博碩士論文 110428022 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:52 、訪客IP:18.223.195.30
姓名 林婕儒(Chieh-ju Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱 恐怖攻擊、經理人管理能力與經理人薪酬
(Terrorist attacks, managerial ability, and CEO compensation)
相關論文
★ 半導體產業購併對股東財富效果之影響-以聯發科公司為例★ 區塊鏈技術應用於金融科技公司企業資金電子調撥系統實作與驗證
★ 金融科技浪潮下銀行分行經營績效之探討-以個案銀行為例★ 收購案後,主併公司與目標公司財務顧問之間開始合作原因之探討
★ 併購交易完成後,主併公司與目標公司財務顧問延續合作之因素探討★ 產品組成變動與公司投資決策
★ CEO年齡與選擇併購目標公司之偏好★ 外部董事產業經驗對於併購的影響
★ 目標公司執行長年齡與併購決策★ 企業生命週期轉變對股利變化的影響
★ 經理人文化認同形成對風險承擔行為之影響 -以S&P500指數上市公司為例★ 併購如何創造綜效──以台灣與韓國為例
★ CEO文化認同與債務期限選擇★ 台灣上市櫃公司撰寫CSR報告書與公司價值之相關性探討
★ 經理人文化認同與公司CSR政策執行之關聯性-以S&P500指數上市公司為例★ COVID-19疫情對全球航空產業營運之影響–以中華航空為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究探討經理人恐怖攻擊經歷以及管理能力相互作用對經理人薪酬的影響。恐怖攻擊的威脅日益影響社會和商業運作,為企業經理人帶來複雜挑戰。本研究通過研究 1992 年至 2016 年間美國的恐怖襲擊樣本,發現經理人恐怖攻擊經歷與總體經營能力的相互作用與經理人薪酬之間存在顯著正向關係。在受恐怖襲擊影響的公司中,被歸類為總體經營者(Generalists)的經理人在襲擊後平均獲得了17.35% 的額外年報酬。薪酬的組成也發生了變化,具有較高經營能力的經理人似乎獲得了在薪酬、現金支付、期權價值、長期績效計畫價值和股權支付方面的額外獎勵。然而,在經理人恐怖攻擊經歷與總體經營能力之間的關係對風險激勵和薪酬對企業績效的敏感性方面,我們未找到具有統計學意義的結果。本研究填補了文獻中在探討恐怖襲擊、經理人總體經營能力和薪酬之間的綜合影響方面的探討,且本文研究結果提供了關於在危機期間如何對待和激勵經理人的洞察。

關鍵字:恐怖攻擊、經理人薪資、管理能力 
摘要(英) This study examines the interrelation between terrorist attacks, CEO general managerial ability, and executive compensation. The threat of terrorist attacks has increasingly impacted society and business operations, leading to complex challenges for corporate executives. Using a sample of terrorist attacks in the U.S. from 1992 to 2016, the results show a significant positive relationship between the interaction of terrorist attacks and general managerial ability with CEO pay. CEOs classified as generalists working at firms affected by terrorist attacks earn a post-attack premium of 17.35%. The composition of compensation also changes, CEOs with higher level of general managerial skills seem to receive premium on executive’s Salary, Cash Pay, Option Value, LTIP Value, and Equity Pay. While we did not find statistically significant result in the terrorist attack combined with CEO general managerial ability influences on CEO pay sensitivity. This research fills a gap in the literature by exploring the combined impact of terrorist attacks, CEO general managerial ability, and compensation. The findings provide insights how CEOs are rewarded and incentivized during crises.

Keywords: Terrorist Attacks, General Managerial Ability, CEO Compensation
關鍵字(中) ★ 恐怖攻擊
★ 經理人薪資
★ 管理能力
關鍵字(英) ★ Terrorist Attacks
★ General Managerial Ability
★ CEO Compensation
論文目次 Table of Contents
摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Tables v
1. Introduction - 1 -
2. Literature review and hypotheses’ development - 4 -
2.1 The impact of terror attacks on CEO compensation - 4 -
2.2 The impact of general managerial ability on CEO compensation - 6 -
2.3 The interrelation between the impact of negative events and general managerial ability - 7 -
3. Sample selection and Methodology - 10 -
3.1 Independent variables - 10 -
3.2 Dependent variables and control variables - 11 -
3.3 Regression Model - 12 -
4. Empirical results - 14 -
4.1 Descriptive statistics - 14 -
4.2 Effect of terrorist attacks and general managerial ability on executive compensation levels - 14 -
4.3 Effects of CEO general managerial ability and terror attacks on the composition of compensation - 16 -
4.4 Effects of CEO general managerial ability and terror attacks on Vega and Delta - 17 -
4.5 Alternative measures of attack proximity and CEO compensation - 18 -
5. Conclusion - 19 -
References - 21 -
Appendix - 34 -
參考文獻 References
Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2008). Terrorism and the world economy. European Economic Review, 52(1), 1-27.
