你傾訴越多我越喜歡？Instagram上的擬社會互動與感知真實性－探討網紅類型與自我揭露的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：18.116.90.141

姓名

陳韻方(Yun-Fang Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

你傾訴越多我越喜歡？Instagram上的擬社會互動與感知真實性－探討網紅類型與自我揭露的影響

相關論文

★ 工作滿足、領導行為、工作特性與人格特質對離職傾向之探討-以超大型會計師事務所審計人員為例	★ 以組織診斷模型診斷企業組織層級架構－以某公司為例
★ 科技產業組織診斷與分析之研究-以Q公司為例	★ 製造業推行六標準差的成功關鍵因素探討
★ 高職辦理輪調式建教班對學校經營績效之評估－以北區私立高職為例	★ 本國商業銀行經營績效之探討-資料包絡分析法之應用
★ 台灣中小企業創業動機與創業績效關係之研究	★ 員工當責與真誠領導之關聯性-以心理賦權與團隊凝聚力為中介變數
★ 以個人與環境適配為關鍵中介探討特定品牌領導對員工品牌權益之影響	★ 道德感讓你買更多綠色產品？從消費者產品知覺價格及品質角度來探討—以綠色程度做調節
★ 線上品牌社群該如何提升與粉絲的價值共創？以線上品牌社群活動與線下實體活動為中介變數探討	★ 農業創新服務模式之商業模式研究-以蜂巢數據科技有限公司為例
★ 燈⽕闌珊處的求職旅程：如何透過⼯作價值觀、雇主吸引⼒、激勵因⼦為求職者點亮路徑	★ 購買意願的幕後功臣：Instagram大小網紅的自我揭露對消費者自我一致性與感知真實的影響
★ 中小企業之組織診斷與分析－以A公司為例	★ 高科技產業人力資源發展與組織績效之研究－以新竹科學園區為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

網紅行銷市場的趨勢與成長，是企業品牌在行銷產品時越來越重視的宣傳管道之一。消費者很重視網紅的生活態度與價值觀，對於網紅代言也更加重視客觀與真實感。對於網紅而言，究竟該如何塑造社群中的獨特風格並保有類似朋友間的真實性，是讓網紅行銷能發揮最佳廣告效果的一大關鍵，本研究試圖回答「網紅類型與自我揭露程度的差異，是否會影響消費者與網紅間的擬社會互動與感知真實性，進而影響網紅代言的廣告效果」。
本研究分為三個部份進行探討，第一部份探討網紅與消費者的擬社會互動與感知真實性是否會對於廣告效果產生影響；第二部份探討網紅類型（微型網紅與大型網紅）的差異對於對擬社會互動、感知真實性與廣告效果之調節效果；第三部份探討自我揭露程度（自我揭露程度高與自我揭露程度低）的差異對於對擬社會互動、感知真實性與廣告效果之調節效果。
本研究採用實驗法，2網紅類型（大型網紅vs.微型網紅）x 2自我揭露程度（自我揭露程度高 vs, 自我揭露程度低）之組間實驗設計。採用結構方程模型進行分析，以網路問卷方式收集資料。總計回收770份有效問卷，問卷回收後利用統計軟體SPSS 21、AMOS 21進行資料分析與假設驗證。本研究有以下發現：（1）擬社會互動對於感知真實性有正向影響（2）感知真實性對於廣告效果有正向影響（3）網紅類型對於擬社會互動與感知真實性間有調節效果（4）自我揭露對於擬社會互動與感知真實性間有調節效果（5）自我揭露對於感知真實性與產品態度、購買意願間有調節效果。
本研究之研究貢獻分為四個部分，首先，本研究由全面性觀點切入結合現今網紅行銷的趨勢加以探討，補足過往研究多由單一面向切入之缺口，給予企業主與網紅實務上之見解與建議；第二，證實社群媒體能有效促進網紅與消費者間的擬社會互動與感知真實性，並且對廣告效果產生正向影響；第三，將網紅類型作為調節變數，證實微型網紅相較於大型網紅更能有效促進擬社會互動與感知真實性，填補過去針對網紅類型如何影響消費者心理、態度與行為之研究缺口；第四，將自我揭露作為調節變數，證實自我揭露程度越高就越能與消費者產生更高的擬社會互動與感知真實性，進而提升網紅代言時消費者對於產品態度與購買意願的正向影響，不僅拓展社會滲透理論與社會交換理論於網紅行銷的研究，也探討自我揭露深度的影響，發展與過往不同的研究視角。

