自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台之開發與初步評估

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：8

、訪客IP：3.22.241.220

姓名

康家豪(CHIA-HAO KANG) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台之開發與初步評估
(Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Self-direct Learning E-Portfolios Platform for Science Inquiry)

相關論文

★ 支援國小科展探究教與學之網路科展探究系統的開發與評估	★ 教師科展專業知識分享社群平台系統開發與評估
★ 科學小論文寫作平台的建置與評估	★ 「探究教學線上教師社群平台」之建置與評估:以知識管理理論為基礎
★ 科學閱讀平台之發展與評估	★ 以鷹架為基礎之科展探究系統平台之開發與評估
★ Improving Novice Teachers’ Instructional Practice Through Online Multilevel Reflection: The Role of Novice Teachers’ Beliefs	★ The Effect s of Video-based Reflection on Preservice Teachers′ Micro Teaching Focusing on Meaningful Learning with ICT
★ Examining Teachers’ Online Video-Based Reflective Practice for Professional Development Regarding Guided-Discovery Learning Instruction	★ 數位教育遊戲之開發與評估：以「Mr.道耳頓的奇幻歷險」為例
★ 應用自然語言處理技術開發基於知識翻新理論之線上非同步合作論證平台與平台初步評估	★ 同步討論與反思系統（SDRS）對小學生知識建構學習環境感知和學習成果的影響
★ 具有集成設計框架的同步在線論證系統用戶界面：重新設計和評估	★ 科學探究學習系統之開發與評估
★ 支援科學專題學習之線上學習平台開發與評估	★ 線上合作共同備課平台：開發與評估

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

自主學習在 108 年新課綱中加入後，成為了一門重要的高中課程，其目的是為了培
養學生的自發性並達到終生學習的理念，而自主學習對於學生而言也是未來生活、工
作的重要基礎能力。根據文獻與實際的教學場域經驗的觀察，發現自主學習、科學探
究與學習歷程是具有很多的困難與問題，因此本研究開發「自我導向科學探究學習歷
程平台」，提供學生專案管理的工具，可以更有規劃性的按照階段完成專題，並且回
顧學習歷程檔案達到自我的反思與調節，加上合適的鷹架與互動工具，提供學生更好
的線上專題學習環境，進而提升學習成效。在上述平台開發完成後，本研究採用「問
卷調查法」對系統進行的初步評估，針對 43 位高中學生進行問卷資料蒐集，藉此評估
學生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之「科技接受度」、「鷹架功能與互動
工具的知覺有用性」並蒐集受測者的建議與回饋。對實驗後的問卷資料進行統計分析
與討論，根據統及分析的結果得以發現受測之學生對於本研究之研究問題皆為正向回
應，最後透過學生給予的建議與回饋，在進一步改善系統，使系統更加符合教學現
場。

摘要(英)

After 108 curriculum guidelines had published, self-direct learning became an important
course in high school. The aimed to train student’s driven themselves and achieved lifelong
learning. Besides, self-direct learning is important base skills for student in future life.
According to literature review and high school teacher’s experience, we found that self-direct
learning, science inquiry and portfolio had many difficulties and problems. Thus, in this
research’s we develop a self-direct platform, SDLI. In this platform, we provided project
management tools to help students planning their project’s schedule and provided e-portfolios
to help students reviewed their learning portfolios in order to make reflection. Also supported
suitable scaffolds and tools, provides students a better learning environment. After SDLI was
developed, this research would use questionnaire to survey 43 high school students, then
evaluated the technology acceptance of SDLI and the observed usefulness of scaffolds and
tools on SDLI. The analyses and results show that most of participants gave positive feedback
in this survey. Through the suggestions and feedback, we would improve the SDLI and made
it more suitable in reality.

關鍵字(中)

