博碩士論文 110423061 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:117 、訪客IP:3.144.77.71
姓名 楊子奇(Tzu-Chi Yang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 透過社會資本促進知識整合:探討團隊中交互記憶系統的影響
(Facilitate Knowledge Integration through Social Capital: Exploring the Impact of Transactive Memory Systems within IT Teams)
相關論文
★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越:中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討-以自行車產業為例★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析-以銀行簡訊為例★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2024-7-20以後開放)
摘要(中) 組織依靠團隊來解決複雜的任務和決策問題,因為團隊對於解決複雜問題的能力,遠高於個人。但是,團隊往往難以整合散佈在各成員間的知識資源和資訊。然而,先前的研究指出,團隊成員之間的社會互動,可以將團隊知識轉化為公開可獲取的資訊。因此,本研究提出,社會資本,被定義為個體或社會單位所擁有的關係網絡中的實際和潛 在資源總和,可以影響知識整合。本研究探討了社會資本的三個維度,即結構、關係和認知資本,如何與交互記憶系統(TMS)相關。TMS 被用來描述團隊中的集體知識管理。本研究將社會資本視為社交網絡,從而在相互關聯的社交連結的框架內,進行 TMS 的研究。

此研究透過郵寄方法,獲取了台灣前 1,000 家製造業公司的調查數據以進行假說的驗證。研究結果證實了團隊社會資本對 TMS 產生了正向影響。此外,結果同樣顯示,TMS 的兩個維度——協調能力和信任度對知識整合有正向的推動效果。最後,我們基於研究的結果,提供了相關的學術、管理方面的實際意義。
摘要(英) Organizations rely on teams to solve complex tasks and decision-making problems. While teams are better equipped to handle complex problems than individuals, it is difficult for them to integrate knowledge resources and information scattered across team members. Social interactions among team members makes it possible to convert team knowledge into publicly accessible information. Social capital, defined as the sum of actual and potential resources embedded within, available through, and derived from the network of relationships possessed by an individual or social unit, can affect knowledge integration. This study investigates how the three dimensions of social capital, i.e., structural, relational, and cognitive, are related to transactive memory system (TMS) and then influence knowledge integration. TMS is used to describe collective knowledge management in teams. The study conceptualizes social capital as a social network, thus enabling the investigation of TMS within the framework of interconnected social connections.
This study collected data from the top 1,000 manufacturing companies in Taiwan for hypothesis validation. The results substantiate the positive impact of team social capital on the Transactive Memory System (TMS). Furthermore, the findings also demonstrate that two dimensions of TMS - coordination and credibility, positively drive the process of knowledge integration. Finally, based on the results, we provide relevant theoretical and managerial implications.
關鍵字(中) ★ 知識整合
★ 團隊社會資本
★ 交互記憶系統
關鍵字(英) ★ Knowledge integration
★ Group social capital
★ Transactive memory system
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
1. Introduction 1
2. Theoretical Background 4
2.1. Related Work to Knowledge Integration 4
2.2. Related Work to Transactive Memory System (TMS) 10
2.3. Related Work to Social Capital 11
3. Research Model and Hypotheses 13
3.1. Research Framework 13
3.2. Research Hypotheses 14
3.2.1. Effect of Structural Capital on Specialization 14
3.2.2. Effect of Structural Capital on Coordination 15
3.2.3. Effect of Relational Capital on Credibility 17
3.2.4. Effect of Relational Capital on Coordination 18
3.2.5. Effect of Cognitive Capital on Coordination 19
3.2.6. Effect of Specialization on Knowledge Integration 20
3.2.7. Effect of Credibility on Knowledge Integration 21
3.2.8. Effect of Coordination on Knowledge Integration 22
4. Research Methodology 23
4.1. Sample Selection and Data Collection 23
4.2. Operationalization of Constructs 24
4.2.1. Social Capital 25
4.2.2. Transactive Memory System (TMS) 27
4.2.3. Knowledge Integration 29
4.3. Control Variables 29
4.4. Marker Variables 30
4.5. Research Procedures 31
5. Data Analysis and Results 33
5.1. Response Rate 33
5.2. Descriptive Statistics 33
5.3. Measurement Model 38
5.3.1. Reliability and Validity 38
5.3.2. Common Method Bias 43
5.4. Structural Model 44
5.4.1. Assessing Structural Model 44
5.4.2. PLS Results of Hypothesis Testing 45
5.4.3. Robustness Analysis 46
6. Conclusions 49
6.1. Findings and Discussions 49
6.2. Theoretical Contributions and Managerial Implications 51
6.3. Limitations and Future Research 52
References 54
Appendix A 62
參考文獻 Acharya, C., Ojha, D., Gokhale, R., & Patel, P. C. (2022). Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects. International journal of information management, 62, 102438.
