企業重大性議題與漂綠-台灣市場的研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：52

、訪客IP：3.145.91.121

姓名

姜仁匡(Zen-Kuang Chiang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

企業重大性議題與漂綠-台灣市場的研究

相關論文

★ 半導體產業購併對股東財富效果之影響-以聯發科公司為例	★ 區塊鏈技術應用於金融科技公司企業資金電子調撥系統實作與驗證
★ 金融科技浪潮下銀行分行經營績效之探討－以個案銀行為例	★ 收購案後，主併公司與目標公司財務顧問之間開始合作原因之探討
★ 併購交易完成後，主併公司與目標公司財務顧問延續合作之因素探討	★ 產品組成變動與公司投資決策
★ CEO年齡與選擇併購目標公司之偏好	★ 外部董事產業經驗對於併購的影響
★ 目標公司執行長年齡與併購決策	★ 企業生命週期轉變對股利變化的影響
★ 經理人文化認同形成對風險承擔行為之影響 -以S&P500指數上市公司為例	★ 併購如何創造綜效──以台灣與韓國為例
★ CEO文化認同與債務期限選擇	★ 台灣上市櫃公司撰寫CSR報告書與公司價值之相關性探討
★ 經理人文化認同與公司CSR政策執行之關聯性-以S&P500指數上市公司為例	★ COVID-19疫情對全球航空產業營運之影響–以中華航空為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究依序探討了企業永續報告書中重大議題矩陣上議題分佈與公司價值、公司財務風險之間的關聯性，以及機構投資者對矩陣中所揭露資訊的影響，最後利用重大議題矩陣揭露之資訊探詢公司進行漂綠的可能性。手動蒐集 2015 年至 2020 年所有臺灣上市櫃公司所發行之永續報告書，並擷取有繪製重大議題矩陣的報告書作為研究資料之基礎。根據重大議題於矩陣上的分布情形推測其所揭露之資訊，建立三大主要變數側重利害關係人比例 (Stakeholder)、側重公司營運衝擊比例 (Performance)、以及符合公司營運衝擊與利害關係人之一致性比例 (Align)。
本研究發現企業執行ESG/CSR出發點的不同，將會影響公司價值、公司風險的暴露情況。此外發現機構投資人具備影響企業ESG/CSR的影響力，扮演監督之角色。最後本研究自行定義企業漂綠行為的衡量方法，並且在實證模型中發現，當重大性議題矩陣在短期內從側重公司營運衝擊面向偏離越多時，公司越有可能在實行漂綠。

摘要(英)

This study investigates the relationship between the distribution of significant issues in corporate sustainability reports and company value, financial risk, and the influence of institutional investors. It also explores the possibility of "greenwashing" behavior using the disclosed information in the materiality matrix. The study collected sustainability reports from Taiwan-listed companies issued between 2015 and 2020, focusing on those with materiality matrices. Three main variables were established: stakeholder focus ratio, performance focus ratio, and alignment ratio.
The findings suggest that different ESG/CSR approaches impact company value and risk exposure. Institutional investors play a supervisory role in influencing ESG/CSR practices. Lastly, the study defined its own measurement method for company greenwashing behavior and found, in the empirical model, that when the materiality matrix deviates further from a focus on operational impacts in the short term, companies are more likely to engage in greenwashing behavior.

關鍵字(中)

★ 漂綠
★ 企業社會責任

關鍵字(英)

★ Greenwash
★ Corporate Social Responsibility

論文目次

目錄 .......................................................................................................................................................... i 表目錄 .................................................................................................................................................... ii 摘要 ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Abstract .................................................................................................................................................iv 致謝 ......................................................................................................................................................... v
第一章 1-1 1-2
第二章 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4
第三章 3-1 3-2
緒論........................................................................................................................................1 研究背景與動機...............................................................................................................................................1 研究特徵與貢獻...............................................................................................................................................3
文獻回顧..............................................................................................................................5 企業執行 ESG/CSR 與公司價值的關聯性..........................................................................................5 企業執行 ESG/CSR 與公司財務風險關聯性......................................................................................6 機構投資人與企業執行 ESG/CSR 的關聯性 ....................................................................................... 7 重大議題矩陣與公司漂綠行為的關聯性..............................................................................................9
樣本與研究模型..............................................................................................................11 樣本.....................................................................................................................................................................11 變數說明...........................................................................................................................................................12
3-3 模型建立 ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 3-4 敘述統計...........................................................................................................................................................23
第四章實證結果............................................................................................................................25 4-1 企業執行 ESG/CSR 與公司價值之實證分析結果..........................................................................25 4-2 企業執行 ESG/CSR 與公司財務風險之實證分析結果................................................................29 4-3 機構投資人與企業執行 ESG/CSR之實證分析結果......................................................................33 4-4 重大議題矩陣與公司漂綠行為之實證分析結果..............................................................................35
第五章結論與未來建議..............................................................................................................39 附錄 ....................................................................................................................................................... 41 參考文獻 ............................................................................................................................................. 45

參考文獻

英文參考文獻
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447-465.
Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71-86.
Baum, L. M. (2012). It′s not easy being green… or is it? A content analysis of environmental claims in magazine advertisements from the United States and United Kingdom. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(4), 423-440.
Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., & Hasan, I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 297-309.
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 613-626.
Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 741-771.
Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer Jr, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71-83.
Dowling, G. R. (2006). Communicating corporate reputation through stories. California Management Review, 49(1), 82-100.
Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182-192.
Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What′s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do. Indus. & Lab. Rel. Rev., 38, 244.
Gaspar, J. M., & Massa, M. (2006). Idiosyncratic volatility and product market competition. The Journal of Business, 79(6), 3125-3152.
Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of financial Economics, 57(2), 275-305.
Goyal, A., & Santa‐Clara, P. (2003). Idiosyncratic risk matters! the Journal of Finance, 58(3), 975-1007.
Humphrey, J. E., Lee, D. D., & Shen, Y. (2012). Does it cost to be sustainable? Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 626-639.
Jiao, Y. (2010). Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(10), 2549-2561.
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. the Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
Lubatkin, M., & Rogers, R. C. (1989). Diversification, systematic risk, and shareholder return: A capital market extension of Rumelt′s 1974 study. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 454-465.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198-213.
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41.
Nofsinger, J. R., Sulaeman, J., & Varma, A. (2019). Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 700-725.
Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41(2), 483-515.
Terrachoice (2010). The sins of greenwashing: Home and family edition.

中文參考文獻
陳泰諭(2019)。企業社會責任活動之動機層次與公司價值之關聯性。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文，桃園縣。
吳筌翔(2020)。企業執行 CSR 之策略與權益資金成本之關聯性。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文，桃園縣。
吳哲萱(2022)。企業重大性議題與股價資訊性之關聯性-以臺灣上市(櫃)公司為實證研究。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文，桃園縣。
曹晏寧(2020)。企業執行 CSR 之策略與公司價值之關聯性。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文，桃園縣。
林誼萍(2021)。機構投資人與企業 CSR 策略之關聯性_以台灣上市櫃公司為實證研究。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文，桃園縣。

指導教授

李韋憲(Wei-Hsien Li)

審核日期

2023-7-24

推文