assisting.)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

雖然目前網路教學及虛擬教室等新興教育方式十分的盛行，但反觀我們自己的經驗、週遭的親朋好友及國民教育等的。教室裡的教育仍為不可取代的，因為根據學者統計研究，分析出教室裡最主要的獨特因素仍為具有社群活動及面對面的視覺、聽覺差異。
在回歸到教室裡的教育研究，有許多的學者討論教室裡的學習問題，發現師生溝通與互動不良，往往是導致教室內的學習效率不佳的最大因素。因此在伴隨著電腦科技的進步下，已有許多研究在設計並實驗證實了feedback system（回饋、自評系統）及interaction system（互動系統）的效果，但我們比較及實用分析這些研究，發現仍有不足的地方。因此我們整合了研讀後的想法及實驗過後取得的數據，補足了回饋系統其中自評狀態的項目，以及學生自評之餘能得到相對應的輔助，如補充教材及電子筆記的制作，並讓老師在台上看到這些學生的反應資訊時，提供適時的支援並引導使用有效的學習活動，解決老師在台上面對這些資訊時的負擔。
當我們的系統與機制完成後，經過實驗（中央大學，大一計概課的學生，共16名學生，為期6次的試用），將其結果和未使用系統與機制做比較分析，證實我們有效的透過自評的細化及分析讓老師很清楚明白的知道學生的狀況，包括了情緒面和知識面，而支援系統能適時有效的幫助老師的教學，提供老師可以參考的建議，並有系統可以做互動的行為，學生也對於上課使用此系統做為輔助來建立電子筆記，和做互動交流表示贊同，以及對反應後得到的幫助和感受到老師給的關懷程度都有正面的回應。

摘要(英)

Although Distance Learning and Virtual Classroom are hot and new learning ways that attract a lot of students, learning in classroom is still more common and popular, moreover, learning in classroom has not been replaced by other methods outside of classroom because it is more interactive and social.
In recent years, many scholars have been researching educational problems occurred in the classroom, and it is known that the main cause of low learning efficiency is usually about bad communication and interaction between student and teacher. As the progression of computer science, the ability of feedback system and interaction system was designed and proved by in many studies; however, after surveying researches in this realm, we found that there might be some insufficiencies waiting to be improved. Thus, we combined existed results with our ideas and tried to fix defects of reactive circumstance and data analysis in feedback system, and made this system, with duly supports and functions leading to effective learning, useful for teachers to solve their problems of inability to deal with feedbacks on stage.
When we completed our system and mechanism, we have proved that the subdivision and analysis of feedback enable teachers to know their students’ situations, including their emotions, through experiments. And, it is not only that the support system helps teacher on teaching- students admired this system as an assisting tool of responding and taking notes. Furthermore, they specifically gave positive opinions about the feeling of being concerned after their response.

關鍵字(中)

★ 互動系統
★ 適性化教育
★ 教室內

關鍵字(英)

★ adaptive instruction
★ interaction system
★ in the classroom

論文目次

中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖片目錄 VII
表格目錄 VIII
第1章　緒論 1
1-1、研究背景 1
1-2、研究動機 3
1-3、研究目標 5
1-4、問題與對策 6
1-5、論文架構 9
第2章相關研究與分析 10
2-1、特色介紹 10
2-2、做法比較與分析 15
第3章適性化的設計與機制 18
3-1、規劃藍圖 18
3-2、互動與溝通 19
3-2-1、學生的回饋系統（feedback system） 19
3-2-2、老師的互動建議機制 22
3-3、適性化的功能 25
3-3-1、老師端的教學支援 27
3-3-2、學生端的學習輔助 28
3-4、系統架構 29
3-5、功能模組 30
第4章在教室內的實作與應用 32
4-1、劇本（Scenario） 32
4-2、環境與平台 34
4-3、運作流程 35
4-4、系統畫面 39
4-4-1、老師端的界面 39
4-4-2、學生端的界面 41
第5章實驗結果與分析 44
5-1、實驗背景 44
5-2、實驗目的 45
5-3、實驗結果與分析 46
5-3-1、互動與溝通 46
5-3-2、適性化的感受 49
5-3-3、學業成積的影響 52
第6章結論 55
參考文獻 57

