摘要(英) |
The permanent surface displacement caused by active fault movement is a critical issue for nearby underground structures. The rapid development of underground mass transit networks in Taiwan′s metropolitan areas has led to an increase in tunnel density year by year. Taiwan is located in the seismically active Pacific Ring of Fire, with numerous active faults and frequent earthquakes. When a strong earthquake occurs, tunnels can deform or even displace. If a tunnel is near an active fault, the near-fault effects and the development of shear zone in the ground can also affect the tunnel. Additionally, when urban renewal projects involve terminology for new structures, the relationship between existing tunnels and shear zones needs to be considered during an earthquake.
This study employs centrifuge model simulations to investigate the interaction behavior between a rectangular tunnel and a shear zone under a reverse fault movement with a dip angle of 60 degrees. The focus is on the tunnel′s response when subjected to fault movements at different horizontal and vertical positions. The prototype dimensions are discussed in the experimental content, with the soil layer composed of silica sand having a thickness of 16 m. Rectangular tunnels are placed at depths of 3.7 m and 7.5 m (defined by the tunnel center point). The tunnel centroid height is 1.86 m, and the contact stress is 56.8 kPa. During the experiments, fault movement, tunnel inclination, tunnel displacement, shear zone development, and ground surface elevation changes were recorded.The study found that when the tunnel burial depth is twice the tunnel height and located above the fault extension line or in the downward direction at 0.5 times the tunnel width, the tunnel′s inclination, horizontal and vertical displacements, and ground surface impact range are larger. Conversely, when located in the upward direction at 0.5 times the tunnel width or in the downward direction at 1 time the tunnel width from the fault extension line, these impacts are smaller. Thus, the danger zone can be defined as within 0.5 times the tunnel width in the upward direction to 1 time the tunnel width in the downward direction from the fault extension line. At the same burial depth, the closer the tunnel is to the fault extension line, the greater the inclination, horizontal and vertical displacement, increasing by up to 17.6 degrees, 30.5%, and 36.3% of the tunnel width, respectively. At the same horizontal position, the shallower the burial depth, the greater the tunnel′s inclination, horizontal and vertical displacement, increasing by up to 8.9 degrees, 5%, and 6.4% of the tunnel width, respectively.When the tunnel is located within the shear zone, the shear zone bypasses the tunnel, and the angle between the envelope line and the extension line increases by up to 37 degrees (at the same burial depth with different horizontal positions) and 10 degrees (at the same horizontal position with different burial depths). The larger the angle between the shear zone and the fault extension line, the greater the ground surface impact range, increasing by up to 90% of the soil layer thickness at the same burial depth and up to 40% when the burial depth becomes shallower.In conclusion, tunnel design needs to consider the impacts of burial depth and horizontal position on its stability and ground surface impact range to ensure tunnel safety. |
參考文獻 |
[1] 李崇正,「離心模型試驗在大地工程之應用」,地工技術,第36集,第76-91頁(1991)。
[2] 李崇正,「模型試驗在大地工程教學的應用」,土木水利,第30卷,第4期,第89-92頁(2003)。
[3] 李錫堤、康耿豪、鄭錦桐、廖啟雯,「921集集大地震之地表破裂及地盤變形現象」,地工技術,第81期,第5-16頁(2000)。
[4] 張徽正、林啟文、陳勉銘、盧詩丁,「臺灣活動斷層分布圖說明書」,經濟部中央地質調查所特刊,第10號(1998)。
[5] 林啟文、劉彥求、周稟珊、林燕慧,「臺灣活動斷層調查的近期發展」,經濟部中央地質調查所彙刊,第34號,第1-40頁(2021)。
[6] 林啟文、陳文山、饒瑞鈞,「台灣活動斷層調查地近期發展」,經濟部中央地質調查所特刊,第18號,第85-110頁(2007)。
[7] 林銘郎、李崇正、黃文正、黃文昭,「活動斷層近地表變形特性研究」,經濟部中央地質調查所報告,第9號,臺北,臺灣(2011)。
[8] 盧詩丁、陳柏村、許晉瑋,「臺灣活動斷層研究及未來發展」,大地技師,第15期,第14-25頁(2017)。
[9] 張有毅,「以離心模型試驗及個別元素法評估正斷層和逆斷層錯動地表及地下變形」,博士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園,臺灣(2013)。
[10] 江富誠,「斷層錯動對地表不同基礎結構物的影響」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園,臺灣(2023)。
[11] 交通部公路工程部,「隧道設計標準」,市區道路及附屬工程設計規範(2003)。
[12] 交通部鐵路類工務部,「鐵路明挖覆蓋隧道設計規範」,交通部鐵路類工務部(2016)
[13] 內政部國土管理署,「建築物混凝土結構設計規範」,建築管理組(2023)
[14] Mohammad Hassan Baziar a,n , Ali Nabizadeh b , Chung Jung Lee c , Wen Yi Hung., “Centrifuge modeling of interaction between reverse faultingand tunnel,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Open-File Report 151-164 (2014).