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40.
Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42(8), 1105-1120.
Alavi, M., & Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029-1037.
Argote, L., & Guo, J. M. (2016). Routines and transactive memory systems: Creating, coordinating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 36, 65-84.
Argote, L., Insko, C. A., Yovetich, N., & Romero, A. A. (1995). Group learning curves: The effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 512-529.
Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571-582.
Argote, L., & Ren, Y. (2012). Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1375-1382.
Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organization. WW Norton & Company.
Bartsch, V., Ebers, M., & Maurer, I. (2013). Learning in project-based organizations: The role of project teams′ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 239-251.
Basaglia, S., Caporarello, L., Magni, M., & Pennarola, F. (2010). IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate. International journal of information management, 30(6), 542-551.
Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self‐categorization, affective commitment and group self‐esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British journal of social psychology, 39(4), 555-577.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings LJ, 38, 805.
Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization science, 15(6), 633-644.
Bresman, H. (2013). Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Academy of management journal, 56(1), 35-61.
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of applied psychology, 101(8), 1151.
Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard university press.
Chakrabarty, S., Whitten, D., & Green, K. (2008). Understanding service quality and relationship quality in IS outsourcing: Client orientation & promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task-technology-structure fit. Journal of Computer information systems, 48(2), 1-15.
Chen, C.-J., Hsiao, Y.-C., & Chu, M.-A. (2014). Transfer mechanisms and knowledge transfer: The cooperative competency perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2531-2541.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS quarterly, 855-870.
Choo, C. W. (1996). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions. International journal of information management, 16(5), 329-340.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Harvard university press.
Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. (2011). Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 119-154.
Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352-364.
Dai, Y., Roundy, P. T., Chok, J. I., Ding, F., & Byun, G. (2016). ‘Who knows what?’In new venture teams: Transactive memory systems as a micro‐foundation of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1320-1347.
De Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.
De Souzabido, D., & Da Silva, D. (2019). SmartPLS 3: Specification, estimation, evaluation and reporting Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa–RAEP, 20(2), 465-514.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 611.
Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554-1568.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing research, 19(4), 440-452.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of management journal, 55(4), 998-1022.
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 51(3), 451-495.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, 25-56.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 819.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of management journal, 36(4), 844-863.
Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2017). Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity: The influence of transactive memory systems. Journal of Management, 43(3), 919-945.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, 9-30.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hsu, M. H., & Chang, C. M. (2014). Examining interpersonal trust as a facilitator and uncertainty as an inhibitor of intra‐organisational knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 24(2), 119-142.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204.
Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of experimental social psychology, 10(4), 371-384.
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of management review, 30(1), 146-165.
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. (2016). Reflections on the 2015 decade award—Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer: An emergent stream of research. In: Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American Cities–Vintage books. New York.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2008). Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization science, 19(2), 260-276.
Joshi, K. D., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2007). Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 322-335.
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 187-213.
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS quarterly, 783-808.
Ko, D.-G., Kirsch, L. J., & King, W. R. (2005). Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS quarterly, 59-85.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
Lang, J. C. (2004). Social context and social capital as enablers of knowledge integration. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Leana III, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of management review, 24(3), 538-555.
Lee, H., Park, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Role of leadership competencies and team social capital in IT services. Journal of Computer information systems, 53(4), 1-11.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of applied psychology, 88(4), 587.
Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519-1533.
Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization science, 22(5), 1254-1265.
Li, Y.-H., & Huang, J.-W. (2013). Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance. Information & Management, 50(6), 304-313.
Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
Lin, T. C., Hsu, J. S. C., Cheng, K. T., & Wu, S. (2012). Understanding the role of behavioural integration in ISD teams: an extension of transactive memory systems concept. Information Systems Journal, 22(3), 211-234.
Lui, S. S., & Ngo, H. y. (2005). An action pattern model of inter‐firm cooperation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1123-1153.
Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of marketing, 62(4), 1-12.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(2), 273.
Maurer, I., Bartsch, V., & Ebers, M. (2011). The value of intra-organizational social capital: How it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organization Studies, 32(2), 157-185.
