| 摘要(英) |
The construction industry has brought economic prosperity and convenience to people′s livelihoods. However, as construction projects progress, they also generate pollution that affects the environment. In response to this issue, the Public Construction Commission (referred to as the Commission) of the Executive Yuan in Taiwan requires developers to allocate 0.3-3% of the direct project costs for implementing environmental protection measures.
This study collected data from 27 cases of road public construction projects to investigate compliance with budget allocation requirements set by the Commission, the effectiveness of implemented environmental protection measures, and the achievement of environmental protection goals.
The research findings revealed that in 18 cases, the final settlement amount for direct project expenses exceeded the budget, primarily due to changes in construction quantities. For the environmental protection measures, 11 cases had settlement amounts equal to or lower than the budgeted amount. There was no clear correlation between the allocation of environmental protection measure costs and the direct project costs. Out of the 27 cases studied, 13 cases met the requirements set by the Commission in terms of budget compliance.
Among the different cases, the most frequently implemented environmental protection measure was the category of "other environmental facilities and management maintenance costs," which was observed in 16 cases. Specifically, dust prevention facilities and water sprinkler vehicles were the most common pollution control measures, implemented in 12 cases each.
Overall, the settlement amounts for environmental protection measures were mostly equal to or lower than the budgeted amounts. In nearly half of the cases, the budget and settlement for environmental protection measures complied with the Commission′s requirements. The majority of cases implemented a high proportion of "other environmental facilities and management maintenance costs." There is a need to strengthen the understanding and supervision of environmental protection measures by the organizing authorities. |
| 參考文獻 |
1. 行政院公共工程委員會-公共建設工程經費估算編列手冊https://www.pcc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=CA00C8A13A1413BB
2. 營建工地全國法規https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070110
3. 噪音管制區劃定作業準則https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0030016
4. 公共工程施工綱要規範第01572章環境保護https://pcces.pcc.gov.tw/csi/Default.aspx?FunID=Fun_9
5. 行政院環境保護署-環境影響評估法https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0090001
6. 行政院環境保護署-環境影響評估法施行細則https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0090002
7. 行政院環境保護署-開發行為環境影響評估作業準則https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCODE=O0090003
8. 水污染防治法https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0040001
9. 空氣污染防制法https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0020001
10. 噪音管制法https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0030001
11. 營建工程空氣污染防制設施管理辦法https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0020058
12. 營建工程空氣污染防制設施管理辦法修正總說明https://air.epa.gov.tw/NewMessage/
13. 美國的環境保護政策https://zhtw.eferrit.com/
14. 中華民國行政院公共工程委員會全球資訊網-重要指標 (pcc.gov.tw) https://www.pcc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=1B54CFFDF6FEA06B
15. 行政院環保政策 (國情簡介-環境保護) (ey.gov.tw)
16. 工程資訊 (twce.org.tw) http://www.twce.org.tw/info/
17. 中華系統https://www.ch-si.com.tw/2023
18. 行政院環保署-環境基本法https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0100001
19. 環境保護https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/
20. 行政院公共工程委員會-採購金額區分https://www.pcc.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=3147CE21437457B2&sms=9DBAB9FE4BBD5E1E&s=AC8BF5EA7FB616E7
21. 張瑞麟，營建工程環保評鑑指標調查之研究-以台中市為例，朝陽科技大學環境工程與管理系碩士論文，2013
22. 劉洪浩，公共工程綠林回饋評估機制之研究，中華大學營建管理研究所碩士論文，2011
23. 張峻昇，營建工程粒狀污染物之排放與污染防制策略，國立高雄第一科技大學環境與安全衛生工程研究所碩士論文，2014
24. 蔡文雄-公共工程環境維護費預算編列資料庫系統雛形之研究-以建築工程為例，淡江大學水資源及環境工程學系碩士論文，2000
25. 盛培勇，高雄縣市營建工程污染管制計畫與空氣污染防制費徵收作業研究，國立屏東科技大學環境工程與科學系碩士論文，2005
26. 黃彥霖，營造業之致肺癌工作環境與從業人員之防護認知之研究，台灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文，2016
27. 余世章，環境保護教育之研究，三民主義學報，第23期，2001，207
28. 鄭福田，空氣污染回顧與展望，工業污染防治，第150期，2020，27
29. 吳宏謀-公共建設績效管理新作法，國土及公共治理季刊，2017
30. 李錦地-國內營造業推動環境管理之研究，中華民國環境工程學會服務部，1999
31. 陳澤仁、莊益賓 ，國道 5 號南港頭城段工程環境保護工作，交通部高速公路局，2001
32. 林耀煌，營建工程噪音及空氣汙染防制規範之先期研究成果報告，行政院環保署，1989
33. 林耀煌，建立營建公害管理制度之研究，內政部建築研究所籌備處， 1991
34. 蔡茂生，道路工程施工安全之規劃與實施，現代營建427期，2015
35. 臺灣公路工程第 43 卷第 4 期
36. 臺灣建築學會「建築學報」第 102 期
37. Wu, Z., Zhang, X., & Wu, M. "Mitigating construction dust pollution: state of the art and the way forward."Journal of Cleaner Production,Volume 112, Part 2,2016, 1658-1666.
38. Kaluarachchi, M., Waidyasekara, A., Rameezdeen, R., & Chileshe, N.， "Mitigating Dust Pollution from Construction Activities: A Behavioural Control Perspective." Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute(MDPI),2021.
39. Azarov, V., Manzhilevskaya, S., & Petrenko, L. "The pollution prevention during the civil construction." Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering,2018
40. Wiesser, A. A., Scherz, M., Passer, A., & Kreiner, H."Challenges of a Healthy Built Environment: Air Pollution in Construction Industry." Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute(MDPI),2021.
41. Ekins, P., & Zenghelis, D. "The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability." Sustainability Science,2021.
42. Newman, P., James Hargroves, K., Julia Kiran Desha, C., Wilson, K., & Beauson, J.. "Reducing the environmental impact of road construction." ResearchGate,2012
43. American Legal Publishing. (2005). ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CODE. American Legal Publishing’s Code Library.
44. South Carolina Code. (1993). Sections 48-2-50 and 48-39-145.
45. State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection. (2015). NPDES Generic Permit For Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities.
46. Mesa, Arizona. (n.d.). Environmental Fee FAQ. Retrieved from https://www.mesaaz.gov/residents/environmental/environmental-fee-faq
47. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency https://www.epa.gov/lep/traditional-chinese
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit