博碩士論文 111427017 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:30 、訪客IP:3.141.47.82
姓名 陳卉芊(Hui-Chien Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 共融型組織氛圍對安靜離職傾向之影響—以組織自尊為中介變項
相關論文
★ 傳統食品業之轉型與品質升級策略探討-以P公司為例★ 航空器維修訓練調整策略探討-以C公司為例
★ 企業社會責任ヽ內控內稽制度措施的探討-以T銀行為例★ 主管管理職能評鑑與驗證-以A公司為例
★ 人力資源部門客戶服務代表角色與功能探討-以某科技公司為例★ E公司員工品格教育與工作投入、工作壓力、員工幸福感關係之研究,知覺組織支持之中介效果
★ 工作要求、工作控制與工作生活平衡關係之研究:以主管家庭支持行為為調節變項★ 如何打造正向的企業志工參與環境-以國內大型電子製造業為例
★ 如何塑造良好的企業志工投入與推薦-以國內大型電子製造業為例★ 組織自尊、學習目標導向及尋求回饋行為對於員工自我學習之影響
★ 家長式領導與組織認同感之關聯性研究-以信任主管為調節變項★ 影響在臺產業外籍移工的生活與工作適應程度: 從組織及勞工本身之變數探討
★ 尋求更好的解決之道!以正向觀點探討企業進用身心障礙者之問題-以M公司身障進用經驗為例★ 營業額意圖:組織和個人因素的影響以及企業家意圖在越南語境中的中介作用
★ 如何提升外派人員效能?知覺組織支持與配偶家庭支持對外派人員組織認同、工作投入、工作壓力之影響─以主管家庭支持行為為調節★ 育嬰的代價?影響育嬰留職停薪復職後個人績效及勞動條件變更之因素分析
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 隨著社會的發展與更迭,逐漸有越來越多不同的員工加入職場,職場的多元化成為一種顯著趨勢。這種多元化不僅體現在年齡層面,還包括性別、種族、宗教信仰、文化背景等多個方面。因此,工作者對於工作環境的需求和看法也隨之產生了變化。而組織也需要建立起一個更加多元共融的工作氛圍,以迎合來自不同背景的員工,讓員工能感受到被尊重和被理解,進而提升員工的工作投入。而建立這樣的共融型組織氛圍不僅有助於提升員工在組織中的自我認同感,還能夠有效降低員工的安靜離職率。因此,本研究以在同單位在職滿一年以上之工作者作為研究對象,探討共融型組織氛圍、組織自尊以及員工安靜離職傾向的的關係,並同時探討組織自尊於共融型組織氛圍與安靜離職傾向之間的中介效果。
本研究透過SurveyCake線上問卷,進行資料收集,最終共回收437份有效問卷,研究結果發現:(1)共融型組織氛圍對於安靜離職傾向具有顯著負向關係;(2)內部雇傭公平對於安靜離職傾向無顯著負向關係;(3)個體差異整合對於安靜離職傾向無顯著負向關係;(4)決策共融對於安靜離職傾向無顯著負向關係;(5) 共融型組織氛圍對於組織自尊具有顯著正向關係;(6)內部雇傭公平對於組織自尊無顯著正向關係;(7)個體差異整合對於組織自尊具有顯著正向關係;(8)決策共融對於組織自尊具有顯著正向關係;(9)組織自尊對於安靜離職傾向具有顯著負向關係;(10)共融型組織氛圍(個體差異整合、決策共融)對於安靜離職傾向具有負向關係,而在其中組織自尊具有完全中介效果。
摘要(英) With the development and change of society, more and more different employees are joining the workplace, and the diversity of the workplace has become a significant trend. This diversity is not only reflected in age, but also in gender, race, religious beliefs, cultural background and other aspects. As a result, workers′ needs and perceptions of the work environment have changed. Organizations also need to establish a more diverse and inclusive work atmosphere to cater to employees from different backgrounds, so that employees can feel respected and understood, and thus enhance their commitment to their work. The establishment of such an inclusive organizational atmosphere not only helps to enhance employees′ sense of self-esteem in the organization, but also effectively reduces the intention of becoming quiet quitters. Thus, this study focuses on the topic of climate for inclusion, including the foundation of equitable employment practices, integration of differences, and inclusion in decision making, and examines their impact on quiet quitting, with organizational-based self esteem as the mediator.