摘要(英)

In the realm of product marketing, influencer marketing has emerged as a prominent channel that brands increasingly value. Consumers place great importance on influencers′ lifestyles and values, seeking objectivity and authenticity in influencer endorsements. For influencers, crafting an unique style within their community while maintaining a sense of genuine friendship is a key factor in maximizing the effectiveness of influencer marketing. This research aims to address the question, "Does the difference in influencer types and self-disclosure levels impact parasocial interaction and perceived authenticity between consumers and influencers, subsequently affecting the advertising effectiveness of influencer endorsements?"
The study is divided into three parts: the first part investigates the influence of parasocial interaction and perceived authenticity on advertising effectiveness; the second part examines how influencer types (micro-influencers and macro-influencers) moderate the relationship between parasocial interaction, perceived authenticity, and advertising effectiveness, and the third part explores how self-disclosure levels (high and low) moderate the same relationships.
2 (Influencer Type: Macro-influencer vs. Micro-influencer) x 2 (Self-Disclosure Level: High vs. Low) between-group experimental design is employed in this study. Structural equation modeling is used for data analysis, and data are collected through online surveys. A total of 770 valid responses are collected and analyzed using SPSS 21 and AMOS 21 for hypothesis testing.
The findings of this study are as follows: (1) Parasocial interaction positively influences perceived authenticity. (2) Perceived authenticity positively affects advertising effectiveness. (3) Influencer type moderates the relationship between parasocial interaction and perceived authenticity. (4) Self-disclosure moderates the relationship between parasocial interaction and perceived authenticity. (5) Self-disclosure moderates the relationship between perceived authenticity and product attitudes as well as purchase intention.
The research contributions can be summarized in four aspects. Firstly, the study fills a gap in previous research by adopting a comprehensive perspective and addressing the current trends in influencer marketing, providing practical insights and recommendations for both brands and influencers. Secondly, it confirms that social media effectively facilitates parasocial interaction and perceived authenticity between influencers and consumers, positively impacting advertising effectiveness. Thirdly, by considering influencer type as a moderating variable, the research demonstrates that micro-influencers are more effective in promoting parasocial interaction and perceived authenticity, bridging the gap in understanding how influencer types influence consumer psychology, attitudes, and behaviors. Lastly, by examining self-disclosure as a moderating variable, the study confirms that higher levels of self-disclosure lead to stronger parasocial interaction and perceived authenticity with consumers, subsequently enhancing the positive impact of influencer endorsements on consumer product attitudes and purchase intentions. This not only expands the application of social penetration theory and social exchange theory in influencer marketing research but also explores the impact of different levels of self-disclosure, offering a novel perspective compared to previous studies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 網紅代言
★ 網紅類型
★ 自我揭露
★ 擬社會互動
★ 感知真實性
★ 廣告態度
★ 產品態度
★ 購買意願

關鍵字(英)

★ influencer endorsements
★ influencer type
★ self-disclosure
★ parasocial interaction
★ perceived authenticity
★ advertising attitudes
★ product attitudes
★ purchase intention

