摘要(英) |
Roads, pavements, and highways are common civil engineering structures seen in daily life. It is often observed that road pavements suffer from damage, such as potholes and cracks. However, in engineering, there seems to be no convenient theoretical data that allows engineers to directly predict the failure behavior and deformation of such materials. Although experiments may reveal the behavioral data of these materials, the experimental process is often time-consuming. If a precise material theory can describe the properties of pavement, numerical analysis can be used to save significant time and effort in obtaining relatively reliable data for prediction.
Therefore, this study aims to understand and classify pavement materials theoretically, and describe material characteristics numerically. By updating the material properties in dynamic equations with these new characteristics, we can conduct analysis and simulations, comparing the results with different software packages to verify the reliability of the model.
This research uses the IDAP-ENSP (Implicit Dynamic Analysis Procedure based on Equivalent Nodal Secant Properties) dynamic time-history analysis procedure. This procedure uses the secant stiffness method for iteration, diagonalizing the matrix without the need to calculate the inverse matrix, resulting in relatively higher computational efficiency compared to traditional finite element analysis procedures. For comparison, the study uses ABAQUS 2017 software, a well-established and trusted tool in the engineering field, making it a valuable reference for comparison.
Finally, the analysis results are compared, summarized, and categorized based on various material properties. The theoretical material model and numerical analysis behaviors are cross-referenced and validated. The advantages and disadvantages of generating the material model and the comparison of analysis results are discussed, including differences, consistencies, and possible influencing factors. Conclusions and recommendations for future research updates are also presented. |
參考文獻 |
[ 1] Tzu-Ying Lee, Kun-Jun Chung, Hao Chang(2017), “A new implicit dynamic finite element analysis procedure with damping included”, Engineering Structures 147 (2017) 530–544
[ 2] Lee, T.Y., Chung, K.J. and Chang, H. (2018), “A new procedure for nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures under seismic loading based on equivalent nodal secant stiffness,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 18(3), 1850043.
[ 3] 翁逸偉(2011),「鋼床鈑鋪面破壞分析及較適鋪面材料之探討」,博士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢。
[ 4] John D. Ferry(1980.), “VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES OF POLYMER, 3rd Edition”, John wiley & Sons.
[ 5] Li Qi, Lewei Qian, Stephen Woodruff, and David Cartes(2007),” Prony Analysis for Power System Transient Harmonics”, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
[ 6] Nicholas W. Tschoegl(1989),” The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior An Introduction”, ISBN-13:978-3-642-73604-9
[ 7] Bilel Miled(2011), “Coupled viscoelastic-viscoplastic modeling of homogeneous and reinforced thermoplastic polymers”, Ecole polytechnique de Louvain Institute of Mechanics, Materials and Civil Engineering
[ 8] Hasan Taherkhani,Masoud Jalali(2016), Investigating the performance of geosynthetic reinforced asphaltic pavement under various axle loads using finite-element method , Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
[ 9] Bathe, K. J. and Baig, M. M. I. (2005), “On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics,” Computer & Structure. 83, 2513-2524.
[ 10] Bathe, K. J. (2007), “Conserving energy and momentum in nonlinear dynamics: a simple implicit time integration scheme,” Computer & Structure. 85, 437-445.
[ 11] Chopra, A. K. (2012), Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering (4th edn), Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
[ 12] Noh, G., and Bathe, K. J. (2018). “Further insights into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics.” Computers & Structures, 202, 15-24. |