★ 專題導向學習
★ 自主學習
★ 自我導向學習
★ 科學探究
★ 學習歷程

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要 ......................................................................i
Abstract ................................................................. ii
致謝 ................................................................... iii
目錄 .....................................................................iv
圖目錄 ...................................................................ix
表目錄 .................................................................. xii
第一章緒論 ............................................................... 1
第一節研究背景與動機................................................. 1
第二節研究目的....................................................... 3
一、開發「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」 .......................... 3
二、對已完成開發的「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」進行初步評估 .... 3
第三節研究問題....................................................... 4
一、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之科技接受度為何 ? .. 4
二、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之鷹架輔助功能及互動工
具知覺有用性為何? ................................................. 4
三、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之系統建議與回饋為何?4
第四節名詞解釋....................................................... 5
一、自主學習 (self-direct learning)..................................... 5
二、專題導向學習 (project-based learning) .............................. 5
三、科學探究 (science inquiry)........................................ 5
四、學習歷程 (portfolio)............................................. 5
第二章文獻探討 .......................................................... 7
第一節自主學習....................................................... 7
一、自主學習 ...................................................... 7
二、學習歷程 ...................................................... 8
三、自主學習目前的問題 ............................................ 8
第二節科學探究...................................................... 10
一、科學探究 ..................................................... 10
二、新版科學探究架構 ............................................. 11
三、小結 ......................................................... 11
第三節相關系統介紹以及分析與比較.................................... 12
一、相關系統介紹 ................................................. 12
二、相關系統與工具之分析比較 ..................................... 17
三、小結 ......................................................... 19
第四節總結.......................................................... 21
第三章系統設計與實作 ................................................... 23
第一節系統開發方式.................................................. 23
一、系統開發人員架構圖 ........................................... 23
二、系統開發流程 ................................................. 24
第二節系統設計與規劃................................................ 26
一、系統設計特色 ................................................. 26
二、系統功能模組 ................................................. 28
三、系統使用案例 ................................................. 33
四、系統使用流程規劃 ............................................. 41
第三節系統配置...................................................... 44
一、硬體設備與環境 ............................................... 44
二、軟體建置 ..................................................... 44
三、使用環境建議 ................................................. 45
第四節系統介面與功能畫面............................................ 46
一、登入與註冊介面 ............................................... 46
二、專案管理介面 ................................................. 47
三、專案看板管理介面 ............................................. 50
四、專案想法牆介面 ............................................... 53
五、專案反思日誌介面 ............................................. 55
六、專案繳交任務介面 ............................................. 56
七、專案學習歷程檔案介面 ......................................... 57
第四章研究方法 ......................................................... 59
第一節研究對象...................................................... 60
一、受測者基本資料 ............................................... 60
二、受測者之網路輔助專案的相關經驗 ............................... 61
三、受測者之網路系統輔助學習的相關經驗 ........................... 61
第二節研究流程...................................................... 62
一、施測及評估階段 ............................................... 62
二、結果分析階段 ................................................. 62
第三節系統評估流程.................................................. 63
一、系統平台介紹 ................................................. 63
二、系統平台操作 ................................................. 63
三、系統問卷施測與建議回饋 ....................................... 64
第四節研究工具...................................................... 65
一、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之科技接受度六點量表65
二、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之鷹架功能及輔助工具知
覺有用性六點量表 ................................................. 66
三、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之其他回饋問卷 .... 67
四、結果分析篇碼方式 ............................................ 67
第五節資料收集與分析................................................ 69
一、資料收集 ..................................................... 69
二、資料分析 ..................................................... 69
第五章研究結果與討論 ................................................... 71
第一節高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之科技接受度........ 71
一、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之整體知覺有用性 ... 71
二、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之整體知覺易用性 ... 74
三、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之整體使用意願 ..... 76
四、小結 ......................................................... 78
第二節高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之鷹架工具及互動工具知
覺有用性............................................................. 79
一、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」中概念鷹架之知覺有用性
................................................................. 79
二、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」中程序鷹架之知覺有用性
................................................................. 80
三、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」中後設認知鷹架之知覺有
用性 ............................................................. 80
四、高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」中互動工具之知覺有用性
................................................................. 82
五、小結 ......................................................... 83
第三節高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之系統建議與回饋.... 84
一、功能建議 ..................................................... 84
二、操作建議 ..................................................... 85
三、未來使用意願與原因 ........................................... 85
第六章結論與建議 ....................................................... 87
第一節研究結論...................................................... 87
一、「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」協助學生自主學習是有用的 ..... 87
第二節研究建議...................................................... 89
參考文獻 ................................................................ 92
附錄 .................................................................... 96
附錄一學生背景調查問卷.............................................. 96
附錄二高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之科技接受度問卷.... 97
附錄三高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之鷹架功能及輔助工具知
覺有用性............................................................. 99
附錄四高中生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之其他回饋問卷..... 103

參考文獻

教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北：教育部。
吳茹茜（2021）。高中生自主學習現況與問題之探討─以丹鳳高中為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
陳又齊（2022）。以想法為中心的多維度跨域專題學習平台之開發與初步評估（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中央大學網路學習研究所。
蔡宛庭（2016）。支援科學專題學習之線上學習平台開發與評估（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中央大學網路學習研究所。
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Berger, F., Schreiner, C., Hagleitner, W., Jesacher-Rößler, L., Roßnagl, S., & Kraler, C. (2021). Predicting Coping With Self-Regulated Distance Learning in Times of COVID-19: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 701255-701255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701255
Cavaller, V. (2011). Portfolios for entrepreneurship and self-evaluation of higher education institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.005
Chiang, C.-L., & Lee, H. (2016). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability of Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, 709-712. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779
Council, N. R. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
Council, N. R. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/9596
Cudney, E., & Kanigolla, D. (2014). Measuring the Impact of Project-Based Learning in Six Sigma Education. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 4(3), 272-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488289.2014.930546
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. New York: Prometheus Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 45(8), 922-939. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20248
Hovey, K. A., & Ferguson, S. L. (2014). TEACHER PERSPECTIVES AND EXPERIENCES: Using Project-Based Learning With Exceptional and Diverse Students [Article]. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 16(1/2), 77-90. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=99392000&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live
Katayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting Students “Partially” Involved in Note-Taking Using Graphic Organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598498
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., Swanson, R. A., SWANSON, R., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development.
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. na.
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2 ed., pp. 275-297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of research in science teaching, 43(7), 607-636. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20141
Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self‐regulated learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 1995(63), 3-12.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Chapter 10 - The Development of Academic Self-Regulation: The Role of Cognitive and Motivational Factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation (pp. 249-284). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7
Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.455
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
Sale, D. (2020). Creative Teachers: Self-Directed Learners. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3469-0
Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010
Väljataga, T., & Fiedler, S. (2009). Supporting students to self-direct intentional learning projects with social media. Educational technology & society, 12(3), 58-69.
Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students′ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance education, 34(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education, 36(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660802232779
Zheng, L., Li, X., & Chen, F. (2018). Effects of a mobile self-regulated learning approach on students′ learning achievements and self-regulated learning skills. Innovations in education and teaching international, 55(6), 616-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1259080
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Chapter 2 - Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

指導教授

吳穎沺

審核日期

2023-7-18

推文