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract iii
致謝辭 v
目錄 vi
圖目錄 x
表目錄 xi
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究動機與預期貢獻 7
二、文獻探討與研究假設 10
2-1 社群媒體與網紅行銷 10
2-1-1 網紅定義 10
2-1-2 網紅代言 11
2-2 擬社會互動 12
2-2-1 擬社會互動定義 12
2-2-2 擬社會互動相關研究 13
2-3 感知真實性 15
2-3-1 感知真實性之定義 15
2-4 廣告效果 17
2-4-1 廣告態度 17
2-4-2 產品態度 18
2-4-3 購買意願 18
2-5 感知真實性與廣告效果之相關研究 19
2-6 網紅類型與相關研究 21
2-6-1 網紅類型調節作用 24
2-7 自我揭露 26
2-7-1 自我揭露定義及相關研究 26
2-7-2 自我揭露理論 27
2-7-3 自我揭露於社群媒體之相關研究 29
2-7-4 自我揭露調節作用 32
2-8 研究架構圖 35
三、研究方法 36
3-1 研究對象與樣本發放 36
3-2 實驗法 37
3-2-1 實驗設計 37
3-2-1-1 網紅挑選與設計 37
3-2-1-2 產品挑選與設計 38
3-2-1-3 自變項定義與操弄 40
3-2-1-3-1 網紅類型(大型網紅 vs. 微型網紅) 40
3-2-1-3-2自我揭露程度(自我揭露程度高 vs. 自我揭露程度低) 41
3-3 問卷設計與變項衡量 45
3-3-1 自我揭露 45
3-3-2 感知真實性 47
3-3-3 擬社會互動 48
3-3-4 廣告態度 49
3-3-5 產品態度 50
3-3-6 購買意願 50
3-3-7 控制變數 51
3-4 實驗測量 52
3-4-1自我揭露貼文前測 52
3-4-2 實驗程序 53
3-5 分析方法 54
3-5-1 敘述性統計與相關分析 55
3-5-2 因素分析 55
3-5-3 信度分析 56
3-5-4 效度分析 56
3-5-5 結構方程模型 56
四、資料分析與研究結果 58
4-1 樣本結構與敘述性統計分析 58
4-2 正式實驗之操弄性檢定 61
4-2-1 自我揭露程度之操弄檢定 61
4-2-2 網紅類型之操弄檢定 61
4-3 相關分析 62
4-4 信度分析 64
4-5 建構效度分析 64
4-5-1 收斂效度 65
4-5-2 區別效度 66
4-6 共同方法變異分析 67
4-7 結構方程模型 68
4-7-1 結構模式適配度 68
4-7-2 路徑係數分析 70
4-7-3 多群組分析 74
4-7-3-1 網紅類型調節效果評估 74
4-7-3-2 自我揭露調節效果評估 77
4-7-3-3 網紅類型與自我揭露調節效果評估 79
4-8 中介與調節效果分析 81
五、結論與建議 84
5-1研究結果與研究意涵 85
5-1-1 擬社會互動與感知真實性對於廣告效果的影響 85
5-1-1-1 擬社會互動與感知真實性 85
5-1-1-2 感知真實性與廣告效果 86
5-1-2 網紅類型的調節效果 86
5-1-2-1 網紅類型對於擬社會互動與感知真實性之間的調節效果 86
5-1-2-2 網紅類型對於感知真實性與廣告效果之間的調節效果 87
5-1-3 自我揭露的調節效果 89
5-1-3-1 自我揭露對於擬社會互動與感知真實性之間的調節效果 89
5-1-3-2 自我揭露對於感知真實性與廣告效果之間的調節效果 90
5-1-4 網紅類型與自我揭露調節效果 91
5-2 研究貢獻 92
5-3 實務意涵 95
5-4 研究限制與後續研究建議 97
參考文獻 99
附錄－研究問卷 117

圖目錄
圖1、網紅圖片 38
圖2、產品圖片 40
圖3、產品貼文設計 40
圖4、網紅Instagram主頁面設計 41
圖5、自我揭露程度高之貼文 44
圖6、自我揭露程度低之貼文 45
圖7、結構模式路徑估計圖 71
圖8、依變項為購買意願之中介分析圖 81
圖9、交互作用圖 79

表目錄
表1、產品文案 39
表2、自我揭露之文案 42
表3、「自我揭露」之操作性定義及衡量題項 46
表4、「感知真實性」之操作性定義及衡量題項 47
表5、「擬社會互動」之操作性定義及衡量題項 48
表6、「廣告態度」之操作性定義及衡量題項 49
表7、「產品態度」之操作性定義及衡量題項 50
表8、「購買意願」之操作性定義及衡量題項 51
表9、前測貼文 53
表10、網紅介紹之文字說明 54
表11、各實驗組之有效樣本分佈表 58
表12、有效樣本之基本資料分析 59
表13、變數之敘述性統計與相關係數表 63
表14、變數量表之Cronbach’s α係數 64
表15、變數之收斂效度分析 65
表16、區別效度分析矩陣 67
表17、整體模式適配度指標檢定表 69
表18、結構模式直接路徑估計表 72
表19、網紅類型調節效果於自我揭露高情境中之多群組比較表 75
表20、網紅類型調節效果於自我揭露低情境中之多群組比較表 76
表21、自我揭露調節效果於大型網紅情境中之多群組比較表 78
表22、自我揭露調節效果於微型網紅情境中之多群組比較表 78
表23、大型網紅x自我揭露高與微型網紅x自我揭露低之多群組比較表 80
表24、大型網紅x自我揭露低與微型網紅x自我揭露高之多群組比較表 80
表25、中介調節分析表 83
表26、研究假設驗證 84