A research was conducted through SurveyCake, targeting the people who have been working in the same unit for one year or more as the research subjects, and a total of 437 valid questionnaires were collected. The result of this study found that: (1) Climte for inclusion has significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (2) The foundation of equitable employment practices has no significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (3) Integration of differences has no significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (4) Inclusion in decision making has no significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (5) Climte for inclusion has a significant positive impact on organizational-based self esteem; (6) The foundation of equitable employment practices has no significant negative impact on organizational-based self esteem; (7) Integration of differences has a significant positive impact on organizational-based self esteem; (8) Inclusion in decision making has a significant positive impact on organizational-based self esteem; (9) Organizational-based self esteem has a significant negative impact on quiet quitting; (10) Organizational-based self esteem has indirect mediation effect between climate for inclusion (including integration of differences, and inclusion in decision making) and quiet quitting.
關鍵字(中) ★ 共融型組織氛圍
★ 多元共融
★ 雇傭公平
★ 個體差異整合
★ 決策共融
★ 組織自尊
★ 安靜離職傾向
關鍵字(英) ★ Climate for inclusion
★ Diversity
★ Equity
★ Inclusion
★ The foundation of equitable employment practices
★ Integration of differences
★ Inclusion in decision making
★ Organizational-based self esteem
★ Quiet quitting
論文目次 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
謝誌 iv
目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究問題 5
1-3 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧 7
2-1共融型組織氛圍 7
2-2安靜離職 10
2-3組織自尊 14
第三章 研究方法 18
3-1研究架構 19
3-2研究假說 20
3-3研究對象、研究變項操作與衡量工具 20
3-3資料蒐集與統計分析方法 25
第四章 研究分析 28
4-1敘述性統計分析 28
4-2信度與效度檢驗 29
4-3相關分析 35
4-3迴歸分析與假設驗證 38
4-4 研究假說結果彙整 45
第五章 結論與建議 46
5-1研究結論 46
5-2管理意涵 49
5-3研究限制與未來研究建議 51
參考文獻 53
附錄:研究問卷 64
參考文獻 中文參考文獻
104 玩數據(2022年10月25日)。你也「安靜離職」了嗎?企業觀察3成員工已在「工作中」離職。104職場力。https://blog.104.com.tw/104data-quiet-quitting/
女人迷(2023)。女人迷2023DEI多元共融白皮書:企業人才公平發展與永續治理方針|入門概覽版。Womany女人迷。https://womany.net/dei/insights
李庭(2023)。新世代,有你們不一樣!工作特性、組織自尊與員工創造力之關係探討獎酬與認可的調節式中介作用〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用:An introduction to Amos and its uses in scale development: Graphics & Basic(32)。心理出版社。
李興娜、淩文輇(2011)組織自尊問題研究。中國人力資源開發(8),5-8。
李晨麟、潘盈朵、王新野、李苑與遊旭群(2023)。包容型氛圍感知對員工建言的影響: 心理安全感與惰性感知的雙重路徑。心理科學,46(1),105-112。
余璿、陳維政(2016)。整體公平感與員工工作場所行為:組織信任和組織自尊的不同作用。華東經濟管理,30(03),131-135。
余君濤(2021)。我『消極』故我在— 剖析台灣社會躺平主義。政策研究指標資料庫。https://pride.stpi.narl.org.tw/index
林芷均(2023)。組織公平對安靜離職傾向之影響-以領導成員交換關係為中介變項〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
金冬梅、曹夢瑛與董飛(2017)。組織信任對新生代員工組織承諾影響的實證研究:組織自尊的中介作用。北京經濟管理職業學院學報,32(4),13-19。
吳斯茜、鍾孟娟(2023)。基層警察正安靜離職嗎?從工作敬業觀點探討。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報,(19),79-92。
許梅枝、張向前(2018)。包融型氛圍:研究回顧與模型建構。中國人力資源開發,35(2),61-71。
景保峰、周霞(2017)。包容研究前沿述評與展望。外國經濟與管理,39(12),3-22。
陳維政、李金平(2005)。組織氣候研究回顧及展望。外國經濟與管理,27(8),18-25。
陳潔、陳張、方陽春(2017)。包容型氛圍對科技人才創新行為的影響。科研管理,38(S1),1-6。
陳俞蓁(2021)。個人發展計畫實踐對於員工創造力之影響-以組織自尊、組織承諾為中介變項〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
侯琬蓉(2008)。薪酬滿意度與薪資公平對工程師工作態度之影響﹝未出版之碩士論文﹞。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
張偉豪、鄭時宜(2012)。與結構方程模型共舞:曙光初現。新北市:前程文化。
彭台光、高月慈及林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
溫福星(2013)。社會科學研究中使用迴歸分析的五個重要觀念。管理學報,30(2),169-190。
蔡玲玉(1989)。薪酬管理制度與勞資關係氣氛之研究。﹝未出版之碩士論文﹞。國立政治大學企業管理研究所。

英文參考文獻
Afrahi, B., Blenkinsopp, J., de Arroyabe, J. C. F., & Karim, M. S. (2022). Work disengagement: A review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 32(2), 1-52.