參考文獻

中文部份
[1] 吳明隆. (2003). 班級經營與教學新趨勢. 五南圖書出版社.
[2] 林寶山. (2003). 實用教學原理. 台北：心理出版社.
[3] 黃智偉. (2001). Using EduClick as a Remote Interactive Evaluation System. 國立中央大學, 網路學習科技研究所, 碩士畢業論文.
英文部份
[4] Airasian, P. W. (1994). Classroom assessment (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[5] Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., & Vogel, D. (1997). Using information technology to add value to management education. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 6, 1310-1333.
[6] Althaus, S. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication in the University Classroom: An Experiment with On-line Discussions. American Political Science Association. Communication Education, 46(3), 158-174.
[7] Anderson, R. J., Anderson, R., Vandegrift, T., Wolfman, S., & Yasuhara, K. (2003). Promoting Interaction in Large Classes with Computer-mediated Feedback. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Bergen, pp. 119-123.
[8] Anderson, R., Chung, O., K. M. Davis, Davis, P., Prince, C., Razmov, V., & Simon, B. (2006). Classroom Presenter- A Classroom Interaction System for Active and Collaborative Learning. Workshop on the Impact of Pen-based Technology on Education.
[9] Anderson, W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman. P. 103.
[10] Atkinson, R. (1968). Computerized instruction and the learning process. American Psychologist, 23:225-239.
[11] Atkinson, R. (1976). Adaptive instructional systems: some attempts to optimize the learning process. In D. Klahr, Cognition and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, (pp. 81-108).
[12] Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education 41, 77-86.
[13] Boyle, J., Nicol, D., Hamilton, B., & Dempster, B. (2002). Experience with Classroom Feedback Systems to Enable Socratic Dialogue in Large Engineering Classes. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, the IEE, Savoy Place, London WC2R 0BL, UK.
[14] Boyle, J. T., & Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Association for Learning Technology Journal. 11, 43-57.
[15] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking R. R., Donovan, M. S., & Pellegrino J. W. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[16] Brusilovsky, P., & Pesin, L. (1995). Visual annotation of links in adaptive hypermedia. Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, Edited by I. Katz et al. Denver, May 7-11, 1995, pp. 222-223.
[17] Brusilovsky, P., Bra, P. D., Eklund, J., Hall, W., & Kobsa, A. (1999). Adaptive hypermedia (panel): purpose, methods, and techniques. Proceedings of the tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and hypermedia: returning to our diverse roots. p.199-200, February 21-25, 1999, Darmstadt, Germany.
[18] Budin, H. (1999). The computer enters the classroom. Teachers College Record, 100, 656-669.
[19] Draper, S., Cargill J., & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. vol. 18, no.1, pp. 13-23.
[20] Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A Classroom Communication System for Active Learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 7, 3-47.
[21] eclass. (2000~). Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/fce/eclass/index.html
[22] Federico, P. A. (1980). Adaptive instruction: trends and issues. In R. Snow, P.-A. Federico & W. Montague, Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol.1, Cognitive process analyses of aptitude (pp.1-26).
[23] Federico, P. A. (1999). Hypermedia environments and adaptive instruction. Computers in Human Behavior 15, 653-692.
[24] Fitch, J. L. (2004). Student Feedback in the College Classroom: A Technology Solution. Educational Technology Research and Development. ETR&D, vol. 52, no. 1, pp.71-81.
[25] Fujimoto, T. (2002). Literature research: Comparative research on online learning versus classroom learning. The Pennsylvania State University, EDPSY 421: Research project paper.
[26] Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73-90.
[27] Guthrie, R. W., & Carlin, A. (2004). Waking the Dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. New York, NY.
[28] iCampus. (1999~). Microsoft & MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). http://icampus.mit.edu/index.shtml
[29] ITS. (2004). ADDIE- Instructional Design Model. Instructional Technology Services.
[30] Jones, E. R. (1999). A comparison of an all web-based class to a traditional class. Paper presented at the 10thAnnual International Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Antonio, Texas.
[31] Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O., & Canny, J. (2005). Livenotes: A System for Cooperative and Augmented Note-Taking in Lectures. Conference on Human Factors in Computing System. ACM Press, pp. 531-540.
[32] Liu, T. C., Liang, J. K., Wang, H. Y., Chan, T. W., & Wei, L. H. (2003). Embedding EduClick in Classroom to Enhance Interaction. Proceedings of International Conference on Computer in Education. Hong Kong, China, pp. 117-125.
[33] McGourty, J. (2000). Using Multisource Feedback in the Classroom: A Computer-Based Approach. IEEE Transactions on education, Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 120–124, May 2000.
[34] McGourty, J., & K. De Meuse. (2000). The Team Developer: A Skill Building and Feedback Program. J. Wiley and Company, New York (2000).
[35] Pelton, T. M., & Pelton, L. F. (2003). The Classroom Interaction System (CIS): Neo-Slates for the Classroom. W. –M. Roth (ed.), CONNECTIONS. (pp. 101-110).
[36] Ratto, M., Shapiro, R. B., Mihn Troung, T., & Griswold, W. G. (2003). The ActiveClass Project: Experiments in encouraging classroom participation. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL). S. 477-486.
[37] Suppes, P., & Morningstar, M. (1968). Computer-assisted instruction. Science 166:343-350.
[38] Truong, K. N., & Abowd, G.D. (1999). StuPad: Integrating Student Notes with Class Lectures. Extended Abstracts of CHI, ACM Press, pp. 208-209.
[39] Vogel, D., & Klassen, J. (2001). Technology-supported learning status, issues and trend. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 104-114.
[40] Vye, N. J., Schwartz, J. D., Bransford, B. J. and Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, G. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. Graesser, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

指導教授

陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2006-7-20

推文