參考文獻

一、英文文獻
Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers’ fashion brands and# OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86-100.
Abidin, C., & Ots, M. (2016). Influencers tell all? Unravelling Authenticity and Credibility in a Brand Scandal. In Blurring the lines: Market-driven and democracy-driven freedom of expression (pp. 153-161). Nordicom.
Abidin, C., & Thompson, E. C. (2012). Buymylife. com: Cyber-femininities and commercial intimacy in blogshops. Women′s Studies International Forum, 35(6), 467-477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2012.10.005
Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior. Englewood cliffs.
Allen, K., & Mendick, H. (2013). Keeping it real? Social class, young people and ‘authenticity’in reality TV. Sociology, 47(3), 460-476.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79-95.
Attrill, A., & Jalil, R. (2011). Revealing only the superficial me: Exploring categorical self-disclosure online. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1634-1642.
Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557-569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
Audrezet, A., De Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557-569.
Auter, P. J. (1992). Psychometric: TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36(2), 173-181.
Auter, P. J., & Moore, R. L. (1993). Buying from a friend: A content analysis of two teleshopping programs. Journalism Quarterly, 70(2), 425-436.
Baker, M. J., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 538-555.
Ballantine, P. W., & Martin, B. A. (2005). Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. ACR North American Advances, 32, 197-201.
Barry, T. E., & Howard, D. J. (1990). A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 9(2), 121-135.
Baruh, L., & Cemalcılar, Z. (2018). When more is more? The impact of breadth and depth of information disclosure on attributional confidence about and interpersonal attraction to a social network site profile owner. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(1), article 1.
Basil, D. Z., & Herr, P. M. (2006). Attitudinal balance and cause‐related marketing: An empirical application of balance theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 391-403.
Bateman, P. J., Pike, J. C., & Butler, B. S. (2011). To disclose or not: Publicness in social networking sites. Information Technology & People, 24(1), 78-100.
Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 815-832.
Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635-657.
Becker, M., Wiegand, N., & Reinartz, W. J. (2019). Does it pay to be real? Understanding authenticity in TV advertising. Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 24-50.
Beverland, M. (2006). The ‘real thing’: Branding authenticity in the luxury wine trade. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 251-258.
Beverland, M., Farrelly, F., & Quester, P. (2006). Brand-personal values fit and brand meanings: Exploring the role individual values play in ongoing brand loyalty in extreme sports subcultures. ACR North American Advances, 33, 21-28.
Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2010). The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838-856.
Beverland, M. B., Lindgreen, A., & Vink, M. W. (2008). Projecting authenticity through advertising: Consumer judgments of advertisers′ claims. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 5-15.
Bickart, B., Kim, S., Pai, S., & Brunel, F. (2015). How social media influencers build a brand following by sharing secrets. In Strong brands, strong relationships (pp. 172-184). Routledge.
Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
Boerman, S. C. (2020). The effects of the standardized Instagram disclosure for micro-and meso-influencers. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 199-207.
Bond, B. J. (2016). Following your “friend”: Social media and the strength of adolescents′ parasocial relationships with media personae. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11), 656-660.
Borges-Tiago, M. T., Santiago, J., & Tiago, F. (2023). Mega or macro social media influencers: Who endorses brands better? Journal of Business Research, 157, 113606.
Britt, R. K., Hayes, J. L., Britt, B. C., & Park, H. (2020). Too big to sell? A computational analysis of network and content characteristics among mega and micro beauty and fashion social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 111-118.
Brown, D., & Hayes, N. (2008). Influencer marketing. Routledge.
Brown, S., Kozinets, R. V., & Sherry Jr, J. F. (2003). Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 19-33.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469-479.
Carpenter, A., & Greene, K. (2015). Social penetration theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Carrigan, M., Magrizos, S., Lazell, J., & Kostopoulos, I. (2020). Fostering sustainability through technology-mediated interactions: Conviviality and reciprocity in the sharing economy. Information Technology & People, 33, 919-943. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2018-0474
Carter, D. (2016). Hustle and brand: The sociotechnical shaping of influence. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 205630511666630.
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. (2010). Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Washington, DC, USA.
Chen, Y. (2016). The rise of ‘micro-influencers’ on Instagram. Digiday. https://digiday.com/marketing/micro-influencers/
Cho, S. H. (2007). Effects of motivations and gender on adolescents′ self-disclosure in online chatting. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 339-345.
Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2007). Who is the celebrity in advertising? Understanding dimensions of celebrity images. The journal of popular Culture, 40(2), 304-324.
Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481-495.
Colliander, J., & Dahlén, M. (2011). Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media: Weighing publicity effectiveness of blogs versus online magazines. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 313-320.
Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
Cornelis, E., & Peter, P. C. (2017). The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images. Journal of Business Research, 77, 102-112.
Coursaris, C. K., Van Osch, W., & Kourganoff, C. (2018). Designing the Medium and the Message for Sponsorship Recognition on Social Media: The Interplay of Influencer Type, Disclosure Type, and Consumer Culture. Paper presented at the Sixteenth Annual Pre-ICIS Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, San Francisco.
Cozby, P. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: a literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2), 73-91.
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828.
Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Sage Publications, Inc.
DeVito, J. A., O′Rourke, S., & O′Neill, L. (2000). Human communication. Longman New York.
Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21-44.
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities′ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1-7.
Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’–credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432-1446.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 357-369.
Domingues Aguiar, T., & van Reijmersdal, E. (2018). Influencer Marketing. AmsterdamStichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Commerciële Communicatie, SWOCC.
Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web-Blog@ management. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 21-32.
Duffy, A., & Kang, H. Y. P. (2020). Follow me, I’m famous: travel bloggers’ self-mediated performances of everyday exoticism. Media, Culture & Society, 42(2), 172-190.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers.
Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261-277.
Evers, C. W. (2019). The gendered emotional labor of male professional ‘freesurfers’ digital media work. Sport in Society, 22(10), 1691-1706.
Fazio, R. H., & Petty, R. E. (2008). Attitudes: Their structure, function, and consequences. Psychology Press.
Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S., & LaGroue, J. (2018). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88-96.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92.
Frederick, E. L., Lim, C. H., Clavio, G., & Walsh, P. (2012). Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4), 481-502.
Fritz, K., Schoenmueller, V., & Bruhn, M. (2017). Authenticity in branding–exploring antecedents and consequences of brand authenticity. European Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 324-348.
Gardner, M. P. (1985). Does attitude toward the ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set? Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 192-198.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152-177.
Goffman, E. (1949). Presentation of self in everyday life. American journal of sociology, 55, 6-7.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
Griffiths, M. (2001). Sex on the Internet: Observations and implications for Internet sex addiction. Journal of Sex Research, 38(4), 333-342.
Guido, G., Peluso, A. M., & Moffa, V. (2011). Beardedness in advertising: Effects on endorsers′ credibility and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(01), 37-49.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate analysis. Englewood. In: Prentice hall international. London: Prentice Hall International.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hartmann, T. (2016). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 131-144). Routledge.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hearn, A., & Schoenhoff, S. (2015). From celebrity to influencer: Tracing the diffusion of celebrity value across the data stream. In A companion to celebrity (pp. 194-212). Wiley.
Herrando, C., & Martín‐De Hoyos, M. J. (2022). Influencer endorsement posts and their effects on advertising attitudes and purchase intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(6), 2288-2299.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.
Hosek, A. M., & Presley, R. (2018). College student perceptions of the (in) appropriateness and functions of teacher disclosure. College Teaching, 66(2), 63-72.
Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021). The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 327-375.
Huffaker, D. (2010). Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 593-617.
Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155-173.
Ilicic, J., & Webster, C. M. (2016). Being true to oneself: Investigating celebrity brand authenticity. Psychology & Marketing, 33(6), 410-420.
Iqani, M. (2019). Picturing luxury, producing value: The cultural labour of social media brand influencers in South Africa. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(2), 229-247.
Jamieson, L., & Ekerwald, H. (2000). Intimacy. Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. . Acta Sociologica, Cambridge/Oxford: Polity Press/Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. A. (2022). Influencer advertising on Instagram: product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 101-127.
Jensen Schau, H., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385-404.
Jerslev, A. (2016). Media times| in the time of the microcelebrity: celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5233-5251.
Jiang, L., John, L. K., Boghrati, R., & Kouchaki, M. (2022). Fostering perceptions of authenticity via sensitive self-disclosure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(4), 898.
Jiang, L. C., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure–intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 58-77.
Jin, S.-A. A., & Phua, J. (2014). Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 181-195.
Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. John Wiley.
Jourard, S. M., & Lasakow, P. (1958). Some factors in self-disclosure. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56(1), 91–98.
Jun, S., & Yi, J. (2020). What makes followers loyal? The role of influencer interactivity in building influencer brand equity. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(6), 803-814.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K.-K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
Kashian, N., Jang, J.-w., Shin, S. Y., Dai, Y., & Walther, J. B. (2017). Self-disclosure and liking in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 275-283.
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: the impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), 248-278.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Kennick, W. E. (1985). Art and inauthenticity. The Journal of Aesthetics and art Criticism, 44(1), 3-12.
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017). Self-branding,‘micro-celebrity’and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies, 8(2), 191-208.
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223-232.
Kim, H. (2022). Patient influencers’ promotion of prescription drugs on Instagram: Effects of illness disclosure on persuasion knowledge through narrative transportation. International Journal of Advertising, 41(8), 1541-1566.
Kim, J., Kim, J., & Collins, C. (2021). First impressions in 280 characters or less: sharing life on Twitter and the mediating role of social presence. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101596.
Kim, J., Klautke, H., & Serota, K. (2009). Effects of relational motivation and age on online self-disclosure: A content analysis of MySpace profile pages. Paper presented at the annual confer-ence of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2020). How does a celebrity make fans happy? Interaction between celebrities and fans in the social media context. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106419.
Kim, M., & Lee, M. (2017). Brand-related user-generated content on social media: the roles of source and sponsorship. Internet Research, 27(5), 1085-1103.
Kim, M., Song, D., & Jang, A. (2021). Consumer response toward native advertising on social media: The roles of source type and content type. Internet Research, 31(5), 1656-1676.
Kim, W. G., Ma, X., & Kim, D. J. (2006). Determinants of Chinese hotel customers’e-satisfaction and purchase intentions. Tourism Management, 27(5), 890-900.
Knoll, J., Schramm, H., Schallhorn, C., & Wynistorf, S. (2015). Good guy vs. bad guy: The influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising, 34(5), 720-743.
Ko, H.-C., & Wu, W.-N. (2017). Exploring the determinants of viewers′ loyalty toward beauty YouTubers: a parasocial interaction perspective. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology, New York.
Kowalczyk, C. M., & Pounders, K. R. (2016). Transforming celebrities through social media: the role of authenticity and emotional attachment. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(4), 345-356.
Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 109-116.
Lasaleta, J. D., & Loveland, K. E. (2019). What’s new is old again: Nostalgia and retro-styling in response to authenticity threats. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(2), 172-184.
Lee, E.-J., & Jang, J.-w. (2013). Not so imaginary interpersonal contact with public figures on social network sites: How affiliative tendency moderates its effects. Communication Research, 40(1), 27-51.
Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2020). I like what she’s# endorsing: The impact of female social media influencers’ perceived sincerity, consumer envy, and product type. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(1), 76-91.
Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2021). Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 822-841.
Lee, S. S., & Johnson, B. K. (2022). Are they being authentic? The effects of self-disclosure and message sidedness on sponsored post effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 30-53.
Lee, Y.-H., Yuan, C. W., & Wohn, D. Y. (2021). How video streamers’ mental health disclosures affect viewers’ risk perceptions. Health Communication, 36(14), 1931-1941.
Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. d. P. (2022a). The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(3), 295-311.
Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. d. P. (2022b). Influencers′ intimate self-disclosure and its impact on consumers′ self-brand connections: scale development, validation, and application. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 420-437.
Leite, F. P., Pontes, N., & de Paula Baptista, P. (2022). Oops, I′ve overshared! When social media influencers′ self-disclosure damage perceptions of source credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107274.
Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as para‐social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 23(1), 69-80.
Liedtka, J. (2008). Strategy making and the search for authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 237-248.
Lim, X.-J., Cheah, J.-H., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Richard, J. E. (2022). Does retail type matter? Consumer responses to channel integration in omni-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102992.
Lin, H.-C., Bruning, P. F., & Swarna, H. (2018). Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services. Business horizons, 61(3), 431-442.
Lin, R., & Utz, S. (2017). Self-disclosure on SNS: Do disclosure intimacy and narrativity influence interpersonal closeness and social attraction? Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 426-436.