Allport G W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Journal of Negro History,52(3), 390-393.
Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 491-500.
Arsel, Z., Crockett, D., & Scott, M. L. (2022). Diversity, equity, and inclusion (dei) in the journal of consumer research: a curation and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 920-933.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Beer, M. (2009). High commitment high performance: How to build a resilient organization for sustained advantage. John Wiley & Sons.
Berry, J. W. (1984). Cultural relations in plural societies: alternatives to segregation and their socio-psychological implications. In N. Miller & M. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact (pp. 11-29). Academic Press.
Bies, R. J. (2001). International (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organization justice (pp. 89-118). Stanford University Press.
Bies, R.J. & Moag, J.S. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness, in Lewicki, R.J., Shpeherd, B.H. and Bazerman, M.H. (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (pp. 43-55). JAI Press.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing service over self-interest. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210).John Wiley & Sons.
Bowden, T. (2002). An investigation into psychological predictors of work family conflict and turnover intention in an organizational context. University Of Kent.
Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., Wang, Q., Kirkendall, C., & Alarcon, G. (2010). A meta‐analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization‐based self‐esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 601-626.
Brewer, M.B., & Miller, N. (1984). Groups in Contact: The Psychology of desegregation, in Beyond the contact hypothesis: theoretical perspectives on desegregation(pp. 281-284). Academic Press.
Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1988). Contact and cooperation: when do they work?. In Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp.315-326). Springer US.
Carson, K.D., Carson, P.P., Lanford, H., & Roe, C.W. (1997). The effects of organization-based selfesteem on workplace outcomes: an examination of emergency medical technicians. Public Personnel Management, 26(1), 139-155.
Choi, J. (2008). Event justice perceptions and employees′ reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 513-528.
Cho, S., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2008). Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived homogeneous culture: a study of organizational commitment and job performance among korean employees. Administration in Social Work, 32(4), 100-126.
Clair, J. A., Beatty, J., & MacLean, T. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 78-95.
CNBC. (2021, April 30). CNBC and SurveyMonkey Release Latest Workforce Happiness Survey. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/30/cnbc-and-surveymonkey-release-latest-workforce-happiness-survey.html
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445.
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business Research Methods (8th edition). McGraw-Hill.
Cottrill, K., Denise Lopez, P., & C. Hoffman, C. (2014). How authentic leadership and inclusion benefit organizations. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 33(3), 275-292.
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z.S., Bobocel, D.R. & Rupp, D.E. (2001), Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164-209.
Dwertmann, D. J. G., & Boehm, S. A. (2016). Status matters: the asymmetric effects of supervisor–subordinate disability incongruence and climate for inclusion. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 44-64.
Ellis, L., & Yang, A. (2022, August 27). What is quiet quitting? employees are setting boundaries for better work-life balance. Wall Street Journal. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/meet-the-so-called-quiet-quitters-i-still-get-just-as-much-accomplished-i-just-dont-stress-and-internally-rip-myself-to-shreds-11661372447
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229-273.
Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (2001). Decategorization and the reduction of bias in the crossed categorization paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 193-216.
Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (2002). The out-group must not be so bad after all: the effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 313-329.
Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (2005). Prejudice and intergroup attributions: the role of personalization and performance feedback. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 391-410.
Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O’Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflicts. The Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 32-55.
Fujimoto, Y. & Härtel, C.E. (2017), Organizational diversity learning framework: going beyond diversity training programs. Personnel Review, 46(6), 1120-1141.
Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Moisoglou, I., ... & Kaitelidou, D. (2023). The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation. AIMS Public Health, 10(4), 828-848.
Gallup (2023) State of the global workplace 2023 report: the voice of the world′s employees. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx?thank-you-report-form=1
Gardner, D.G., & Pierce, J.L. (1998). Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context: an empirical examination. Group & Organization Management, 23(1), 48-70.
Gardner, D. G., & Pierce, J. L. (2001). Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context: a replication. Journal of Management Systems, 13(4), 31–48.