Ahern, K. R. (2018). The importance of psychology in economic activity: Evidence from terrorist attacks (No. w24331). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Aslam, F., & Kang, H. G. (2015). How different terrorist attacks affect stock markets. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(6), 634-648.
Andreou, P. C., Philip, D., & Robejsek, P. (2016). Bank liquidity creation and risk‐taking: Does managerial ability matter?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(1-2), 226-259.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111(5), 1043-1075.
Bulan, L., Sanyal, P., & Yan, Z. (2010). A few bad apples: An analysis of CEO performance pay and firm productivity. Journal of Economics and Business, 62(4), 273-306.
Brounen, D., & Derwall, J. (2010). The impact of terrorist attacks on international stock markets. European Financial Management, 16(4), 585-598.
Baghdadi, G. A., Nguyen, L. H., & Podolski, E. J. (2020). Board co-option and default risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101703.
Core, J., & Guay, W. (2002). Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 613-630.
Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 431-468.
Cremers, K. M., & Petajisto, A. (2009). How active is your fund manager? A new measure that predicts performance. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3329-3365.
Chemmanur, T. J., Paeglis, I., & Simonyan, K. (2009). Management quality, financial and investment policies, and asymmetric information. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(5), 1045-1079.
Custódio, C., Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2013). Generalists versus specialists: Lifetime work experience and chief executive officer pay. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 471-492.
Custódio, C., & Metzger, D. (2013). How do CEOs matter? The effect of industry expertise on acquisition returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(8), 2008-2047.
Conyon, M. J. (2014). Executive compensation and board governance in US firms. The Economic Journal, 124(574), F60-F89.
Crossland, C., Zyung, J., Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2014). CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 652-674.
Chen, Y., Podolski, E. J., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2015). Does managerial ability facilitate corporate innovative success?. Journal of Empirical Finance, 34, 313-326.
Devos, E., Elliott, W. B., & Warr, R. S. (2010). The role of CEO compensation in stock splits. Working paper University of Texas.
Devos, E., Elliott, W. B., & Warr, R. S. (2018). The propensity to split and CEO compensation. Financial Management, 47(1), 105-129.
Dai, Y., Rau, P. R., Stouraitis, A., & Tan, W. (2020). An ill wind? Terrorist attacks and CEO compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(2), 379-398.
Eckstein, Z., & Tsiddon, D. (2004). Macroeconomic consequences of terror: theory and the case of Israel. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(5), 971-1002.
Edmans, A., Gabaix, X., & Landier, A. (2009). A multiplicative model of optimal CEO incentives in market equilibrium. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(12), 4881-4917.
Eisfeldt, A. L., & Papanikolaou, D. (2013). Organization capital and the cross‐section of expected BHRurns. The Journal of Finance, 68(4), 1365-1406.
Ferreira, D., & Sah, R. K. (2012). Who gets to the top? Generalists versus specialists in managerial organizations. The RAND journal of economics, 43(4), 577-601.Murphy, K. J., & Zabojnik, J. (2007). Managerial capital and the market for CEOs. Available at SSRN 984376.
Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(13), 982-987.
Garicano, L., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006). Organization and inequality in a knowledge economy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1383-1435.
Gabaix, X., & Landier, A. (2008). Why has CEO pay increased so much?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 49-100.
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1979). Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 20(2), 231-259.
Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1995). Executive pay and performance evidence from the US banking industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 39(1), 105-130.
Hwang, Y., & Han, S. H. (2022). Terrorist attacks, CEO overconfidence, and CEO compensation. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102275.
Lazear, E. P. (2012). Leadership: A personnel economics approach. Labour Economics, 19(1), 92-101.
Murphy, K. J., & Zabojnik, J. (2007). Managerial capital and the market for CEOs. Available at SSRN 984376.
PwC, 2016. The 19th Annual Global CEO Survey. BHRrieved from website: www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/.
Terviö, M. (2008). The difference that CEOs make: An assignment model approach. American Economic Review, 98(3), 642-668.
Tingbani, I., Okafor, G., Tauringana, V., & Zalata, A. M. (2019). Terrorism and country-level global business failure. Journal of Business Research, 98, 430-440.
Vincenty, T. (1975). Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Survey Review, 23(176), 88-93. Custódio, C., Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, P. (2013). Generalists versus specialists: Lifetime work experience and chief executive officer pay. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 471-492.
指導教授 李韋憲(Wei-Hsien Li) 審核日期 2023-7-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明