Lippert, T., & Prager, K. J. (2001). Daily experiences of intimacy: A study of couples. Personal Relationships, 8(3), 283-298.
Liu, C., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2020). The impact of self-congruity and virtual interactivity on online celebrity brand equity and fans’ purchase intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(6), 783-801.
Lou, C. (2022). Social media influencers and followers: Theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 4-21.
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58-73.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130-143.
Marôpo, L., Jorge, A., & Tomaz, R. (2020). “I felt like I was really talking to you!”: intimacy and trust among teen vloggers and followers in Portugal and Brazil. Journal of Children and Media, 14(1), 22-37.
Marques, I. R., Casais, B., & Camilleri, M. A. (2021). The effect of macrocelebrity and microinfluencer endorsements on consumer–brand engagement in Instagram. In Strategic corporate communication in the digital age. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Martikainen, I., & Pitkänen, A. (2019). The Significance of Consumers’ Perceived Authenticity to Engagement: Explorative Research of Influencer Marketing in Instagram [Unpublished master’s thesis, Linköping University].
Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139-158.
Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale university press.
Marwick, A. E. (2015). You may know me from youtube:(micro‐) celebrity in social media. In A companion to celebrity (pp. 333-350). John Wiley.
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.
McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of social issues, 58(1), 9-31.
Mehta, A. (2000). Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3), 67-72.
Mitchell, A. A. (1981). The dimensions of advertising involvement. in Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1), 25-30.
Mitchell, A. E., Castellani, A. M., Herrington, R. L., Joseph, J. I., Doss, B. D., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Predictors of intimacy in couples′ discussions of relationship injuries: an observational study. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 21-29.
Mitchell, V. W., & Walsh, G. (2004). Gender differences in German consumer decision‐making styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 3(4), 331-346.
Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1396-1427.
Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323-339.
Morton, T. L. (1978). Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 72-81.
Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which “intenders” actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405.
Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D., & Folse, J. A. G. (2016). Brand authenticity: Testing the antecedents and outcomes of brand management′s passion for its products. Psychology & Marketing, 33(6), 421-436.
Nah, H. S. (2022). The appeal of “real” in parasocial interaction: the effect of self-disclosure on message acceptance via perceived authenticity and liking. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107330.
Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090-1098.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). McGraw-Hill.
Ogba, K. T., Onyishi, I. E., & Chukwuorji, J. C. (2021). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Moderating role of online moral foundations. Current Psychology, 40, 4785-4790.
Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons′ perceived image on consumers′ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46–54.
Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S.-M. (2021). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. In Social media influencers in strategic communication (pp. 103-118). Routledge.
Park, J., Lee, J. M., Xiong, V. Y., Septianto, F., & Seo, Y. (2021). David and Goliath: when and why micro-influencers are more persuasive than mega-influencers. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 584-602.
Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59-77.
Posey, C., Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., & Ellis, T. S. (2010). Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: the case of working professionals in France and the UK who use online communities. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 181-195.
Rao Hill, S., & Qesja, B. (2022). Social media influencer popularity and authenticity perception in the travel industry. The Service Industries Journal, 43(5-6), 289–311.
Rasmussen, L. (2018). Parasocial interaction in the digital age: An examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of YouTube celebrities. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 280-294.
Reichelt, J., Sievert, J., & Jacob, F. (2014). How credibility affects eWOM reading: The influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1-2), 65-81.
Robinson, P., Heitmann, S., & Dieke, P. (2011). Research Themes for Tourism. CABI.
Rosaen, S. F., & Dibble, J. L. (2016). Clarifying the role of attachment and social compensation on parasocial relationships with television characters. Communication Studies, 67(2), 147-162.
Rose, R. L., & Wood, S. L. (2005). Paradox and the consumption of authenticity through reality television. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 284-296.
Rosengren, S., & Campbell, C. (2021). Navigating the future of influencer advertising: Consolidating what is known and identifying new research directions. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 505-509.
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180.
Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships.
Russell, C. A., Stern, B. B., & Stern, B. B. (2006). Consumers, characters, and products: A balance model of sitcom product placement effects. Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 7-21.