Gostick, A. (2022, August 23). 5 Ways to combat quiet quitting. Forbes.com. https://www.forbes.com/sites/adriangostick/2022/08/23/5-ways-to-combat-quiet-quitting/?sh=1744c41a4c49.
Harter, J. (2022). Is quiet quitting real. Gallup. com.
Hewlin, P. F. (2003). And the award for best actor goes to…facades of conformity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 633-642.
Hewlin, P. F. (2009). Wearing the cloak: antecedents and consequences of creating facades of conformity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 727-741.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. University of California Press.
Hopke, T. (2022).Quiet quitting: the culture reset gift most companies needed. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/teresahopke/2022/09/30/quiet-quittingthe-culture-resetgift-most-companies-needed/
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18 (1), 56-87.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. (No Title)
Korman, A. K. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1p1), 31-41.
Korman, A. K. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and an extension. Academy of Management Review, 1(1), 50-63.
Lee, J. (2003). An analysis of organization-based self-esteem as mediator of the relationship between its antecedents and consequences. The Korean Personnel Administration Journal, 27(2), 25-50.
Le, H., Palmer Johnson, C., & Fujimoto, Y. (2021). Organizational justice and climate for inclusion. Personnel Review, 50(1), 1-20.
Le, L. H., Hancer, M., Chaulagain, S., & Pham, P. (2023). Reducing hotel employee turnover intention by promoting pride in job and meaning of work: a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 109, 103409.
Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet quitting -causes and opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9-18.
McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. M. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletion, 107(2), 247-255.
Meyer, J. P. (2014). Employee commitment, motivation, and engagement: exploring the links. In M. Gagné, (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory, (pp.33-49). Oxford University Press.
Moorman, R. H., & Byrne, Z. S. (2013). How does organizational justice affect organizational citizenship behavior?. In Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 355-380). Psychology Press.
Mor Barak, M. E., & Cherin, D. A. (1998). A tool to expand organizational understanding of workforce diversity: exploring a measure of inclusion-exclusion. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 47-63.
Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A., & Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(1), 82-104.
Mor Barak, M. E., Lizano, E. L., Kim, A., Duan, L., Rhee, M. K., Hsiao, H. Y., & Brimhall, K. C. (2016). The Promise of diversity management for climate of inclusion: a state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(4), 305-333.
Morgan, G. (1991). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Morrison, E. W., Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.
Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774.
Pelled, L.H., Ledford, G.E. & Mohrman, S.A. (1999), Demographic dissimilarity and workplace inclusion. Journal of Management Studies, 36(7), 1013-1031.
Pichler, S., Kohli, C. & Granitz, N. (2021). Ditto for gen z: a framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation. Business Horizons, 64(5), 599-610.
Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organizationbased self-esteem: construct definition measurement and validation. Academy of. Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648.
Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: a review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of management, 30(5), 591-622.
Prasad, A. (2001), Understanding workplace empowerment as inclusion. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(1), 51-69.
Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 141-156.
Scheyett A (2022) Quiet quitting. Social Work, 68(1), 5-7.
Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Sanchez, D. (2018). Inclusive workplaces: a review and model. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 176-189.
Shore, L.M., Randel, A.M., Chung, B.M., Dean, M.A., Ehrhart, K.H. & Singh, G. (2011), Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research, Journal of Management, 34(4), 1262-1289.
Simpson, K. C., & Boyle, D. (1975). Esteem construct generality and academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35(4), 897-904.
Smith, R. A. (2022, September 29). Quiet quitters make up half the u.s. workforce, gallup says. Wall Street Journal. https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2022/09/06/gallup-poll-quiet-quitters-make-up-half-of-the-u-s-workforce/70420/#:~:text=About%20half%20of%20U.S.%20workers%20could%20be%20described,description%20but%20are%20psychologically%20detached%20from%20their%20work.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner′s guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
Tang, T.L., & Ibrahim, A.H. (1998). Antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior revisited: public personnel in the united states and in the middle east. Public Personnel Management, 27(4), 529-550.
Wasserman, I. C., Gallegos, P. V., & Ferdman, B. M. (2008). Dancing with resistance: leadership challenges in fostering a culture of inclusion. In K. M. Thomas (Eds.), Diversity resistance in organizations (pp. 175-200). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2022, August 31). Quiet quitting is about bad bosses, not bad employees. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/08/quiet-quitting-is-about-bad-bosses-not-bademployees.
指導教授 王群孝(Chun-Hsiao Wang) 審核日期 2024-6-29
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明