[15] Bonilla, M. G., “Evaluation of potential surface faulting and other tectonic deformation,” U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 82-732 (1982).
[16] Bray, J. D., Seed, R. B., Cluff, L. S., and Seed, H. B., “Earthquake fault rupture propagation through soil,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp.543–561 (1994).
[17] Bray, J. D., Seed, R. B., and Seed, H. B., “Analysis of earthquake fault ruptures propagation through cohesive soil,” Journal of geotechnical engineering, Vol. 120, pp. 562-580 (1994b).
[18] Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., and DeWolf, J. T., “ Mechanics of Materials”, McGraw-Hill, USA, (2011)
[19] Chen, W. S., Lee, K. J., Lee, L. S., Streig, A. R., Rubin, C. M., Chen, Y. G., Yang, H. C., Chang, H. C., and Lin, C. W., “Paleoseismic evidence for coseismic growth-fold in the 1999 Chichi earthquake and earlier earthquakes, central Taiwan,” Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, Vol 31, pp. 204-213 (2007).
[20] Cole, D. A., and Lade, P. V., “Influence zones in alluvium over dip-slip faults,” Journal of geotechnical engineering, Vol. 110, pp. 599-615 (1984)
[21] ISRM, “Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 99-103 (1978).
[22] Karamitros, D. K., Bouckovalas, G. D., and Kouretzis, G. P., “Stress analysis of buried steel pipelines at strike-slip fault crossings,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 27, pp. 200–211 (2007).
[23] Kelson, K. I., Kang, K. H., Page W.D., Lee, C. T., and Cluff, L. S., “Representative Styles of Deformation along the Chelungpu Fault from the 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) Earthquake: Geomorphic Characteristics and Responses of Man-Made Structures,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 930-952 (2001).
[24] Kelson, K. I., Harder, L. F., Kishida, T., Ryder, I., “Preliminary Observations of Surface Fault Rupture from the April 11, 2011 Mw6.6 Hamadoori Earthquake, Japan,” Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance, No. GEER-025D (2011).
[25] Lee, J. W., Hamada, M., Tabuchi, G., and Suzuki, K., “Prediction of fault rupture propagation based on physical tests in sandy soil deposit,” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, B.C., Canada, Paper No. 119 (2004).
[26] Li, C. Y., Wei, Z. Y., Ye, J. Q., Han, Y. B., and Zheng, W. J., “Amounts and styles of coseismic deformation along the northern segment of surface rupture, of the 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake, China,” Tectonophysics, Vol. 491, pp. 35-58 (2010).
[27] Lin, M. L., Chung C. F., and Jeng F. S., “Deformation of overburden soil induced by thrust fault slip,” Engineering Geology, Vol. 88, pp. 70-89(2006)
[28] McCalpin, J. P., Paleoseismology, Academic Press, USA, pp.171-207 (2009).
[29] Rizkalla, M., and Read, R. S., “Pipeline geohazards planning, design, construction and operations,” ASME Press, New York, USA, pp. 390-443 (2019).
[30] Soegianto, D. P., “Centrifuge Modelling on Dip-Slip Fault Rupture Propagation in Multiple Soil Strata,” Master Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (2020).
[31] Takemura, J., Kusakabe, O., and Yao, C., “Development of a fault simulator for soils under large vertical stress in a centrifuge,” ICE, USA, Vol. 20, pp. 118-131 (2020).
[32] Taylor, R. N., “Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology” , CRC Press, USA, pp.19-33 (1994). |