Ryan, R. M. (2004). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. Teoksessa Deci, EL & Ryan, R. M.(toim.) Handbook of Self-Determination Theory. In (pp. 6-33). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Savage, M. E., & Spence, P. R. (2014). Will you listen? An examination of parasocial interaction and credibility in radio. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 21(1), 3-19.
Schallehn, M., Burmann, C., & Riley, N. (2014). Brand authenticity: model development and empirical testing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(3), 192-199.
Schiappa, E., Allen, M., & Gregg, P. B. (2007). Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. In Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 301-314). Routledge.
Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. (2000). Consumer Behaviour. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River. New Jersey.
Schlegel, R. J., Hicks, J. A., King, L. A., & Arndt, J. (2011). Feeling like you know who you are: Perceived true self-knowledge and meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 745-756.
Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit. International Journal of advertising, 39(2), 258-281.
Scott, D. M. (2015). The new rules of marketing and PR: How to use social media, online video, mobile applications, blogs, news releases, and viral marketing to reach buyers directly. John Wiley & Sons.
Seok, H., Chung, M., Chun, E., & Ko, E. (2016). How consumer’s review on beauty mobile application affects perceived information authenticity, brand attitude, purchase intention and electronicword-of-mouth (e-wom). 2016 Global Marketing Conference, Hong Kong.
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1380.
Shimp, T. A. (1981). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9-48.
Shoenberger, H., Kim, E. A., & Johnson, E. K. (2020). # BeingReal about Instagram ad models: The effects of perceived authenticity: How image modification of female body size alters advertising attitude and buying intention. Journal of Advertising Research, 60(2), 197-207.
Silvera, D. H., & Austad, B. (2004). Factors predicting the effectiveness of celebrity endorsement advertisements. European Journal of Marketing, 38(11/12), 1509-1526.
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742.
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
Spiggle, S., Nguyen, H. T., & Caravella, M. (2012). More than fit: Brand extension authenticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 967-983.
Stern, B. B., Russell, C. A., & Russell, D. W. (2007). Hidden persuasions in soap operas: Damaged heroines and negative consumer effects. International Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 9-36.
Stever, G. S., & Lawson, K. (2013). Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 339-354.
Su, B.-C., Wu, L.-W., & Wu, J.-P. (2023). Exploring the Characteristics of YouTubers and Their Influence on Viewers’ Purchase Intention: A Viewers’ Pseudo-Social Interaction Perspective. Sustainability, 15(1), 550.
Taylor, C. R. (2020). The urgent need for more research on influencer marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 39(7), 889-891.
Taylor, D. A., & Altman, I. (1975). Self-disclosure as a function of reward-cost outcomes. Sociometry, 38(1), 18-31.
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549.
Tran, T. T. H., Robinson, K., & Paparoidamis, N. G. (2022). Sharing with perfect strangers: the effects of self-disclosure on consumers’ trust, risk perception, and behavioral intention in the sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 144, 1-16.
Trilling, L. (2009). Sincerity and authenticity. Harvard University Press.
Tsai, W.-H. S., & Men, L. R. (2017). Social CEOs: The effects of CEOs’ communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1848-1867.
Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
Um, N. (2022). Impact of Parasocial Interaction, Perceived Ad Message Authenticity, and Match-Up between Brand and Celebrity in Evaluation of Instagram Celebrity-Based Brand Endorsement. Sustainability, 14(5), 2928.
Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1-10.
Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999). How advertising works: what do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 26-43.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Voorveld, H. A. (2019). Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 14-26.
Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617-644.
Wallace, P. (1999). The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, E. S.-T., & Hu, F.-T. (2022). Influence of self-disclosure of Internet celebrities on normative commitment: the mediating role of para-social interaction. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 292-309.
Wellman, M. L., Stoldt, R., Tully, M., & Ekdale, B. (2020). Ethics of authenticity: Social media influencers and the production of sponsored content. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(2), 68-82.
Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2012). A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 199-206.
Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self‐disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338-346.
Wickham, R. E. (2013). Perceived authenticity in romantic partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 878-887.
Wiedmann, K.-P., & Von Mettenheim, W. (2020). Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise–social influencers’ winning formula? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(5), 707-725.
Zhu, H., Kim, M., & Choi, Y. K. (2022). Social media advertising endorsement: the role of endorser type, message appeal and brand familiarity. International Journal of Advertising, 41(5), 948-969.

指導教授

李憶萱

審核日期

2023-8-16

推文