Mehta, A., & Mehta, N. (2018). Knowledge integration and team effectiveness: A team goal orientation approach. Decision Sciences, 49(3), 445-486.
Mehta, N., & Bharadwaj, A. (2015). Knowledge integration in outsourced software development: The role of sentry and guard processes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 82-115.
Mehta, N., Hall, D., & Byrd, T. (2014). Information technology and knowledge in software development teams: The role of project uncertainty. Information & Management, 51(4), 417-429.
Mell, J. N., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Heugens, P. P. (2022). From boundary spanning to intergroup knowledge integration: The role of boundary Spanners’ metaknowledge and proactivity. Journal of Management Studies, 59(7), 1723-1755.
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 94(2), 535.
Mitchell, V. L. (2006). Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS quarterly, 919-939.
Monteverde, K. (1995). Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Science, 41(10), 1624-1638.
Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance.
Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 82(1), 117-133.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
Newell, S., Tansley, C., & Huang, J. (2004). Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: The importance of bridging and bonding. British journal of management, 15(S1), 43-57.
Nguyen, N. P., Ngo, L. V., Bucic, T., & Phong, N. D. (2018). Cross-functional knowledge sharing, coordination and firm performance: The role of cross-functional competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 123-134.
Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1-12.
Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of management journal, 47(6), 860-875.
Oh, H., Labianca, G., & Chung, M.-H. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of management review, 31(3), 569-582.
Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. (2009). 10 coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 463-502.
Paul, D. L., & McDaniel Jr, R. R. (2004). A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS quarterly, 183-227.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology, 63, 539-569.
Prencipe, A., & Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research policy, 30(9), 1373-1394.
Prieto-Pastor, I., Martín-Pérez, V., & Martín-Cruz, N. (2018). Social capital, knowledge integration and learning in project-based organizations: A CEO-based study. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The american, 4.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political science & politics, 28(4), 664-683.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster.
Raza, S. A., & Standing, C. (2011). A systemic model for managing and evaluating conflicts in organizational change. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 187-210.
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization science, 12(4), 502-517.
Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189-229.
Reus, T. H., & Liu, Y. (2004). Rhyme and reason: Emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Human Performance, 17(2), 245-266.
Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of management review, 33(1), 163-184.
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of management journal, 48(6), 1033-1049.
Robert Jr, L. P., Dennis, A. R., & Ahuja, M. K. (2008). Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams. Information systems research, 19(3), 314-334.
Scott, J. (1991). Networks of corporate power: A comparative assessment. Annual review of sociology, 17(1), 181-203.
Soluk, J., Kammerlander, N., & Darwin, S. (2021). Digital entrepreneurship in developing countries: The role of institutional voids. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120876.
Tang, F. (2015). When communication quality is trustworthy? Transactive memory systems and the mediating role of trust in software development teams. R&D Management, 45(1), 41-59.
Tansley, C., & Newell, S. (2007). Project social capital, leadership and trust: A study of human resource information systems development. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4), 350-368.
Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of management journal, 49(4), 723-740.
Templeton, G. F., Lewis, B. R., & Snyder, C. A. (2002). Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 175-218.
Tiwana, A. (2004). An empirical study of the effect of knowledge integration on software development performance. Information and Software Technology, 46(13), 899-906.
Tiwana, A., & McLean, E. R. (2005). Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 13-43.
Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of management journal, 53(1), 167-181.
Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization science, 13(2), 179-190.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management journal, 41(4), 464-476.
Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of management journal, 48(3), 532-547.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of group behavior, 185-208.
Yu, Y., Hao, J.-X., Dong, X.-Y., & Khalifa, M. (2013). A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams. International journal of information management, 33(5), 780-790.
Yuan, Y. C., Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2010). The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise retrieval: A multilevel network perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 700-714.
Yuan, Y. C., Monge, P. R., & Fulk, J. (2005). Social capital and transactive memory systems in work groups: A multilevel approach. Academy of Management Proceedings,
Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Hayton, J. (2020). What do we know about knowledge integration: Fusing micro-and macro-organizational perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 160-194.
Zhang, Z.-X., Hempel, P. S., Han, Y.-L., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 92(6), 1722.
Zhong, X., Huang, Q., Davison, R. M., Yang, X., & Chen, H. (2012). Empowering teams through social network ties. International journal of information management, 32(3), 209-220.
指導教授 王存國(Eric T. G. Wang) 審核日期 2023-7-27
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明